alexa High-Volume Hospitals for Patients Affected by Thoracic Aortic Diseases. Do We Really Need them? | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2329-9495
Angiology: Open Access
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

High-Volume Hospitals for Patients Affected by Thoracic Aortic Diseases. Do We Really Need them?

Giovanni Mariscalco1*, Aleassandra Frontera2, Carmelo Dominici2 and Daniele Maselli2

1Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit and Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK

2Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cardiac Surgery Unit, S.Anna Hospital Catanzaro, Italy

*Corresponding Author:
Giovanni Mariscalco
Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit and Department of Cardiovascular Sciences
University of Leicester, Clinical Science Wing, Glenfield Hospital Leicester, United Kingdom
Tel: +44-(0)116.258 3019
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: January 27, 2016; Accepted date: January 28, 2016; Published date: January 30, 2016

Citation: Mariscalco G, Frontera A, Dominici C, Maselli D (2016) High-Volume Hospitals for Patients Affected by Thoracic Aortic Diseases. Do We Really Need them?. Angiol 4:e114. doi:10.4172/2329-9495.1000e114

Copyright: © 2016 Mariscalco G, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Angiology: Open Access

Editorial

The term “thoracic aortic disease” (TAD) includes a wide range of aortic diseases with variable clinical presentations and prognosis. The Global Burden Disease 2010 project demonstrated that the overall global death rate from aortic aneurysms and aortic dissection increased from 2.49 per 100000 to 2.78 per 100000 inhabitants between 1990 and 2010, with higher rates for men [1]. At the same time, admissions for thoracic aortic aneurysms have increased from 4.4 to 9.0 per 100000 in the UK, mainly due to an increase in elderly patients, over 75 years of age [2].

Despite this emerging epidemic, standard of care for TAD has not been established. The 2010 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for the management of TAD [3] include a level I recommendation for the “evidence-based referral” of TAD patients, limiting their care to large volume centres, with experienced physicians, and supporting teams. However, the evidence to support this recommendation is level C, based on the consensus of opinion of the experts and small studies, retrospective studies and registries. Similarly, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2014 guidelines on TAD [4] primarily consist of recommendations based on level C evidence. This contrasts with the evidence base for the management of other cardiovascular conditions [5,6].

Therefore, do we really need high-volume hospitals for dealing with patients affected by TAD? Yes, we do. However, despite this intuitive evidence, a large variety in outcomes and results across cardiac centres and countries is still present. Only few studies have investigated the relationship between hospital volume and mortality in patients affected by TAD, including both aortic aneurysms and dissections [7-12]. Although limited in numbers, these studies underpin the need of dedicated super-centers in order to improve survival of such disease. Chikwe et al. [11] evaluated the impact of low-volume, mediumvolume and high-volume hospitals in patient mortality. Their data fully support the need for super-center in dealing with TAD. Even more impressive were the data published by the Duke University: after the introduction of specific thoracic program for aortic dissection (mainly based on dedicated surgeons for type A dissection case) hospital mortality declined from 34% to 2.8% [12].

Based on these evidence, it appears clear the need of high-volume centers for thoracic disease. The knowledge gap in the standard of care for TAD is waiting to be filled.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

  • International Conference on Angiology
    Oct 16-17, 2017, Budapest, Hungary
  • 21st International Conference on Clinical & Experimental Cardiology
    October 16-18, 2017 Chicago, USA

Article Usage

  • Total views: 8084
  • [From(publication date):
    March-2016 - Sep 19, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7994
  • PDF downloads :90

Review summary

  1. Goldie
    Posted on Aug 02 2016 at 1:40 pm
    The article is a highly informative editorial that enriches the readers with update knowledge on the clinical developments related to thoracic aortic diseases. The article also disseminates knowledge on the various summits, conferences and projects that are aimed to manage the rampant occurrence of aortic diseases.
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords