alexa In Silico Identification of Potentially Functional Conserved Motifs in Two Components of the 5’ to 3’ mRNA Decay Pathway of Plants | OMICS International
ISSN: 2329-9029
Journal of Plant Biochemistry & Physiology
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

In Silico Identification of Potentially Functional Conserved Motifs in Two Components of the 5’ to 3’ mRNA Decay Pathway of Plants

Luis David Maldonado-Bonilla*

Institute of Genetics, University of Mar Campus, Puerto Escondido, Mexico

*Corresponding Author:
Luis David Maldonado-Bonilla
Institute of Genetics, University of Mar Campus
Puerto Escondido, Oaxaca 71980
Tel: +529545824990 extn. 311
Fax: +529545824990
E-mail: [email protected] (or) [email protected]

Received date: July 11, 2017; Accepted date: July 21, 2017; Published date: July 25, 2017

Citation: Maldonado-Bonilla LD (2017) In Silico Identification of Potentially Functional Conserved Motifs in Two Components of the 5’ to 3’ mRNA Decay Pathway of Plants. J Plant Biochem Physiol 5: 194. doi: 10.4172/2329-9029.1000194

Copyright: © 2017 Maldonado-Bonilla LD. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Plant Biochemistry & Physiology


Pathways of mRNA degradation influence the remodeling of the transcriptomes. The 5’ to 3’ mRNA decay pathway consist on three subsequently acting mechanisms: deadenylation, decapping and 5’ to 3’ exonucleolytic decay. Specific physical interactions between the components of this pathway are essential to generate functional complexes that properly destroy unnecessary transcripts in eukaryotes. Most of the information about the structure of the components of this pathway comes from studies in yeast and animals, but little is known about the conservation of protein-protein interaction domains and motifs in the homolog decay factors of plants. The decapping subunit DCP1 and the 5’ to 3’ exoribonuclease XRN4 are critical components of this pathway. To get an overview of the structure and conservation of these proteins in plants, the sequences of the corresponding homologs of angiosperms, bryophytes and the gymnosperm Picea abies were retrieved, aligned and subjected to search of conserved sequences. Comparisons revealed conserved domains and structural motifs in plants and metazoans, which implies shared physical interactions that might arise during the early evolution of eukaryotes, for example, the trimerization of DCP1 and the recognition of proline-rich sequences (PRS) by β-sheets of the Dcp1/EVH1-like domain. However, the in silico analysis revealed that plant decay factors contain specific motifs, such as the PRS in DCP1 itself, that could have emerged to confer specialized functions in plants. Furthermore, this analysis revealed that XRN4 homologs of angiosperms acquired a sequence reminiscent to the homolog 5’ to 3’ exoribonuclease of fruit fly that allow the interaction with DCP1.


mRNA decay; Decapping; 5’-Exoribonuclease; Proteinprotein interactions; Motif


Transcript abundance is the result of the balance between the transcriptional activity mediated by transcription factors that recognize cis-regulatory elements in the promoters, and the rate and pathways of mRNA decay. Such balance is necessary to confer appropriate gene expression in different tissues or under specific environmental conditions such as stress or the incidence of another living being. Several mRNA decay pathways have been described, each pathway is mechanistically distinct and specialized in regulating de decay of specific transcripts [1,2]. The 5’ to 3’mRNA degradation is a major decay pathway that starts with the removal of the poly(A)-tail mediated by deadenylases. Poly(A)-binding proteins (PABP) are necessary to promote translation initiation, thus, inhibition of translation caused by deadenylase activity is a pre-requisite step of mRNA degradation [3].

Decapping inhibits translational initiation and expose to mRNA to 5’ to 3’ exonucleolytic decay. In eukaryotic organisms, the decapping reaction is catalyzed by the regulatory subunit DCP2 [4]. DCP2 is a flexible enzyme that transits between open-to-closed conformation, being the closed conformation the active one [5]. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the binding of the regulatory subunit Dcp1p stabilizes the closed conformation of Dcp2p and increases the affinity to the substrates [6]. In spite of performed experiments, direct interaction between DCP1 and DCP2 in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana has not been detectable, another proteins might bridge the physical proximity in vivo [7]. The closed/active conformation of DCP2 is stabilized in vivo and in vitro by enhancers of decapping, which are structurally diverse and can bind to DCP1, DCP2 or both. The proteins Edc1p, Edcp2p, Edc3p Scd6p, Dhh1p, Pat1p and the Lsm1-7 complex are well-known enhancers of decapping in the baker’s yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae that also can function as inhibitors of translation, which strengthen the observation that inhibition of translation and 5’ to 3’ decay are interconnected processes [8].

In spite of the wide distributions of these components, there are lineage-specific enhancers of decapping, for example EDC4/Ge-1/ VCS, a scaffolding protein that promotes DCP1-DCP2 interaction, is conserved in metazoans and Arabidopsis, but lacking in baker’s yeast [9], on the other hand, the enhancer of decapping PNRC2 is specific of humans and interacts with DCP1 [10]. After decapping, the accessible 5’ phosphate makes the mRNAs prone to be degraded in the 5’ to 3’ direction, which is catalyzed by the 5’ to 3’ exoribonucleases (XRN). In mammals, this enzyme is known as XRN1 [11], PACMAN (PCM) or XRN1 in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster [12] and XRN4 in Arabidopsis (AtXRN4) [13].

Components of 5’ to 3’ decay, proteins related to posttranscriptional mechanisms and the translationally repressed mRNA substrates are aggregated into microscopically detectable cytoplasmic particles referred to as RNA Processing bodies (P bodies, PB) [14,15]. The protein composition of PB is highly conserved among organisms, and their assembly depends on multiple interactions between the decay factors, accessory proteins and the mRNAs loaded within. The mRNAs interacting with the 5’ to 3’ mRNA decay or bounded into PB cannot be translated, but eventually can be re-incorporated in ribosomes to undergo translation, or a molecular switch might promote the degradation. A set of protein-protein interactions between decapping subunits and 5’ to 3’ Exoribonucleases might be critical to mediate the proper degradation of transcripts that are no longer required. Several experimental evidences illustrate how these interactions occur in yeast and metazoans [8,14]. The Arabidopsis mutants dcp1 and dcp2 are seedling lethal, which evidences the indispensable role of decapping to plant development [16]. However, little is known about the molecular process that links the decapping to the 5’ to 3’ exonucleolytic degradation in plants, which might require physical interaction between decapping components and homologs of XRN4. The availability of fully sequenced genomes allows us to identify components of the 5’ to 3’ mRNA decay in angiosperms and bryophytes, Here, an in silico analysis of homologs of DCP1 and XRN4 suggests a number of domains and motifs potentially involved in protein-protein interactions are conserved in plants and metazoans, but also unique features characteristic of plants that might have a specific biological role.

Materials and Methods

Protein sequence retrieval

In order to avoid bias, one representative specie form twentyseven different families of angiosperm were selected, as well as the early diverging angiosperm Amborella trichopoda three bryophytes from different families (Pyscomitrella patens, Marchantia polymorpha and Selaginella moellendorffii) and the gymnosperm Picea abies. Experimentally confirmed components of 5’ to 3’ mRNA decay of human, fruit fly, baker’s yeast and Arabidopsis thaliana were used as query to obtain the corresponding homologs of the plants enlisted above by performing BLASTP at Uniprot [17], Phytozome v12 [18] and GreenPhylDB v4 [19] and NCBI. The closest related to the query was picked to further analysis. The list of entry numbers of the proteins is included in the Supplementary information.

Identification and analysis of conserved domains and motifs

Identification of domains protein sequences were confirmed by using the online tool InterProScan, available at the Interpro. Conserved motifs were detected after MUSCLE sequence alignment performed in MEGA6 [20] and confirmed by searches performed in MEME (Multiple Em for motif elicitation) [21]. Alignments and consensus sequences were created in BioEdit 7.2.5 and Weblogo [22], respectively.

Generation of 3D models

Ab initio modeling of the putative trimerization domains of Arabidopsis thaliana and Marchantia polymorpha were performed in QUARK [23]. Both predicted models and the human TD (2WX3) were visualized, refined and merged in PyMOL v1.7.4.

Results and Discussion

Structure of plant DCP1 proteins reveals potential interaction partners

DCP1 interacts with DCP2 trough the Dcp1 domain (IPR010334), also known as Eva/Vasp homology 1-like (EVH1-like) domain at the N terminus [24], it is necessary to maintain decapping activity, which is a member of the Pleckstrin Homology (PH) domain-like superfamily (IPR011993). The Dcp1/EVH1-like domain of DCP1 is composed by two α-helices flanking seven β-sheets. The first helix is required to interact with DCP2, and the NR-loop, located between the third and fourth β-sheets, increases decapping activity in vitro, but does not contribute in the physical interaction between DCP1 and DCP2 [25]. The peculiar array of the β-sheets of the PH variants allows the recognition of distinct Proline-rich sequences (PRS) [26]. It is worth to mention that PRS are lacking in DCP2, therefore, Dcp1 domain recognizes PRS found in enhancers of decapping such as Edc1p in fission yeast [6] and PNRC2 in humans [10]. In fruit fly, DCP1 interacts with a PRS of the C-terminus of XRN1/PCM, this sequence is known as DCP1-binding motif (DBM) [27]. In order to elucidate the structure of DCP1 in plants, DCP1 homologs of representative plant families, mostly angiosperms, were retrieved from UNIPROT, Phytozome, GreenPhylDB and Genebank. Dicot plants present one single gene of DCP1, but monocots have two, three or four copies of genes with similar architecture that might be products duplication events. In the case of monocots, the gene that presented more similarity with the Arabidopsis DCP1 was selected.

The PH domain-like was in silico identified in the N-terminus of the homologs of DCP1 analyzed here, as well as other potentially functional sequences (Figure 1). The region encompassing the β-sheets of Dcp1 domain is highly conserved among plants and animals (Figure 2), including the amino acids required to the binding of PRS, suggesting that β-sheets might confer a functional structure that has been preserved during evolution as a way to recruit specific PRS-containing proteins to enhance the decapping reaction, or to connect decapping with the exonucleolytic decay. So far, PRS sequences that recognize plant DCP1 proteins are not reported, but the high conservation of the residues of β-sheets suggests PRS-binding activity.


Figure 1: Structure of DCP1 from different taxa show a conservation of the Dcp1 domain, a putative Trimerization domain and a proline-rich sequence (PRS) motif in plants. MI is conserved in humans and fruit fly and absent in plants.


Figure 2: Alignment of the Dcp1/EVH1-like domain fragment that encompass β-sheets of selected DCP1 proteins. Hydrophobic and hydrophilic residues of dmdcp1 involved in binding of DBM of PCM/XRN1 are marked as green circles and green squares, respectively. Residues of hsdcp1 involved in binding of the PRS of PNRC2 are marked with purple circles. Residues below blue line encompass the NR-loop. Positions of each β-sheet are represented by the arrow.

Surprisingly, a highly conserved and PRS is located at the C-terminus of DCP1 proteins from angiosperms, the basal angiosperm Amborella trichopoda, and the bryophytes Pyscomitrella patens and Marchantia polymorpha (Figure 3). The β-sheets of (PH) domain-like superfamily proteins form a cleft that recognizes PRS of four residues [26]. The PRS identified in plant homologs of DCP1 is longer compared to the PRS harbored in decay factors of yeast and animals, but it might be relevant to demonstrate whether a portion of this novel PRS is able to interact in cis or trans with the β-sheets of DCP1. The conservation of this sequence in angiosperms and bryophytes suggests that DCP1 of plants might have specific partners. In Arabidopsis, movement of PB through actin cytoskeleton depends on the interaction of AtDCP1 with plant-specific class XI myosins [28]. Furthermore, the association between PB and actin has been reported in tobacco [29]. In contract to plants, the movement of PB in animals is dependent on the cap-binding protein eIF4E that interacts with the Myosin Va [30]. 0DCP1 of plants could acquire features that diversify physical interactions and the underlying molecular functions, for example, the movement through actin cytoskeleton. AtDCP1 also interacts with SPIRRING (SPI), which is required to the assembly of the PB [31]. The residues of AtDCP1 required to interact with class XI myosins and SPI are unknown, but interestingly, SPI harbors a PH domain that might recognize the conserved PRS found in AtDCP1, but other domains of SPI such as WD40 might be also considered as necessary to set this interaction.


Figure 3: Alignment of PRS in plants and the consensus sequence. As the sequence of Picea abies is quite dissimilar, it was not included to generate the consensus. Numbers correspond to the position of the residue in each protein.

The Motif I (MI) or short helical leucine-rich motif (HLM) is adjacent to the PH domain-like of DCP1 of metazoans, it is absent in yeast, and was not identified in the vascular plants and bryophytes presented in this research. MI is required to recruit EDC3 and DDX6 to increase decapping activity [32]. The conservation of this lineagespecific motif might be favored by the selection pressure of the conserved interactors Edc3 and DDX6/Me31B, which are apparently absent in plants.

A conserved TD-like sequence suggests trimerization of plant DCP1 proteins

At one point, a single molecule of DCP1 undergoes a limited number of protein-protein interactions due to physical and spatial constraints. Interactors of DCP1 might be exchanged according to the requirements of the cell or the sort of mRNAs that have to be regulated. In metazoans, DCP1 forms trimers in vivo [32]. Trimerization increases the surface of recruitment of enhancers of decapping and increases the size of PB. AtDCP1 immunoprecipitates with itself when is transiently expressed in Nicotiana benthamiana [7], but the number of AtDCP1 molecules that can simultaneously interact is unknown.

Trimerization of DCP1 is mediated by the Trimerzation Domain (IPR031953, TD) located at the C-terminal of the protein. TD is an L-shaped domain composed by two hydrophobic α-helices separated by a kink of an aspartate residue [32]. MUSCLE alignments revealed that TD is conserved in the majority of the plant proteins analyzed. The exceptions are the DCP1 of Spriodela polyrhiza and Picea abies that present a very divergent C-terminus sequence, and the shorter polypeptide DCP1 of Selaginella moellendorffii (Figure 1). The structure-based alignment of TD from metazoans and the putative TD-like sequences detected in plants reveals conserved critical residues of the hydrophobic α-helices as well as charged residues to form hydrogen bonds (Figure 4A). The residue D558 of human DCP1 (HsDCP1) and D345 of the fruit fly DCP1 (DmDCP1) form a kink that separates the two α-helices of their respective TD. Such residues or residues with similar charge are detected in the same position of the TD-like sequences of plants. Mutations in hydrophobic residues in the α-helices of the human HsDCP1 decreases decapping activity in vivo. The wider surface of the trimer DCP1 conferred by the hydrophobic residues might facilitate the assembly of enhancers of decapping that ensure the closed/active state of DCP2.

The ab initio modeling program QUARK was used to predict the tri-dimensional structure of the TD-like sequence of the DCP1 of the angiosperm Arabidopsis and the bryophyte Marchantia polymorpha. The predicted model is composed by two helices separated by an aspartate, similar to the experimentally elucidated TD structure of HsDCP1 and DmDCP1, especially the first α-helix (Figure 4B). However, the two residues that separate the aspartate of the kink and the conserved phenylalanine of the second α-helix (D558 and F561 of HsDCP1) are not conserved in plants, where only one residue is intercalated. The stretch of residues from D558 to F561 influence the orientation of the second α-helix of the TD of humans, which forms a right angle formed between the two α-helices. The slight difference in the corresponding stretch of the TD-like sequence of plant DCP1 analyzed here might compromise the formation of the right angle. The predicted models exhibit the aspartarte that interferes the progression of the first α-helix, and an acute angle between the two α-helices. The points out to potential trimerization of DCP1 as a conserved attribute of the 5’ to 3’ mRNA decay pathway of animals and plants.


Figure 4: Structure-based alignment of the putative TD reveals that most of the plant DCP1 might form timers. Positions of the residues inside the proteins are indicated by the numbers. A) Amino acids below blue circles form the hydrophobic core to promote trimerization in human DCP1. Amino acids below red squares mediate hydrogen bonds both in human DCP1. Asterisk denotes the aspartate of the kink. B) Ab initio modeling of TD form Arabidopsis and Marchantia polymorpha reveals a similar structure of the human TD although the second helices are distinctly oriented. The arrow pointes out the first helix and the asterisk indicates the aspartate of the kink.

Plant homologs of atxrn4 share unique motifs

As decapping and 5’ to 3’ exonucleolytic mRNA decay are coupled processes, physical proximity between DCP1, DCP2, enhancers of decapping and the 5’ to 3’ exoribonucleases might be necessary to avoid accumulation of unlikely translatable decapped mRNAs and secure an effective mRNA degradation. Therefore, 5’ to 3’ exoribonucleases have motifs that allow the assembly with decay factors and RNA-binding proteins that might carry substrates.

In Arabidopsis, there are three 5’ to 3’ exoribonucleases denoted as AtXRN2, AtXRN3 and AtXRN4 [13]. XRN2 and XRN3 are nuclear enzymes, and participate in degradation of miRNA loops and maturation of rRNA [33,34]. Only XRN4 participates in the degradation of mRNAs, whether decapped mRNAs or 3’-end cleavage products of ARGONAUTE [35]. XRN4 localizes to PB, suggesting a biochemical link with decapping. Sequences of homologs of XRN4 of the plants selected for this research where retrieved form databases in order to identify similarities and differences respect to the yeast and metazoan enzymes, and to propose potential motifs involved in protein-protein interactions that enable their role in 5’ to 3’ mRNA decay.

5’ to 3’ exoribonucleases are characterized by the catalytic domain (IPR0027073) that comprises most of the protein sequence. Besides catalytic domain, the sequences of the tested proteins are quite divergent, nevertheless, additional motifs where identified, including the experimentally confirmed motifs of the fruit fly and human enzymes (Figure 5A). A neighbor joining tree illustrates dissimilarity between proteins of metazoans, yeast, angiosperms and the basal angiosperm Amborella trichopoda (Figure 5B). The XRN4 of the gymnosperm Picea abies and bryophytes are more similar to the paralog XRN3, in this case sequences closely related to XRN4 were not identified. XRN4 homologs from dicots and monocots are clustered into two well-differentiated clades.


Figure 5: (A) Structure of 5’-3’ exoribonucleases from Drosophila melanogaster, Homo sapiens and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the paralog XRN3 was included into this analysis. Domains and functional motifs of metazoan enzymes are indicated. Domain architecture of XRN3 and XRN4 include a ZnK, the DBM-like is found in XRN4. (B) Unrooted neighbor-joining tree of 5’ to 3’ exoribonucleases shows XRN4 of angiosperms are divided into two clades; one clade of dicot and other of monoct XRN4. Proteins of Physcomitrella patens and Marchantia polymorpha are more related to the paralog XRN3 (AtXRN3). Reference sequences of metazoans and yeast form an independent group. In spite of the divergence at the C terminus, XRN4 from angiosperms contain a sequence similar to DBM of PCM/XRN1.

The first half of the catalytic domain (IPR004859) harbors residues involved in the recognition of 5’ monophosphate and the cleavage of one single nucleotide from the substrate [12]. XRN4 of plants and the paralog AtXRN3 present a highly conserved zinc knuckle (Znk) CxxCxxxGHxxxxC (IPR025829) adjacent to first half of the catalytic domain (Figure 6A). This architecture in also found in putative 5’ to 3’ exoribonucleases from filamentous fungi such as Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans, Aspergillus oryzae and Metarhizium acridum (UniProtKB entry identifiers: P0CL88, Q2UCP5 and E9EHF1, respectively). Besides the residues that coordinate a zinc atom, hydrophobic residues predominate in this Znk. In fruit fly, CLIPPER (CLP), a subunit of the cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor (CPSF), binds to G or C-rich RNA clusters. The RNA-binding activity of CLP is conferred by the C terminus that encompass two Znk [36]. The proteins Air1/2 are involved in degradation of cryptic unstable transcripts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Air1/2 have five Znk with potential RNA-binding or protein-binding activity [37]. So far, the molecular function of the Znk in the 5’ to 3’ exoribonucleases of plants are unknown, but its high conservation in and its position inside the catalytic domain suggests a plant-specific role during catalysis or in the selection of the substrates prior enzymatic activity.


Figure 6: Motifs and their consensus in XRN4 homologs. Numbers indicate the position of the residues in the protein. (A) A zinc knuckle (Znk) is highly conserved. Hydrophobic residues prevail into this motif. (B) A DBM-like sequences is specific of angiosperms, black circles indicate the residues of PCM/XRN1 that recognize the β-sheets of Dcp1/EVH1-like domain [27], which are conserved in angiosperms. A motif of PNRC2 was included in the alignment because of its binding activity [10]. The sequence LPKP that directly contacts Dcp1/EVH1-like is marked inside the blue square.

The structure of PCM/XRN1 includes additional domains: PAZ/ tudor, KOW, Winged helix, and SH3-like, as well as a glutamine-andproline rich tract (QP), all of them do not affect the catalysis, but might be required to stabilize the whole protein structure [12]. These domains are not conserved in XRN4 of plants. The assembly between components of decapping and 5’ to 3’ exoribonucleases might be critical to the progression of mRNA decay. 5’ to 3’ exoribonuclease must be placed in the nearby of decapping reactions in order to have accessible substrates. In baker’s yeast, XRN1p interacts with the inhibitor of translation Pat1p and the Lsm1-7 complex, involved in tethering mRNAs to 5’ to 3’ decay and stimulation of decapping [8]. Although there is a biochemical link between XRN1p, Pat1p and the Lsm1-7 complex, motifs involved in the interaction are unknown. In humans, XRN1 stays close to the decapping complex due to the interaction with the scaffold protein EDC4, which also interacts with DCP1 and DCP2. The interaction between the human XRN1 and EDC4 depends on the EDC4-binding motif (EBM) (Figure 4A) located at the C terminus, that recognizes the α-helical domain of EDC4 [25]. EBM is specific of human XRN1 and it is not conserved in fruit fly, baker’s yeast and plants.

In fruit fly, PCM/XRN1 interacts with DmDCP1 though the DCP1-binding motif (DBM), a PRS located at the C terminus [27]. Proline and a tryptophan residues of DBM are essential to bind the cleft formed by the β-sheets of the Dcp1/EVH1-like. Residues of the second half of DBM form a α-helix. The PRS of the human PNRC2 has a similar sequence and structure. The sequence LPKP in the middle of the PRS of PNRC2 makes multiple hydrophobic interactions and Van der Waals contacts with Dcp1/EVH1-like, and a tryptophan residue is also important [10].

In spite of the divergence between the sequences of PCM/XRN1 and plant XRN4, a search of conserved sequences at the C terminus of plant XRN4 by MEME [21] found a consensus motif (DBM-like)reminiscent to the DBM and the PRS of PNRC2 (Figure 6B). The conservation of the prolines and the tryptophan is remarkable. DBM-like is characteristic of the angiosperms included in this research, except Carica papaya and Vitis vinifera, re-annotations and the release of further version of their genomes will be necessary to confirm or reject this finding. Due to DBM-like is not detected in AtXRN3 –involved in distinct pathways- and XRN4 homologs of bryophytes and Picea abies, this novel motif seems to be a specific feature of the XRN4 of angiosperms and an evidence of orthology. Furthermore, DBM-like was identified in the early divergent flowering plant Amborella trichopoda, suggesting the motif arose before diversification of angiosperms. As DBM-like is not detected in XRN3 and other nuclear 5’ to 3’ exoribonucleases (data not shown), its potential functionality might contribute to the specialization to this enzymes in the cytoplasmic 5’ to 3’ mRNA decay that requires a biochemical link with decapping. In vivo interaction between the Arabidopsis DCP1 and XRN4 was previously reported [38], but the residues involved in the interaction were not identified. Therefore, a potential association DCP1-XRN4 in angiosperms might occur through the β-sheets of the Dcp1 domain and the DBM-like, which is similar to the interaction between DmDCP1-PCM/XRN1 and HsDCP1-PNRC2.


The β-sheets of the Dcp1/EHV1 domain of DCP1 are highly conserved in plants and quite similar to the corresponding sequences of metazoans. Consequently, PRS have to be the ligands of this domain. DCP1 proteins of angiosperms and the bryophytes Physcomitrella patens and Marchantia polymorpha present an extended PRS that might recognize Dcp1/EVH1 domain or similar folds, it might contribute to unique functions. A TD-like sequence in angiosperms, possibly composed by two hydrophobic helices might mediate trimerization of DCP1 in angiosperms, Physcomitrella patens and Marchantia polymorpha, possibly to increase decapping activity in these plants. A Znk is a common feature of plant 5’ to 3’ exoribonucleases that might influence enzymatic activity. A DBM-like motif is characteristic of XRN4 of angiosperms, and, as in the case of the fruit fly, it might confer interaction with DCP1, which might guarantee the synchrony and increase the efficiency of the 5’ to 3’ mRNA decay pathway.

Conflict of Interest

The author claims no conflict of interest. This research has not been submitted to any other journal.


The author thanks to National Council of Science of Mexico (CONACYT) and the Program ‘Cátedras CONACYT’ for supporting this research.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Article Usage

  • Total views: 296
  • [From(publication date):
    September-2017 - Dec 15, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 213
  • PDF downloads : 83

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version