alexa Influence of Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis (CRMO) On Densitometry Measurements Obtained by Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry | OMICS International
Journal of Molecular Biomarkers & Diagnosis

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Influence of Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis (CRMO) On Densitometry Measurements Obtained by Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry

Paul F White*

Department of Anesthesiology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, The White Mountain Institute, The Sea Ranch, CA, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Paul F White
Department of Anesthesiology
Cedars Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles
PO Box 548, Gualala, CA 95445, CA, USA
Tel: +2147703775
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: April 24, 2017; Accepted Date: April 30, 2017; Published Date: May 03, 2017

Citation: White PF (2017) It Is Time to Consider Non-Pharmacologic Alternatives to Opioid Analgesics for Treating Chronic Pain. J Mol Biomark Diagn 8:341. doi: 10.4172/2155-9929.1000341

Copyright: © 2017 White PF. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Molecular Biomarkers & Diagnosis


The incidence of detecting focal chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) lesions on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and the effect of these lesions on DXA bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC), and their associated Z-scores were retrospectively reviewed. Materials and Methods. The study included 22 patients (14 females, 8 males; median age of 13 years) with CRMO and in whom a total body less head (TBLH) and lumbar spine DXA scan had been obtained. Whole-body bone scintigraphy and MRI were used as the reference standards. Sites involved with CRMO were subsequently detected and DXA measurements were re-measured after removing the sclerotic lesions from the analysis. Results. In total, sclerotic CRMO lesions were detected in 15 of the 22 patients (68%) by DXA, although the number of lesions detected (on a per-lesion analysis) was much less (i.e. 29 of 129 lesions; 19.4%) when compared to MRI and/or bone scintigraphy. Larger lesions had a greater impact on the derived BMD/BMC measurements, and changed the diagnosis in one patient from having normal to abnormal DXA results based on the final Z-score. Discussion. CRMO lesions detected on DXA examinations should be regarded as a potential source of error. Careful inspection and re-quantification of the BMD, BMC and associated Z-score after applying an appropriate correction should be considered in patients with large CRMO lesions identified on DXA examinations.

What is this Article About?

In a recent article by Goesling et al. these investigators reported that prescription opioid analgesic use often continued after surgery. It is alleged that more than 20 million people in the USA are addicted to prescription opioid medication. The Center for Disease Control (2016) emphasized the importance of finding alternatives to opioid medication for treating chronic pain. In a pilot study involving a highintensity cold laser device (Phoenix thera-lase [Dallas, TX]), we were able to successfully treat three patients who had become addicted to prescription opioid-analgesic medication after a major operation.

This Editorial describes why it is important to consider using socalled ‘alternative’ therapies like high-intensity cold lasers rather than simply relying on opioid (narcotic) analgesics to treat patients with chronic pain. In the new clinical practice guidelines for the management of back pain published in the Annuals of Internal Medicine (Qaseem et al. 2017), the authors endorsed the use of noninvasive treatments like cold laser therapy for treatment of acute, subacute and chronic low back pain.

Recently, the Center for Disease Control conducted a review of the benefits and harms, as well as the costs, of using opioid analgesics for the treatment of chronic pain [1]. In light of the growing opioid epidemic in his country, these authors emphasized the importance of increasing the use of non-opioid analgesic techniques for chronic pain management. Of interest, Goesling et al. [2] recently reported that for many patients taking opioid analgesics before joint replacement surgery, as well as some opioid-naïve patients undergoing arthroplasty procedures, opioid use persisted after surgery despite the absence of joint pain due to opioid dependency. Although opioid-related side effects are well-known, including nausea, vomiting, constipation, ileus, bladder dysfunction, pruritis, sedation, visual hallucinations, and ventilatory depression, there are growing concerns regarding long-term physical dependence and addiction liability with continued opioid use after surgical procedures.

It has also been reported that prolonged use of opioids is also associated with an increased risk of more serious complications, including opioid use disorder, overdose, and death [3]. Interestingly, no study of prolonged opioid use has ever demonstrated a long-term (≥1 year) benefits for the users. An epidemiological study by Erikssen et al. [4] involving chronic pain patients treated with opioids for 5 yrs provided compelling evidence that opioids were not a panacea for chronic pain. In fact, the patients’ quality of life failed to improve despite escalating doses of opioids over the 5 yr study period. These authors concluded that “it is remarkable that opioid treatment of longterm/ chronic non-cancer pain does not seem to fulfill any of the key outcome treatment goals, namely, pain relief, improved quality of life and improved functional capacity.” Interestingly, some countries do not permit opioid analgesics to be used in the management of chronic, noncancer related pain, and do not prescribe opioid containing analgesic medication when patients are discharged home after surgery.

In 2014, in excess of 10 million people in the United States were reportedly using prescription opioids for non-medical reasons, and approximately 2 million people met diagnostic criteria for a substance use disorder involving prescription opioids, the highest number of individuals considered to have an opioid addiction since the late 19th century [3]. Currently, 4 out of 5 individuals initiating heroin use report starting with a prescription opioid. According to Stat News, overdose deaths due to opioids rose 11% in 2015, to 52,404 (https:// By comparison, the number of people who died in car crashes was 37,757, and gun deaths (including both homicides and suicides), totaled 36,252. Sadly, the public is now paying a huge price for ignoring the warnings regarding opioid use and abuse and we are now facing the worst addiction crisis America has ever observed (Calabresi M. The price of relief: Why America can’t kick its painkiller problem. TIME magazine, 2016). In a more recent article in TIME magazine, the author offered a new paradigm for treating opioid addiction: namely to give more drugs (Park A. A new paradigm for opioid addiction: more drugs TIME magazine, October 2016). The ‘new’ drug treatment which was being recommended for treating opioid dependency is suboxone (a combination of buprenorphine [a weak partial opioid agonist] and naloxone [an opioid antagonist]). Perhaps it is time to seriously consider the use of ‘alternative’ non-pharmacologic therapies rather than simply giving more drugs!

As someone who has long-advocated for the use of non-opioid analgesics as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen for treating pain to reduce the side effects associated with opioid analgesics [5], the consequences of the widespread reliance on opioid-containing medication for managing acute and chronic pain are not surprising [6]. Non-pharmacologic techniques have been previously described in the literature for the treatment of acute and chronic pain (e.g. acupuncture, electrostimulation) [7]. However, these ‘alternative’ therapies have failed to achieve widespread acceptance in the medical community because of issues related to both weak marketing efforts and low reimbursement by the third party payors to the healthcare providers administering these treatment modalities. Cold laser therapy is another widely studied non-pharmacologic modality for treating a variety of acute and chronic pain syndromes [8]. Although both low level and more powerful high intensity cold laser therapies have been reported to produce beneficial effects in clinical trials (and systematic reviews), this therapy has similarly failed to achieve widespread clinical acceptance. We recently evaluated a high intensity cold laser (Phoenix thera-lase System, LLC [Dallas, Texas USA]) for treating patients who received opioid-containing oral analgesics after discharge from the hospital following a major orthopedic surgical procedure [9]. In a pilot study involving three otherwise healthy patients who were continuing to use prescription oral opioid-containing medications for treating residual pain >12 mo after their operation, we utilized high-intensity laser therapy (HILT). After receiving a series of 9-12 cold laser treatments with the 42 Watt Phoenix thera-lase (with a wavelength of 1275 nM) to the painful post-surgical area over a 3-4 week period of time, these patients were able to eliminate their use of opioid analgesic medications without experiencing acute withdrawal side effects, while also resuming their normal activities of daily living. On follow-up at 1-2 months after their last laser treatment, all three patients remained ‘opioid-free’. These anecdotal findings are subject to potential patient bias and the wellknown ‘placebo-effect’ of a novel pain treatment modality. Therefore, it will be important to conduct larger-scale prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled studies to verify these preliminary findings.

Perhaps it is time to consider the use of ‘alternative’ nonpharmacologic therapies like cold laser therapy rather than potentially compounding the management of chronic pain by giving even more drugs. In the new clinical practice guidelines for the management of back pain published in the Annuals of Internal Medicine [10], the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians endorsed the use of noninvasive treatments like cold laser therapy for treatment of acute, subacute and chronic low back pain. If a simple, safe and effective non-invasive non-pharmacologic therapy can reduce dependence on oral opioid-containing medications in the postdischarge period after surgery, it could also prove to be a highly effective approach to treating patients with chronic pain not responding to nonopioid analgesic medications. More importantly, novel approaches like cold laser therapy may represent a cost-effective alternative to chronic use of opioid analgesics in the future. Finding a reliable non-opioid analgesic alternative for managing subacute and chronic pain would be extremely valuable in dealing with the current global opioid epidemic.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 625
  • [From(publication date):
    July-2017 - Jul 23, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 572
  • PDF downloads : 53

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7