alexa Fabrication, Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry Characterization and In Vitro Qualitative Analysis of Biocompatibility of Various Porosities Polycaprolactone Scaffolds
ISSN: 2157-7552
Journal of Tissue Science & Engineering
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Fabrication, Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry Characterization and In Vitro Qualitative Analysis of Biocompatibility of Various Porosities Polycaprolactone Scaffolds

Tania Limongi1*, Andrea Giugni1, Hua Tan2, Ebtihaj M Bukhari3, Bruno Torre1, Marco Allione1, Monica Marini1, Luca Tirinato1, Gobind Das1, Manola Moretti1, Andrea Falqui4 and Enzo di Fabrizio1

1SMILEs Lab, Physical Science and Engineering (PSE) and Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering (BESE) Divisions, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

2Analytical Core Labs, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

3Imaging and Characterization Core Lab, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

4NABLA Lab, BESE Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Corresponding Author:
Dr. Tania Limongi
Physical Science and Engineering (PSE) Division
Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE) Division
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Bldg. 2, 4th floor
Desk 4315-WS09, Desert side, Thuwal, 23955 -6900
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Tel: 9660128082303
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date:: October 20, 2015; Accepted date:: November 25, 2015; Published date:: December 02, 2015

Citation: Limongi T, Giugni A, Tan H, Bukhari EM, Torre B, et al. (2015) Fabrication, Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry Characterization and In Vitro Qualitative Analysis of Biocompatibility of Various Porosities Polycaprolactone Scaffolds. J Tissue Sci Eng 6:159. doi:10.4172/2157-7552.1000159

Copyright: © 2015 Limongi T, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Tissue Science & Engineering

Keywords

Tissue engineering; Biocompatibility; Biomaterials; Porosity; Porogens; Polycaprolactone; Fibroblasts

Abbreviations

3D: Three-Dimensional; ECM: Extracellular Matrix; PGA: Polyglycolic Acid; PLA: Polylactic Acid; PLLA: Poly(L-Lactide); PLGA: Poly(D,L-Lactide-Co-Glycolide); PDO: Polydioxanone; PCL: Polycaprolactone; THF: Tetrahydrofuran; MIP: Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry; SEM: Scanning Electron Microscopy; RT: Room Temperature; O.S.: Opening Size; FBS: Fetal Bovine Serum; PBS: Phosphate Buffered Saline; BSA: Bovine Serum Albumin

Introduction

The continuing demand for tissue and organ substitutes is conferring to tissue engineering the potential to provide surgeons and patients with more translational individualized solutions for injury trauma, disease or simple senescent processes. In most cases using three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds to assist cells grow and development, regenerative medicine upgrades the condition of patients’ life by engineering and/ or replacing damaged tissue and organs as blood vessels [1,2], skin [3,4], cornea [5,6], vertebrae [7], tendon and nerve [8,9], trachea, esophagus [10] and many other types of tissue. Tissue engineers’ work on growing replacement tissues and organs for transplantation into patients and one of the biggest challenges for them is the realization of fully biocompatible scaffolds in order to ensure the most physiological crosstalk between surfaces and cells. Tissues are mainly constituted by the Extracellular Matrix (ECM), a complex network of macromolecules, glycoproteins including fibronectin, laminin and proteoglycans and fibrous proteins as elastin and collagens [11].

A well-designed 3D tissue engineered scaffold should successfully guide cell proliferation, physiological ECM synthesis, adhesion and differentiation by ensuring nutrients and oxygen diffusion and, at the same time, elimination of catabolites. Beyond the biocompatibility, to guarantee successful in vitro tissue regrow and in vivo integration and reformation, scaffolds must be characterized by an accessible geometry. To realize homogenous cell infiltration, invasion and migration into the scaffolds, pores and their interconnectivity, must be optimized to assure a strong cell-biomaterial interface and by avoiding cells detachment. To provide a satisfying cellular proliferation, optimal diffusion of growing factors, nutrients, gasses and an efficient disposal of wasted products, scaffolds should be designed by means of an interconnected porous structure by optimizing mechanical function and mass-transport requirements. In details, pores provide the optimal background for cells proliferation and, by promoting the physiological interactions between the cells and the ECM, they result in essential tools for successful tissue regeneration.

The sizes and the distribution of the void spaces in porous biomaterials relates to specific function; in tissue engineering macropores (50 nm-300 μm) are useful for mechanical function and cell and tissue penetration while micropores (<2 nm) and mesopores (2-50 nm) contribute to solutes diffusion [12,13].

Porous scaffolds have been extensively used in tissue engineering applications, for organ vascularization and for regrowth host tissues [14]. The most effective grade of porosity, for each tissue regeneration applications, is surely related to the tissue and organ type to reproduce; all the different components constituting the cellular microenvironment such as cell phenotypic expression, dimension and ECM production must be strictly considered.

Since optimal pore sizes vary for different cells and tissues [15], porous scaffolds must be realized with specific, porosity and surface-area-to-volume ratio. Synthetic biodegradable polymers as Polyglycolic Acid (PGA), Polylactic Acid (PLA), Poly(L-lactide) (PLLA), Poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), Polydioxanone (PDO) and Polycaprolactone (PCL) by having optimal tensile strength, and predictable degradation rate, are successfully used as porous scaffolding materials [16-21].

Several different technological approaches have been used to realized 3D porous scaffolds using synthetic biopolymers, these include electrospinning [22], gas foaming [23], freeze drying [18], phase separation [24], porogen leaching, fiber bonding [25], three-dimensional printing and fused deposition modeling [26-28]. Doubtless each of the above-mentioned solutions has its advantage, but, for an exact control over porosity and pore diameter, molding fabrication and porogen leaching technique together represent a fast and economic solution for controlling biocompatible materials porosity [29,30]. Solution casting/ particulate leaching, by including casting of the polymer/porogen solution followed by solvent evaporation and removal of the integrated porogen via aqueous washing methods, can be applied to a wide range of biopolymers to design porosity into biocompatible scaffolds. Pores or channels are created using porogens, such as salts and sugar crystals, soft paraffin and biopolymeric spheres [31-33].

This article reported the preparation of porous PCL scaffolds by a NaCl salt-leached method using tetrahydrofuran (THF) as a solvent. PCL was chosen among the aforementioned biocompatible and biodegradable polymers because it is characterized by having a melting point range of 59–64ºC and a tailorable degradation kinetics slower than PGA and Poly(D,L-lactide) [34]. Another important physicochemical property of PCL is its hydrophobicity since it allowed us to seed cells using a single drop of medium by inoculating them on a particular area on the surface of the scaffold.

We focused on the different fabrication steps and on the characterization of the effect of various NaCl crystal sizes on the final structure by means of mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The biocompatibility was investigated by seeding NIH-3T3 fibroblasts on the porous scaffolds and then incubating for 7 days before assessing cell attachment and growth using confocal microscopy.

Materials and Method

Substrate preparation

PCL scaffolds were produced by means of solvent casting/particulate leaching technique. Polymer pellets (Mn~80,000, pellets, Sigma- Aldrich, 440744) were dissolved 5% wt/wt in tetrahydrofuran (34865 Sigma-Aldrich) by stirring for about 4 hours at room temperature (RT). To create the pores into the matrix, sodium chloride crystals (Sigma- Aldrich, S9888) were employed as porogen, sieved using Sigma- Aldrich cell dissociation sieves (Figure 1A-1C) (CD-1 Sigma) with specific Opening Size (O.S.) (140 and 380 μm, Figure 2B). The viscous polymer solution was then cast in 10 ml pyrex low form glass molds (2 cm diameter) containing the salts (30% wt/vol) and solvent was let to evaporate overnight, at RT, in a chemistry fume hood.

tissue-science-engineering-NaCl-crystals

Figure 1: Particulate-leaching techniques materials and methods. The process is easy to carry out: NaCl crystals were used to create the pores, and the grinding (A) and sieving (B and C) of sodium chloride resulted in uniform particulates. A PCL, THF solution was casted into the salt-filled glass mold and after the evaporation of the solvent; the salt crystals are leached away using distilled hot water (D).

The polymer/salt composite was then leached in hot (about 40ºC degrees) Milli-Q water, with water changes every 12 hours, for three days to remove the porogens (Figure 1D). Scaffolds were then dried in an oven at 40ºC for 24 hours and stored in a desiccator. Each PCL substrates (0.7 cm2) were placed in a 12 wells plate, sterilized by immersion in ethanol, washed twice in sterile water, dried in a laminar flow hood and further sterilized by UV irradiation for 2 hours. Substrates were let float face down on the DMEM/F12 plus 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) solution for 7 days in a cell culture incubator (37ºC, 5% CO2, 95% humidity). Before plating the cells, the medium was removed and substrates were washed and let dry in the biological cabinet for a couple of hours.

Cells seeding

NIH/3T3 mouse embryonic fibroblast cells were cultured in T-75 flasks with DMEM media with high Glucose (GIBCO, 12800-017), supplemented with 10% FBS (GIBCO, 1600-044) and penicillin 100 U/ ml (Cellgro, 30.001.C1). They were incubated at 37ºC in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator until reached 70-80% confluent. Cells were trypsinized (Cellgro, 25-052-C1), harvested, diluted 1:1 with fresh medium and counted (8.5 x 105 cells) using a Scepter cell counter (Millipore). 4 x 104 cells were seeded on each scaffold in a single 50 μL drop of medium and after 4 hours, fresh medium was added to each substrate. All cells were incubated and maintained in a humidified atmosphere at 37ºC and 5% CO2 for 7 days.

Scaffolds characterization

Scanning electron microscopy: Scaffolds were observed using a Quanta 200 FEG scanning electron microscope. The cross-sections of the PCL porous surfaces were coated with 10 nm of Iridium by a Q150T sputter coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd.) before observation.

Porosimetry: Mercury intrusion porosimetry (AutoPore IV 9500, Micromeritics, USA) was used to determine pore size distribution and porosity. The samples were first evacuated to a pressure of 0.5 psia in order to remove physisorbed gasses from the interior of the sample. Porosimetry experiments were conducted with an equilibration time of 10 s, the pressure was increased incrementally from 0.5 psia to 60000 psia, and then the pressure was decreased incrementally back to atmospheric pressure. For each sample, about 0.05 g of material was analyzed by using a 3 cc penetrometer.

Immunocytochemistry staining: Cytoskeleton organization was visualized using an actin cytoskeleton and focal adhesion staining kit (Millipore, FAK100) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The cells were washed in 1 X phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (Fisher Scientific, 108294), fixed in a 4% paraformaldehyde (EMS, 15710), in 1 X PBS solution for 20 min and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 (Acros-Organics, 9002-93-1) for 5 min. Blocking solution 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS (Thermo Scientific, 37525) was applied for 30 min, and the cells were rinsed three times with 1 X PBS. Then, cells were incubated with primary antibody anti-Vinculin (1:200) for one hour, followed by washing three times (5 min each). For double labeling secondary antibody FITC-conjugated (1:100) (Millipore, AP124F) was incubated simultaneously with TRITC- conjugated Phalloidin (1:300) in PBS for one hour, followed by washing cells three times (5-10 minutes each) with 1 x wash buffer. Nuclei were stained by incubating cells with DAPI (Invitrogen, D1306) for 5 minutes at RT, followed by washing cells three times (5 minutes each) with 1X wash buffer.

Laser scanning confocal microscopy: Upright LSM 710 Zeiss Confocal Microscopy was used to visualized fluorescence images with a 40X W (Plan-Apochromat, NA 1.0) water-immersion objective. Images were acquired in sequential acquisition mode and processed using Adobe Photoshop CS6 software.

Results

Three types of scaffolds with different pore sizes were produced by using solvent casting/particulate leaching technique with sieved salt crystals with diameters comprise between 140-380 μm (Figure 2A), minus of 140 μm (Figure 2B) and PCL without salts (Figure 2C). According to SEM micrographs by using porogens the substrates resulted characterized by interconnected pore structures both for salts of dimensions comprised in a range of 140-380 μm (Figure 2D) and minus of 140 μm (Figure 2E). Scaffolds realized without salts exhibited a well-defined compact structure (Figure 2F) with small but numerous pores.

tissue-science-engineering-PCL-porous-scaffolds

Figure 2: Photograph and SEM images of the PCL porous scaffolds. The substrates were produced by using NaCl/PCL (30 % wt/v) composition realized with sieved salt crystals with diameters between 140-380 μm (A, D), minus of 140 μm (B, E) and PCL without salts (C, F). In A, B and C ruler represented cm; in D, E, F scale bars equals 100 μm.

MIP results confirmed SEM imaging; in Table 1 is summarized as substrate realized without salt had the highest total pore area (40.26 m2/g) but the smallest pore characteristic length (25.63 μm) and so the lowest porosity (22.76%). Referring to substrates realized using different porogen diameters, their porosity was remarkable higher than no salt ones, but comparable between themselves, 82.47% using smaller crystal salts and 78.05% for the biggest ones. Although the porosity of the two types of scaffold realized with sodium chloride salts is almost the same, the permeability is greater in the substrates made with crystals of size between 140 and 380 μm because their pores are less (total pore area, 4.2 m2/g) but larger (189 μm). Permeability is also affected by tortuosity, the ratio of actual distance travelled between two points to the minimum distance between the same two point [35], and MIP showed that it decreased starting from scaffold realized without NaCl salts and considering than medium and small porogens respectively 13.66, 2.53, 1.77.

       Content No salt <140 mm 140-380 mm UM
 Intrusion Data Summary        
Total Intrusion Volume 0.30 3.79 3.31 mL/g
Total Pore Area 40.26 25.06 4.20 m2/g
Bulk Density at 0.52 psia 0.75 0.23 0.24 g/mL
Apparent (skeletal) Density 0.97 1.24 1.07 g/mL
Porosity 22.76 82.47 78.05 %
Pore Structure Summary        
Threshold Pressure: 7.06 2.37 0.96 psia
Characteristic length 25.63 76.46 189.07 μm
Permeability 0.42 57.53 252.90 darcy
Tortuosity 13.66 2.53 1.77  

Table 1: Most important output data of mercury intrusion porosimetry analysis.

In Figure 3A, in the graphical form, the volume of mercury intruded into each gram of sample as a function of pore diameter was presented; referring to substrates realized using different porogen diameters, their porosity was remarkable higher (blue and black lines) than those realized without NaCl crystals (red line), but comparable between themselves. Figure 3B shows as each type of sample realized with salt leaching was characterized by a particular size of pores, about 200 μm (blue line) for biggest salt crystals, ranging between 140 to 380 μm, and about 80 μm, (black line) for the smallest sieved NaCl salts (<140 μm). Regarding the class of pores with diameter minus of 0.1 μm, MIP analysis allowed us to conclude that their presence was not related to the use of salt in the manufacturing process but to the evaporation of the solvent used for melt PCL in the 3 different kinds of samples (Figure 3C).

tissue-science-engineering-cumulative-pore-area

Figure 3: Cumulative (A) and differential (B) intrusion curves and cumulative pore area (C) as a function of pore diameter measured by mercury intrusion porosimetry.

Since biocompatibility, in terms of cell surface adhesion characterization, is a process also involving cytoskeletal reorganization of actin and vinculin [36-38] our in vitro tests, for the above three different type of scaffold, were performed using NIH/3T3 cells culture and, laser scanning confocal microscopy, to collect preliminary data on cell morphology and cell-scaffold interaction. Confocal microscopy qualitative analysis showed in Figure 4 that the 3 different surfaces were all biocompatible. Dense network of F-actin was observed on the fibroblasts cultured on the no salts scaffold (red signal in Figure 4, panels A-C), while parallel actin stress-fiber with lower density were observed on the elongated cells on the other 2 types of supports (red signal in Figure 4, panels D-I). Intensive vinculin signals (green color in Figure 4 can be found on membranes of cells growth on scaffolds but they were more numerous on those substrates without porogens since vinculin in focal adhesions (yellows dots in Figure 4 B, C, F and I) was located preferentially in correspondence of the edges of the pores present in the matrix of the scaffolds.

tissue-science-engineering-focal-adhesion

Figure 4: Confocal fluorescence microscopy of actin (red), vinculin (green) in focal adhesion (yellow in the merged channel) and nuclei (blue) in NIH-3T3 cells. In panels A, B, C was presented the imaging of cells plated on porous scaffold realized without porogens, in D, E, F cells seeded on substrates realized with crystal salts of dimensions <140 μm and in G, H, I images of cells on scaffold realized with porogens of dimension comprised between 140 and 380 μm. Scale bars equals 10 μm.

Cause of their pore characteristic length (25.63 μm), porosity (22.76 μm) and tortuosity (13.66 μm), these low porosity scaffolds showed successful fibroblasts growth on them. The numerous but small pores of the surfaces realized without the use of NaCl porogens increased cells attachment and proliferation in respect of the situation observed for scaffolds with an average porosity of the 80% realized using medium (<140 μm) (Figure 4D-4F) and wide salt crystals (140-380 μm).

These results indicated that growing fibroblasts on these biocompatible PCL porous scaffolds characterized by pores with a length comparable with the size of the same cells, promoted in vitro adhesion and proliferation. Based on qualitative analyses, the smaller pore size structure resulted more favorable than the other two because of its narrower pore size distribution and fewer large pores, which are surely more difficult to bridge.

To conclude solvent casting/particulate leaching, among the various scaffolding techniques, stands out for the possibility of simply and fast producing scaffolds with a variable pore interconnectivity degree by controlling composition, porosity and pores size. Finally, we propose these degradable porous scaffolds for future studies and for the realization of homogeneous cell/scaffold construct for regenerate tissues, by balancing temporary mechanical function with excellent mass transport simple tuning the degree of their porosity by changing the amount of salt and, the pore size, applying different salt crystals size.

References

 

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

  • 12th Edition of International Conference on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
    May 10-11, 2018,Frankfurt, Germany
  • 4th International Conference on Synthetic Biology and Tissue Engineering
    June 11-12, 2018 Rome, Italy
  • 9th International Conference on Tissue Science and Regenerative Medicine
    July 19-20, 2018 Melbourne, Australia
  • 4th International Conference on Wound Care, Tissue Repair & Regenerative Medicine
    October 5-6, 2018 Los Angeles, USA
  • 9th International Conference on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
    November 9-10 , 2018 Atlanta, Georgia ,USA

Article Usage

  • Total views: 8213
  • [From(publication date):
    December-2015 - Dec 14, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8119
  • PDF downloads : 94
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version