alexa Gauge dependence in the nonlinearly realized massive SU(2) gauge theory 1 | OMICS International
ISSN: 1736-4337
Journal of Generalized Lie Theory and Applications
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Gauge dependence in the nonlinearly realized massive SU(2) gauge theory 1

Daniele BETTINELLI*, Ruggero FERRARI and Andrea QUADRI

Department of Physics, University of Milan and INFN, Sez. di Milano, via Celoria 16, I-20133 Milano, Italy

*Corresponding Author:
Daniele BETTINELLI
Department of Physics University of Milan and INFN Sez.
di Milano, via Celoria 16 I-20133 Milano, Italy
E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Received Date: December 12, 2007; Revised Date: March 28, 2008

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Generalized Lie Theory and Applications

Abstract

The implementation of the ’t Hooft ®-gauge in the symmetrically subtracted massive gauge theory based on the nonlinearly realized SU(2) gauge group is discussed. The gauge independence of the self-mass of the gauge bosons is proven by cohomological techniques.

Introduction

A consistent subtraction scheme for massive non-Abelian gauge theories based on a nonlinearly realized gauge group has been recently proposed in [5]. The symmetric subtraction algorithm was already successfully applied to the four-dimensional nonlinear sigma model in the flat connection formalism in [4]–[7].

The Feynman rules of the nonlinearly realized massive gauge theory entail that already at one loop level there is an infinite number of divergent amplitudes involving the pseudo-Goldstone fields Φa [5]. The latter amplitudes are uniquely fixed by implementing a defining local functional equation [5,7] which encodes the invariance of the path-integral Haar measure under local SU(2)L transformations2

image (1.1)

image is the element of the nonlinearly represented SU(2)L gauge group

image (1.2)

vD is a D-dimensional mass scale and ta are the Pauli matrices. image is the SU(2)L gauge connection. It is also convenient to introduce the SU(2)L flat connection

image (1.3)

with the following SU(2)L transformation induced by the transformation of image

image (1.4)

The amplitudes not involving the pseudo-Goldstone fields are named ancestor amplitudes since they are at the top of the hierarchy induced by the local functional equation. At every loop order there is only a finite number of divergent ancestor amplitudes (weak power-counting theorem [5,10]). The requirement of physical unitarity is satisfied since the Slavnov-Taylor (ST) identity holds [5,9]. The ghost equation and the Landau gauge equation are also preserved by the symmetric subtraction [5]. These symmetries, supplemented by global SU(2)R invariance and the weak power-counting, uniquely fix the tree-level vertex functional of the nonlinearly realized theory [5].

In [5] the Landau gauge was used for the sake of simplicity and conciseness. The aim of this note is to implement the ’t Hooft ®-gauge in a way compatible with all the symmetries required for the definition of the model (local functional equation, ST identity, ghost equation, B-equation for a general ®-gauge [15]) and the weak power-counting.

The validity of the local functional equation requires that the gauge-fixing functional transforms in the adjoint representation of SU(2)L. In the Landau gauge this was achieved by introducing an external vector source V and by making use of the gauge-fixing functional

image (1.5)

where image is the covariant derivative w.r.t. the vector source V. Ba

is the Nakanishi-Lautrup field [15]. It transforms in the adjoint representation of SU(2)L. The local functional equation is preserved by the gauge-fixing (1.5).

It should be stressed that the local functional equation associated with the SU(2)L local invariance is not the standard background Ward identity [1]-[8]. The essential difference is that the local functional equation is bilinear in the vertex functional ¡, due to the presence of the nonlinear constraint Φ0 in Eq (1.2), which needs to be coupled to the scalar source K0 in the tree-level vertex functional.

The ’t Hooft ®-gauge is defined by the condition of the cancellation (once the Nakanishi- Lautrup field is eliminated via its equation of motion) of the mixed image terms arising in the nonlinear theory from the mass invariant

image (1.6)

The ’t Hooft (φ-dependent) gauge-fixing functional must transform in the adjoint representation of SU(2)L in order to preserve the local functional equation. For that purpose one needs to introduce an auxiliary matrix image

image (1.7)

with the same SU(2)L transformation as image

image (1.8)

The combination

image (1.9)

has the correct transformation properties. Therefore one can consider the following gauge-fixing functional

image (1.10)

where ® is the gauge parameter. With the choice in Eq (1.10) the local functional equation is respected and by integrating the Nakanishi-Lautrup field Bα the mixed image terms arising from Eq (1.6) are canceled. The propagators obtained by using the gauge-fixing functional in Eq (1.10) have a UV behaviour compatible with the weak power-counting.

It is important to realize that b­ is not an element of SU(2). The reason is that the amplitudes involving image and image must be ancestors. Already at one loop level one cannot have a finite number of divergent amplitudes involving image and image is given by the SU(2) constraintimageOne must split in a linear way the constant component of image by setting image Sinceimage and image are independent, by inspecting the Feynman rules one can then check that the weak power-counting is preserved. Moreover, since image are independent variables, the BRST transformation can be extended to these sources by pairing them to external source ghosts image as follows

image (1.11)

Then image form BRST doublets [15,16] and therefore they do not contribute to the cohomology H(s) of the BRST differential s. Hence they are not physical, as expected. The same technique can be used to prove that the vector source V does not modify the physical observables too [5].

The ghost-antighost part of the tree-level vertex functional is generated as usual by

image (1.12)

with the standard BRST transformation of the antighost image

Gauge dependence of the physical amplitudes

The issue arises of whether physical amplitudes depend on the gauge choice. This problem can be treated according to the standard extension of the BRST symmetry to the gauge parameter [15,14]

image (2.1)

The extended ST identity is in fact sufficient to prove the independence of the physical quantities from α also in the nonlinear case. We sketch here the main lines of the proof. Dropping inessential terms involving the background ghosts image the ST identity for the vertex functional ¡ is3

image (2.2)

We define as usual the connected generating functional W by the Legendre transformation of ¡ w.r.t. the quantized fields (collectively denoted by image

image (2.3)

where image is a short-hand notation for the sources of the quantized fields. Eq (2.2) yieldsimage stands for the source coupled to the field image

image

By differentiating Eq (2.4) w.r.t image and a set of sources image coupled to physical BRSTinvariant local operators O1, . . . ,On one finds by going on-shell (all external sources set to zero)

image (2.5)

i.e. the physical Green function image is on-shell gauge-independent. is on-shell gauge-independent.

The Nielsen identities [13,12] can also be obtained from the extended ST identity (2.2). We discuss here in detail the Nielsen identity for the two point 1-PI function of the gauge bosons.

By differentiating Eq (2.2) w.r.t. image and by setting all the fields and external sources to zero one gets

image (2.6)

We decompose image and image into their transverse and longitudinal components as follows

image (2.7)

By taking the transverse part of Eq (2.6) one finds (notice that the terms proportional to image only contribute to the longitudinal part and thus drop out)

image (2.8)

The self-mass image is defined as the zero of image

image (2.9)

if no tadpoles are present as in the case under consideration. In passing it is worth noticing that the presence of tadpoles requires that the self-mass is defined as the pole of the transverse part of the connected two-point function (as it happens in the linearly realized theory).

By Eq (2.8) one finds

image (2.10)

Moreover invertibility of image is guaranteed in the loop expansion since

image

The above equation together with Eq (2.10) implies

image (2.11)

i.e. the self-mass is gauge-independent. This behaviour is a typical property of the nonlinear theory. In the linear case the zero of the two-point 1-PI function is in general gauge-dependent. Gauge independence can only be recovered by taking into account the Higgs tadpole contributions. For a detailed comparison of the two-point 1-PI function in the linear and the nonlinear case see [6].

Conclusions

The formulation of the nonlinearly realized SU(2) massive gauge theory in the ’t Hooft gauge has been achieved in a way consistent with all the symmetries of the model and the weak powercounting. This requires the introduction of auxiliary external sources image We have shown that this procedure does not alter the physical content of the model. Gauge independence of physical observables has been established by using cohomological methods. The self-mass, which can be computed in the nonlinearly realized theory as the zero of the transverse part of the 1-PI two-point function, has been proven to be gauge-independent.

Acknowledgement

This work was partially supported by INFN.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11607
  • [From(publication date):
    September-2008 - Sep 19, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7832
  • PDF downloads : 3775
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

bornova escort

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version