alexa In silico Prediction of the Blood-Brain Barrier Permeation: Are We There Yet? | OMICS International
ISSN: 2161-0444
Medicinal Chemistry

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

In silico Prediction of the Blood-Brain Barrier Permeation: Are We There Yet?

Max K Leong1-3*

1Department of Chemistry, National Dong Hwa University, Shoufeng, Hualien 97401, Taiwan

2Department of Life Science and Institute of Biotechnology, National Dong Hwa University, Shoufeng, Hualien 97401, Taiwan

3Department of Medical Research and Teaching, Mennonite Christian Hospital, Hualien, Hualien, 97059, Taiwan

*Corresponding Author:
Max K. Leong
Department of Medical Research and Teaching
Mennonite Christian Hospital, Hualien, Hualien-97059, Taiwan
Tel: +886 3 863 3609
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: January 20, 2015; Accepted date: March 24, 2015; Published date: March 26 2015

Citation: Leong MK (2015) In silico Prediction of the Blood-Brain Barrier Permeation: Are We There Yet? Med chem 5:130-130. doi:10.4172/2161-0444.1000254

Copyright: © 2015 Leong MK. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Medicinal Chemistry

The drug discovery and development has turned to a new chapter ever since the implementation of the Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) in the United States of America and Human Brain Project (HBP) in the European Union. Both initiatives have signified the imminence of finding the treatment for the central nervous system (CNS) disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), brain cancer, and stroke, which, in turn, are substantially affected by aging. Nevertheless, the average lifespan of people increases gradually, resulting in the fact that more and more people are now living with AD, and, more practically, the health care for the CNS diseases will become substantially financial burdens around the globe.

Blood–brain barrier (BBB) is a brain capillary endothelial wall in the circulatory system that prevents many substances from entering the CNS. Actually, the inability to cross the BBB is one of the major hurdles to efficaciously deliver therapeutics to the brain as manifested by the fact only an extremely small portion of small-molecule therapeutic agents and nearly none of macromolecule biopharmaceuticals can cross the BBB. The BBB permeation, which can take places through various routes, including passive diffusion, carrier mediated influx transport, active efflux transport, is one of critical parameters should be taken into account in the process of drug discovery and development to reduce CNS-related adverse side-effects for systemically targeted drug candidates or to design CNS-targeted molecules that can cross the BBB.

In addition to a variety of in vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro assay systems, in silico approaches have played an increasingly important role to assess the BBB permeation. Indeed, numerous quantitative and qualitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models have been reported. Nevertheless, it is not uncommon to find that some quantitative models were developed based on assay data using different animal species, such as rats and mice or some models included different data types, such as brain-to-plasma partition coefficient of the bound compound (Kp) and that of the free compound (Kp,uu). Those factors constitute various levels of heterogeneity in the sample data, hampering the integrity of developed models consequently.

Furthermore, there is no guarantee that a good predictive model can be derived even based on the highly homogeneous sample data. For instance, most of linear quantitative models exhibited a linear relationship between hydrophobicity (log P) and log Kp value that is not completely correct since a more hydrophobic molecule can more easily cross the BBB, whereas it can stay trapped in the membrane once it is too hydrophobic as illustrated by the fact that the marketed CNS drugs have an optimal range of hydrophobicity. As such, substantial deviations can be expected when a predictive model, which is derived based on more lipophilic samples, is applied to those more hydrophobic compounds or vice versa. In addition to hydrophobicity, more descriptors, which correlate with the BBB permeation nonlinearly, can be expected. Accordingly, those linear models cannot be completely applicable to all molecules.

Conversely, machine learning schemes seemingly provide better alternatives to develop in silico models to predict the BBB permeation since mathematically they can handle such nonlinear relationship. Machine learning schemes, nevertheless, are not the total solution to all questions mainly because of complex nature of the BBB permeation, leading to the fact that different BBB permeation routes may require different selections of descriptors or even the same descriptor may correlate with different permeation routes in different ways. For instance, the descriptors required to describe the efflux transport by p-glycoprotein are different from those used to depict the influx transport by organic cation transporter 1. Such discrepancies in the permeation routes can be possibly resolved once the studied compounds can be accurately classified provided that such a priori knowledge is available. Challenges still remain unanswered if molecules can cross the BBB via more than one route, leading to inappropriate classifications consequently or when the predictive models were to be applied to novel molecules, which actually do not exist or whose permeation routes are completely unknown.

To this end, all published models cannot comprehensively take into consideration all the factors associated with the complex process of BBB permeation. It is impractical to expect a true model can be built. As George Box stated that “all models are wrong–but some models are useful.” More advanced and sophisticated algorithms or schemes are much needed to develop genuinely useful models to predict the BBB permeation. Until then, there is still a long and winding route ahead of us.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12054
  • [From(publication date):
    March-2015 - Jun 20, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8266
  • PDF downloads : 3788

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7