alexa Impact of Religion/Spirituality on Health: What are the Evidences? | OMICS International
ISSN: 2378-5756
Journal of Psychiatry
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Impact of Religion/Spirituality on Health: What are the Evidences?

Hena Jawaid*

Psychiatry Unit, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan

*Corresponding Author:
Hena Jawaid
Chief Resident, Psychiatry Unit
Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
Tel: 923337927925
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: August 01, 2014; Accepted Date: September 23, 2014; Published Date: September 30, 2014

Citation: Hena Jawaid (2014) Impact of Religion/Spirituality on Health: What are the Evidences?. J Psychiatry 17:164. doi: 10.4172/Psychiatry.1000164

Copyright: © 2014, Hena Jawaid, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Psychiatry

Health of mind and body

Ancient Greek period focused body and mind using two approaches (1) the materialist; stating matter, or brain (2) the personalist; central in the person is the core called the soul, self, or ego states i.e., thought and emotion.

In most cultures of the world, both in ancient and in modern times care for the soul and body were integrated aspect of any culture. Those who were assigned to the care of people in the culture attended to both their physical and spiritual needs; there were no dichotomy between the needs of the body and the needs of the spirit. In many ancient cultures, the shaman was a religious figure as well as healer also in Christianity; Jesus was a healer of body and spirit. In last few decades, this separation has developed that resulted in religiosity that is solely dedicated for spiritual concerns, while physicians and scientists, to the physical one [1,2].

Rene Descartes, a seventeenth-century philosopher who believed in mechanical laws and gave little or no concern to meaning. His ideologies are dealing with rupture of body and spirit, the healing picture which came to surface contained detached body and soul [3].

Due to rapid succession of discoveries in last couple of decades and progression of neuro-anatomy, neurophysiology and micro-biology, the brain and behavior discussions got a new vision; vision of machine, science and objectivity. By the time, old belief of spiritual highness and intellectual well-being were overshadowed by molecular sciences [Freud et al., 1895].

The authors of the Persuasion and healing holds that effort should be made to steer between doubt and the acceptance. Too much “skepticism” dependent upon standardized scientific methods can miss real phenomena, while too enthusiastic “willingness” to accept every subjective finding may lead to false results. Remen, who has developed Commonweal Retreats for people with cancer, described it well: “Helping, fixing, and serving represent three different ways of seeing life. When you help, you see life as weak. When you fix, you see life as broken. When you serve, you see life as whole. Fixing and helping may be the work of the ego, and service the work of the soul.” [4,5].

Every person has his/her own life stories, relationships, meanings and purpose of life, simply treating a medical diagnosis is not more than approaching a patient with materialist approach only [6] or in another word devaluing him/her from existential connection with others.

Significance of religion/spirituality in life

Religion deals with external functions and apparent code of conduct while spirituality concerns with esoteric dimensions of personality like finding serenity with nature or with surrounding and with God, also to explore out meaning and motives of life. The main features of spirituality as defined by Martsolf and Mickley [7] are meaning, connecting, transcendence and value. Similarly, William James [8] has also distinguished an experiential religion from an Institutional religion with intrinsic and extrinsic meaning respectively.

Simpson and Weiner [9], in the Oxford English Dictionary, offers two related themes .First, spirituality refers to life’s most vital issues and concerns (e.g., the term spiritus in Latin means “the breath,” most vital to life). Second, spirituality is seen as subjective features of life including the senses, such as sight and hearing. The Association of American Medical Colleges defines spirituality as a broad one: “Spirituality is recognized as a factor that contributes to health in many persons. The concept of spirituality is found in all cultures and societies. It is expressed in an individual’s search for ultimate meaning”. Anandarajah [10,11] explained that important aspects of spirituality are love and peace that individuals derive from their relationships, nature and God. Spirituality can be described as latent constructs; as it cannot be observed directly but can be inferred from some of their elements [12].

More than an objective definition, the concept of health has emerged ahead of biological functioning, influenced by cultural, social, and philosophical factors, including purpose in life and the quality of healthy personal relationships [13]. Although researches helped out a lot in sorting out spirituality role but it will take many more years to understand different aspects of spirituality to unfold some of medicine’s greatest mysteries

Evidence based association between spirituality and health

When a person gets ill, he/she experiences stress over the changes in life then eventually looks for evident reasons or solutions for cure, and when the medical system fails to do so, then patient begins to look towards spirituality for healing in other way. Those who were not religious previously may turn to religion for comfort and acquired it as a new method of coping.

In 1974, Benson found that 10 to 20 minutes of meditation twice a day leads to decreased metabolism, decreased heart rate, decreased respiratory rate, and slower brain waves, the practice was beneficial for the treatment of chronic pain, insomnia, anxiety, hostility, depression, premenstrual syndrome, and infertility and was a useful adjunct to treatment for patients with cancer or HIV. The personal beliefs influence illness prevention, coping, recovery, and illness experience. Patients showed less psychological distress if they connect with God in hope for healing and relaxation, most of them report strength and comfort from their spiritual beliefs [14,15].

Positive outcomes

A number of studies suggest reduced mortality for population who are frequently attending religious services compared to those who do not attend. The 12-step program Alcoholics Anonymous lists as one of the 12 steps as: “[we] came to believe that a power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity” [16-18]. With further exploration it was found out that meditation is a good therapy for chronic conditions such as headaches, anxiety, depression, premenstrual syndrome, AIDS, and cancer. Benson’s relaxation response elicited by a simple two-step procedure:

(a) Repeating a word or muscular activity

(b) Passively ignore any other obtrusive thoughts and returning to the repetition.

In 2008, Pargament investigated factors such as heart disease, dyslipidemia, hypertension, cancer and mortality have inverse relationship with religious behaviors. Across every health domain, every predominant religion and spirituality has its own measure of involvement, most notably, frequency of church attendance. Growing literature suggested strong coping in adolescent religious patients with medical conditions such as arthritis, diabetes, renal disease, cancer, cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease, HIV/AIDS, cystic fibrosis, sickle cell anemia, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, chronic pain, and terminal illnesses. In 1995, McCullough reviewed effect of religious behavior on neuro-immunologic, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal changes. Other than these findings better immune function, lower death rates from cancer, better cardiac outcomes, lower blood pressure, lower cholesterol and less cigarette smoking, more exercise and better sleep was also marked in his book called “Handbook of religion and health” [19-23].

Local findings

The study by Qidwai et al. [24] was conducted in 2008 represented majority of the respondents (95.8%) believed -prayers can heal. Three fourth (75.3%) of them believe that prayers can curtail the duration of disease, 49% believed that illness does not prolong by prayers. It is equally important to realize that 160 (40%) participants believed that prayers can prolong life. Methods used for healing by study participants, include: reciting verses from Holy Quran, blowing them on water and then drinking it and wearing of taweez (amulet) which is thought to speed up healing process.

Psychological/mental health associations with spirituality

Emmons (1999) observed that through stressful hours, religious adherence can provide stability, support, and direction to find an ultimate purpose and meaning in life. Spirituality orientations can shape efficient methods for coping that linked to better mental health [25,26]. In a study by Baetz et al. [27], religious attitudes were attributed to greater life satisfaction. Increased satisfaction was predicted by Worship-attendance frequency. Increased Alcohol use was inversely proportional to Worship-attendance frequency. Spiritual well-being is positively associated with quality of life, decreased episodes of depression, anxiety and cognitive avoidance [28].

Negative outcomes

Whether religious beliefs and practices are actually effective in helping people to cope? It was a complete “No” by 20th century professionals. Religion regarded as irrelevant to health, even extended to become a cause of neurosis [29,30]. Rosenstiel and Keefe found that spirituality has been found to be related to higher pain levels. Religious struggles have been related with a number of indicators of psychological distress, including anxiety, depression, negative mood, poorer quality of life, panic disorder, and suicidality (Exline et al., Hays, Meador, Branch, & George, Krause, Ingersoll- Dayton, Ellison, &Wulff, Pargament et al., Pargament, Smith, Koenig, & Perez, Pargament, Zinnbauer, et al.,; Trenholm, Trent, & Compton) [31-37].

When patients are hospitalized they often ask the question, “why me?”, as prayers for healing and relief go unanswered, they ask “Is God punishing me for my sins”? Patients usually get “stuck” in these spiritual struggles and without help are unable to resolve them on their own. In turn they avoid spiritual beliefs to rely on that might otherwise give them comfort and hope.

No association

In 1872, Galton published a retrospective study of the effects of prayer on the health of clergy. Galton concluded that there were no benefits also cited an earlier study which concluded that the many prayers offered for the good health of British monarchs afforded them no increased longevity. In other studies, spirituality was shown to be unrelated to pain severity, pain distress, and the disruption of activities by pain [38].

Integrating spiritual training in medical course

Why spirituality was ignored?

Psychologists and other social scientists have generally kept their distance from religion and spirituality. Few professional training programs in psychology address religious and spiritual issues [39,40]. In general, clinicians appear to have little to do with religious leaders and institutions [28]. The polarization of religion and spirituality into institutional and individual domains has jeopardized the understanding of personal affairs [41].

ossible reasons for the neglect are:

(a) It is less central (Bergin, 1991; “Politics of the Professorate,” Shafranske)

(b) Outside the scope of scientific study [42]

(c) Should necessarily move away during an age of rational enlightenment [43,44].

Health professionals often undervalue the role that religion has on patients’ medical decisions. More recently, the Journal of Clinical Oncology published a survey of 100 patients with advanced lung cancer, their caregivers, and 257 medical oncologists attending the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. In this study, investigators asked participants to rank the importance of factors that might influence chemotherapy treatment decisions. Patients and family members have ranked faith in God as second most important factor but Oncologists ranked faith in God as least important [45-48].

Two basic assumptions have contributed to the neglect of research in this area:

(a) Spirituality cannot be studied scientifically

(b) Neither it Should be studied scientifically

Developing attention

At this time, spirituality is an emerging area of interest. Physicians may find that considering the spirituality may add a new dimension to clinical practice. Between the years 2000 and 2002, more than 1,100 additional articles, studies, and reviews involving religion, spirituality, and mental health appeared in psychology literature, compared with 101 articles between 1980 and 1982, suggesting a remarkable increase in attention paid to this area by scientific community. Recent initiatives to cover spirituality in medical education are discussed. Studies and surveys on the importance of incorporating spiritual discussions into medical care are reviewed [49,50].

The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) has co-sponsored with National Institute for Healthcare Research to conduct four conferences on curricular development in spirituality and medicine. These conferences have been held annually since 1997.

A 1996 Gallup Poll showed that religion and expression of spirituality, plays a central role in the lives of many Americans. When asked, 95% of persons surveyed espoused a belief in God, 57% reported praying daily and 42% reported attending a worship service in the prior week. The American College of Physicians concluded that physicians should extend their approach to psychosocial, existential, or spiritual suffering [51,52].

Barriers in spiritual training

Physician related

For physicians, collecting spiritual information may be:

Time consuming

Something for which they are not trained

They may have difficulty managing, may project their views onto patients or question

Difficulty in identifying patients who want such a discussion

Patient related

An agnostic patient should not be told to engage in worship any more than a highly religious patient who should not be criticized for frequent church attendance. Proselytizing is never appropriate. In Lindgren & Coursey’s [53] study, 38% of patients expressed discomfort with mentioning their spiritual or religious concerns to therapist.

Research scarcity and inadequacies

Systematic reviews of the empirical literature indicate that religion and spirituality are understudied. Weaver et al. [54,55] conducted a systematic review of research on religion and spirituality in articles published in several American Psychological Association journals between the years 1991-94. Weaver found 2.7% of the quantitative studies included a religion and spirituality variable. Published work lacks consistency, even among well-conducted studies. Idler and Kasl found effects of religious attendance on functional capacity in the elderly:

1) Measures of “religious involvement”, an index of the “private, reflective” aspects of religion were not associated with any health outcome

2) Neither church attendance nor religious involvement was associated with lower mortality

Sloan et al. [56] characterized the empirical evidence linking religiousness to health is defective. Their criticisms included:

Misuse of statistics

Inappropriate designs

Inadequate sampling

ost hoc findings of studies not primarily about religiousness, and failure to exhibit those religious factors demonstrated a unique main effect (consistent with the unique variance approach)

Recent additions

In 1992, three medical schools offered courses on spirituality and health. In 2001, 75 of the 125 schools offered courses. At The George Washington University School of Medicine, spirituality is linked with the rest of the curriculum throughout the 4 years of medical school. Thus, when learning to take a history, students learn all aspects of life. Recently, 72 US medical schools have developed courses to teach students how to do spiritual assessments with patients, to integrate spiritual concerns into therapeutic plans, and when to refer patients to chaplains.

US medical schools increasingly offer courses in religion and spirituality. Recommendations of the Association of American Medical Colleges for a Curriculum on Spirituality Outcome goals are as follows:

• The ability to elicit a spiritual history

• An understanding that the spiritual dimension of people’s lives is an avenue for compassionate care giving

• The ability to apply the understanding

• Knowledge of research data on the impact of spirituality on health and on health care outcomes

• An understanding of, and respect for, the role of clergy and other spiritual leaders

• An understanding of their own spirituality and how it can be nurtured as part of their professional growth, promotion of their well-being, and the basis of their calling as a physician

Looking ahead; requirements for better research

Why it is needed?

Healing, derived from German word for ‘Whole’, is more than a particular symptom. Culliford [57,58] relates it to structures of meaning, value and purpose that form the human experience.

A Survey by Ehman et al. [59] at the University of Pennsylvania showing 65 % of patients in a pulmonary outpatient clinic noted that therapeutic alliance increases if physician’s inquiry about spiritual beliefs addressed properly.

The American Journal of Psychiatry editorial (Andreasen) wrote it like, ‘We must practice and preach the fact that psychiatrists are physicians to the soul as well as the body.’ [60].

World Health Organization (1998) quotes health as ‘a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being, not merely the absence of disease’. Mechanical treatment of objective findings in patients is no longer satisfactory. To shape more holistic view of health, Faith, hope and compassion should be integrated into healing process. Larson and Matthews [61] are building hope that the “wall of separation” between medicine and religion will be broken, and emphasize that “future is going to be prayer and Prozac”.


According to the evidence based findings, mixed results of negative and positive associations are present, although data has showed positive linkage to great extent but considering past account of deficiencies, better methodology in future researches regarding religious practices and health findings are needed. Cross-sectional survey can be done among spiritually trained students and those who are not, in order to evaluate the differences (it is expected to make) in patient management and counseling. Proper training can diminish physician’s related concerns like time consumption and poor spiritual assessment skills. More researches are needed on this ground for enhanced understanding of relationship and improvement of health system.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12533
  • [From(publication date):
    November-2014 - Jul 16, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8730
  • PDF downloads : 3803

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7