alexa Machine Learning Methods for Automated Detection of Severe Diabetic Neuropathy | OMICS International
ISSN: 2475-3211
Journal of Diabetic Complications & Medicine

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Machine Learning Methods for Automated Detection of Severe Diabetic Neuropathy

Herbert F Jelinek1,2*, David J Cornforth2 and Andrei V Kelarev1

1Centre for Research in Complex Systems and School of Community Health, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW, Australia

2Applied Informatics Research Group, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia

*Corresponding Author:
Herbert F Jelinek
Centre for Research in Complex Systems and School of Community Health
Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW, Australia
Tel: +61-2-6051-9219
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: April 18, 2016; Accepted date: May 17, 2016; Published date: May 24, 2016

Citation: Jelinek HF, Cornforth DJ, Kelarev AV (2016) Machine Learning Methods for Automated Detection of Severe Diabetic Neuropathy. J Diabetic Complications Med 1:108. doi: 10.4172/2475-3211.1000108

Copyright: © 2016 Jelinek HF, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Diabetic Complications & Medicine


Objective: The present study aimed at investigating machine learning methods for automated detection of severe diabetic neuropathy. Severe diabetic neuropathy represents a significant neurological problem in diabetes as it requires urgent intervention to reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death. Automated detection provides a tool that can be applied to clinical data and for identifying comorbidities that can trigger diagnosis and treatment.

Methods: We applied multi scale Allen factor to determine heart rate variability, a marker for diabetic neuropathy from ECG recordings as features to be used for the machine learning methods and automated detection. The major innovation of this work is the introduction of a new Graph-Based Machine Learning System (GBMLS). This method is intended to enhance the effectiveness of the diagnosis of severe diabetic neuropathy. We applied it to the multi scale Allen factor (MAF) features as a collection of attributes determined from the recorded ECG bio signals. These attributes can be collected as a result of routine ECG investigation of patients regardless of the presenting medical problems.

Results: Our experiments compared the sensitivity and specificity of the automated detection produced by GBMLS with analogous outcomes achieved by various other machine learning approaches. To this end we used a comprehensive collection of important classifiers and clusterers available in the open source machine learning software package Scikit-learn. The experiments have demonstrated that the best outcomes were obtained by GBMLS in combination with MAF, which improved sensitivity to 0.89 and specificity to 0.98 and outperformed several other classifiers and clusterers including Random Forest with sensitivity of 0.83 and specificity of 0.92.

Conclusion: The novel GBMLS machine learning technique applied to MAF attributes has outperformed other machine learning methods and achieved excellent sensitivity and specificity. These results are significant and sufficiently effective to be recommended for practical application of this technique.


Automated detection; Classifiers; Heart rate variability; Graph representation; Machine learning; Multi scale allen factor; Severe diabetic neuropathy


Diabetic neuropathy associated complications, which affects all major organs of the body, are common in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes [1,2]. Cardiac diabetic neuropathy is characterised by damage to nerves regulating the heart rate and any changes in the capacity of these nerves to modulate heart rate leads to changes to heart rate variability (HRV). Its prevalence lies between 20% and 60% in patients with diabetes, with a mortality that is approximately five times higher [3,4].

Testing for cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) in people with diabetes was traditionally based on five Ewing cardiac reflex tests that constitute the gold standard. Recent research has been investigating the efficacy of alternative diagnostic tests, using ECG attributes [5-8] to address shortcomings of the Ewing battery as a number of the Ewing tests included in the Ewing battery are often counter-indicated for patients with cardiorespiratory comorbidity, frail or severely obese patients [9]. Therefore resting supine recordings of ECG that provide heart rate information may be better suited for this clinical population and may be more sensitive and accurate. A number of previous studies have shown the effectiveness of HRV attributes for classifying cardiac pathology [10-12] for more details and further references). Heart rate variability is also decreased in diabetes mellitus type 1 and diabetes type 2. The majority of research has concentrated on investigating the time and frequency domain attributes with some more recent work reporting findings for nonlinear HRV attributes [13-19].

The current research investigated the application of HRV attributes and advanced data mining systems in improving identification of severe diabetic neuropathy. Previously, high levels of accuracy in the diagnosis of mild and moderate stages of CAN have been achieved by classifiers proposed by Kelarev et al. [20-26]. However, these experiments included the original Ewing test results in their classifiers. In contrast, the present paper proposes a system for automated diagnosis of severe diabetic neuropathy on the basis of multi scale Allan factor attributes that can be easier collected compared to the routine collection of Ewing test results.

This is the first article concentrating on automated detection of severe diabetic neuropathy as defined the battery classification by Ewing et al. [27,28]. Severe diabetic neuropathy is characterised by both sympathetic and parasympathetic dysfunction that contributes to the reported increased risk of arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. This makes detection of severe diabetic neuropathy a priority and requires accurate bio signal analysis and classification algorithms to improve identification of at risk patients and treatment effectiveness [3]. The present article applies a novel clustering approach based on graphs (GBMLS) classifier for the identification of severe diabetic neuropathy using multi scale Allan factor (MAF). For complete definition of MAF, we refer to Section 2.5.1 by Teich et al. [29]. Our experiments carefully compare the results of GBMLS system with traditional data mining algorithms. We hypothesise that GBMLS system improves the effectiveness of identifying severe diabetic neuropathy when combined with MAF obtained from the heart rate bio signal.

Background information on previous graph-based methods and further details on the diagnosis of severe diabetic neuropathy, preliminaries on Graph-Based Machine Learning System (GBMLS) methodology, CAN pathophysiology, the diabetes health screening database (DiScRi/DiabHealth) and HRV analysis are given in the next sections.

Brief review of literature and preliminaries

The Ewing battery is the traditional clinical assessment tool for CAN and CAN severity [27,28]. From the five Ewing test results, three measure parasympathetic activity (lying to standing heart rate change, Valsalva manoeuvre, changes in heart rate with rhythmic breathing) and two sympathetic activity (lying to standing blood pressure change, and diastolic blood pressure change with hand grip). For severe diabetic neuropathy two of the parasympathetic tests and any one of the sympathetic tests need to be abnormal [28].

Diabetic neuropathy can be investigated by assessing cardiac rhythm function and cardiac rhythm pathology. Cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) is a pathology that clusters within the umbrella of diabetic neuropathy and assessing cardiac rhythm is the most suitable clinical tool for identification of diabetic neuropathy. This is the first article concentrating on the identification of severe diabetic neuropathy. Our experiments investigated two classes: severe diabetic neuropathy and absence of severe diabetic neuropathy. The class of severe diabetic neuropathy has not been investigated previously as a paradigm in machine learning classification. The absence of severe diabetic neuropathy or complement is a union of three classes considered previously in the literature: no CAN, early CAN, definite CAN, see [27,28] for more explanations and details. When we focus on just one class of severe diabetic neuropathy and combine all other classes into their union, it is possible to achieve higher effectiveness in solving the task of identifying only severe diabetic neuropathy and ignoring differences between other classes, which clinically are less dangerous to the patients [29].

Cardiac autonomic neuropathy relates to abnormal cardiac rhythm that increases risk of sudden cardiac death, especially in diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2 [30,31]. Although a number of invasive and non-invasive assessments can be made that identify diabetes such as blood glucose levels, retinal photography and plantar foot pressure, these tests do not identify cardiac autonomic neuropathy specifically [32-35].

Previous work on data mining and HRV analysis concentrated mainly on standard time and frequency-domain methods and applied automated machine learning assessment of the original Ewing categorization of CAN using HRV attributes [35-37]. However, data mining methods applied to HRV data similar to MAF have been reported by Cornforth et al. [38,39], who examined the effectiveness of 80 time and frequency-domain attributes for the detection of the early stages of CAN, concentrating on the applications of genetic algorithms when searching for a subset of HRV attributes that are optimal for the detection of early CAN.

The motivation to use HRV data is that it is richer than the results of the five Ewing tests and more often and easier to obtain in clinical practice than the Ewing battery tests.

Methodology Applied to Collect Data

In order to investigate the role of HRV attributes and the capability of multi-level clusterers in improving diagnostic accuracy, a large database of test results and health-related parameters collected through the Charles Sturt Diabetes Complications Screening Group (DiScRi/ DiabHealth), containing Ewing battery results and HRV data was selected [40].

Participants were recruited as part of the Charles Sturt University Diab Health screening [41]. Clinical and demographic data as well as the Ewing battery results and ECG records were obtained during 2011-2014. The university human research ethics committee provided consent for the study and all participants gave informed consent following an information session prior to recording any subjects. All participants had to be free of cardiovascular, respiratory and renal disease as well as depression, schizophrenia and Parkinson’s disease, which are known to alter HRV results.

Recordings were obtained with participants in a supine position following a 20-minute rest period. The same conditions were used for each participant, including a temperature stable environment, and all participants were comparable for age, gender, and resting heart rate. The 20-minute ECGs were recorded with a lead II configuration using a Mac lab Pro with Chart 7 software (AD Instruments, Sydney). The sampling rate was set to 400 samples/sec and recordings were pre-processed according to the methods described by Wessel et al. [42]. The status of CAN was defined using the Ewing battery criteria [28]. For each recording, a 15-minute segment was selected from the middle in order to remove start up artefacts and movement at the end of the recording. From this shorter recording, the RR intervals were extracted. HRV analysis involves determining the inter beat intervals between successive pulses of the heart. In terms of ECG curve, these intervals are equal to the intervals between successive QRS complexes on an ECG or the intervals between the fiducial points of the successive R waves (RR intervals), cf. [43] and [4] for more explanations. The RR interval series for each participant was pre-processed using adaptive pre-processing and the measures used were determined from these data [42] for more details on adaptive filtering and pre-processing. The pre-processed data was then utilized to infer MAF values, as explained by Teich et al. [29].

Graph-based machine learning system

Clustering is an automated process that attempts to assign data to a number of groups referred to as clusters. The groups are not defined beforehand, but are obtained as an output of the clustering process. Here we investigate clustering algorithms for the diagnosis of severe diabetic neuropathy, and hence are only concerned with clustering of k=2 groups or clusters. Every clustering algorithm considered in this paper, takes the number k of clusters to be produced as an input parameter, and creates a partition with precisely k groups or clusters.

To obtain a stable and reliable partition, we introduce a new clustering algorithm – Graph-Based Machine Learning System (GBMLS). GBMLS uses a novel model involving a new graph representation. Here we are using standard notation and terms of the graph theory as, for instance, in the monograph [44] and the article [45].

Let p be the number of all patients from the Diab Health database with ECG data used in our experiments. In order to divide these patients into groups, we used several independent partitions and then combined their outcomes by applying our new GBMLS procedure. Our experiments compared the effectiveness of the GBMLS algorithm with several other methods presented in the next sections. In the remainder of this section, we discuss the GBMLS algorithm for the case of two clusters considered in the current experiments.

To begin the operation of GBMLS algorithm, we generated a collection of 80 independent random initial partitions

image (1)

They were generated using the K Means [46] and Mean Shift [47] clustering algorithms, implemented in the open source machine learning package Scikit-learn et al. [48,49]. To make sure that the collection (1) consists of independent random partitions generated using initial points covering the space optimally, we ran each of these two clustering algorithms for 40 random values of their input parameters to obtain 40 different random partitions for each clusterer. Then we combined all of these partitions into the common collection K of 80 partitions.

More specifically, the output of the Mean Shift algorithm depends on the value of the input parameter ‘seeds’, which is used to initialise the iteration process. We ran Mean Shift with 40 random values of the ‘seeds’ to ensure that it creates 40 different and independent output partitions. Likewise, the output of K Means algorithm depends on the selection of initial centroids. It is determined by the input parameters ‘init’ and ‘random_state’. We set the value of ‘init’ equal to the string ‘random’. This option makes K Means start with a set of initial centroids chosen randomly in the data set. The random selection process of initial centroids in KMeans depends on the value of the ‘random_state’ parameter, which is used every time as a seed to the random number generator incorporated in the algorithm. We ran K Means 40 times with 40 different random values of the ‘random_state’ parameter to make sure that it generated independent random partitions.

This means that for each value of = 1, 2, …, 80, each particular partition is made up of two groups or clusters:

image (2)

which partition the set of patients so that the whole set is a disjoint union of these clusters

image (3)

GBMLS procedure takes the collection of 80 partitions as input and produces a new common partition

image (4)

which also divides the whole set of patients

image (5)

and at the same time achieves the best agreement with all the given partitions .

GBMLS procedure uses a graph image with the set V of vertices and the set E of edges. The collection of vertices of the graph is a union of three subsets image. The number of vertices in the first subset Y is equal to the number p of patients, so that image For = 1, 2,…, p, the vertex corresponds to the patient . The number of vertices in the second subset is equal to 2 x 80 = 160, the number of groups or clusters in all partitions , , …, . This means that image, with vertices representing the respective groups or clusters. The collection of edges of the graph is in turn a union of three subsets: image The set D contains all edges of the form image, for all positive integers image satisfying inequalities image. The weight of this edge is set equal to the number of clusters where the patients belong together. The set F comprises of all edges of the form image for all nonnegative integers image satisfying inequalities image an D image This edge represents the following pair of clusters: the cluster image of the partition image and the cluster image of the partition image The weight of this edge is set equal to the well-known Jaccard similarity index image which measures the similarity of the clusters image and image Finally, the set contains all edges image for all nonnegative integers, satisfying inequalities image image where the patient corresponding to the vertex ui belongs to the group image of the partition image To partition the graph into two clusters we used freeware METIS library for partitioning of graphs described by Karypis et al. [50]. The final outcome of GBMLS is then given by the way METIS partitions all vertices of the set corresponding to the patients. Note that the graph image is neither complete nor bipartite.

Other machine learning systems

Our experiments compared the performance of GBMLS with the following machine learning systems available in open source package by Scikit-learn et al. [49]: K Means [46], Mean Shift [47], Birch [50,51], DBSCAN [52] and Ward hierarchical clustering [53] for the diagnosis of severe diabetic neuropathy.

Furthermore, in addition to the comparisons mentioned above we have also studied the effectiveness of the GBMLS algorithm in comparison to the Hybrid Bipartite Graph Formulation (HBGF) and Cluster-Based Graph Formulation (CBGF) defined by Fern et al. [54]. These algorithms rely on different and substantially smaller graphs. The number of edges and vertices in these graphs and their architecture are different from the graph utilized in GBMLS. Let us refer to [55] for previous work in other research domains using HBGF and CBGF algorithms and more detailed bibliography. Moreover, our experiments compared the outcomes obtained by GBMLS with the results produced by numerous other clusterers and classifiers available in the open source machine learning package Scikit-learn et al. [48,49]. This section presents classifiers and clusterers being compared with GBMLS.

Decision Tree (DT) is a decision tree classifier using an optimised version of the Classification and Regression Trees (CART) algorithm. CART is similar to C4.5 classifier. However, it is capable of handling both classification and regression, and unlike C4.5 algorithm, it does not compute rule sets.

Three versions of the Naive Bayes algorithm were also applied from the Scikit-learn package being Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), Multinomial Naive Bayes (MNB), and Bernoulli Naive Bayes (BNB).

Nearest Centroid (NC) [48,49] is a classifier using classes determined by centroids similar to the clusters of the classical k-means clusterer.

Further, we have investigated Support Vector Machines (SVM). Scikit-learn includes two versions of SVM: named SVM and NuSVM. They can operate with the following kernels: ‘linear’, ‘poly’, ‘rbf ’, ‘sigmoid’. To indicate the kernel being invoked we use the following notation: SVM(linear), SVM(poly), SVM (rbf), SVM(sigmoid), NuSVM (linear), NuSVM (poly), NuSVMC (rbf), NuSVM (sigmoid).

There are also two versions of the nearest neighbour classifier in Scikit-learn [49]: K Neighbors (KN) and Radius Neighbors (RN). KN applies nearest neighbours. RN applies all neighbours contained in a sphere of radius indicated by the user as a parameter. For DiScRi data, RN algorithm produced substantially worse outcomes than KN, and so we did not include RN in the diagrams below.

Random Forest (RF) is an efficient ensemble classifier. It operates using one of two criteria measuring the quality of split of data: Gini Impurity or Information Gain. In our experiments Gini Impurity produced better outcomes, and so we include only RF with Gini Impurity in the diagrams. In the diagrams representing the results of our experiments these versions of RF are denoted by RFG and RFE, respectively. Furthermore, the number of trees in the forest can also be specified as the n_estimators parameter. In the diagrams representing the results of our experiments RF with the number of trees equal to t is denoted by RF (t).

For theoretical prerequisites and more detailed information on these classifiers the readers are referred to [49] and [56].

Experimental Results and Discussion

We applied our new clustering approach GBMLS and compared it with HBGF, CBGF and with other classification and clusterers available in the machine learning package Scikit-learn et al. [48,49]. In testing the effectiveness of algorithms during our experiments, for each classifier we determined the sensitivity and specificity [56] for explanations of these notions. These measures are often used in medical studies to evaluate the effectiveness of classifiers. Sensitivity is the proportion of positives (patients with severe diabetic neuropathy) that are identified correctly. It is also called the True Positive Rate (TPR). Specificity is defined as the proportion of people without severe diabetic neuropathy who have a negative test result. It is also called the True Negative Rate (TNR). The values of sensitivity and specificity belong to the interval from 0 to 1, where the best value is 1 in terms of all of these metrics.

Diab Health is the largest known database with CAN information. It is the only database available for the authors of this paper. We selected a subset with 21 patients with severe diabetic neuropathy and 232 number of instances. All these instances contained complete HRV attributes in the Diab Health database. We recorded all available demographic and clinical parameters for these patients in a csv file. To prepare data for the experiments we added MAF values.

In order to compare the performance of GBMLS with other systems available in the Scikit-learn et al. [49], we had to determine the best kernels to be used for SVM and Nu SVM, and the best values of input parameters for several other systems for diagnosing severe diabetic neuropathy. In Scikit-learn, SVM and Nu SVM are available with four kernels: linear kernel, polynomial kernel, rbf kernel and sigmoid kernel. This means that each algorithm SVM and Nu SVM can be executed invoking any of the four kernels. We refer to [49] for more information on the formulas used in these kernels and denote these versions of SVM and Nu SVM by SVM(linear), SVM(poly), SVM (rbf), SVM(sigmoid), Nu SVM(linear), Nu SVM(poly), Nu SVM (rbf), and Nu SVM(sigmoid), respectively. First, we conducted tests to determine the performance of SVM and Nu SVM with the various available kernels. Sensitivity and specificity obtained during this first set of experiments are presented in Figure 1.


Figure 1: Sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis of severe diabetic neuropathy by SVM and NuSVM with various kernels.

Figure 1 shows that in the diagnoses of severe diabetic neuropathy the best sensitivity and specificity were achieved by SVM with polynomial kernel. This outcome will be used to compare to the outcomes obtained by other systems below.

The KN algorithm has an input parameter c, which is an integer specifying a fixed number of nearest neighbours to be used in the algorithm. We used the notation KN(c) to indicate the value c as a parameter in the diagrams representing the results of our experiments. Figure 2 presents sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis of severe diabetic neuropathy obtained by KN(c) for various values of the parameter c based on KD Tree with uniform weights.


Figure 2: Sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis of severe diabetic neuropathy by KN.

The best sensitivity and specificity were obtained by KN with k=4 (Figure 2). This result is included as the performance of KN in the combined diagram below.

Next, we evaluated the performance of RF for various options of the input parameter – the number of random trees. The values of sensitivity and specificity obtained are presented in Figure 3.


Figure 3: Sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis of severe diabetic neuropathy by RF using various numbers of random trees.

Figure 3 shows that the best values of sensitivity and specificity were achieved by RF using six random trees. Therefore this option is the one indicated for RF in the combined diagram below.

Finally, the results of comparing GBMLS to other clusterers CBGF, HBGF and classifiers available in the machine learning package Scikitlearn et al. [49] are depicted in Figure 4. In this diagram we included the best available options determined above for the SVM, KN and RF algorithms.


Figure 4: Sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis of severe diabetic neuropathy by GBMLS and other machine learning systems.

The results of all experiments show that the best sensitivity 0.98 and specificity 0.89 was obtained by the GBMLS algorithm. Note that the ensemble classifier RF implemented in the open source machine learning package Scikit-learn achieved the best performance among all classifiers and clusterers. It can therefore be recommended for clinical assessment and the diagnosis of severe diabetic neuropathy. Results of single HRV attributes do not have sufficient accuracy for classifying severe cardiac neuropathy and an algorithm is required that combines time and frequency domain as well as nonlinear HRV attributes for diagnosis [57]. GBMLS is a novel data mining algorithm that improved the accuracy for classification of severe cardiac autonomic neuropathy based on HRV attributes and make it useful in clinical practice. The algorithm combines results from time and frequency domain, and nonlinear HRV attributes to identify severe cardiac autonomic neuropathy.

Future work will be investigating several data reduction algorithms combined with GBMLS to further delineate subcategories of diabetic neuropathy into early, definite and severe CAN and provide a better basis for treatment decisions in clinical practice.


This is the first paper concentrating on the diagnosis of severe diabetic neuropathy. It advances a new algorithm (GBMLS) for the automated detection of severe diabetic neuropathy. Our experiments compared the sensitivity and specificity of the results obtained by GBMLS to the outcomes produced by other machine learning algorithms. The results demonstrate that our new procedure outperformed other techniques and obtained the best outcomes. The diagnosis of severe diabetic neuropathy by GBMLS achieved the best performance level with sensitivity of 0.98 and specificity of 0.89.


The authors wish to acknowledge the technical assistance of Bev de Jong and Paul Reidler for collecting the Ewing data. The authors would like to express their gratitude to the anonymous reviewer for comments, which have helped to improve the article.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Article Usage

  • Total views: 8738
  • [From(publication date):
    June-2016 - Jul 23, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8635
  • PDF downloads : 103

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7