alexa Metabolomics: Which Role in Asphyxia and Sepsis? | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2155-6148
Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Metabolomics: Which Role in Asphyxia and Sepsis?

Gabriele Finco1, Paola Scano2, Ernesto d’Aloja3, Emanuela Locci3, Mario Musu1, Paolo Mura1, Vassilios Fanos4 and Antonio Noto4*

1Department of Anesthesiology, Cagliari University, Italy

2Department of Chemical and Geological Sciences, Cagliari University, Italy

3Department of Public Health, Clinical and Molecular Medicine-Forensic Science Unit-Cagliari University, Italy

4Department of Pediatrics and Clinical Medicine, Section of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Puericulture Institute and Neonatal Section, Cagliari University, Italy

*Corresponding Author:
Antonio Noto
Department of Pediatrics and Clinical Medicine
Section of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Puericulture Institute and Neonatal Section
Cagliari University, Italy
Tel: 0039/3331014029
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: April 25, 2014; Accepted date: July 21, 2014; Published date: July 28, 2014

Citation: Finco G, Scano P, d’Aloja E, Locci E, Musu M, et al. (2014) Metabolomics: Which Role in Asphyxia and Sepsis?. J Anesth Clin Res 5:420 doi: 10.4172/2155-6148.1000420

Copyright: © 2014 Finco G, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research


Metabolomics is a new “omics” approach concerning the high-throughput identification, quantification and characterization of endogenous and exogenous metabolites. This new technique is gaining consideration upon medical practice improving the single metabolite analysis as well as measuring the response to treatment in intensive care units. However, despite great efforts, very little research has new biomarkers or specific metabolic profiles, which characterize disorders such as asphyxia and sepsis. Here, we point out some of the recent works published in literature regarding the management of these conditions having high mortality and morbidity rates. The purpose of this review is also to highlight the ability of metabolomics to find early biomarkers for these conditions as well as to predict the development of side\effects due to the therapy. The goal is to demonstrate that the metabolomics technique can be considered a viable option for the study of these conditions, which may help to develop a better care in intensive departments.


Metabolomics; 1H-NMR; GC/MS; Anaesthesia; Resuscitation; Asphyxia; Sepsis


Over the past years there has been an increased interest in encouraging research in the anaesthesia and resuscitation fields especially regarding topics that arise great interest for the national health system [1,2]. However, despite great efforts, very little research has been translated into the clinical practice. Among the recent technologies, metabolomics seems to be able to provide a remarkable impact trying to improve the diagnosing, prognosis and stratification risk of human diseases [3]. In this regard, the most studied pathologies concerning the intensive care units (ICU) are asphyxia and sepsis. The former, by means of perinatal asphyxia, is one of the main causes of neonatal death especially in developing countries. The incidence has been reported to be 2-6/1,000 term births [4]. It is a condition in which there is a decrease of oxygen to the tissues, in spite of adequate blood flow, leading to a wide scale of injury, depending on several factors such as duration of insult, the recovery time after injury, and the intervention provided. Currently, a limited range of biochemical tests are in clinical use. Early biomarkers indicating the duration and severity of hypoxia and enabling risk stratification immediately after asphyxia might be particular helpful.

Another serious disorder, that is currently studied, is sepsis; it is one of the most common causes of death in ICU [5]. Sepsis condition affects annually over 750,000 people with high morbidity and mortality rates [6]. Recent studies estimate that the number of cases will reach almost one million by 2020 [7]. Sepsis in clinical terms is a systemic inflammatory response to a virus, bacteria or fungi infection, leading to a massive production of pro-inflammatory mediators. It leads to an alteration of metabolic balance, which results in tissue necrosis, hypotension, organ injury, and death [8]. In addition, among the sepsis-like syndrome there is a different rate of mortality ranging from 7% for the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), 20% for the severe sepsis and 46% for the septic shock [9]. A special part is given to the neonatal sepsis, which is defined as a complex clinical syndrome and it is one of the most significant causes of preterm infant’s morbidity and mortality. Recent studies have shown that more than 21% of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants surviving beyond 72 hours have at least one episode of blood culture-confirmed sepsis. Its incidence has a range between 0.5% and 1% in the developing countries and the timing-identification is a major diagnostic problem [10,11]. Currently, for most of biochemical and haematological tests, the range of false negative and false positive is still high [10].

This scenario shows, without any doubt, the need for new improvements for both asphyxia and sepsis in the early diagnosis as well as monitoring the risk stratification, complications and death. Based on this fact, metabolomics, analysing a whole metabolic profile, can help to improve the knowledge by defining patient’s metabolic phenotype and discovering typical signatures representing the disease under investigation.

The Metabolomics Technology

The metabolomics approach consists on the quantitative analysis of large number of metabolites within a biological sample such as urine, blood, saliva etc. From a clinical point of view, the study of the metabolites within a biofluid is similar to observe an instantaneous metabolic snapshot, in fact, the metabolites (<1000 Da) represent the end products of gene, transcripts and proteins, offering unique insights into small molecule regulation, which may uncover new biochemical patterns [12]. Metabolomics studies have taken advantage of advanced instrumentation such as nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry (NMR), and mass spectrometry (MS) coupled with a multivariate statistical data analysis (MVA) [13]. NMR spectrometry is based on the magnetic properties of certain nuclei such as hydrogen, carbon and phosphorus. The technique is rapid and non-destructive, for the sample, it usually requires minimal laboratory preparation and it allows capturing simultaneously a large number of metabolites with an analytical sensitivity ranging between mM/L and μmol/L; below this cut-off, the detection and quantification of metabolites are unreliable. However, for other molecules or toxic metabolites, the detection limit of the NMR may be inadequate. Therefore, a more sensitive technique needs to be used. MS is still considered the gold standard in metabolite detection. Its sensitivity allows detection of several hundreds of small molecules reaching concentration of nmol/L range. Commonly, MS methods involve the separation of molecules by GC,or LC to unravel the metabolite complexity [14]. However, it requires longer analytical time, a derivatization process and the limitation of volatile compounds. Due to the huge diversity of chemical structures and the large differences in abundance, there is no single method available to analyse the entire metabolome. Therefore, a number of complementary approaches need to be used for detect as many metabolites as possible [15].

Data Analysis

The data obtained following the analysis are represented as a set of peaks. The intensities of the latter are proportional to the concentration of the metabolite. The introduction of a “standard” compound in known concentration is used as a reference to calculate the concentration of various metabolites in the biological fluid from the ratios of intensities. Subsequently, the analysis of the spectra requires the use of mathematical tools that are useful for extracthidden information among several thousands of variables [16,17]. The representation of data in spaces of small dimensions greatly facilitates the analysis and interpretation of results. MVA is classified into two categories: “unsupervised” and “supervised” methods [18,19]. A typical unsupervised approach is represented by the PCA (principal component analysis). It can be used to identify specific structures in a dataset such as clusters, anomalies or trends that exist between the observations. The PCA allows representing similarity between observations and variables. The analysed data are projected along the17 directions that allow obtaining the maximum possible variance. The first principal component is defined by the set of variables that describe most of the variance; the second describes the main component orthogonal to the first.

However, most of the predictive models rely on supervised models. Supervised methods require a training data set, in which the outcome is known, to build a predictive model. Samples belonging to the same group are close to each other and the resulting variables of importance (VIP) of the model can be considered as the weight factor that allows identifying the main metabolites responsible for the separation among the groups in the score plot. In general, it is essential to confirm the findings of any of these multivariate methods using a second set of “blind” samples, which may adequately test the results obtained. Once the best model has been built, the parameters R2 and Q2 should be tested. R2 estimates goodness of fit, Q2 estimates goodness of prediction. A high R2 close to 1 (or between 0.7 and 0.9) and high Q2 close to 0.8 (between 0.6 and 0.9) are evidences of an excellent mathematical model. This approach allows the classification of the different samples on the basis of metabolic profiles and to search for new biomarkers that characterize each group of samples under study. In this regard, it is always mandatory to reduce the number of false positive biomarkers assessing the accuracy of the multivariate model. Moreover, it must be aware that metabolomics studies are at risk for potential clinical confounders such as interindividual variability, diet, drug effects, age, sex, and comorbities. Therefore, each of these confounders needs to be taken into account.

The Translation Role for Metabolomics Studies

Once the identification of the new biomarkers is completed, it can be considered only the first step for the translation process. In fact, the typical flow “from laboratory to the patient bedside” involves several other steps that are called biomarker validation. It consists in the estimation of the performance in terms of sensitivity and specificity using a receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curve. The sensitivity is the percentage of subjects/patients who are correctly categorized with a biomarker among those who truly have the disease. Analogously, specificity is the percentage of subjects/patients who are categorized as not having the disease among all patients who truly don’t have the disease. The area under the ROC (AUROC) provides a good measure of the overall model performance. An AUROC of 1 represents the ideal performance with a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. Subsequently, the limit of detection, the robustness and the intra laboratory reproducibility are also parameters that need to be careful tested. Furthermore, the results achieved must be tested in different laboratories aiming to reproduce identical results independently.

Metabolomics and Asphyxia

Some papers dealing with the impact of asphyxia on global metabolism have recently appeared in the literature (Table 1). In particular, a work published by Vento et al. [20] explored the effect of resuscitation using pure oxygen (100%) compared to the room air concentration (21%) in a court of asphyctic term neonates compared to a control group [20]. In order to asses the presence of damage, authors measured oxidative stress biomarkers such as: reduced glutathione (GSH), oxidized glutathione and the superoxide dismutase (SOD), while to test the cardiac and renal damage they used plasma cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and urinary N-acetyl-glucosaminidase (NAG). Both groups of asphyctic neonates (100%/21%) showed an increased production of oxidative stress biomarkers, moreover, the group resuscitated with pure oxygen also revealed significantly higher value of cTnT and NAG. Authors suggest that the room air resuscitation causes less oxidative stress and damage to heart and kidney than pure oxygen.

Summary of the metabolomics analysis for the asphyxia condition
Approach (Un targeted/Targeted) Analytical techniques Animal/Human sampling Biofluid Key metabolic pathways Reference
Targeted Spectrophotometry
Human (Newborns) Blood Production of oxidative stress biomarkers, and significantly higher value of cTnT and NAG . Vento et al. [20]
Targeted ESI MS/MS
Plasma The metabolites key components of Krebs cycle metabolism, glycine and amino acid metabolisms. Solberg et al. [21]
Untargeted NMR/MVA Animal
Urine Resuscitation with lower oxygen concentration was associated with cellular homeostasis, maintenance, and carbohydrates metabolisms.
Higher oxygen concentration was characterized by ROS production.
Fanos et al. [22]

Table 1: A schematic representation of metabolomics workflow applied to asphyxia samples.

In a recent work, Solberg et al. tried to determine the best oxygen concentration used as resuscitation procedure [21]. Authors used electrospray ionization with a tandem mass spectrometry (ESI MS/MS) and a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to study the effect of hypoxia and reoxygenation in 33 piglets, which were divided in three groups and resuscitated with different oxygen concentrations. The first group had 21% of oxygen, the second group 100% for 15 minutes and then 21%, the last one just 100%. Authors hypothesized that the metabolites belonging to each group may uncover a maker of hypoxia as well enabling to find the best resuscitation procedure. These metabolites included several key components of Krebs cycle metabolism, glycine and amino acid metabolisms. They suggested that the resuscitation with 100% of oxygen was correlated to the reduction, in terms of concentration, of the metabolites alphaketo- glutarate, succinate and fumarate, which was also associated to the delay in recovery.

In the following paper, Fanos et al. performed a comparative study on the metabolic effect on 40 piglets subjected to experimental hypoxia and reoxygenation [1]. Aim of this work was to investigate whether different metabolomics profiles occurred according to different oxygen concentrations administered at resuscitation (18%, 21%, 40% and 100%). Urine metabolic profiles were analyzed at baseline and after reoxygenation by 1H-NMR. The metabolites were identified by MVA indicating that resuscitation with 21% of oxygen seems to be optimal in terms of survival, and rapidity of resuscitation. Authors also suggested that metabolomics approach could be a new tool for a more in-depth knowledge of the pathophysiological responses of the new-borns to the resuscitation with different oxygen concentration.

This recent literature suggests that metabolomics is a promising method to assess the best oxygen concentration to be used for resuscitation. Indeed, this approach is a powerful instrument of knowledge about the factors responsible of the metabolic modifications, which can help identifying metabolic patterns of function, disease, and injury, as well as for therapeutic strategies.

Metabolomics and Sepsis

Since sepsis is a complex multiorgan dysfunction, resulting in large changes in the organism metabolites, the analysis of the metabolome may be an attractive methodology for the determination of multiple metabolites. However, very little research has been performed using the metabolomics approach in the field of sepsis especially in human [22]. So far, only few recent papers have been published using both animal models, and human samples. These works are highlighted below (Table 2).

Summary of the metabolomics analysis for the sepsis condition
Approach (Un targeted/Targeted) Analytical  techniques Animal/Human sampling Biofluid MVA Key metabolites identified Reference
Untargeted NMR Animal (Sprague-Dawleyrats) Serum Orthogonal partial least squares lactate, alanine, acetate, acetoacetate, hydroxybutyrate, and formate Lin et al. [23]
Targeted UPLC-Q-TOF-MS Animal (Sprague-Dawleyrats) Plasma Orthogonal partial least squares hypoxanthine, indoxylsufate, glucuronic acid, gluconic acid, proline, uracil, nitrotyrosine, uric acid, and trihydroxycholanoic acid Liu et al. [24]
Untargeted NMR Animal (Sprague-Dawleyrats) Broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF), lung tissue and serum Partial least squares -
discriminant analysis
alanine, creatine, phosphoethanolamine, and myoinositol increased in lung tissue; creatine increased and myoinositol decreased in balf; alanine, creatine, phosphoethanolamine, and acetoacetate increased in serum. Izquierdo-Garcia et al. [25]
Human (Newborns) Urine Orthogonal partial least squares- discriminant analysis NMR: acetate
acetone, citrate
creatinine glycine
lactate, lysine
GC/MS: lactate, glucose,, maltose,
ribitol, ribonic acid, pseudo-uridine,
2,3,4-trihydroxybutyric acid, 2-ketogluconic acid
 3,4-dihydroxybutanoic acid, 3,4,5-trihydroxypentanoic acid
Fanos et al. [22]
Untargeted NMR Human
Serum Orthogonal partial least squares glucose, 3-hydroxybutyrate, o-acetylcarnitine, succinate, creatine, and creatine phosphatelactate, 2-hydroxyisovalerate, isobutyrate, creatinine, trimethylamine n-oxide, and ureabranched-chain amino acids Mickiewicz et al.[28]

Table 2: A schematic representation of metabolomics workflow applied to sepsis biofluids.

In 2009, Lin et al. [23] proposed an NMR-based metabolomics study to evaluate the feasibility to build and early predictive experimental model for the investigation of the sepsis syndrome. Authors advised that the purpose for performing this study was the lack of sensitivity of the common biomarkers, such as C reactive protein and procalcitonin, which are routinely used in clinical laboratory. By contrast, they hypothesized that a panel of metabolites could better identify an early septic condition, becoming in the next future a valid alternative. In order to perform this study, serum samples were collected from 60 male pathogen-free Sprague-Dawley rats (220-250 g; 6-8 weeks). The experimental sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) and rats were randomized into a sham-operated group (n 20) and a CLP group (n 40). According to the difference of survival during the following days, CLP rats were then divided into a surviving group (n 19, in case of survival duration exceeding 6 days) and a nonsurviving group (n 21, survival duration between 24 h and 6 days). From each animal, approximately 1.0 mL of blood was collected by tail (sera were obtained by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 15 min). Later, samples were stored at minus 80°C until NMR analysis. The metabolomics analysis revealed that the levels of six metabolites, mainly involved in energy metabolism, including lactate, alanine, acetate, acetoacetate, hydroxybutyrate, and formate, changed markedly in septic rats and especially in the nonsurvivors group. Using these metabolites, a predictive model called radial basis function neural network was created for an early prognostic evaluation of sepsis. The model achieved a prediction accuracy of approximately 87% indicating that the NMR-based metabonomic approach may be a promising technique for an early prognosis with the advantages of being rapid, less costly, and more efficient. Authors stated that the metabolomics approach would offer in the near future a promising tool for clinicians to predict the outcome of septic patients in intensive care unit.

More recently, Liu et al. [24] investigated the sepsis condition caused by a thermally injured in experimental animal model of rats. Authors, using ultra performance liquid chromatographyquadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q-TOF-MS) on plasma samples, were able to identify 9 metabolites, which were responsible for the septicemia. The metabolites related to the sepsis were: hypoxanthine, indoxylsufate, glucuronic acid, gluconic acid, proline, uracil, nitrotyrosine, uric acid, and trihydroxy cholanoic acid. A deeper analysis of these metabolites suggested their involvement in oxidative stress and tissue damage. In another work, Izquierdo-Garcia et al. [25] has used NMR spectroscopy coupled with MVA for the study of sepsis. They collected and analyzed bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), lung tissue and serum samples from 28 male Sprague Dawley rats, which were divided into two groups. The first group had the cecal ligation puncture in order to develop sepsis infection, while the second group did not receive the puncture. Using the metabolomic approach the authors were able to construct a predictive model, which could discriminate between the two groups with a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. The most important metabolites in the septic rat’s model were: alanine, creatine, phosphoethanolamine, and myoinositol increased in lung tissue; creatine increased and myoinositol decreased in BAL fluid; and alanine, creatine, phosphoethanolamine, and acetoacetate increased in serum.

The first report on early and late diagnosis of neonatal sepsis was performed by Fanos et al. [2]. In this study, authors used a combined approach based on both 1H-NMR and gas-chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) techniques, coupled with MVA, to investigate the impact of sepsis in a population of neonates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the capability of the metabolomics approach to identify a potential metabolic profile related to the neonatal septic condition. The population includes 25 neonates and among them, 9 patients had a diagnosis of sepsis while 16 were controls. 1H-NMR and GC/MS spectra were acquired for all urine samples and analysed by using an Orthogonal Partial Least Square- Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA). The OPLS-DA model showed a significant separation between the two groups of samples, and the metabolites responsible for the separation were identified. In particular, the infected group was characterized by a urinary increase in acetate, acetone, glycine, lysine lactate, glucose, maltose, and a decrease of ribitol, ribonic acid, pseudo uridine, 2,3,4-trihydroxybutyric acid 2-ketogluconic acid 3,4-dihydroxybutanoic acid 3,4,5-trihydroxypentanoic acid, citrate and creatinine. The authors indicate that was possible to identify by MVA a different metabolomics pattern between classes of neonates having a different clinical outcome. These results agree with recent works published in the literature. In particular, the presence of acetone in the urine of the septic group has been suggested as a compensatory reaction to a reduced level of ATP. Lactate and glucose were also found to be increased in the urine of septic patients compared to controls, while citrate, a metabolite of the Krebs cycle, had decreased [15,26,27]. This study showed a unique metabolic profile of the patients affected by sepsis compared to non-affected ones, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.05).

At the same time, Mickiewicz et al. [28] studied the metabolic profiles of human serum sample using 1H NMR metabolomics approach as tool for septic shock diagnosis. Based on the idea that metabolomics can provide a unique insight into metabolic changes of living systems, the aim of the study was focused on developing a new approach to improve the diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis. Human blood samples from 39 septic shock patients and 20 controls were collected within the first 24 hours after admission to the ICU. The patients recruited were in accordance to specific published criteria for SIRS and septic shock. The samples were then centrifuged at 1,200×g for 10 minutes, collected in a 15-mL tube, and frozen at –80°C until NMR analysis. In order to prepare samples for NMR experiment, the sera were thawed and filtered twice using 3-kDa filters. The resulting spectra were first processed using an unsupervised method, which was able to separate the septic shock samples and controls without any outliers. Subsequently, to better reveal the differences between the metabolic profiles of the two groups, a supervised OPLS-DA analysis was performed. The most important metabolites responsible for the clustering between the groups were identified. Sixty metabolites changed significantly in septic shock patients, they are mainly involved in energy metabolism such as glucose, 3-hydroxybutyrate, O-acetylcarnitine, succinate, creatine, and creatine phosphate. Authors also suggested that the significant increases in the concentration of metabolites such as lactate, 2-hydroxyisovalerate, isobutyrate, creatinine, trimethylamine N-oxide, and urea may be related to organ failure. In addition, the levels of branched-chain amino acids decrease significantly in the sepsis group, suggesting an increased protein breakdown and oxidation as source for the energy production. A very remarkable goal of the study is the demonstration of a strong potential prediction of mortality among the septic shock patients. The metabolomics approach appeared more efficient than the common scores (APACHE/SOFA) for the early prognosis of patient outcome. Nonetheless, authors considered the study as an initial step for the use of the metabolomics approach in a clinical setting. In fact they underlined the need for further studied across multiple centres.


So far, it can be stated that the metabolomics technique can be considered a viable option for the study of pathologies such as asphyxia and sepsis. Certainly, further studies are requested to confirm these preliminary results; nevertheless, very interesting data are available in the literature.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11641
  • [From(publication date):
    July-2014 - Aug 23, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7849
  • PDF downloads :3792

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version