alexa Letter to the Editor: Critic of the Sample and the Models | OMICS International
ISSN: 2167-1044
Journal of Depression and Anxiety
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Letter to the Editor: Critic of the Sample and the Models

Jannika Beckmann1, Rebekka Kuhlmann1, Sandy Marca2* and Céline Rappaz2

1Department of Psychology, Westfälische-Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Deutschland

2Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Switzerland

*Corresponding Author:
Sandy Marca
Department of Psychology
University of Fribourg, Switzerland
Tel: +41787751629
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: February 22, 2017; Accepted Date: February 27, 2017; Published Date: March 03, 2017

Citation: Beckmann J, Kuhlmann R, Marca S, Rappaz C (2017) Letter to the Editor: Critic of the Sample and the Models. J Depress Anxiety 6:273. doi: 10.4172/2167- 1044.1000273

Copyright: © 2017 Beckmann J, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

Majid P. Omran recently, published a research article in 2016 about his investigations of structural associations between cognitive beliefs and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. He proposed different models based on measures from the Thought-Action Fusion Scale, the Obsessive Compulsive Inventory - Revised and the obsessive beliefs questionnaire accomplished by a sample of students.

Introduction

Majid P. Omran recently, published a research article in 2016 about his investigations of structural associations between cognitive beliefs and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. He proposed different models based on measures from the Thought-Action Fusion Scale, the Obsessive Compulsive Inventory - Revised and the obsessive beliefs questionnaire accomplished by a sample of students.

After reading this article, one can notice three main issues regarding (1) the sample, (2) the cognitive model of OCD on which the study is based and (3) the lack of coherence concerning the description of the proposed models of structural associations.

Keywords

Obsessive-compulsive symptoms; Coherence

Sample Issue

Regarding the limitations of the study, the author correctly mentions that the sample is only composed of regular students, but he does not take into account the possible impact of the male-female ratio on the results. Indeed, the conclusions of the study [1] in a clinical population “indicate a slight female predominance in their sample of OCD patients”. Additionally, they also showed a very “higher frequency of cleaning/washing compulsions in women” in p. 439. Since the sample included double as many women than men, this female predominance could lead to an over estimation of the structural associations between cognitive beliefs and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. As an alternative, the author could analyse the data of men and women separately in order to circumvent the problem mentioned before and additionally to avoid the Simpson’s paradox. This paradox is a “well known statistical phenomenon which the relationship between two variables differs within subgroups compared to that observed for the aggregated data” [2-4].

Cognitive Model of OCD Issue

The theoretical model used by Omran as the basis of his experiment has been an object of controversy. Indeed, Dolan et al. demonstrated that “the traditional view of OCD, which sees the intrusive thoughts as the primary cause of the disorder, has limited validity [2,3]. There are far more people with intrusive thoughts about potential harm than there are patients with OCD” as reported. The authors also suggested that the harm-avoidance behaviours are the actual primary cause for OCD rather than the intrusive thoughts proposed by Omran [3].

Proposed Model of Structural Associations Issue

The figures that the author presents for the proposed model of structural associations do not support its description. This tends to make it difficult for the reader to comprehend the theoretical basis of this study and the relevance of the findings that it provides.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

  • International Child & Adult Behavioural Health Conference
    September 13-14, 2018 Dubai, UAE
  • 12th World Congress on Advances and Innovations in Dementia
    September 17-18, 2018 Singapore City, Singapore
  • 30th International Conference on Mental and Behavioral Health
    November 12-13, 2018 Melbourne, Australia
  • 5th International Conference on Depression , Anxiety and Stress Management
    November 05-06, 2018 Bangkok, Thailand

Article Usage

  • Total views: 494
  • [From(publication date):
    April-2017 - Apr 23, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 442
  • PDF downloads : 52
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version