alexa Liquid-Liquid Equilibria of Water + Lacticacid + Butylacetate | OMICS International
ISSN: 2157-7048
Journal of Chemical Engineering & Process Technology

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Liquid-Liquid Equilibria of Water + Lacticacid + Butylacetate

Afolabi, Tinuade Jolaade and Alao Adeyinka Idowu*
Department of Chemical Engineering, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria
Corresponding Author : Alao Adeyinka Idowu
Department of Chemical Engineering
Ladoke Akintola University of Technology
Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria
Tel: 2348036339757
E-mail: [email protected]
Received April 23, 2014; Accepted May 24, 2014; Published May 26, 2014
Citation: AFOLABI, Tinuade J, ALAO, Adeyinka I (2014) Liquid-Liquid Equilibria of Water + Lactic acid + Butyl acetate. J Chem Eng Process Technol 5:194. doi:10.4172/2157-7048.1000194
Copyright: © 2014 Afolabi, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Related article at
DownloadPubmed DownloadScholar Google

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Chemical Engineering & Process Technology


Experimental liquid-liquid equilibria of the ternary system of (water + lactic acid + butyl acetate) were studied at T=(298.15, 303.15 and 308.15) K under atmospheric conditions. Complete phase diagrams were obtained by determining solubility and tie-line data. The ternary system exhibits type-1 behavior of LLE. The reliability of the experimental tie-line data was ascertained by using both Hand and Othmer-Tobias correlations. The UNIFAC group contribution method was used to predict the observed ternary liquid-liquid equilibrium data. Distribution coefficients and separation factors were evaluated to evaluate the extracting capability of the solvent. Separation factors were more than unity and the UNIFAC prediction was satisfactory.

Lactic acid; Liquid-liquid equilibria; Butyl acetate; Separation factor; UNIFAC
Fermentation is one of the viable processes in the production of some chemicals in manufacturing industries. Two of the major obstacles of fermentation are purity of the product and efficiency of the medium. Industrially, lactic acid is produced through the fermentation of sugar, starch, molasses or cheese whey in the presence of micro-organisms such as Lactobaccilus delbrueckii [1-8]. The pure lactic acid is used and applied; in the food industry (as food additives and preservatives), in pharmaceutical industry (as calcium source in calcium lactate), as solvent for lacquers and moisturizers in hand skin lotion or for the production of biodegradable polymers [1,2]. The main obstacle or problem of its industrial production, just like other fermentation processes, is the accumulation of the acid. During the fermentation process, the lactic acid accumulation leads to the simultaneous decrease in the pH of the medium and this causes the process inhibition. Therefore there is need to either remove the acid in situ or add a neutralizer that will optimize the fermentation process, in order to increase the productivity of the acid and the performance of the bioreactor [3-8]. This has therefore caused an increase in interest towards the acid recovery from fermentation broth. Different processes have been applied for this purpose which includes precipitation with calcium hydroxide, use of ion exchange resins and electrodialysis [9-14]. Some of the methods are either complicated, yield low product, have low purity, cause disposal and environmental problems, or costly, which at the end makes about 50% of the total cost spent on separation and purification [15,16]. In lieu of all these separation processes, distillation and extraction processes can also be used to separate waterbased products, the former being non-applicable in the case of lactic acid because the acid can be deformed at high temperature [2,17]. Research has been carried out on the probable use of some groups of extractants (such as alcohols, acetates, ketones, etc.) for the latter process; long chain alcohols were found suitable for this purpose and their liquid–liquid equilibrium data were also determined [18,19]. Also, the equilibrium condition between the organic and aqueous phases was found to be a very important aspect of the liquid-liquid extraction process and variables most generally considered for the process are: physical properties (density difference between liquid phases and boiling point), chemical properties (distribution coefficient, selectivity and flammability), availability and cost [17,20,21].
This study is a part of research program on the recovery of lactic acid from fermentation broth using organic solvents. Several studies have been carried out to obtain LLE data on the extraction of lactic acid from its dilute aqueous solution [19,22,23]. Ternary liquid-liquid equilibria are usually determined by either the titration method, continuous measurement or cell equilibration method [21,24]. In the cell equilibration method, the solubility data is first established using the cloud point method and the tie lines are determined with the aid of a gas chromatograph (GC) [25,26] or a refractometer, which has been initially calibrated [20]. Based on hydrogen bonding interactions, butyl acetate is considered as a probable solvent for the removal of lactic acid from fermentation broth [18]. The LLE results for (water + lactic acid + butyl acetate) at three different temperatures (T = 298.15K, 303.15K and 308.15K) are reported here. The reliability of the experimental data was ascertained by using both the Othmer-Tobias and Hand correlating equations [27].
The liquid-liquid equilibrium data were predicted by the UNIFAC (universal functional group activity coefficient) method [24-29]. The UNIFAC method uses the activity coefficient, γi for the prediction. At equilibrium, the activities of the component ion in both phases are equal and the mole fractions xi E and xi R of the conjugate phases are calculated using the following equation:
Where γEi and γRi are the corresponding activity coefficients of component i in extract and raffinate phases. The interaction parameters between each of the main groups were used to calculate activity coefficients of component i. The values of the UNIFAC parameters for LLE predictions were taken from a UNIFAC table [29].
Experimental Section
Materials and Equipment’s
Analytical grade butyl acetate and lactic acid (purities >90%) were purchased and used without further purification. Deionized and redistilled water was used throughout the experiment. Setra digital balance (410S model) was used to measure the masses of the materials. The stated accuracy of the balance is 10-3 g. Brix values were measured with Digital Refractometer (203X model) by MISCO Limited London. The surface was cleaned with water before and after every measurement. The refractometer has the variation of ± 0.1 brix value. Rotary evaporator (52A model) was used to stir the mixture at a constant temperature. Variation of the rotary evaporator is ± 0.1 °C. Boiling points were measured with Fischer boiling point apparatus.
Experimental procedure
The binodal curves for the (water + lactic acid + butyl acetate) system at T=(298.15, 303.15 and 308.15) K were determined by the cloud point method [14,24,25]. The major central part of the solubility curve was obtained by titrating the heterogeneous mixture of (water + butyl acetate) with lactic acid until the turbidity disappeared. For the water and butyl acetate-side limited regions, binary mixtures of (water + lactic acid) were titrated with butyl acetate and binary mixture of (butyl acetate + lactic acid) titrated with water until the transition from homogeneity to turbidity was observed. The corresponding brix values were recorded. Mutual solubility values of (water + butyl acetate) binaries were also measured using the method based on cloud point detection. The transition point between homogeneity and heterogeneity zones was also determined visually. The titration was performed by adding in minute drops the material and the visual inspection of the transition was achieved by waiting approximately 5 minutes at the transition point and observed the heterogeneity. The graphs of variation of brix value with corresponding mass fractions of water (W1) and butyl acetate (W3) were plotted at (T=298.15, 303.15 and 308.15) K for calibration.
End point determinations of tie-lines were based upon the independent analysis of the conjugate phases which were regarded as being in equilibrium. Mixtures of known masses of water, lactic acid and butyl acetate lying within the heterogeneous gap were introduced into rounded bottom flask attached to a rotary evaporator and were stirred vigorously for about 2 hours. The mixture was then transferred into a vertical settler to settle down into water and butyl acetate layers. The brix values of the resulting two phases were measured using the refractometer [20]. The composition of each phase was determined from the calibration graph.
Results and Discussion
Experimental LLE data
The experimental solubility data of the phase equilibria of (water + lactic acid + butyl acetate) at T=(298.15, 303.15 and 308.15) K (Tables 1-3), while the corresponding binodal curves (Figures 1-3). The ternary system exhibits type-1 behavior of LLE [21]. This type is characterized by the total miscibility between two pairs and partial miscibility in the third pair as shown in the figures. The heterogeneous area (that is area under the curve) increased with temperature in the order of 298.15K<303.15K<308.15K. This due to the fact that solubility increases with temperature which has in turn increased the heterogeneous area [2].
Calibration curves were determined for the ternary system at T=(298.15, 303.15 and 308.15) K. The resulting curves are reported in Figures 4-6 respectively. The tie-lines data of the ternary system at T = (298.15, 303.15 and 308.15) K are eventually evaluated from the resulting curves (Tables 4-6). The tie-lines for the system at the three temperatures are shown in Figures 1-3, respectively. The slope of the tie-lines obtained in this work shows that lactic acid is more soluble in water than in butyl acetate.
Distribution coefficient and separation factor
To indicate the ability of the solvent in the recovery of lactic acid, distribution coefficients for water () and lactic acid ( ) and separation factors (S) were calculated from experimental data. w13 and w23 are the mass fractions of water and lactic acid in organic-rich phase, respectively. w11 and w21 are the mass fractions of water and lactic acid in aqueous phase, respectively. The separation factor is defined as the ratio of distribution coefficients of lactic acid (1) to water (2), .
The variation of distribution coefficient and separation factor for lactic acid as a function of the solute mass fraction in the aqueous phase for the ternary system at different temperatures are shown in Figures 7 and 8.
The experimental results indicate that butyl acetate has a high separation factor, which shows the ability of this solvent to extract lactic acid from water. This quantity is greater than one (separation factors varying between 3.0438 and 5.9683) for the system reported in this work, which means the extraction of lactic acid by butyl acetate is possible. The separation factors and distribution coefficients are not constant over the whole two-phase region.
In order to compare the effectiveness of extraction of lactic acid by butyl acetate to those of long-chain alcohols, the separation values measured at 298.15 K in this work are compared with those of octanol, nonanol and decanol. The separation values for the three long-chain alcohols (varying between 4.43 and 9.19) were higher than that of butyl acetate, which shows that long-chain alcohols were better extractants compared to butyl acetate [20], though the efficiency of the acetates could be better off using those of long chains [2].
Reliability of the tie-line data
The reliability of experimentally measured tie-line data can be ascertained by applying Othmer-Tobias and Hand correlations [27] at each temperature as shown in equations 4 and 5 respectively.
Where w11 is mass fraction of water in water-rich phase; w21 is the mass fraction of lactic acid in water-rich phase; w23 is the mass fraction of lactic acid in solvent-rich phase; and w33 is the mass fraction of butyl acetate in solvent-rich phase.
Othmer-Tobias plots were constructed of ; and Hand plots were construcred of . The correlations are shown in Figures 9 and 10 at the three different temperatures.
The linear plots of the correlations were used to determine the coefficients ai and bi shown in Table 8 Standard deviations were calculated to evaluate the deviations of the experimental values from the linear plots, according to equation 6. These are reported in Table 8.
Where N is the number of the tie lines and i=j=1and 3. δ1 and δ2 (i = 1 or 2) are the standard deviations of the mass fractions of water in the raffinate phase and butyl acetate in the extract phase respectively. The standard deviations calculated were low. These give credence to the experimental data obtained.
Prediction of the experimental tie-line data
The UNIFAC method was also used to predict the equilibrium data of the ternary mixtures; the method using the group parameters and group-group interaction parameters of CH, CH2, CH3, OH, COOH and H2O functional groups obtained by Poling et al. [29], given in Tables 9 and 10, respectively.
A FORTRAN programme was written to predict the LLE data according to UNIFAC equations 6, 7 and 8. The Predicted values (Wij pre; i=component, j=phase) are compared with the experimental values at the respective temperatures (Tables 11-13).
The quality of the prediction was evaluated with the residual function (F) calculated from the difference between the experimental value and predicted value for each ternary system according to equation 9; where n is the number of tie-lines, wiexp is the experimental mass fraction and wical is the predicted mass fraction of component i. j refers to phases and k=1,2,3,4…..n(tie lines).
The residual function (F) calculated for (water + lactic acid + butyl acetate) system at T = 298.15K, 303.15K and 308.15K were 0.0271, 0.0387and 0.0332, respectively.
The binodal and tie-line data for (water +lactic acid + butyl acetate) ternary system were determined at temperatures of 298.15K, 303.15K and 308.15K. The tie-line data of the system were satisfactorily ascertained by the Othmer-Tobias and Hand correlating equations. Butyl acetate was able to recover lactic acid from aqueous lactic acid solution. The UNIFAC method used predicted the experimental data satisfactorily.

Tables and Figures at a glance

image   image   image   image   image
Table 1   Table 2   Table 3   Table 4   Table 5


image   image   image   image
Table 6   Table 7   Table 8   Table 9


image   image   image   image
Table 10   Table 11   Table 12   Table 13


Figures at a glance

image   image   image   image   image
Figure 1   Figure 2   Figure 3   Figure 4   Figure 5


image   image   image   image   image
Figure 6   Figure 7   Figure 8   Figure 9   Figure 10
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

  •  International Conferenceand Expo on Oil and Gas
    August 09-10, 2018 Madrid, Spain
  • International Conference on Chemical Engineering
    September 17-18, 2018 Vancouver, Canada

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12017
  • [From(publication date):
    July-2014 - Jul 17, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8189
  • PDF downloads : 3828

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version