Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Textile Physics Section, Department of Jute and Fibre Technology, Institute of Jute Technology, University of Calcutta 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Calcutta, India

- *Corresponding Author:
- Biswas SK

Textile Physics Section

Department of Jute and Fibre Technology

Institute of Jute Technology, University of Calcutta 35

Ballygunge Circular Road, Calcutta-700 019, India

**Tel:**9432284831

**E-mail:**[email protected]

**Received date:** April 18, 2017; **Accepted date:** July 10, 2017; **Published date:** July 15, 2017

**Citation: **Biswas SK (2017) Generation of Jute Fibre Length Distribution via Graphics and Computer Simulation with Gamma Distribution Function. J Textile Sci Eng 7: 307. doi: 10.4172/2165-8064.1000307

**Copyright:** © 2017 Biswas SK. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

**Visit for more related articles at** Journal of Textile Science & Engineering

Notwithstanding the complexity of production of jute fibre filaments a simple graphical presentation of jute fibre length distribution is made. The computer simulation of four types of frequency distribution of jute fibre length depending on method of sampling and testing is presented. These four distribution curves gives six points of intersections which merit technological significance. A study of fibre length-frequency distribution depending on methods of sampling and testing may lead to a general form of Gamma distribution function. The parameters in the mathematical formulae may serve as characteristics of condition giving the benchmark for valid experiment. This type of work involving exponential distribution was not done previously and provides a deeper insight into the characterisation of its comparative features with respect to normal distribution of fibre length. It can be observed that fibrograms for exponential and normal distributions have close similarity if their mean values are same. However, the survivor or array diagram distinguishes the basic distributions better than the fibrogram. This would be useful in the context that the basic frequency distributions of fibre lengths are somewhat difficult to obtain from direct experiments.

Gamma distribution; Jute fibre; Fibre length; Length distribution

In jute, the raw fibre as it comes from the plant consists of many single filaments bonded together by adhesion and branching to form a three-dimensional meshy structure. On carding, this meshy structure is broken into individual fibrous elements of different lengths , the longer elements being more complex, since these consists of several single filament still joined together in some way. This complexity will cause the linear density of the longer elements to be greater than that of the single filaments. In addition, the single filaments in the longer elements may be thicker and stronger than those in the shorter ones. On both these counts, the linear density of the longer elements will be greater than that of the shorter ones [1]. When the meshy structure of raw jute reeds is broken down randomly into fibrous elements in a carding machine, the frequency of such elements by number can be expected to decrease exponentially with increase in their length [2]. In this paper a graphical presentation of jute fibre length distribution is made. A study of fibre length-frequency distribution depending on methods of sampling and testing may lead to a general form of Gamma distribution function. It may be mentioned that for Gamma distribution [3] the density function of the random variable x is given by

Whose

mean=α/λ, variance=α/λ^{2}, standard deviation = and coefficient of
variation= . This distribution has two parameters.

The parameterα is called a shape parameter since, as α increases, the density becomes more peaked. The parameter λ is a scale parameter; that is, the distribution depends on λ only. Variation for the values of α which may serve as behaviour characteristic of condition that appear as parameters in the mathematical formulae giving the benchmark for valid experiment.

**Figure 1** is the graphical representation of data collected by
measuring length of single fibres. The vertical axis is number (quantity) of fibre, the horizontal axis fibre length increments, and each circle o,
represents a single fibre. One could imagine that the o‘s are end views
fibres stacked vertically with each stack consisting only of fibres of
same length. To the left hand side are the short fibres, the right hand
side the long fibres. Statisticians call **Figure 1** a histogram or length
frequency distribution diagram. **Figure 1** gives all of the information
we need to know about fibre length and fibre length distribution. Since
it is easier to determine the weight of fibre than to count the number of
fibre, histograms and staple diagrams (arrays) are usually constructed
on fibre weight basis. For clarity and ease of explanation, fibre number basis is used in this discussion. Detailed discussion about number and
weight basis of testing is made in later section of this paper. Another
method of representing data collected by measuring length of fibres is in **Figure 2**. The vertical axis is number (quantity) of fibre, the horizontal
axis is the fibre length and each cylinder represents a fibre. **Figure 2a** is a
picture of fibres arranged in order of length with left hand ends aligned
at the vertical axis. **Figure 2a** is simply a rearrangement of **Figures 1** and **2** is the staple diagram and, as in **Figure 1** contains all of the information
we need to know about end to end lengths. Millions of millions of fibres
are involved in fibre and yarn production. **Figure 1** and **Figure 2a** do
not contain all the fibres, they contain only a representative number of
fibres. More realistic is **Figure 2b** which is three dimensional having a
z-axis. Layer after layer of staple diagrams on to infinity. A bale of fibres
could be represented as in **Figure 2b**. As fibres were rearranged going
from **Figure 1** to **Figure 2b** so can the fibres be rearranged as illustrated in **Figure 3**. To make this rearrangement, fibres of **Figure 2b** are selected at
random along their lengths, the catch points placed on the vertical axis,
and fibres thus selected arranged in descending order of the extension
distance to the right hand side of the catch point. For illustration,
fibre segments marked 1, 2, and 3 in **Figure 2b** are shown in their
appropriate location in **Figure 3** accordingly enough fibres are selected
to make **Figure 3** becomes representative. **Figure 3** is a fibrogram and
contains all of the information we need to know about fibre length and
fibre length distribution. Of the three methods of representative of fibre
length, the staple diagram of **Figure 2a** is easily accepted by our mental processes, the mental picture requires no strain on the imagination
and we have a comfortable feeling; thus the staple diagram has been
established as the standard of comparison and the bench mark from
which other fibre length test methods are compared. However, in yarn
spinning and non-oven fabric production, ends of fibres must never
be aligned. The fibrogram which is an arrangement of fibre as they are, or as they will be in future processes, becomes the bench mark of
comparison concerning fibre performance in yarn spinning and nonoven
fabric manufacture [4]. This type of work involving exponential
distribution was not done previously and provides a deeper insight into
the characterisation of its comparative features with respect to normal
distribution of fibre length. The survivor diagrams (curves O and P)
and fibrograms (curves Q and R) are also computed and presented in **Figure 4** for end-biased and length-biased samples, respectively. It can
be observed from **Figure 4** that fibrograms for exponential and normal
distributions have close similarity if their mean values are same.
This is corroborated with the values of the corresponding fibrogram
parameters. However the survivor or array diagram which is also still
popular in industrial practice distinguishes the basic distributions as
evident in **Figure 5**, better than the fibrogram. This would be useful in
the context that the basic frequency distributions of fibre lengths are
somewhat difficult to obtain from direct experiments.

**Figure 4:** Theoretical survivor diagrams of cotton fibre of 6 length-unit mean
fibre length and 12 length –unit maximum fibre length on the basis of number
from an end –biased sample (curve-c) and length-biased sample (curve-D);
and jut fibre in silver yarns of 6length unit mean fibre length 12length unit
maximum fibre length on the basis of number from an end biased sample
(curve-O) and length biased sample (curve-P).

**Figure 5:** Theoretical Fibrograms of cotton fibre of 6 length-unit mean fibre
length and 12 length-unit maximum fibre length on the basis of number
from an end-biased sample(curve- E) and length-biased sample (curve-F);
and jute fibre in sliver and yarns of 6 length-unit mean fibre length and 12
length-unit maximum fibre length on the basis of number from an end-biased
sample(curve- Q) and length-biased sample(curve- R).

In fibre length measurements two kinds of sample are experimentally obtainable through two kinds of sampling methods – end-biased and length biased. An end-biased sample is defined as one in which each fibre of population has equal probability of being included since each fibre has two ends independent of its length or any other characteristics. The end-biased sample is a random sample. A length biased sample is one in which the probability of a fibre being included is directly proportional to its length. In fibre testing, a random selection is restricted due to the essential nature of the fibre that it is much longer than it is thick. Because of this, it is only too easy to take a sample in such a way that it contains far more long fibres than it should. The knowledge of the nature of the bias in favour of the longer fibre would help to avoid the same. In some contexts in which length biased sampling is used it is reasonable to regard the length biased distribution as the object of study [5].

The frequency distributions of fibre length in jute slivers and yarns have been deduced analytically by Banerjee [2] for different methods
of sample preparation. The expected average length of fibres obtained
on the basis of number and weight of fibres has been estimated for
each of such distribution. The present author [6-8] has shown that the
Gamma function provides mathematical short-cut for the analysis of
fibre length distribution and average length of jute fibres depending
on sampling and testing method to arrive at the results as obtained
by Banerjee. The two sampling method i.e., (i) end-biased and (ii)
length biased sampling method have been considered. For each of such
sampling the expected distribution of fibre length obtained on the basis
of (i) number and (ii) weight of fibres has also been estimated. Thus
four types of length distributions are obtained such as the frequency
of length l tested on the basis of number from end-biased sample (f_{EN} (l)), the frequency of fibre of length l tested on the basis of number
from a length-biased sample (f_{LN} (l)), the frequency of fibre of length l
tested on the basis of weight from an end-biased sample (f_{EW}(l)) and the
frequency of fibre of length l tested on the basis of weight from a length
biased sample (f_{LW}(l)) (**Figure 6**).

The end-biased and number based length distribution of fibre f _{EN} (l), which is expected to be similar to the basic type has been used by
Banerjee (1980) to obtain f_{LN} (l) and f_{EW} (l), and in turn f_{LN} (l) has been
used to obtain f_{LW} (l). The present author uses the Gamma function to
obtain the same result very quickly [6-8] and f_{EW} (l) has been considered
[7] to obtain f_{LW}(l). He has also considered all the other possible routes
of transformations of one type of length distribution to the other types
and presented their rederivation through Gamma function to achieve a
considerable amount of simplification [9]. The summary of the results
of the distribution is given in **Table 1**.

Method followed |
Relationship for frequency distribution |
Average length |

Basic population number-based | ||

End-biased sampling number-based | ||

Length-biased sampling number-based | ||

End-biased sampling weight-based | ||

Length-biased sampling weight-based |

**Table 1:** Summary of results of derivation.

Cox [5] describes relations between mean (*μ*) of the end-biased
distribution f(x) and an expectation (mean or average) E_{g}(x) with
respect to length-biased distribution g(x) as

Where *μ,σ* are the mean and standard deviation of the end-biased
distribution f(x).

For Gamma distribution the above relation becomes

Where *α* is called a shape parameter of the end-biased distribution f(x).

**Computer simulation and modal length**

The computer simulations of four frequency distribution function
f_{EN}(l), f_{LN}(l), f_{EW}(l) and f_{LW}(l) as given in **Table 1** were carried for l=5 cm.
The computer programme in F77 is given in Appendix 1. The resulting
curves obtained with the help of a Graphic Software are presented in **Figure 6**. However the proliferation of so many distribution curves
depending on the method of sampling and testing may give several
points of intersection when these are superimposed. In fact reports
of experimental observation of intersection were available in some
cases and attempt had been made to attribute suitable technological
significance to it [8,10]. The present author has found out analytically
all the intersections and showed that intersections depend on the
average length of fibre population. Computer simulations are also
presented and reported here [8].

He has also found out analytically the modal length of fibre lengthfrequency distribution depending on methods of sampling and testing [11,12]. The best measure of staple length for general application is given by modal or most frequent length of fibre length-frequency distribution [13].

The modal length *l ^{m}* can be determined from the condition [14].

(2)

Using Equations 1 and 2 can be written as

(3)

It may be mentioned that for Gamma distribution the density function of the random variable x is given by

Whose

mean=*α*/λ, variance=*α*/λ^{2}, standard deviation= and coefficient
of variation= .

This distribution has two parameters. The parameter α is called
a shape parameter since, as α increases, the density becomes more
peaked. The parameter λ is a scale parameter; that is, the distribution
depends on λ only. A study of fibre length-frequency distribution
depending on methods of sampling and testing in **Table 1** may lead
to a general form of Gamma distribution function if we use *1/l*=λ.This
remains the motivation of this work. **Table 2** gives Standard Deviation
and Coefficient of Variation for the respective values of α which may
serves as characteristic of condition that appear as parameters in the
mathematical formulae giving the benchmark for valid experiment
[15,16]. It may be noted that not only average length of fibre but also
standard deviation and coefficient variation depend on methods of
sampling and testing. **Table 3** gives Summary of Results of average
length from Cox’s formula and modal length from equation (3).

Method followed |
Standard deviation |
Coefficient ofvariation (%) |

Gamma distribution
(shape parameter=a, scale parameter l=1/l) |
||

Basic population
Number-based
Where a=1 |
‾l |
100 |

End-biased sampling
Number –based
Where a=1 |
‾l |
100 |

Length-biased sampling
Number-based
Where a=2 |
||

End-biased sampling
Weight-based
Where a=3 |
||

Length-biased sampling
Weight-based
Where a=4 |
100/2=50 |

**Table 2: **Summary of results of standard deviation and coefficient of variation.

Method followed |
Average length from Cox’s formula |
Modal length from equation (3) |

Gamma distribution
(shape parameter= , scale parameter =1/l) |
||

Basic population Number-based Where =1 | Not required | 0 |

End-biased sampling Number –based Where =1 | Not required | 0 |

Length-biased sampling Number-based Where =2 | 2 ‾l |
‾l |

End-biased sampling Weight-based Where =3 | 3 ‾l |
2‾l |

Length-biased sampling Weight-based Where =4 | 4 ‾l |
3‾l |

**Table 3:** Summary of results of average length from cox’s formula and modal length from equation (3).

- Banerjee BL (1982) The relation between the length and linear density of jute and flax fibres obtained after carding and drawing operations. J Textile Inst 73: 183-188.
- Banerjee BL (1980) Effects of sampling and testing methods on the determination of fibre length in jute slivers and yarns. Indian J Textile Res 5
**:**98-102. - Trivedi KS (1994) Probability & Statistics with Reliability, Queuing, and Computer Science Applications, New Delhi, Prentice-Hall of India: 126-210.
- Biswas SK, Chanda RS (2010) Mathematical Approach to Generating Fibre. Length Distribution via Computer simulation ,In Jute and allied Fibre: Production, Utilisation and Marketing Eds. Palit P, Sinha MK, Meshram JH, Mitra S, Laha SK. Indian Fibre Society, Eastern Region: 83-90.
- Cox DR (2005) Some sampling problems in technology. In: Symposium on the foundation of survey sampling eds. Johnson NL & Smith H, New York, John, Wiley: 506.
- Biswas SK (1989) Use of Gamma function in the Calculation of average fibre length. Indian J Textile Res 14 : 145-146.
- Biswas SK (1990) Some application of Gamma Function in the Calculation of average fibre length. Jute Development J 10: 26-27.
- Biswas SK (2010) Application of Gamma Function in the Determination of fibre length in Jute Slivers and Yarns. Modern Textile Journal: 44-47.
- Biswas SK (1996) Some studies of jute fibre length distribution with Gamma Function. IAPQR Transations 21: 67-72.
- Sinha NG (1975) Physical aspect of fine Spinning of jute. Indian J Phys 49: 245-248.
- Biswas SK (2006) Computer and simulation studies of modal length of jute fibre. Textile Trends 49: 33-35.
- Biswas SK (2010) Computational and Simulation Studies of modal length of jute fibre. J Natural Fibers
**7**: 111-117. - Morton WE, Hearle JWS (1993) Physical Properties Textile Fibres ( 3rd edn), Manchester The Textile Institute: 94-100.
- Goon AM, Gupta MK, Dasgupta B (1993) Fundamentals of Statistics Calcutta : The World Press: 264.
- Biswas SK (2000) Computational and simulation studies of jute fibre length distribution. Indian J Fibre Text Res 25
**:**221-224. - Sinha NG (1975) Physical conditions for finest and best quality yarns from jute.J Text Assoc 36: 51-57.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

- Advantages of E-Business
- Applied Arts
- Applied Engineering
- Applied Statistics
- Biological Engineering
- Brittle Materials
- Business & Management
- Ceramics Engineering
- Chemistry
- Cognitive Systems Engineering
- Color science
- Commercialization of New Techniques
- Composite Materials
- Design and Microfabrication
- Dyes
- Dynamical System
- Electronic Material Development
- Entrepreneurship
- Fashion Design
- Fashion Technology
- Fiber
- Fiber Engineering
- Fiber Innovation
- Fibrous Materials
- Finance management
- Health care management
- Industrial Crystallization
- Industrial Engineering
- Logistics
- Management Cybernetics
- Manufacturing system
- Material Sciences
- Materials Engineering
- Materials Management
- Medical Textile
- Metallic Materials (Ferrous & Nonferrous)
- Modern Analytical Chemistry
- Modern Chemistry Formulaes
- Modern Experimental Chemistry
- Modern Heterocyclic Chemistry
- Modern Inorganic Chemistry
- Modern Nuclear Chemistry
- Modern Organometallic Chemistry
- Modern Physical Organic Chemistry
- Modern Stoichiochemistry
- Modern Theoretical Chemistry
- Molecular Electronics
- Nano Composites
- Nano Materials
- Nano Particles
- Nano Structures
- Nonlinear Dynamics
- Operations Research
- Polymer Sciences
- Polymer Structure
- Polymeric Materials
- Porous Materials
- Process Engineering
- Production and Operations Management
- Reliability engineering
- Semiconductors
- Stochastic control
- Supply Chain Management
- Technologies Management
- Textile Design
- Textile Engineering
- Textile Industries
- Textile Science
- Textile Technology

- Total views:
**369** - [From(publication date):

August-2017 - Apr 23, 2018] - Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views :
**332** - PDF downloads :
**37**

Peer Reviewed Journals

International Conferences
2018-19