alexa Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 (FGF23) Levels, Phosphate Intake and its Association with Indices of Renal Handling of Phosphate in Healthy Volunteers | OMICS International
ISSN: 2157-7439
Journal of Nanomedicine & Nanotechnology

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 (FGF23) Levels, Phosphate Intake and its Association with Indices of Renal Handling of Phosphate in Healthy Volunteers

Noreen Abbas, Aysha Habib Khan*, Farooq Ghani and Imran Siddiqui

Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, P.O. Box 3500 Karachi 74800, Pakistan

*Corresponding Author:
Aysha Habib Khan
Aga Khan University Hospital
Stadium Road, P.O. Box 3500 Karachi 74800, Pakistan
Tel: 92 21 3493 0051
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: October 31, 2015; Accepted Date: January 09, 2016; Published Date: January 20, 2016

Citation: Abbas N, Khan AH, Ghani F, Siddiqui I (2016) Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 (FGF23) Levels, Phosphate Intake and its Association with Indices of Renal Handling of Phosphate in Healthy Volunteers. J Nanomed Nanotechnol 7:348. doi:10.4172/2157-7439.1000348

Copyright: © 2016 Abbas N, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Nanomedicine & Nanotechnology


FGF23 is a novel phosphaturic hormone; we aimed to assess the FGF23 levels and its association with dietary phosphate intake and indices of renal handling of phosphate in this study. Prospective study was conducted in which dietary phosphate intake was assessed by food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) along with blood and spot urine samples were collected after overnight fast for determining serum phosphate, FGF23, fractional excretion of phosphate (FePO4) and tubular maximum for phosphate (TmP/GFR). FGF23 (C-Term) was measured by a sandwich ELISA. The mean dietary phosphate intake of eighty healthy adults (mean age of 29 ± 5 years) was 1220 ± 426 mg; median FGF23 was 49.9 RU/ml (IQR=33, 76) and mean FePO4 was 7 ± 4.7. Subjects were stratified into two groups according to serum phosphate levels. Significant difference was not found in dietary phosphate intake and FGF23 levels in the two groups. However, TmP/GFR and creatinine were significantly different in the two groups. FePO4 was high in both the groups. Overall a rising pattern of FGF23 levels was seen with increasing serum phosphate levels. Significant positive correlation was found between FGF23 and dietary phosphate (r=0.22, p<0.05) and negative correlation was seen between FGF23 and FePO4 (r=-0.260, p<0.05).


Phosphate; FGF23; TmP/GFR; 1, 25(OH)2 Vitamin D; FePO4


Fibroblast 23 (FGF23) is primarily expressed in osteocytes and in endothelial cells lining the venous sinusoids of bone marrow and thymus [1]. Most of its functions occur in the kidney through an FGF receptor (FGFR)/Klotho complex; and it acts opposite to vitamin D by inhibiting 1 alpha hydroxylase and stimulating 24 hydroxylase enzymes in the renal tubule. As a result, 1,25 OH vitamin D catabolism is increased with decrease in production due to excess of FGF23 [2]. Moreover, the expression of type II sodium-dependent phosphate cotransporters (mainly NPT2a and NPT2c) is inhibited by FGF23 in cells of renal proximal tubules which reduces phosphate reabsorption and consequently increases urinary phosphate excretion.

FGF 23 also interacts negatively with PTH mRNA in contrast to CKD, where increased FGF23 is associated with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Due to these opposing verdicts; local and systemic confounding factors have been projected to modify FGF23 levels and taken together, it is advocated that PTH and FGF23 axis is similar to vitamin D-FGF23 loop [2].

Another main stimulus for FGF23 released is increased phosphate intake as evinced by the literature, as FGF23 levels were not increased by the rise in serum phosphate levels due to non-dietary interventions [3]. Literature showed that consumption of diet low in calcium and high in phosphorus have detrimental effects on the normal physiology of peak bone mass which leads to osteoporosis in later life. Both short term and longer consumption of phosphate causes increase in PTH levels and thus increases bone turnover. On the other hand despite minor rise in PTH levels, calcitriol showed a significant reduction or no change in concentrations.

As FGF23 is a novel regulator of phosphate homeostasis and its has actions on PTH and 1,25 (OH)2 D metabolism and is considered key factor in bone cellular, metabolic, and mineralization functions. Hence, both over and under expression of FGF23 results in negatively affecting bone mineralization; while its deficiency leading to severe hypophosphatemia, hyper vitaminosis D, and increased circulating calcium [2]. The extra renal functions of FGF23 are important apart from renal failure, as the association of FGF23 with adversative outcomes including cardiovascular changes is sturdier.

Studies showed that higher FGF23 levels are now associated with cardiovascular complications and death. Association of FGF23 concentrations with adversarial outcomes is stronger in patients with CKD as it is not captured by measurement of routine biomarkers for CKD i.e., eGFR or albuminuria [3].

FGF23 has not been studied in our population. We presumed that FGF23 is high in our subjects due to high dietary phosphate intake [4]. This has implications for the bone health and diagnosis and treatment of phosphate-wasting disorders and vitamin D metabolic defects. The purpose of this study was to explore FGF23 levels in healthy subjects and assess its relationship with serum phosphate; TmP/GFR, FePO4 and dietary phosphate.

Materials and Methods

A prospective cross sectional study took place at Section of Clinical Chemistry, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi. The study was reviewed and accepted by the Ethical Review Committee, Aga Khan University Hospital.

Healthy subjects of either gender staff were recruited after informed consent. A performa including the demographics age, gender, ethnicity, occupation was filled at the time of drawing blood.

Blood sample was taken from study subjects after an overnight fast, in ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) and gel tubes for analysis of FGF23 and serum phosphate and creatinine respectively. At the same time subjects were asked to provide a spot urine sample for phosphate and creatinine measurements. Plasma was collected after centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 5 min. Aliquotting of plasma samples was performed, and tubes were labeled and kept at -70°C till analysis of plasma FGF23, serum creatinine and phosphate.

Dietary information was recorded on food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) through a face-to-face interview with the principal investigator, and the duration of each interview took about 20 to 25 minutes. The FFQ was previously validated [5]. The raw composition of phosphate content in each food item was taken from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, and Nutrient data laboratory. In certain cases where this information was not available from the USDA, other local food composition tables were consulted [6]. Dietary data for phosphate content were totaled by multiplying the intake frequency of each food item by the phosphate content of the given portion sizes.

FGF23 levels (C-term) were measured by a sandwich enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) from Immunotopics Inc. (San Clemente, California). Both normal and abnormal control materials were run to assure quality of analysis. The normal reference range for plasma FGF23 was taken as median 52.4 RU/ml [4,7,8].

Plasma and urinary phosphate and creatinine levels were measured by Synchron CX9 by Beckmann instruments Brea, California USA based on spectrophotometric principle. To ensure quality, two levels of controls (normal and abnormal) were run with each batch of plasma, serum and urinary phosphate and creatinine analysis. The laboratory participated in external proficiency testing from BIORAD laboratories California, USA for phosphate and creatinine every three months.

Values for serum phosphate, serum creatinine, urinary phosphate and creatinine were utilized for derivation of FePO4 and TmP/GFR by using these formulae [9]:

Normal range for TmP/GFR was 2.4-4.8 mg/dl and cutoff for normal FePO4 was taken as <5%.

SPSS version 19 was used to compute and analyze the data. Frequencies of gender were generated. Means and standard deviations for continuous variables (age, serum FGF23, serum and urinary phosphate and serum and urinary creatinine) and proportion for categorical variables (gender, ethnic origin, and education) was also computed. A confidence interval of 95%, for the FGF23 was reported. Data of FGF23 was skewed so median value was reported along with interquartile ranges. We had also compared two groups of serum phosphate using Mann-Whitney U Test and association between log transformed FGF23, serum phosphate, dietary phosphate, serum creatinine, FePO4 and TmP/GFR using spearman’s correlation coefficient

Effect modifiers were controlled through age, gender, serum phosphate; dietary phosphate, FePO4, serum creatinine and TmP/ GFR to see the impact on the outcome variable. A p-value of <0.05 was considered as significant and p value<0.01 as highly significant in all statistical analysis.


Eighty subjects were recruited in the study. The mean age of the study subjects was 29 ± 4.7 years with 51% (n=41) being females. Table 1 shows the anthropometric details and biochemical parameters assessed in study subjects.

49% (n = 39)
51% (n= 41)
Mean Age
29 ± 4.7
Mean BMI
22.98 ± 3.91
Mean Serum PO4
3.35 ±  3.91
Mean TmP/GFR
3.04 ± 0.57
Mean FePO4
7.0 ± 4.7
Mean Dietary
1220 ± 426
Median FGF-23
49.9 (33-76.1)

Table 1: Demographic, Dietary Phosphate Intake and Biochemical Characteristics of Study Subjects (n=80).

Relation of serum phosphate with FGF23 and indices of renal handling

Only one subject had high serum P (>4.5 mg/dl), with high dietary phosphate intake (1685.6 mg) and high FePO4 (8.5%) and FGF23 levels of 54.9 RU/ml. This subject was excluded from final analysis.

Table 2 shows indices of renal handling, dietary phosphate intake and FGF23 levels in 79 subjects with low and normal serum phosphate levels. Six subjects (11%) were identified to have low mean serum phosphate levels (2.3 ± 0.2 mg/dl), the cause of which is not known. Mean TmP/GFR was low and FEPO4 was high in subjects with hypophosphatemia. FGF23 concentrations were increased in only 2 subjects, while the rest have levels less than the cut off.

Serum Phosphate   p-value
  < 2.5 (n=6) 2.5 to 4.5 (n=73)
FGF23 (RU/ml) 52.3
(IQR = 31.8 to 75.3)
(IQR= 32.3 to 81.6)
2.1 ± 0.22 3.1 ± 0.47 0.000***
Dietary Phosphate Intake (mg) 1174 ± 519 1219 ± 416 0.563
FePO4 (%) 7.9 ± 4.1 9.1 ± 4.7 0.468
Serum Creatinine
0.6 ± 0.2 0.8 ± 0.2 0.033*

Table 2: Indices of Renal Handling, Dietary Phosphate Intake and FGF-23 In Subjects With Low and Normal Serum Phosphate Levels (n=79).

Creatinine and TmP/GFR were significantly different between subjects with low and normal serum phosphate levels.

Distribution of FGF23 and association with indices of renal handling

Log FGF23 showed a statistically significant negative correlation with serum creatinine (p<0.05) and FEPO4 (p<0.05). Significant association was not found with serum PO4, dietary phosphate and TmP/GFR (Table 3). However, with increase in median FGF23 quartiles, a downward trend is seen in serum phosphate and TmP/GFR and upward trend in FePO4 (Tables 4 and 5).

Independent Variables
Dependent Variable (Y)
β P
Gender -0.11 0.038       0.598 i.e., 59.8%
BMI -0.01 0.157
Dietary Phosphate Intake 0.00086 0.698
S. Phosphate -2.18 0.245
S. Creatinine -1.44 0.009
TmP/GFR 2.62 0.084
FePO4 0.12 0.019

Table 3: Correlates between FGF23 and indices of renal handling.

  Median FGF23
  Quartile 1
Quartile 2
Quartile 3
Age 26 30 36
S. PO4 3.5 3 2.1
S. CR 0.8 0.5 0.9
FEPo4 6.87 8.79 16.58
TmP/GFR 3.26 2.74 1.75
TPO 1588.24 1305.87 1588.24

Table 4: Distribution of dietary phosphate and indices of renal handling with median FGF23 quartiles.

Study Year Author Study Subjects Population FGF-23 levels Other Parameters included
2003 Jonsson et al.[22] 141 adult Caucasians 55  ±  50 RU/ml Normal Phosphate
2003 Weber et al.[4] 42 adults Caucasians Median 13 RU/ml (5 to 210) Ca2+ 9.5 ± 0.1 mg/dl, PO4 3.7 ± 0.1mg/dl, median creatinine 0.9 (0.6–1.3) mg/dl, median iPTH 34 (11–77).
2005 Ferrari et al.[24] 29 healthy males Swiss 48.3 ± 4.6 RU/ml Serum Phosphate  3.90 ± 0.09 mg/dl, PO4 intake 1400 ± 100 mg, TmP/GFR  3.57 ± 0.09 mg/dl, PTH  26 ± 2.1 pg/ml, 1, 25 OH vit D  37.5 ± 1.0 pg/ml.
2009 Laroche et al.[12] 15 adults French  39.1  ±  16.4 RU/ml Serum phosphate 3.2 ± 0.5 mg/dl, PTH  21 ± 8 pg/ml, Ca2+ 9.7 ±  0.8 mg/dl
2015 Abbas et al. 80 healthy adults Pakistani Median 49.9 RU/ml (33-76.1) Serum phosphate 3.35 ±  3.91 mg/dl, dietary Phosphate 1220 ± 426 mg, TmP/GFR 3.04 ± 0.57 mg/dl, FePO4 7.0 ± 4.7 %

Table 5: Various studies reporting FGF-23 levels in healthy controls.


FGF23 is a bone-generated major regulator of phosphate homeostasis. It is identified in healthy individuals and its level in our population is comparable with those reported in literature on healthy subjects from other population. Similar findings are seen in the 25 healthy Swiss subjects with high phosphate intake of 1400 ± 100 mg, median FGF23 of 48.3 ± 4.6 RU/ml and serum phosphate of 3.90 ± 0.09 mg/dl (Table 4).

This is the first study from Pakistan that has determined plasma FGF23 levels in healthy subjects. Median plasma FGF23 in apparently normal healthy subjects is 49.9 (IQR=33-76.1), at serum phosphate of 3.3 ± 3.91 mg/dl and dietary phosphate intake of 1220.3 ± 426.4 mg. Plasma FGF23 was not different between the low and normal phosphate group. Increased FePO4 is seen in the subjects, most likely to be due to high dietary phosphate intake.

Significant association was not found which may be due to small sample size. In addition, parathyroid hormone levels were not measured which has positive effect on urinary phosphate excretion. High PTH is a frequent finding in our population due to prevalent vitamin D deficiency [10].

Serum phosphate homeostasis is a dynamic process and its vivo levels are balanced by a coordinated process including phosphate gut absorption, preservation and efflux of bone and cellular phosphate along with the urinary excretion from the kidneys. It is done mainly by kidneys which maintain serum phosphate levels by controlling its excretion stimulated by changes in dietary pattern of phosphate. Most of the phosphate load is cleared by kidneys and it is considered a vital organ in maintaining the phosphate homeostasis.

Literature showed that disorders of phosphate metabolism are risk factors for cardiovascular complications and these findings lead to phosphate intake restrictions as part of treatment for the enhanced prognosis in patients with cardiovascular diseases as increased phosphate intake was the main causative factor in the studied population. The novel mediators of phosphate metabolism i.e., FGF23 and klotho are linked to dietary phosphate intake and are integral markers of phosphate overload and its bad prognosis.

Furthermore, serum phosphate was weakly associated with FGF- 23 and it was also not statistically significant in our healthy volunteers whereas a significant correlation was seen with FePO4 and serum creatinine. Westerberg et al. also showed negative linear correlations between FGF23 and phosphate and between FGF23 and TmP/GFR was borderline significant in their small sample done on healthy donors before nephrectomy [11]. Recent literature showed special focus on FGF23 and its association with phosphate homeostasis and vitamin D abnormalities in patients with chronic renal failure.

Our study has some limitations, first of all, small sample size of the study, which limits the applicability of our findings to other studies. Secondly, we have not assessed the vitamin D, serum calcium levels and PTH in this study which is another well described biologic modifiers of FGF23 i.e., it inhibits 1α-hydroxylation of leading to low levels of 1,25 (OH)2 D. These findings are significant in our population where there is a high risk of bone diseases due to increased high incidence of vitamin D deficiency [12,13] and use of a diet which is rich in phosphate and low in calcium. Moreover, Recently FGF23 is also connected to hypertension, obesity and metabolic syndrome which are prevalent in our population. If such data can be authenticated in our population settings, this would represent a key paradigm move that changed FGF23 from biomarker to mechanism of disease, and raises the option of FGF23 being a primary target for intervention.


Study was funded by the Departmental Seed Money Grant for research development (2009), The Aga Khan University (Project ID # IS SM 090502.). This study was reviewed and approved by Ethical Review Committee (ERC), The Aga Khan University (1314-Path-ERC-09).


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

  • 2nd World Congress on Nano Science and Nano Technology
    August 10-11, 2018 Osaka, Japan
  • 25th Nano Congress for Future Advancements
    August 16-18, 2018 Dublin, Ireland
  • 20th Asia Pacific Nanotechnology Congress
    July 23-24, 2018 Sydney, Australia
  • 26th International Conference on Advanced Nanotechnology
    October 04-05 2018 Moscow, Russia
  • Nanotechnology & Materials Engineering
    Oct 25-26, 2018 Budapest, Hungary

Article Usage

  • Total views: 8722
  • [From(publication date):
    February-2016 - Jul 20, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8624
  • PDF downloads : 98

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7