alexa Macrobenthic Community Structure - An Approach to Assess Coastal Water Pollution in Bangladesh | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2150-3508
Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Macrobenthic Community Structure - An Approach to Assess Coastal Water Pollution in Bangladesh

Jahangir Sarker Md1*, Shamsul Alam Patwary Md1, Borhan Uddin AMM1, Monjurul Hasan Md1, Mehedi Hasan Tanmay1, Indrani Kanungo1 and Mohammed Rashed Parvej2

1Department of Fisheries and Marine Science, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali, Bangladesh

2Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute, Mymensingh, Bangladesh

Corresponding Author:
Jahangir Sarker Md
Department of Fisheries and Marine Science
Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali, Bangladesh
Tel: +880-321-71487
Fax: +880-321-62788
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: November 25, 2015; Accepted date: February 10, 2016; Published date: February 20, 2016

Citation: Sarker J Md, Patwary SA Md, Uddin AMMB, Hasan M Md, Tanmay MH, et al. (2016) Macrobenthic Community Structure - An Approach to Assess Coastal Water Pollution in Bangladesh. Fish Aquac J 7: 157. doi: 10.4172/2150-3508.1000157

Copyright: © 2016 Sarker J Md, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal

Abstract

A research on the assemblages of benthic macro faunal community in the coastal areas of Bangladesh was conducted during February-March, 2015 following the standard methods to assess the status of environmental pollution. The abundance (r=0.846) and species richness (r=0.864) of the macrobenthic communities were significantly influenced by the water salinity of the sampling sites (p ≤ 0.05). Both the study areas namely the Bakkhali River Estuary and the Meghna River Estuary showing the highest (3909 ± 540 ind./m2) and lowest (2236 ± 689 ind./m2) density of benthic macrofaunal abundance respectively might be considered as moderately polluted areas according to the results obtained from Shannon-Wiener index of species diversity (2.69 ± 0.13 and 2.00 ± 0.11 respectively) and Margalef's species richness (2.21 ± 0.43 and 1.36 ± 0.11 respectively). Therefore, it is plausible that the macrobenthic community explained in the present study might be a key future outline to assess the status of coastal water pollution of those concerned areas of Bangladesh.

Keywords

Macrobenthos; Bakkhali river estuary; Meghna river estuary; Shannon-wiener index; Margalef’s species richness

Introduction

Benthos is the organism that inhabit in bottom of an aquatic body. Benthic communities are usually dominated by different species of polychaete, oligochaete worms, gastropods, bivalvia and various minor insect larvae. Benthic organisms such as macro, meio and micro fauna and flora play an important role in food chains in an aquatic ecosystem [1]. Macrobenthic organisms may be influenced positively or negatively by physico-chemical parameters of the environment depending on their sources [2]. According to environmental conditions benthic communities vary considerably [3]. The amount of nutrients released from the sediment by benthic communities may vary [4]. Various physical and chemical conditions of the water body such as depth, current of the water, organic contents of the sediments, contaminations of bed sediments environment, toxicity of sediments influence the abundance and distribution of macrobenthos [5]. Macrobenthos are the most commonly used organisms for bio-monitoring in lotic habitat worldwide [6]. It is evident that macrobenthos play an important role in improving and preserving water quality through mineralization and recycling of organic matters [7,8]. The physical and chemical status of the riverine ecosystem becomes recognizable through the elasticity of the community structure of the benthic organisms [9,10]. That’s why benthic macro-invertebrates make ideal subject for biological assessment of water quality [11].

Bangladesh is blessed with an extensive coastline of about 710 Km [12]. The southeastern and southwestern coast of this country is mostly covered by a complex estuarine ecosystem with strong interactions of biotic and abiotic factors. The main estuarine systems of the country are Brahmaputra-Megna (Gangetic delta), Karnaphuly, Matamuhuri, Bakkhali and Naf rivers, which are comprised of mangroves, salt marshes, sea grass, seaweeds, fisheries, coastal birds, animals, coral reefs, deltas, salt beds, minerals and sand dunes. The estuarine environment, which serves as feeding, breeding and nursery grounds for a variety of animals, varies according to the volume of discharge of the river and tidal range. These diverse living resources in the estuarine environment play an important role which is economically significant in many ways. Although coastal and estuarine resources contribute a vital role in terms of both the ecosystem and the economy, study of the estuarine coastal environment in Bangladesh is still lacking [13].

Khan [14] conducted an investigation on the abundance and distribution of macrobenthic organisms in the Mouri River, Khulna to determine the level of river pollution. They identified twenty (20) different species in their study area where polychaeta dominated all over the river. Abu Hena [15] conducted a primary research work on the composition of macrobenthos in the Bakkhali Channel System, Cox’s Bazar to investigate the relationship between soil parameters and the macrobenthos composition in their study area. But there is almost no information on the long term study of benthos particularly in the coastal waters of Bangladesh. Therefore the present study was designed to explore diversity of benthos in the South-Western coastal waters of Bangladesh with the following objectives.

Objectives

• To know the diversity of benthic macro fauna in the Meghna River Estuary (at Chairman Ghat, Noakhali) and the Bakkhali River Estuary (Cox’s Bazar).

• To compare the benthic macro faunal abundance in between two selected estuaries.

• To assess the environmental conditions of the Meghna River Estuary and the Bakkhali River Estuary.

Materials and Methods

Sediment samples were collected from the Meghna River Estuary (at Chairmanghat, Noakhali) and the Bakkhali River Estuary (Cox’s Bazar) during February-March, 2015 (Figure 1). 6 sampling stations (3 from each estuary with triplicate fashion) were selected to carry out the present study. Among the two study sites the Bakkhali river estuary, Cox’s Bazar, is situated in the southern region of Bangladesh. The approximate geographical location of this estuary is between 20085ʹ40ʺ to 21046ʹ92ʺ N latitude and 91096ʹ60ʺ to 92034ʹ37ʺE longitude (Figure 1). The estuary is directly influenced by semi-diurnal tides and climatology impacted by monsoon winds where it’s bottom consists mostly of muddy and sandy particles [16]. 3 sampling stations from the Bakhkhali River Estuary namely S-IB, S-2B, S-3B and another 3 stations from the Meghna River Estuary namely S-4M, S-5M and S-6M were selected. Besides on the coast of Bangladesh the Meghna River Estuary is a coastal plain estuary. The bathymetry, tides and outflow from the Meghna River are the important driving forces of that estuary [17]. The approximate geographical location of this estuary is between (22035ʹ14.7ʺN and 91001ʹ31.8ʺE to 22035ʹ24.6ʺN and 91001ʹ47.4ʺE) (Figure 1).

fisheries-and-aquaculture-journal-study-sites-namely-Meghna-River

Figure 1: Map showing the location of two study sites namely the Meghna River Estuary, Noakhali and Bakkhali River Estuary, Cox’s Bazar of Bangladesh.

For macrobenthic fauna, samples were collected using a small boat during February to March, 2015. Sediment samples were collected using an Ekman dredge having a mouth opening of 0.02 m2. Collected sediment samples were sieved through 500 μm mesh screen to retain macrobenthos. The sieved organisms were preserved immediately with 10% formalin solution in the plastic container with other residues. Preserved samples were then brought back to laboratory for further analysis. In the laboratory, small amount of “Rose Bengal” was added to increase visibility of organisms. Identification of macrobanthic fauna were done using simple microscope up to possible taxonomic level [18- 20] and their counting were made as total individual per m2 (ind./m2). During sampling, in situ water quality parameters were measured at each sampling site. The water salinity (ppt), temperature (°C), pH, and DO (Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L) alkalinity (ppm) were measured using refractometer (NewS-100, TANAKA, Japan), thermometer (centigrade scale), pH meter (HANNA Instruments), DO meter (HANNA Instruments) and Hach hardness and alkalinity kit respectively.

The total number of macro invertebrates was counted in a sample and then number of macro-invertebrates per square meter occurrence was computed using the following formula Welch [21],

image

Where

N=Number of macro-invertebrates 1 sq. m. of profoundal bottom

O=No. of macro-invertebrate (actually counted) per sampled area,

a=Transverse area of Ekman dredge in sq. cm, and

s=Number of sample taken at one sampling site.

Species diversity index (H)

Species richness index (d); and evenness index were calculated according to following equations

The data harvested from monthly samples were blended to provide the value of Shannon-Wiener Index (Species diversity, H) according to [22],

image

Where

S=Total number of species in a sample,

Pi=ni/N=Proportion of individuals of the total sample belonging to the ith species.

N=Total number of individual of all the species,

ni=Number of individuals belonging to the ith species.

The Margalef’s index

Species Richness (D) is simple ratio between total species (S) and total numbers of individual (N) [23]. It can be used to compare one community with another. The index is

image

Where

D=Margalef’s index

S=Number of species in sample

ln=log normal

N=Total number of individuals in sample

Simpson index (D)

The Simpson Index value also ranges between 0 and 1, and the greater the value, the greater the sample diversity [24]

image

In the Simpson index, P is the proportion (n/N) of individuals of one particular species found (n) divided by the total number of individuals found (N), Σ is still the sum of the calculations, and s is the number of species.

Species Evenness: According to Cox [25,26] the species evenness is

image

Where

The value of E is between 0.

Hmax=ln(S) and S=S=Total number of species in a sample

H=Shannon Diversity value

Equitability

Shannon diversity divided by the logarithm of number of taxa [27] was measured by using following formula:

image

Where

J=Equability index

Hs=Shannon and Weiner Index

S=Number of species in a population

The dominance index (D)

The dominance index [27] was measured to determine whether or not particular fisheries species dominate in a particular aquatic system and can be useful index of resource monopolization by a superior competitor, particularly in communities that have been invaded by exotic species. This index was determined by using following formula:

image

Where

ni=number of individuals of species i

n=total number of individuals

Menhinick’s richness index

The ratio of the number of taxa to the square root of sample size [28].

image

Where

S=Number of species in sample

N=Total number of individuals in sample

Brillouin index

It is measured by using following formula [29]

image

Where

N! is N factorial, i.e., N × (N-1) × (N-2) × (N-3) × ... × 3 × 2 × 1

Fisher’s alpha

A diversity index, defined implicitly by the following formula [27].

image

Where

S=number of taxa,

n=number of individuals and

a=Fisher’s alpha.

Berger-Parker dominance

According to Harper the Berger-Parker dominance is simply the number of individuals in the dominant taxon relative to n [27].

Paleontological Statistics (PAST) version 3.15, a software package for paleontological data analysis written by Ryan [30] was used to run the analysis. PAST has grown into a comprehensive statistical package that is used not only by paleontologists, but in many fields of life science, earth science, and even engineering and economics.

Results and Discussion

The abundance of macrobenthos was studied during February to March, 2015 in the Bakkhali river estuary situated in Cox’s Bazar district and the Meghna river estuary situated at Chairman Ghat in Noakhali district. Among the observed water quality parameters (Table 1) temperature (°C) is the important one because it has a major influence on biological activity and growth and the higher the water quality the greater the biological activity (Washington State Department of Ecology, 1991). The mean temperature (°C) observed in the Bakkhali River estuary and Meghna River estuary were 28.33 ± 1.53 and 27.33 ± 1.53 respectively. Due to runoff of huge freshwater from other upper rivers of Bangladesh through the Meghna River to the Bay of Bengal, the average salinity difference of this estuary is lower than the Bakkhali River estuary (Figure 2). The average salinity of the Meghna river estuary was 5.67 ± 0.58 ppt which was lower than the average salinity of the Bakkhali River estuary (22.00 ± 2.65 ppt) during the study period (Table 1). There was no significant difference in pH values observed between two study sites. The average pH measured in the study sites were 6.98 ± 0.45 in the Bakkhali River estuary and 7.87 ± 0.81 in the Meghna River estuary (Table 1 and Figure 3). The values of dissolved oxygen observed in the present study influenced the abundance of the macrobenthic community both in the Meghna River and the Bakkhali River estuary (Figure 4). This result is supported by Islam [31], who reported that Species richness of macrobenthic community was positively (p < 0.005) influenced by dissolved oxygen and percentage of silt while it was negatively (p < 0.005) influenced by percentage of sand and particle density. The abundance of benthic community was significantly (p < 0.05) influenced by water salinity (Table 1). Hossain and Marshall [32] also identified that species richness increased onwards, though abundance (density) showed no distinct directional trend. Diversity indices were generally positively correlated with salinity and pH (p < 0.05) and negatively with clay and organic matter. Hossain and Marshall [32] suggested that species distribution and community structuring is more strongly influenced bysediment particle characteristics than by the chemical properties of the water (pH and salinity).

Sites Stations Temperature (0C) Salinity (ppt) Dissolved Oxygen (ppm) pH Alkalinity (ppm)
Bakkhali River Estuary S-1B 27 19 6.8 7.5 135
S-2B 28 24 13.7 6.75 120
S-3B 30 23 7.1 6.7 114
Mean ± Sd 28.33 ± 1.53 22 ± 2.65 9.20 ± 3.9 6.98 ± 0.45 123 ± 10.82
Meghna River Estuary S-4M 26 6 12.57 7.15 174
S-5M 27 5 12.89 8.75 168
S-6M 29 6 9.15 7.72 180
Mean ± Sd 27.33 ± 1.53 5.67 ± 0.58 11.54 ± 2.07 7.87 ± 0.81 174 ± 6.00

Table 1: In situ water quality parameters measured from the Bakkhali River Estuary and the Meghna River Estuary.

fisheries-and-aquaculture-journal-abundance-macro-benthic-communities

Figure 2: Relationship between the salinity (ppt) and abundance of macro benthic communities observed in the study sites. Bars indicate Standard Error.

fisheries-and-aquaculture-journal-changes-pH-abundance-macro-benthic

Figure 3: Relationship between the changes of pH and abundance of macro benthic communities in the study sites. Bars indicate Standard Error.

fisheries-and-aquaculture-journal-Bars-indicate-Standard-Error

Figure 4: Relationship between the changes of DO (ppm) and abundance of macro benthic communities in the study sites. Bars indicate Standard Error.

5 major groups of macrobenthos (Polychaeta, Oligochaeta, Arthropods, Gastropods and Bivalvia) identified in Bakhlali river estuary (3909 ± 540) was higher than the Meghna river estuary (2236 ± 689) where the existence of bivalvia and gastropoda were found absent in the Meghna river estuary during the study period (Table 2). Polychaete and bivalvia showed the highest (49.42 %) and lowest (5.54 %) density respectively (Table 2) among 28 families (Table 3) identified from 5 major microbenthic groups. The average benthic organisms found in the sampling stations of the Bakkhali River Estuary and the Meghna River Estuary were (3909 ± 540 Ind./m2 and 2236 ± 689 Ind./m2 respectively) was similar to the work done by Ibrahim who identified that the benthic communities were more dominant during pre-monsoon season (25,836.8 ind./m2) as compared to post-monsoon season (21,573.1 ind./m2 ) in the coral areas of Karah Island, Terengganu, Malaysia. Besides khan identified that the population density varied from 96 to 9410 ind./m2 in the Mouri River of Bangladesh. Amongst 28, the 10 most abundant microbenthic families recorded from the two study sites were Lumbrinereidae- 12.30%, Cerithidae-10.12%, Nerediidae-8.43%, Goniadidae-7.47%, Naididae-7.47, Capitellidae-6.26%, Neptydae-5.07%, Ocypodidae- 4.83, Isaeidae-4.82% and Sternaspidae-2.89% (Table 3). Lumbrinereidae was found dominant both in the Meghna River Estuary and the Bakkhali River Estuary where Cerithidae was dominant in the Bakhkhali river estuary (Table 3). The present findings were quite similar to the findings of Hossain [33] who investigated the polychaetes faunal biodiversity of the Meghna River estuarine bed. Similar results from other study [33] on faunal composition, seasonal abundance of polychaete (ind./ m2), species richness and species biodiversity (Swandwip, Hatiya, Bhola, Barisal and Chandpur) of Bangladesh revealed that Polychaetes was the most dominant among the macrobenthic groups constituted 56.72% of the total macrobenthos. However, results from the present study on microbenthic species composition was a little bit higher than that of the results postulated from Abu Hena on Bakhlali river estuary (Polychaeta, 9.966-30.31%; Oligochaeta, 3.68-30.31%; Crustacea, 0.02- 58.40%; Bivalvia, 1.40-82.09% and Gastropoda, 0.08-4.25% and similar to the results of Asadujjaman [14,15,18,34].

Among the recorded 28 macrobenthic families from the study sites, the maximum number of families was found in S-1B and S-2B of the Bakkhali River Estuary where 21 families were common in both stations (Table 3). Abundance of polychaetes were found to be the highest (9110 ind./m2) among all macro-benthic communities (Table 2). Maximum value (2089 ind./m2) macrobenthos was found at sampling station S-2B of the Bakkhali River Estuary and minimum (711 ind./ m2) at station S-4M of the Meghna River Estuary (Table 2). A total 15 families were identified under taxonomic group of Polychaeta (Table 3). Olygochaetes were common at all the stations and occupied fourth position as regards to the abundance of total macro-benthos (Table 2). The maximum value (311 ind./m2) was recorded at station S-5M of the Meghna River Estuary whereas the minimum (177 ind./m2) value was recorded at station S-2B of the Bakkhali River Estuary (Table 2). A total 2 families were identified under the group of Oligochaeta (Table 3).

Benthos Groups Bakkhali River Estuary Meghna River Estuary Mean ± SD Total Percentage (%)
S-1B S-2B S-3B S-4M S-5M S-6M
Polychaete 1555 2089 1733 711 1733 1289 1518.33 ± 432.73 9110 49.42
Oligochaete 221 266 177 267 311 222 244 ± 42.83 1464 7.94
Arthropods 266 445 311 311 533 489 392.50 ± 100.91 2355 12.77
Bivalvia 311 400 311 0 0 0 170.33 ± 172.90 1022 5.54
Gastropoda 1066 933 711 0 0 0 451.67 ± 463.38 2710 14.70
Unidentified 400 355 177 266 355 221 295.67 ± 80.07 1774 9.62
Total 3819 4488 3420 1555 2932 2221 3072.50 ± 1070.42 18435 100
Mean ± SD 3909 ± 540 2236 ± 689      

Table 2: Abundance of Benthic groups (individuals/m2) found in the study sites.

Arthropods constituted 12.77% of total macro-benthos (Table 2) and ranked 3rd. The maximum value (533 ind./m2) was found at station S-5M of the Meghna River Estuary and minimum (266 Ind./ m2) at station S-1B of the Bakkhali River Estuary (Table 2). A total of 4 families were identified under the taxonomic group of Arthropoda (Table 3).

Gastropods constituted 14.70% of total macro-benthos (Table 2) however absent in the Meghna river estuary (Table 2). Gastropods had its highest density (1066 ind./m2) at station S-1B and lowest (711 Ind./ m2) at station S-3B of the Bakkhali River Estuary (Table 2). A total of 3 families were recorded during the study period under this group (Table 3).

Maximum value (400 ind./m2) of bivalvia was found at station S-2B and minimum (311 Ind./m2) at S-1B and S-3B (Ind./m2). Bivalvia ranked 7th and contributed 1.15% of total Macro-benthos (Table 2). Total 3 families of benthos were identified under this taxonomic group (Table 3). The percentages of Polycheate were higher than the other benthic groups at all the stations (Table 3). The stations (S-4M, S-5M, S-6M) of the Meghna river estuary showed higher percentages of Olygochaete than the stations of Bakkhali river estuary.

Family Bakkhali River Estuary Meghna River Estuary Total Mean Standard Deviation Percentage (%) S-1B S-2B S-3B S-4M S-5M S-6M
Capitellidae 356 267 311 44 133 44 1155 192.50 137.09 6.26
Goniadidae 222 400 400 0 311 44 1377 229.50 174.31 7.47
Lumbrinereidae 89 0 178 *356 *756 *889 2268 378.00 366.30 12.30
Nereidae 311 400 177 222 311 133 1554 259.00 99.26 8.43
Onupidae 44 0 0 0 0 0 44 7.33 17.96 0.24
Spionidae 89 0 0 0 0 0 89 14.83 36.33 0.48
Sternaspidae 311 89 133 0 0 0 533 88.83 122.46 2.89
Syllidae 44 178 0 0 0 0 222 37.00 71.28 1.20
Magelonidae 44 89 267 0 0 89 489 81.50 99.21 2.65
Neptydae 44 313 267 44 178 89 935 155.83 115.79 5.07
Paraonidae 0 0 0 0 44 0 44 7.33 17.96 0.24
Maldanidae 0 44 0 0 0 0 44 7.33 17.96 0.24
Sabellidae 0 89 0 44 0 0 133 22.17 37.17 0.72
Glyceridae 0 44 0 0 0 0 44 7.33 17.96 0.24
Cossuridae 0 133 0 0 0 0 133 22.17 54.30 0.72
Orbiniidae 0 44 0 0 0 0 44 7.33 17.96 0.24
Naididae 178 222 177 267 311 222 1377 229.50 52.10 7.47
Tubificidae 44 44 0 0 0 0 88 14.67 22.72 0.48
Mysidae 44 44 44 0 0 44 176 29.33 22.72 0.95
Isaeidae 222 400 267 0 0 0 889 148.17 172.54 4.82
Ampeliscidae 0 0 0 133 177 89 399 66.50 77.98 2.16
Ocypodidae 0 0 0 178 356 356 890 148.33 175.01 4.83
Veneridae 133 222 89 0 0 0 444 74.00 91.69 2.41
Trapezidae 89 44 0 0 0 0 133 22.17 37.17 0.72
Tellinidae 89 133 222 0 0 0 444 74.00 91.69 2.41
Trachidae 222 222 0 0 0 0 444 74.00 114.64 2.41
Cerithidae *533 *711 *622 0 0 0 1866 311.00 345.30 10.12
Littorinidae 311 0 89 0 0 0 400 66.67 124.88 2.17
Unidentified 400 356 177 267 356 222 1778 296.33 87.74 9.64
Total 3819 4488 3420 1555 2933 2221 18436 3072.67 1070.42 100.00

Table 3: Abundance of benthos families (individuals/m2) observed in the present study.

Some water quality parameters were strongly correlated with the abundance of the benthic macrofaunal communities. The abundance of the benthic macrofaunal communities were significantly positively correlated with salinity (r=.846; p ≤ 0.05) and negatively correlated with alkalinity (r=-.842, p ≤ 0.05). On the other hand, the abundance of the benthic macrofaunal communities were significantly positively correlated with hardness (r=0.857, p ≤ 0.05) and TDS (r=0.887; p ≤ 0.05). The abundance of benthic communities were negatively significant with DO (r=-.106, p ≤ 0.05) (Table 4).

Temperature Salinity DO pH Alkalinity Abundance
Temperature   0.445 -0.491 -0.357 -0.443 0.289
Salinity     -0.318 -0.720 -0.980** 0.846**
DO       0.190 0.298 -0.106
pH         0.645* -0.287
Alkalinity           -0.842**
Abundance            

Table 4: Relationship between water quality parameters and abundance of macrobenthic communities.

Macrobenthic species composition in Bakkhali river estuary showed the maximum numbers of Polycheate (46%) followed by gastropods- 23%, atrhropods-9%, bivalvia-8% and oligochaete-6% where the Meghna river estuary (Figure 5) showed the maximum number of Polychaete (56%) followed by arthropods-20%, oligochaete-12% (Figure 5). The density of macrobenthos found in 6 stations of the two study sites were tabulated in Table 5 with percentage and ranked according to the abundance of the macrobenthos in each station. Polycheate ranked number 1 in all stations while other benthic groups were fluctuated within the stations (Table 5).

fisheries-and-aquaculture-journal-Percentage-macro-benthic-groups

Figure 5: Percentage of macro benthic groups in the Bakkhali River Estuary (A) and the Meghna River Estuary (B).

A biodiversity index seeks to characterize the diversity of a sample or community by a single number. The concept of the ‘‘species diversity’’ involves two components: the number of species or richness and the distribution of individuals among species. However, Shannon– Wiener diversity index considers the richness and proportion of each species while Evenness and Dominance indices represent the relative number of individuals in the sample and the fraction of common species respectively. Quality of an aquatic ecosystem is dependent on the physico-chemical qualities of waters and it is reflected on biological diversity. Different diversity indices were recorded in Table 6. About 28 families were identified from sampling stations during the study period. Among the 28 families, the highest number of families were identified from Station S-2B (22 families) followed by the S-1B (21 families), S-3B (15 families), S-6M (11 families), S-5M (10 families) and S-4M (09 families) (Table 6). The Dominance-D value of the sampling stations was found 0.06878. The highest Dominance-D value was found in station S-6M (0.2155) followed by the S-4M (0.1546), S-5M (0.1392), S-3B (0.0913), S-2B (0.07605) and S-1B (0.07552) (Table 5). The Simpson_D value of the sampling stations was identified as 0.9312. The highest and lowest values (Table 6) of Simpson_D were identified in the stations S-1B (0.9245) and S-6M (0.7845) respectively. Another important diversity index is Shannon_H diversity index. The value of Shannon_H diversity index was recorded 2.89 while the value of Equitability J was found highest in the station of S-3B (0.94) and the lowest (Table 6) was in the station of S-6M (0.80). On the other hand another diversity index Fisher Alpha showed highest value in the station of S-2B (3.01) and the lowest was in the station of S-4M (1.27) (Table 6). After analyzing the diversity indices of the sampling stations of Bakkhali River Estuary and Meghna River Estuary, the significant differences were found between the two study sites which are shown in Figure 6. Different diversity indices showed significant differences between the two study sites. The diversity values of Shannon H (Bakkhali River Estuary-2.85, Meghna River Estuary-2.11), Evenness (Bakkhali River Estuary-0.67, Meghna River Estuary-0.63), Simpson Index (Bakkhali River Estuary-0.93, Meghna River Estuary-0.84), Mechinick (Bakkhali River Estuary-0.24, Meghna River Estuary-0.16), Margalef (Bakkhali River Estuary-2.67, Meghna River Estuary-1.36) and Fisher alpha (Bakkhali River Estuary-3.16, Meghna River Estuary-1.55) were found higher in the Bakkhali River Estuary and lower in the Meghna River Estuary (Figure 6). Only the Dominance-D value and Berger- Parker value of the Meghna River Estuary were found higher than the Bakkhali River Estuary (Figure 6).

fisheries-and-aquaculture-journal-Diversity-Indices-study-sites

Figure 6: Diversity Indices of the two study sites.

Shannon Weiner diversity Index is a commonly used diversity index that takes into account both abundance and evenness of species present in the community. In the present study after analyzing the whole samples (18) from six sampling stations of two sampling sites, overall H value was found 2.89 (Table 6). The highest Shannon diversity index (2.781) was found at S-2B in the study period and lowest was found at S-6M (1.909) (Table 6). In biological communities, Shannon-Wiener diversity index varies from 0 to 5. According to this index, values less than 1 characterize heavily polluted condition, and values in the range of 1 to 2 are the characteristics of moderate polluted condition while the value above 3 signifies stable environmental conditions [35,36]. Higher value of Shannon_H indicated that the sampling stations have high number of individuals. Significant difference was found in the mean Shannon diversity index among the stations of the study sites (Table 6). This finding is similar to the findings of Bhandarkar, who investigated on the potential of benthic macro-invertebrates community assemblages in predicting the water quality status. Bhandarkar [37] identified that (Shannon-Weiner index value ranges from 1.2 to 2.9 in three ecosystems), all the selected sampling sites fall under moderate pollution. The Shannon equitability index values showed a greaterAccording to Margalef [38], the higher diversity values reflect the suitability of habitat for the organism and have been reported to be correlated with longer food chain and complex food web of the ecosystems and also more stable community. Margalef index has no limit value and it shows a variation depending upon the number of species. In the present study the values of Margalef diversity index were between 1.089 and 2.497 at station S-4M and S-2B respectively. Menhinick index, like Margalef’s index, attempts to estimate species richness but at the same time it is independent on the sample size. In the present investigation, it ranged from 0.185 to 0.34 (Table 6). The low diversity associated with station S-5M, as described by the Shannon, Margalef and Menhinick indices, may be attributed to lesser number of species and environmental degradation due to anthropogenic pressures, besides other biotic factors [39]. The mean Margalef’s value of the Bakkhali River Estuary (2.21) is higher than the mean value of the Meghna River Estuary (1.17). Table 5 showed how the values differ among the stations of the study sites. Again, Hossain [33] identified that the Shannon species diversity index of polychaetes varied from 0-1.36. It was the highest at Swandwip during post monsoon and lowest at Bhola during monsoon in Bangladesh. Abu Hena [15] also identified that the Shannon diversity index ranged from 0.65-1.04 among the sampling stations at the Bakkhali River Estuary, Cox’s Bazar. equitability in the apportionment of individuals among the species in all the sites.

Study Sites Stations Benthos Group Individuals/m2 Percentage (%) Rank of Abundance
  Bakkhli River Estuary S-1B Polychaete 1556 41.21 1
Oligochaete 222 5.88 6
Arthropods 266 7.04 6
Bivalvia 265 7.02 6
Gastropoda 1067 28.26 2
Unidentified 400 10.59 5
Total 3776 100  
S-2B Polychaete 2089 46.55 1
Oligochaete 266 5.93 6
Arthropods 445 9.92 6
Bivalvia 400 8.91 6
Gastropoda 933 20.79 3
Unidentified 355 7.91 6
Total 4488 100  
S-3B Polychaete 1733 50.67 1
Oligochaete 177 5.18 6
Arthropods 311 9.09 6
Bivalvia 311 9.09 6
Gastropoda 711 20.79 3
Unidentified 177 5.18 7
Total 3420 100  
  Meghna River Estuary S-4M Polychaete 711 45.72 1
Oligochaete 267 17.17 4
Arthropods 311 20.00 4
Bivalvia 0 0.00 0
Gastropoda 0 0.00 0
Unidentified 266 17.11 4
Total 1555 100  
S-5M Polychaete 1733 59.11 1
Oligochaete 311 10.61 5
Arthropods 533 18.18 4
Bivalvia 0 0.00 0
Gastropoda 0 0.00 0
Unidentified 355 12.11 5
Total 2932 100  
S-6M Polychaete 1289 58.04 1
Oligochaete 222 10.00 6
Arthropods 489 22.02 3
Bivalvia 0 0.00 0
Gastropoda 0 0.00 0
Unidentified 221 9.95 6
Total 2221 100  

Table 5: Density of macrobenthos found in the Bakkhali River Estuary and the Meghna River Estuaryo.

Species evenness refers to how close in numbers of each species in an environment are. Mathematically it is defined as a diversity index, a measure of biodiversity which quantifies how equal the community numerically. The higher value shows lower variation in number of species. Usually it has been also defined as the ratio of observed diversity to maximum diversity, the latter being said to occur when the species in a collection are equally abundant [40]. Evenness index value for collected 18 samples was 0.62, where the highest (0.85) and the lowest (0.61) values of Evenness recorded from S-3B and S-6M, respectively (Table 6). No significant difference was found in mean value of evenness value among the stations and as well as within the two study sites (Table 6).

Stations S-1B S-2B S-3B Mean ± SD S-4M S-5M S-6M Mean ± SD All Stations
Taxa_S 21 *22 15 19.33±3.79 9 10 11 10 ± 1.0 28
Individuals 3819 *4488 3420 3909 ± 540 1555 2933 2221 2236 ± 689 18436
Dominance D 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.08 ±0.01 0.15 0.14 *0.22 0.17± 0.04 0.07
Simpson D *0.93 0.92 0.91 0.92 ± 0.01 0.85 0.86 0.78 0.83 ± 0.04 0.93
Shannon_H 2.76 *2.78 2.54 2.69 ±0.13 1.98 2.12 1.91 2.00 ± 0.11 2.89
Evenness 0.75 0.73 *0.85 0.78 ± 0.06 0.81 0.83 0.61 0.75 ± 0.12 0.62
Brillouin 2.74 *2.77 2.53 2.68 ± 0.13 1.97 2.11 1.89 1.99 ± 0.11 2.88
Menhinick *0.34 0.33 0.26 0.31 ± 0.04  0.23 0.18 0.23 0.22 ± 0.03 0.21
Margalef 2.43 *2.50 1.72 2.21 ± 0.43 1.09 1.13 1.30 1.17 ± 0.11 2.85
Equitability_J 0.91 0.90 *0.94 0.91 ± 0.02 0.90 0.92 0.80 0.87 ± 0.07 0.86
Fisher_alpha 2.93 *3.01 2.02 2.65 ± 0.55 1.27 1.29 1.51 1.36 ± 0.13 3.37
Berger-Parker 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.16 ± 0.02 0.23 0.26 *0.40 0.30 ± 0.09 0.12

Table 6: Diversity Indices Observed in the Present Study.

In the present study diversity of benthic organisms were in the sequence of Polychaete (49.42%) > Gastropods (14.70%) > Arthropods (12.77%) > Oligochaete (7.94%) > Bivalvia (5.54%). On the other hand there was an inverse relationship between these two indices in the three sampling stations of the Bakkhali River Estuary. This findings is similar to the investigation of Bu-Olayan and Thomas who observed that the diversity of benthic organisms were in the sequence of Annelida > Mollusca > Crustacea > others group in Kuwait Bay of the Arabian Gulf. Evenness index (–) was found to be increased with increasing Bu-Olayan H and Thomas [41] identified that low diversity indices correspond to the increase in trace metal level in benthic species collected from four sites, wherein high abundance of certain benthic species and high trace metal levels due to manmade perturbations were observed altering the diversity indices and those indices would validate benthic organisms as an indicator to trace metal pollution in Kuwait marine ecosystem, however primary or secondary data regarding trace metal concentrations is absent in the present study area [41].

Conclusion

The coastline along the South-Eastern part of Bangladesh has high fisheries resources and the fisheries production of the estuarine areas of that coast is higher than other coastal areas of the country. Environmental pollution is believed to be the major constraints of fisheries production of an area. Although similar research is untouched to assess the environmental pollution of a water body, macrobenthic structure of those water bodies is used as indicator. Therefore, due to the lack of detailed study on the macrobenthic structure of those areas, present study was designed to assess the pollution status of the Bakkhali River estuary and the Meghna River estuary. A total 28 families under 05 major groups/taxa of macrobenthic communities were identified and the dominant group both in number of families (16 families) and individuals (49.42%) was the Polychaeta followed by Gastropoda (14.70%), Arthropods (12.77%), Oligochaete (7.94%) and the lowest was Bivalvia (5.54%). The abundance (r=.846) and species richness (r=.864) of the macrobenthic communities were significantly influenced by the water salinity of the sampling sites (p ≤ 0.05). Both the study areas namely the Bakkhali River Estuary and the Meghna River Estuary showed the highest (3909 ± 540 ind./m2) and lowest (2236 ± 689 ind./m2) density of microbenthic communities respectively. These two study sites might be considered as moderately polluted areas according to the results obtained from Shannon-Wiener index of species diversity (2.69 ± 0.13 and 2.00 ± 0.11 respectively) and Margalef’s species richness (2.21 ± 0.43 and 1.36 ± 0.11 respectively). Therefore, it can be concluded that the macrobenthic community explained in the present study might be a key future outline to assess the status of coastal water pollution of those concerned areas of Bangladesh.

Acknowledgement

The authors realized thanks to the laboratory staffs of the Department of Fisheries and Marine Science, Noakhali Science and Technology University (NSTU) for their help in sample collections.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Article Usage

  • Total views: 9655
  • [From(publication date):
    March-2016 - Oct 23, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 9312
  • PDF downloads :343

Review summary

  1. Leroy
    Posted on Aug 18 2016 at 3:32 pm
    The research article discusses envirnomental pollution as major constraints of fisheries production in bangladesh. Research is done to gain assess to the environmental pollution of water body, macrobenthic structure of those water bodies to be used as indicator. Authors have concluded that the macrobenthic community explained in the present study might be a key future outline to assess the status of coastal water pollution of those concerned areas of Bangladesh.
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords