alexa Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Pivotal Players in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Microenvironment | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2157-7633
Journal of Stem Cell Research & Therapy
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Pivotal Players in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Microenvironment

Sanaa EL Marsafy1*, Jérôme Larghero2-4, Annelise Bennaceur-Griscelli1,5,6 and Ali Turhan1,5,6

1Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris. Hôpital Paul Brousse, Laboratoire d’ Hematologie Biologique. Villejuif, France

2Assistance Publique –Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Cell therapy Unit and Clinical Investigation Center (CIC) 1427, Paris, France

3University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, F-75475 Paris, France

4INSERM UMR1160, Institute Universitaire d’Hématologie. Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris France

5INSERM UMR 935, « ESteam Paris Sud », Stem cell core facility, Institute André Lwoff, University Paris Sud, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France

6University Paris Sud11, Faculty of Medicine, Kremlin-Bicêtre, France

*Corresponding Author:
Sanaa EL Marsafy, MD, PhD
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Paul Brousse
Laboratoire d’Hematologie Biologique, Villejuif, France
Tel: +33 1 42 49 96
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: July 04, 2014; Accepted date: August 05, 2014; Published date: August 07, 2014

Citation: EL Marsafy S, Larghero J, Bennaceur-Griscelli A, Turhan A (2014) Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Pivotal Players in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Microenvironment. J Stem Cell Res Ther 4:225. doi:10.4172/2157-7633.1000225

Copyright: © 2014 El Marsafy S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Stem Cell Research & Therapy

Abstract

The hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) reside in a specialized microenvironment in the bone marrow (BM) referred to as the osteoblastic and perivascular niches where various components involving the mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) and their progeny are implicated in shaping the HSC compartment. Of interest, the development of various disorders including leukemia, cancers and autoimmune diseases are associated with abrasions and altered functions of MSC. Herein, we focus attention on the subtypes of MSC in the HSC niche with emphasis on their role in controlling normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Additionally, MSC therapeutic potential in targeting tumor cells will be discussed. Delineation of the cross-talk between MSC and HSC is valuable for a better comprehension of the underlying physiopathology of a given hematologic disorder and might pave the way for new therapeutic approaches.

Keywords

Mesenchymal stem cells; Hematopoietic niche; Chronic myeloid leukemia; Cell therapy

Introduction

The hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) reside in privileged sites in the bone marrow (BM) which are termed the HSC niches (endosteal and vascular niches). In these locations, a wide variety of cells including the bone lining osteoblasts, vascular endothelial cells, osteoprogenitors, MSC/stromal cells, osteoclasts, adipocytes, macrophages, immune and neural cells has been proposed to play a crucial hematopoietic regulatory role [1,2]. In respect of MSC, the BM, adipose tissue, muscles, synovium, placenta and umbilical cord are enriched in these cells [3]. Of note, characterization of cultured MSC relies on the expression of CD73, CD90, STRO-1 and CD105 and lack of HLA-DR, endothelial (CD31) and hematopoietic (CD34 and CD45) markers (4). Further identification standards of MSC are based on their adherence to plastic surfaces, self-renewal and differentiation potential into osteoblasts, adipocytes and chondrocytes. Nevertheless, their capacity to differentiate into neurons, skeletal muscle and myocardium was also discussed [4-7].

The prospective MSC isolation from different tissues depends on the expression of more specific molecules such as CD271, CD146, mesenchymal stem cell antigen-1 (MSCA-1), Oct4, Nanog, surface specific embryonic antigen-4 (SSEA-4) and Ganglioside2 (GD2) [8,9] (Table 1).

Surface markers Positive:    STRO-1, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD146, CD271, MSCA-1 Negative:   CD34, CD45, CD31, HLA-DR
Differentiation potential Osteogenic, Adipogenic, Chondrogenic
Properties Colony formation: CFU-F Adherence High proliferative potential

Table 1: In vitro characteristics of MSC.

Under normal physiological conditions, MSC are not circulating, however, activation by tissue damage results in their proliferation, differentiation and migration [10]. In this respect, several factors are implicated in the mobilization and homing of MSC such as insulin growth factor-1(IGF-1), the high mobility group box-1 (HMGB- 1), the basic fibroblast growth factor (b-FGF) and CXCL-5 [10-12]. A combination of erythropoietin (EPO) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was reported to promote MSC migration through enhanced ERK1/2 signaling and expression of matrix metalloprotein-2 (MMP-2) [13].

Of interest, MSC stemness and survival are promoted by hypoxia through mechanisms involving autophagy and up-regulation of self renewal markers such as oct-4, sox-2 and Nanog [14,15]. However, MSC fate is regulated by several signaling cascades involving the canonical Wnt and TGF-β superfamilly. Given the diversity of Wnt proteins and receptors expressed on MSC, Wnt3a interaction with MSC was reported to promote proliferation of undifferentiated MSC rather than MSC differentiation into osteoblasts. On the other hand, interaction of TGF-β3 with its specific receptor on MSC was reported to trigger intracellular signaling molecules including SMAD proteins that promote chondrogenic differentiation [16-18]. Other growth factors including the BMP family, IGF, PDGF and FGF act in concert with Wnt and TGF-β signaling pathways to direct MSC differentiation [16,19]. For instance, activation of BMP2 and IGF2 were reported to promote the osteogenic differentiation of CD271+MSC [20]. Other monitors of MSC differentiation are the micro-RNA (mi-RNAs). This latter are 19- 22 nucleotide fragment of non-coding RNA that affect various cellular process through post-transcriptional regulation of target genes [21]. A large array of mi-RNA has been reported to accelerate or inhibit MSC commitment and lineage differentiation. In this context, expressed miRNA-335 and its encoding gene MEST (mesoderm-specific transcripit homology) in the pluripotent MSC can be modulated by interferon-γ (IFN-γ) leading to MSC differentiation [21]. Indeed, the differentiation of MSC is dependent on the mechanisms that control the specific cell lineage and those suppressing the development of other lineage. For instance, the expression of mi-RNA-140 was reported as a specific regulator of chondrogenic differentiation acting, in part, through repression of both CXCL-12 and metalloproteinase with thrombosponin motifs (ADAMTS)-5 [22]. MSC commitment and differentiation towards adipocytes is under the control of signaling cascade emitted by many agents including BMP, Wnt, TGF-β, insulin and several transcription factors such as CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (CEBPs) and peroxidase proliferator activated receptor (PPAR-γ). Several mi-RNA have been reported to interact with different signaling pathways leading to either enhancement or repression of adipogenesis [23]. In this regard, mi-RNA 27a has been reported to suppress adipocyte differentiation through PPAR-γ down regulation [24]. On the other hand, mi-RNA 17-29 cluster have been reported to accelerate adipocyte differentiation by negative regulation of tumorsuppressor Rb2/p130 [25]. Similarly, several types of mi-RNA can modulate signaling pathways and transcriptional factors responsible for osteoblastic differentiation. For instance, mi-RNA 206 was reported to inhibit osteoblastic differentiation through targeting connexin 43 [26]. However, mi-RNA 133 and mi-RNA 135 inhibit oeteogenesis by targeting Runex2 and SMAD 1/5 [27]. On the other hand, mi-RNA 2861 supports BMP2 signaling pathway, hence, promoting osteoblastic differentiation [28]. Given the importance of mi-RNA in managing MSC differentiation, we hypothesize that future modulation of their expression might be a tool for the induction of a particular lineage of MSC differentiation useful for in tissue engineered therapy.

Origin and Localization of MSC within the BM

Recent studies consistently reveal that MSC are generated in two waves: the first one neuroepithelial-derived and the second one is of non-neural origin [29]. The earliest MSC wave is emerged from the neural crest stem cells (NCSCs), which then migrate from the dorsal neural tube to the aorta-gonads- mesonephros (AGM) region before they join the BM [30,31]. However, the adult perivascular tissue was proposed as the non-neural origin of MSC. This suggestion is relied on the following observations: (A) - the expression of certain markers like CD146, NG2 and platelet derived growth factor receptor –β (PDGF-R β) by both the pericytes and MSC (B) - the potential of both MSC and pericytes to differentiate into osteoblasts, chondrocytes and adipocytes, (C) - localization of MSC expressing the pericyte marker, 3G5, in the perivascular niche [3,32,33]. The odontoblasts and the inter-vertebral disc were additionally reported as non-neural sources of MSC [3,34]. Of interest, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) was proposed as a potential origin of MSC. In such process, the epithelial cells lose polarization and basal junction with subsequent cytoskeleton reorganization and lastly acquire a mesenchymal like identity such as the multipotent differentiation potential [35].

Localization of MSC in the HSC niches revealed the presence of CD271+ MSC subtype in close vicinity to the bone lining cells and in the BM parenchyma. These CD271+MSC were reported to express Oct4 and SSEA-4 multipotent markers and possess the potential to differentiate into osteogenic, adipogenic, pericytic lineages [8,16,36]. However, MSC CD146+, were detected in association with the BM sinusoids and do express VCAM-1, CD44 and PDGFR-α and β while lacking the expression of pan endothelial marker (CD31/PECAM-1) and the smooth muscle α-actin [37,38]. A subpopulation of MSC CD146+ cells with long dendrites do express high levels of CXCL-12 and are termed CXCL12-abundant reticular (CAR) cells [39,40]. This latter, are capable to differentiate into adipo-osteogenic progenitors and can support homing and maintenance of the HSC. In addition, CAR cells have demonstrated a role in the development of B lymphocytes, plasmacytoid denderitic and NK- cells [41,42]. Worthy mentioning, the co-expression of CD146 and CD271+ on MSC is dependant on aging and the localization of these cells within the BM niche. In this respect, MSC CD271+ CD146+ was reported as the prevalent phenotype in the fetal BM being substituted by CD271+CD146- cells in the adulthood [43]. The oxygen gradient within the BM niche might underlie the prevalence of MSC CD146+ in the perivascular niche and MSC CD271+ in the hypoxic endostium [8,44].

In addition, the perivascular niche harbors a MSC subtype expressing the intermediate filament protein, Nestin. This subpopulation is a selfrenewing with a tri-lineage differentiation potential and do express high levels of HSC maintenance genes including SCF and Angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) [45]. Furthermore, MSC Nastin+ are in spatial association with both HSC and adrenergic nerve fibers where HSC retention is regulated by opposing signals derived from the sympathetic nerve fibers and the adjacent macrophages [46]. Of interest, implication of the immune T cells in the induction of the osteoblastic lineage was recently reported following intermittent treatment of MSC Nestin+ by parathyroid hormone (PTH) [47]. In this context, the interaction of the PTH with its specific receptor (PTH- related protein receptor, PPR), expressed on the T lymphocytes will trigger the production of Wnt10b that triggers the Wnt signaling pathway in MSC with subsequent osteogenic differentiation [47,48].

Furthermore, MSC expressing leptin receptors (lepr+ MSC) were identified mainly in the perivascular niche. Leptin is a cytokine expressed in the white adipose tissue and acts centrally by stimulating the hypothalamus with subsequent expression of several neuropeptides that contribute to bone loss. Alternatively, through a peripheral mechanism, leptin binds to the specific receptors expressed on the MSC resulting in enhanced osteogenic differentiation. Of note, lepr+ MSC do not express nestin, however, they do express high levels of CXCL-12 suggesting an overlap with CAR cells [49,50]. Of note, a balanced differentiation of MSC into osteoblasts and adipocytes is required for optimal niche function. However, aging favors the formation of adipocytes that negatively regulate the hematopoiesis, partially, through the secretion of adiponectin [51]. Taken together, these studies provide evidence that MSC subpopulations are important players in the BM HSC niches.

MSC Orchestrate HSC Fate in the BM Niche

The osteoblastic and the perivascular niches have been described as privileged zones for regulation of HSC fate. The osteoblastic niche is preferentially located in the epiphysis of long bones, precisely, in the trabecular’s endosteum and to a lesser extent in the cortical bone of the diaphysis (bone shaft). However, the perivascular niche encircles the BM vasculature [52,53].

In the mouse, using SLAM family receptors, HSC were detected adjacent to the vascular endothelium all through the BM and nearby the trabecular endostieum. Nevertheless, multipotent and restricted progenitors were distributed although the long bone diaphysis [53-55]. Otherwise, multimodal imaging protocols have proved the presence of two putative HSC niches, namely, the reconstitution and the homeostatic niches [56]. The former includes the BM zones displaying the highest bone remodeling activity and enhanced blood supply thus allowing for HSC cycling and augmentation of the hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell pool. Alternatively, the latter niche is evenly distributed all through the BM and harbors the steady-state HSC (in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle) [57]. Indeed, localization of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in a given zone is likely dependent on its cellular and cytokine profile. For instance, cells of the perivascular niche including CAR, Nestin+ MSC, Lpr+ MSC and endothelial cells were reported as the main physiological source of CXCL-12 and SCF. Of interest, conditional deletion of these cytokines from the perivascular stromal cells and endothelial cells resulted in selective depletion of HSC while lymphopoiesis was spared, most likely due to localization of lymphopoiesis in the endosteal niche [50-57]. In this latter location, the osteoblasts and the neighboring MSC were proved to produce a number of factors including CXCL-12, IL-7 and SCF which are known to maintain the common lymphoid cells and B-lymphoid progenitors. Accordingly, deletion of SCF from the osteoblasts, CAR and Nestin+ MSC was reported to deplete the B-lymphoid progenitors with no deleterious effect on the HSC frequency or function [50]. Likewise, conditional deletion of CXCL-12 from the osteoblasts resulted in depletion of the lymphoid lineage rather than the HSC [58,59].

There is ever-increasing evidence for the necessity of a specialized BM microenvironment to promote HSC division indispensable for self-renewal and production of various differentiating descendants. For instance, after transplantation, HSC divide rapidly and symmetrically to replenish the stem cell pool. Some of these cells polarize and divide asymmetrically to give one identical stem cell and another cell designated to differentiate after several rapid symmetric divisions. The initial symmetric HSC division is independent of regulatory cytokines. Yet, contact with the supporting microenvironment seemed critical for symmetric and asymmetric division of both primitive and committed progenitors. Such contact with stromal cells promotes the expression of a battery of HSC genes that regulates adhesion, cytoskeleton rearrangement and DNA repair [60,61]. The spatial distribution of the adhesion molecules plays a key role in defining the cell shape and the asymmetric cell division through biases of polarized actin and microtubules networks as well as biases of segregated DNA which dictates distinct fates for generated daughter cells [62,63]. Of interest, myosin-IIB (MYIIB) represents the major non muscle myosin II isoform in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. The contractile forces of polarized myosin-IIB (MYIIB) could influence the differential segregation of HSC fate determinants and tapering of MYIIB isoform was observed along with the HSC differentiation being replaced by the activated MYIIA isoform [64].

Of note, HSC fate in terms of self-renewal and differentiation into terminally mature progenies is under the control of key regulators involving Wnt and Notch that work in concert with other signaling pathways for establishing a balance between these two opposing cell outcomes [65]. For instance, Wnt ligands, expressed by BM MSC and primitive HSC, were reported to function via paracrine and autocrine mechanisms leading to canonical or non- canonical signaling pathway activation. In the former one, the downstream signaling is established by binding of Wnt ligand with Frizzled receptor/Lrp co-receptor, followed by stabilization and nuclear transfer of β-catenin which binds to T-cell factor complex leading to the expression of several target genes [66,67]. Nevertheless, the impact of Wnt on the HSC and committed progenitors was debatable. In one study, enhanced autonomus canonical Wnt signaling in HSC by retroviral over-expression of β-catenin was reported to expand the HSC while inhibiting their differentiation both in vitro and in vivo [68]. In other studies, deletion of β and γ-catenin revealed no effect on HSC frequency and differentiation potential. The existence of other functionally active pathway has been proposed as a possible compensatory mechanism to overcome the double absence of β and γ-catenin [69,70]. Worthy mentioning, MSC- paracrine Wnt secretion was reported to induce HSC quiescence, in part, through up-regulation of the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor, p21 [71,72]. However, autonomus Wnt signaling in MSC was reported to repress HSC retention factors including angiopoietin-1, SCF and VCAM-1 leading to HSC activation [73].

In non-canonical Wnt signaling, activation of Wnt/JNK/PCP or Wnt-Ca+2 pathways is dependent on the employed member of Wnt’s family and the type of the engaged receptor [65,74]. Again, the influence of the non-canonical Wnt signaling on HSC is controversial. For instance, Wnt5a injected into mice engrafted with human repopulating cells have enhanced the HSC multilineage reconstitution potential [75]. However, others have demonstrated that Wnt5a maintains HSC in a G0 state. A possible antagonistic response between Wnt5a and Wnt3a on HSC was proposed as a possible mechanism for the observed HSC quiescence [74,76]. Indeed, quiescence of HSC pool is under the control of other soluble Wnt antagoniste including Wnt inhibitory factor-1 (WIF-1) secreted frizzled-related proteins (SFRPs), sclerostin (SOST) and Dickkopf (DKK). These Wnt antagonists are secreted by MSC, BM stromal cells, osteoblasts and osteoclasts [65].

In addition to Wnt signaling, Notch activities have been implicated in controlling HSC biology. Notch signalling is triggered by the interaction of Notch ligand with the appropriate receptor leading to nuclear translocation of the receptor’s intracellular domain and ultimate transcriptional regulation of multiple genes including Hes or Hes related (Hrt) family genes. These genes encode for basic HLH proteins that, in general, function as DNA-binding transcriptional repressors [77].

The dual capacity of the BM stromal cells, in terms of eliciting and responding to Notch signalling, was attributed to simultaneous expression of Notch-receptors and Jagged-1 [78]. Of interest, treatment of mice with intermittent parathyroid hormone (PTH) revealed enhanced Jagged-1 expression in osteoblasts with subsequent Notch signaling in HSC leading to their expansion [79].

Furthermore, mouse primitive HSC transduced with retrovirus encoding for Notch-1 revealed enhanced potential to self-renewal and differentiation to myeloid and lymphoid lineages both in vivo and in vitro [80]. Moreover, human-mouse xenotransplantation models proved evidence that Jagged-1 can maintain and expand primitive human hematopoietic cells capable of multi-lineage reconstitution in vivo without loss of progenitors [78,81].

Worthy mentioning, HSC fate regulation engage other molecules including osteopontin and thrombopoietin-1 which are involved in anchoring the HSC to the niche and ensure their maintenance in G0 stage of the cell cycle [9,82]. The perivascular Schwann cells, marked by glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), also play a role in the induction of HSC quiescence through the activation of latent TGF-β [83]. In addition, local calcium gradient and hypoxia in the endosteal share in maintenance of the HSC quiescence [41]. Hypoxia was reported to induce the expression of cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor genes and the accumulation of the hypoxia inducing factor-1 (HIF-1) with subsequent up-regulation of HSC maintenance genes [84]. Of interest, acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL), even under normal oxygen tension, showed selective activation of HIF-1α with subsequent activation of Notch signaling leading to expansion of leukemic pool [85,86]. Similar augmentation of HIF-1α was reported in CML stem cells, explaining in part, their survival and resistance to conventional chemotherapy [87]. Taken together, the interference with HIF signaling pathway might be a successful approach to execute malignant cells.

MSC play a crucial role in HSC traffic, in part, through CXCR4/ SDF-1, SCF/c-Kit and Slit-2/Robo-4 axis [88,89]. In addition, perivascular Nestin+ MSC, in response to sympathetic nerve signaling, were reported to slow down the expression of HSC retention factors including the CXCL-12, Ang-1, SCF and VCAM-1 leading to egression of HSC out of the BM. Nevertheless, neighboring CD169+macrophages have indirect HSC holding action which can be inhibited by G-CSF leading to release of HSC in the peripheral circulation [90,91]. As a final point, MSC could influence the HSC fate through modulation of the immune response. One scenario implicates the secretion IFN-γ by activated NK cells which, in turn, augment HLA-G expression on MSC. Binding of HLA-G to the inhibitory receptor ILT2 expressed on NK cells will lead to suppression of NK downstream signaling pathway [92]. Other mechanisms relay, in part, on the inflammatory cytokine that up-regulate a variety of MSC adhesion molecules including ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 [93]. Furthermore, suppression of BM microenvironment might be the consequence of MSC production of inhibitory cytokines, nitric oxide, cyclooxygenase and indolamine 2,3 dioxygenase (IDO) [94,95].

MSC-leukemic Stem Cell Crosstalk

Experimental transplantation models of human LSC into immunodeficient mice have proved that leukemic stem cells (LSC), like their normal HSC counterparts, reside in specific niches in the BM microenvironment. In this location, LSC engraft the endosteal niche and expand to the neighboring perivascular endothelium prior to evasion of the peripheral circulation [96]. Modulation of the BM microenvironment might be a prerequisite for changing the outcome LSC. In this regard, mice treated with PTH were shown to express high levels of TGF-β1 owing to osteoblastic cell activation and bone remodelling. In this model, transplantation of myeloid LSC showed maintenance inhibition of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) and attenuation of CML disease manifestations. Alternatively, under the same experimental conditions, acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) was insensitive to increased TGF-β1 and revealed accelerated engraftment likely due to deficient expression of TGF-β1 receptors in this type of leukaemia. Taken together, these studies prove a differential sensitivity of CML and AML to TGF-β1-modified BM microenvironment and propose the use of PTH treatment for boosting the CML-specific therapy [97].

Further modification of the BM microenvironment was achieved by an experimental deletion of Dicer 1 gene in early osteoprogenitors [98]. Such intervention provoked the development of myelodysplasia and AML in the manipulated mice and indicated that genetic anomalies in the endosteal niche could be a predisposing factor for the development of LSC [98].

Of interest, in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), MSC have demonstrated critical aberrations including, among others, epigenetic changes, reduced proliferation and impaired osteogenic differentiation as well as premature senescence. Furthermore, the expression of key molecules engaged in the interaction with HSC such as osteopontin, jagged-1, SCF and Ang-1 was reduced [99]. Alternatively, normal in vitro MSC support of hematopoiesis was reported by other investigators, in spite of the presence of severe chromosomal aberrations in MDSMSC [100]. Indeed, there is mounting evidence for a multitude ways in which the MSC can support a variety of malignant hematopoietic disorders. For instance, MSC can enforce LSC survival and adhesion, in part, through the secretion of various inflammatory mediators including CCL2, and IL-8 as well as the expression of CD44 adhesion molecule [101,102]. The importance of CXCL-12/CXCR-4 axis in CML homing and mobilization was proved during imatinib treatment which enhanced CXC-R4 expression on the leukemic cells, thus, facilitating their mobilization of to the BM [103]. However, selective blockage of CXCL-12/CXCR-4 axis by AMD3100 or AMD11070 molecules, in association with the appropriate chemotherapy, was used as a tool for eradicating residual leukemia cells [104,105].

Additionally, BM stromal cells were reported to express high levels of placental growth factor (PGF) which is implicated in enhanced angiogenesis and CML growth. In a mouse model of human CML, a therapeutic protocol combining PGF inhibitor and imatinib was reported to enhance survival of affected mice [106].

Additionally, MSC expression of asparagine synthetase and secretion of asparagine was reported to defend ALL cells from asparaginase cytotoxic effect [107].

In multiple myeloma (MM), protection of the malignant cells from the apoptotic action of bortezomib was achieved by the agonistic action of IL-6, secreted by MSC, and the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [108,109].

Yet, MSC from MM patients revealed impaired osteogenic potential which could explain, in part, the defective bone formation in later stages of the disease [110]. Worthy mentioning, BM infiltration with malignant lymphoma cells was reported to be associated with ectopic lymph node follicular-like reticular cells (FRC). These latter, represent BM MSC that acquire a complete FRC phenotype under the influence of lymphocyte- secreted cytokines including the TNF-α and lymphotoxin α1β2. These ectopic lymph nodes will recruit more lymphoma cells and promote their survival and multiplication [111].

The BM is a referred site for breast and prostate cancer metastasis where MSC and their progeny are integrated in the cancer niche. In this location, stromal fibroblasts represent a mixture of normal and cancer associated fibroblasts (CAF). These latter might represent a state of epithelial to mesenchymal transformation of the tumor parenchyma or might be a consequence of chronic inflammation and tumor epithelial dysplasia. The secretion of TGF-β was reported to accelerate the differentiation of MSC into CAF that are recruited to the tumor area in SDF-1α dependent manner [112]. SDF-1 can trigger CAF cells via JAK2/STAT3 and MAPK/ERK signaling pathways with subsequent organization of actin filaments and cytoskeleton [113,114]. Furthermore, SDF-1 was reported to recruit endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) into carcinomas, thus, promoting the angiogenesis and the tumor growth [115]. Other mechanisms implicating MSC in the tumor growth include inhibition of dendritic cell co-stimulatory markers and IL-10 secretion, secretion of pro-angiogenic growth factors and the potential to differentiate into fibroblasts, pericytes and endotheliallike cells [116,117]. Besides, MSC might provide tumor protection likely through the production of several anti-apoptotic factors such as hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1), basic fibroblast growth factor (b-FGF) and granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) [118].

Alternatively, MSC could inhibit tumor growth by several mechanisms including the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines that enhance infiltration of macrophages and monocytes to the tumor area [119]. DKK-1 secretion by MSC and inhibition of β-catenin signaling were reported to inhibit the breast cancer [120,121]. Similarly, the secretion of TGF-β3 and HGF has been demonstrated to interfere with the proliferation of hepatic cell carcinoma via up-regulation of p21, p27 and subsequent inhibition of ERK1/2 signaling pathway [122].

Whether MSC and a given type of leukemic cells would share the same genetic abrasion was the field of debatable data. For instance, the detection of mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL-4) fusion gene, characteristic of infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia (pro B-ALL) in both LSC and MSC, has suggested a common emerging cellular origin [123,124]. However, other studies have demonstrated that MSC are spared of the chromosomal anomalies characterizing the malignant clone in CML, Ph+, bi-phenotypic leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome JAK2 V617F [125-127].

MSC-based Therapy-in the Context of Malignant Disorders

MSC are used experimentally in a variety of clinical contexts seeking for tissue repair, eradication of malignant cells as well as the treatment of graft-versus-host disease and autoimmune diseases. Such opportunity is attributed to MSC immune modulation capability, lack of immunogenicity and secretion of a wide range of mediators involving interleukines, chemokines as well as anti-inflammatory and angiogenetic factors. Additionally, MSC behavior of tumor tropism and their potential for drug and gene delivery were believed crucial for targeting cancer cells [128]. To achieve this therapeutic goal, attention must be paid to ex-vivo expansion protocols. For instance, the addition of exogenous growth factors such as FGF-β to the culture media has been reported to optimize the proliferation of CB-derived MS [129]. Furthermore, culture of dermis isolated stem cells under hypoxic condition has been reported to enhance ex vivo chondrogenesis, hence, the MSC potential for cartilage engineering [130]. The presence or absence of xeno serum in the culture media is another contributing factor for MSC expansion [131]. Culture media supplemented with autologous activated platelet-rich plasma, in replacement of fetal bovine serum, was proved safe and efficient in expanding the limited harvest of umbilical cord blood (UCB)-MSC with conservation of their multi-differentiation potential [132]. Likewise, replacement of the animal serum with human platelet lysate was reported to promote growth and expansion of BM-MSC in clinical scale cultures [133].

Taking into consideration the risk of transformation during the process of culture, regular karyotype and telomerase examination are highly recommended to ensure absence of mutations and genetic aberrations in expanded MSC [134]. Selection of MSC donor age, the use of adequate MSC numbers, the choice of the route and timing of MSC administration are also required for attaining good results [135]. Of interest, MSC transplantation trials in adult individuals have reported no significant safety signals except the development of transient fever. Yet, several adverse events such as acute infusion toxicity, infections and different organ dysfunction have been recorded in a low scale and require further investigations [136].

In view of their immunosuppressive potential and the regenerative capacity, MSC were used to prevent graft versus host disease (GvHD) in allogenic transplantation settings. There is ever-increasing evidence for enhanced proliferation and engraftment of HSC following cotransplantation of MSC and CD34+. This effect could be explained by boosting T cell recovery and interference with graft-versus-host disease development [137]. The MSC production of cytokines involving IL- 2, G-CSF and GM-CSF could underlie, in part, the observed HSC proliferation. MSC secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines including IL-4 and IL-10 were believed to support the development of CD4+Tregulatory cell (Treg), thus controlling the development of GvHD [138,139]. Of interest, optimization of the MSC immunomodulatory effect could be attained by priming with certain inflammatory mediators such as IFN-γ, IL-1b and TNF-α [134]. Additionally, pretreatment of MSC with β-catenin was reported to enhance HSC self-renewal in an experimental transplantation model. Hence, Wnt-treated MSC was suggested to be an attractive tool in HSC transplantation settings [140].

The use of MSC for targeting malignant cells relies on several mechanisms including tumor tropism and the capacity to deliver therapeutic genes to the tumour niche. Indeed, certain factors including the monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), IL-8, TGF-β and VEGF were reported as a requirement for MSC migration and tumor invasion [141,142]. In addition, there is a mounting evidence for successful use of engineered MSC expressing certain genes for targeting malignant cells. In this regard, MSC engineered for herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene expression were used in the presence of ganciclovir for targeting glioma cells [143]. Additionally, intra-tracheal injection of MSC expressing CX3CL-1, an immuno-stimulatory chemokine, was reported to inhibit certain experimental lung tumors [144]. The antitumor activity of recombinant human TRAIL (TNFrelated apoptosis inducing ligand) was previously reported. However, its use in vivo was limited by its rapid clearance and short plasma halflife. Interestingly, MSC- TRAIL transduced were used as a constant source of this factor and appeared promising for targeting cancer cells [145,146].

Conclusion

MSC offer the majority of stromal cell lineage including chondrocytes, osteoblasts and adipocytes. Additionally, they co-localise with HSC and LSC in the BM niche and influence their fate decision through mutual cross talk. The impact of MSC on the tumorogenesis could be attributed, in part, to their immune modulation behaviour and tendency for tumor tropism. This latter ability was exploited for deliverance of therapeutic genes to the tumour niche for targeting malignant cells. Clearly, MSC should be viewed as a double-edged weapon, hence, further researches are recommended to understand the complex interactions between tumor cells and the surrounding microenvironment.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11808
  • [From(publication date):
    August-2014 - Jun 25, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7983
  • PDF downloads :3825
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords