alexa Fractional Delivery: Toward a Painless, Safe and Effective Cutaneous Vaccination | OMICS International
ISSN: 2157-7560
Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Fractional Delivery: Toward a Painless, Safe and Effective Cutaneous Vaccination

Ji Wang*

Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, 50 Blossom Street, Edwards 211, Boston, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Wang Ji
Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School
50 Blossom Street, Edwards 211
Boston, MA 02114, USA
Tel: 617-724-2653
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: January 18, 2017; Accepted date: January 19, 2017; Published date: January 24, 2017

Citation: Wang J (2017) Fractional Delivery: Toward a Painless, Safe and Effective Cutaneous Vaccination. J Vaccines Vaccin 8:e130. doi: 10.4172/2157-7560.1000e130

Copyright: © 2017 Wang J. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination


Delivering vaccines into skin (Cutaneous Vaccination) is one of most promising strategies for the next generation vaccination. Cutaneous vaccination enables high vaccination efficacy harnessing the unique immunological nature of skin that numerous antigen presenting cells (APCs) reside in epidermis and dermis concomitant with an abundant network of lymphatic vessels. In sharp contrast, as a conventional vaccination site for most vaccines, muscle has few APCs. Therefore, cutaneous vaccination always showed a superior efficacy to intramuscular injection for a number of vaccines, including Influenza, Hepatitis B, Rabies, Polio etc. This advantage enables us to address the problem of age-related low vaccination efficacy in very young (<2 years) and elder (>65 years) populations, to overcome vaccine shortage in developing countries (e.g. inactivated poliovirus vaccine) or during a pandemic (e.g. pandemic influenza vaccine) by sparing antigen doses.

However, the clinic application of cutaneous vaccination is hindered by limitations of current intradermal injection technology. First, intradermal injection via hypodermic needles, also known as the Mantoux injection method, can only be properly handled by experienced professionals. Second, injection of a large volume (>100 μl) into skin induces more pain than intramuscular injection, resulting in poor patient compliance. Third and most importantly, skin is prone to inducing inflammations. As a result, conventional intradermal injection via hypodermic needles always induced a higher level of local reactions demonstrated by a number of clinic studies. For example, intradermal injection of influenza vaccines always induced erythema and swelling, persistent for days. Therefore, new technologies and strategies are needed to fully realize the potential of cutaneous vaccination.

Fractional delivery is a promising strategy for cutaneous vaccination. It could be accomplished by microneedle arrays, fractional laser-mediated delivery methods or hollow microneedle arrays. Vaccines and adjuvants are delivered into hundreds of tiny spots, usually smaller than 300 μm in diameter, instead of injecting all antigens into one big spot. These tiny spots are well separated and surrounded by healthy tissues. The tiny injection site with fractional antigen dose reduces the local irritations induced by vaccines or adjuvants and ensures a quick recovery of injured tissues without compromising vaccination efficacies. Moreover, the distance between each spot also matters. A longer distance could further constrain local reactions [1]. However, the optimal distance should be determined individually for each vaccine and delivery system.

Factional delivery of Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) vaccine via a biodegradable microneedle array resulted in a significantly improved skin condition compared to the conventional intradermal injection which always induces severe skin lesions and permanent scars in human skin [1]. A similar result has been observed from the influenza vaccine study. Cutaneous vaccination of inactivated influenza virus vaccine by microneedles showed mild to no local reactions in swine, a clinic relevant model for human skin [1]. Besides live bacteria vaccines (BCG) and inactivated virus vaccines (Influenza), vaccination of liveattenuated viral vectors could also benefit from fractional delivery. For example, delivery vaccinia virus, the vaccine for smallpox, by lasermediated micro-fractional powder delivery induced fewer skin lesions with greatly accelerated skin recovery [2].

Fractional delivery is not only beneficial for delivering vaccines into skin, but also improves the safety of intradermal delivery of adjuvants. Adjuvant is a very important component of modern vaccines. They are able to augment the efficacy of vaccines, accelerate the induction of immune responses, prolong the duration of immunity and switch the type of immune responses. However, most adjuvants that have been approved or are under development induce severe skin reactions [3]. Fractional delivery may address this issue. A combination of MPL and CpG adjuvants induces severe skin irritations. However, if MPL/CpG is fractionally delivered, the skin irritations could be significantly impaired [3]. Microneedles-mediated fractionally delivery has been used to deliver QS-21 and Alum adjuvants into skin [4,5]. Previously, alum adjuvant could only be used for intramuscular injections because of its potential to induce skin reactions. Moreover, a laser based adjuvant that fractionally delivers micro-sterile inflammation into skin also showed good safety profiles [6].

Taken together, fractional delivery of vaccines or adjuvants retains the efficacy of cutaneous vaccination but significantly improves the safety. In additional, the fractional delivery technologies such as microneedles induce less pain than conventional intradermal injection, because of their small needle size. Therefore, fractional delivery of vaccines into skin is a promising strategy for a painless, safe and effective vaccination. Expanding this strategy to a broader spectrum of vaccines/adjuvants and developing new technologies are expected. Further clinical trials are merited.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Article Usage

  • Total views: 1213
  • [From(publication date):
    February-2017 - Jun 26, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 1139
  • PDF downloads : 74

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7