alexa Laparoscopic Treatment of an Interstitial Pregnancy | OMICS International
ISSN: 2161-0932
Gynecology & Obstetrics

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Laparoscopic Treatment of an Interstitial Pregnancy

Hamon NG1*, Peng NG2 and Sharon Li3

1Senior House Officer, Gold Coast University Hospital, 1 Hospital Boulevard, Parkwood, QLD 4214, Australia

2Obstetrician and Gynaecologist, Sunnybank Private Hospital Medical Centre, Suite 5, 245, McCullough St, Sunnybank, QLD 4109, Australia

3Obstetrician and Gynaecologist, Sunnybank Private Medical Centre, Suite 3, 245, McCullough St, Sunnybank, QLD 4109, Australia

Corresponding Author:
Hamon NG
Senior House Officer, Gold Coast University Hospital
1 Hospital Boulevard, Parkwood, QLD 4214, Australia
Tel: 0430110256
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: May 05, 2014; Accepted Date: August 22, 2014; Published Date: August 27, 2014

Citation: Hamon NG, Peng NG, Sharon Li (2014) Laparoscopic Treatment of an Interstitial Pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet (Sunnyvale) 4: 238. doi: 10.4172/2161-0932.1000238

Copyright: © 2014 Hamon NG, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Gynecology & Obstetrics


In a 35 year old patient who was 8 weeks pregnant with a diagnosis of a stable, interstitial ectopic pregnancy, a decision was made to proceed with laparoscopic surgical management. A successful wedge resection of the ectopic pregnancy was completed with minimal blood loss using a Ligasure blunt tip laparoscopic sealer/divider forceps and O V-Loc suture. Other treatment modalities were discussed.


Interstitial (cornual) pregnancy accounts for 2-4% of all tubal pregnancies [1] and is regarded as a medical emergency due to the risk of severe maternal haemorrhage if it ruptures [2]. Previous goldstandard of treatment involved a Laparotomy due to the increased vascularity of the area. However, laparoscopic surgery can now be considered an alternative option [2]. Other treatment options are explored in the discussion. The following case report demonstrates a successful laparoscopic technique of treating an interstitial ectopic pregnancy.

Case Report

A 35 year old G1P0 woman who was 8 weeks pregnant, had an endovaginal ultrasound scan, which showed a 2 cm gestation sac in her left adnexa. It was thought to be a tubal ectopic pregnancy. The patient herself was asymptomatic with no pain or bleeding.

A laparoscopy performed on the same day showed a very vascular interstitial pregnancy, which made up about 1/4 of the whole uterus. The cornual mass was excised with a Ligasure blunt tip laparoscopic sealer/divider forceps. The Ligasure forceps was used to coagulate and separate the lateral aspect of the cornual mass from the fallopian tube, suspensory ligament of the ovary and the adjacent broad ligament. The forceps then grasped and separated the inferior edge of the mass, cutting in from the lateral aspect of the uterus into the uterine cavity. The forceps hugged the mass and excised it from the uterine body, removing about 1/3 of the uterine fundus, finishing on the superior medial edge of the mass. The resulting defect was closed in two continuous layers with an ‘O V-Loc 180’ suture (Barbed, selfanchoring dissolvable suture). There was minimal blood loss of <50 mL. The operation on the actual ectopic pregnancy itself took about 20 minutes. Post-operation, only oral analgesics were required. The patient was discharged on the next day.

Her serum beta HCG level was 48,200 IU/L the day before surgery, 23,500 IU/L 12 hours after the operation, and 344 IU/L 9 days after surgery. This is a drop of more than 51% within a day after the operation. A threshold value of more than 50% drop makes a persistent ectopic pregnancy much less likely [3].


Interstitial pregnancy is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy. Bouyer et al. [3] reported an incidence of 2.4% in 1,800 cases of ectopic pregnancies. Traditionally, the most common treatment of an interstitial pregnancy is through cornual wedge resection by Laparotomy. With the advancement of technology and surgical skills, various alternative treatment modalities have been reported. They are often made possible because of the advancement of ultrasound scanning with the consequent early discovery of unruptured interstitial pregnancy.

Methotrexate in single or multiple doses, administered systemically or directly into the interstitial pregnancy, can be a useful option. The advantage is that surgery may be averted. The uterine integrity may be preserved. Direct injection of methotrexate into the lesion was shown to have a three time shorter average time to resolution of serum bHCG compared with systemic treatment [4]. However, it is not appropriate for ruptured ectopic pregnancy. Direct methotrexate injections can be hard to organise during accidental discoveries of interstitial pregnancies in laparoscopic cases thought to be normal tubal ectopic pregnancies. An overall failure rate of up to 35% has been reported [5-8]. There may be an increased risk of recurrent ectopic pregnancy especially on the ipsilateral side. Failure rate for large interstitial pregnancies is likely to be higher. Methotrexate, being an antimetabolite and anti-folate chemotherapeutic agent, has the potential to cause collateral tissue or organ damage and may not be acceptable or appropriate to some patients. Other concerns are multiple doses may be required, treatment prolonged and there is a risk of uterine rupture with catastrophic haemorrhage (Figure 1).


Figure 1: Ectopic pregnancy.

Direct injection of potassium chloride may be a preferable option for the treatment of heterotopic interstitial pregnancies [9]. Patients particularly at risk of heterotopic pregnancies are IVF patients whereby 2 or more embryos are transferred.

Hysteroscopic or combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic treatment of interstitial pregnancies have also been described [10-14]. The laparoscopy offers some safety against cornual rupture during hysteroscopic resection or suction curettage. This is not a commonly used treatment as there is paucity of data about its safety.

Laparoscopic surgical treatment can be either by cornuostomy or wedge resection. The latter offers more certainty in the complete elimination of trophoblastic tissue, and less risk of subsequent ectopic pregnancy on the same side. However, it is more challenging in the reconstruction of the uterus. Cornuostomy preserve more anatomical integrity but is more likely to have persistent retained trophoblastic tissue.

Methotrexate can be given post-operatively if there is inadequate reduction in HCG levels where retained trophoblastic tissue is suspected. It has been recommended that post-operative methotrexate should be reserved for the few patients in whom the HCG concentration does not decrease by 15% within 48 hours [15].

The main concern about laparoscopic surgery for interstitial pregnancy is the risk of rupture in future pregnancy. As it is a novel method of treatment, there is insufficient data to demonstrate its safety for future pregnancy. Cases of cornual ruptures have been reported [16]. Good surgical technique and keeping diathermy use to a minimum to reduce adjacent tissue damage will likely reduce this risk. A retrospective review of 52 cases of laparoscopic surgical treatment of interstitial pregnancy has provided some promising results [17]. The 52 cases were followed up for at least 18 months. Eighteen women managed to become pregnant and 10 had pregnancies beyond 24 weeks gestation. There was no report of any uterine rupture or dehiscence. For women who wish to have another pregnancy, sonohysterography has been recommended to look for myometrial thinning [18]. Careful monitoring of all subsequent pregnancies is essential and caesarean delivery is highly recommended.

The second main concern of the laparoscopic surgical treatment of interstitial pregnancy is the risk of major haemorrhage. In this case study, the wedge resection was performed using the ligasure laparoscopic sealer/divider forceps. This forceps offers average seal cycles of 2-4 seconds with effective haemostasis and minimal adjacent tissue damage of <5 mm. It significantly reduces blood loss and operation time [19-21].

The third main concern of the laparoscopic method of treating interstitial pregnancies involves the length of time of operation. Currently, most laparoscopic repairs of interstitial pregnancy were by interrupted figure of 8 stitches, involving multiple knot tying. This is time consuming and laparoscopic knot tying is a relatively difficult technique to master. In this case study, by using the O V-Loc suture, the barbed suture ensures tension is maintained in between each stitch, much like an open procedure. A continuous stitch therefore can be performed, maintaining tension throughout the whole wound closure. Knot tying is not required at all as the stitch is self-holding. This ensures more secure tissue approximation, haemostasis and reduces operation time considerably [22].

In conclusion, with the appropriate patients, setting and in the presence of experienced laparoscopic surgeons, laparoscopic management for interstitial pregnancies may be considered a preferable option.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

  • 7th International Conference and Exhibition on Surgery June 21-23, 2018 Dublin, Ireland Theme: Advancements and Endeavours in the Field of Surgery
    June 21-23, 2018 Dublin, Ireland Dublin, Ireland
  • Annual Congress on Research and Innovations in Medicine July 02-03, 2018 Bangkok, Thailand Theme: Current Research and Innovations in Medicine to Improve Human Health
    July 02-03, 2018 Bangkok, Thailand
  • International Conference on Medical and Health Science August 24-25, 2018 Tokyo, JAPAN Theme: Scrutinize the Modish of Medical and Health Science
    August 24-25, 2018 Tokyo, Japan
  • World Summit on Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery Sep 10-11, 2018 Singapore Theme: Expanding new horizons in Trauma and Surgery
    Sep 10-11, 2018 Singapore City, Singapore
  • 6th American Gynecological Surgery Conference September 28-29, 2018 San Antonio | Texas | USA
    September 28-29, 2018 San Antonio, USA
  • World Congress on Fetal and Maternal Medicine October 15-17, 2018 Osaka, Japan Theme: A New Beginning on Fetal, Maternal & Neonatal Medicine
    October 15-17, 2018 Osaka, Japan
  • International Conference on Reproduction and Fertility October 18-19, 2018 Abu Dhabi, UAE
    October 18-19, 2018 Abu Dhabi, UAE

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11974
  • [From(publication date):
    August-2014 - Jun 18, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8199
  • PDF downloads : 3775

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7