alexa Multisite Handle vs. Single Blade Handle (Comparative Study) | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2167-0951
Hair Therapy & Transplantation
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Multisite Handle vs. Single Blade Handle (Comparative Study)

Ahsen Farooque*

Hair Restoration Surgeon, Los Angeles Doctors Hair Transplant Clinic, Bahrain

*Corresponding Author:
Ahsen Farooque
MBBS (pb), Hair Restoration surgeon
Los Angeles doctors Hair Transplant clinic, Bahrain
Tel: 973-17-621581
Fax: 973-17-626764
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: March 11, 2015 Accepted date: August 04, 2015 Published date: August 11, 2015

Citation: Farooque A (2015) Multisite Handle vs. Single Blade Handle (Comparative Study). Hair Ther Transplant 5:136. doi:10.4172/2167-0951.1000136

Copyright: © 2015 Farooque A. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



Visit for more related articles at Hair Therapy & Transplantation

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore and describe the ability of three blades "Smart Multisite Handle" in terms of its use and to measure its efficiency in comparison to conventional single blade handle.

Keywords

Follicular grafts; Multisite handle; Single blade handle

Creation of Recipient Sites

Only recently, as the awareness grew with respect to avoiding unnecessary surgical trauma as well as opt for maximum possible density of hair, physicians now prefer to create recipient sites which are considerably smaller in size; 0.4-5 mm to 0.7-8 mm, but in larger numbers; around 3000-4000, to accommodate same number of follicular grafts.

Making of large number of comparatively smaller recipient sites, however, is quite a crucial task which needs to be completed within a specific time, keeping in view the graft survival time. Similarly, to maintain the uniformity of distance between the sites as well as controlling the depth and angle of individual sites is another factor, to be considered, for optimum quality results, in hair transplant procedures.

Introduction

The addition of new instrument is developed and designed solely by Aesthetic Instruments with technical guidance of Dr. Ahsen Farooque and his technical team. The instrument, named Smart Multisite Handle, is used to create three recipient sites of equal depth, angle and distance between them, simultaneously, thereby to cut short half the time and labor on the part of physician, besides achieving other advantages in hair transplant procedure.

Objective

The purpose of this study is to explore and describe the ability of three blades Smart Multisite Handle in terms of its use and to measure its efficiency in comparison to conventional single blade handle.

Comparative study of time measure between three blade Smart Multisite Handle and conventional single blade handle, during creation of recipient sites

Comparative study of three blade, Smart Multisite Handle with that of single blade handle was conducted at Dr Ahsen’s private clinic in Lahore on two different patients, selected for mega sessions of 3000 grafts, each, to evaluate time consumption during creation of recipient sites for both the procedures. Instruments used for patient A was smart multisite handle (small 0.7 mm and medium 0.9 mm sizes) and single blade conventional handle was used for patient B. However, large multisite handle (1.2 mm) was not used, as mini-grafts or couples were not opted, in both the cases. Time duration for each type of handle was noted down for respective number of sites created. While total time consumption in both the cases included the time required for relative siting logistics, ie (oozing management etc. Comparative study of 3 blade handle vs. single blade handle) (Tables 1-4).

Blade size (mm) Number of sites created Time Duration
0.7 (single) 155 (one hair for zigzag margin) 4
0.7 (3-blades) 162+1750=1912 (for one & 2 hair) 12
0.9 (3-blades) 850 (for three and four hair) 7
- Total time consumption=Total sites created=2917 23 minutes
Average no. of sites/minute=126.8

Table 1: The time check for three blade handle (Smart Multisite Handle). *All above sites were made using two multisite handles (small and medium) One hair sites for zig-zag pattern (along hair line margin) were also made with smart multisite handle by using one blade only.

Blade size (mm) Number of sites created Time Duration
0.7 161 (one hair for zig- zag margin) 4
0.7 195+1832=2027 (one & two hair) 38
0.9 910 (for three and four hair) 18
- Total time consumption= 60
Total sites created=3098
Average no. of sites/minute=61.96

Table 2: The time check for single blade handle. *All above sites were made using two conventional single blade handles, each containing 0.7 mm and 0.9 mm blades, respectively.

Blade sizes(mm) Number of sites created Time duration(minutes)
0.7 (single blade) 162(1 hair grafts) 5
0.7 (3 blade) 2700 (1+2 hair (zigzag) 18
0.9mm (3 blade) 50 (3 and 4 hair) 9
- Total sites create:3812 -
Total time taken:3 2

Table 3: Time check study of 3 blade handle on patient #4 for creation of 3812 recipients sites.

Blade sizes(mm) Number of sites created Time duration (minutes)
0.7 (single blade) 130(1 hair grafts) 4
0.9 (3 blade handle) 1680 (2&3 hair grafts) 13
- Total sites create: 1810 -
Total time taken: 17

Table 4: Time check study of 3 blade handle on patient #5 for creation of 1810 recipients sites (FUE mega session).

Results

•Single blade handle took more than twice as much time as was taken by three blade handle.

•Time taken for the assembly and adjustment of blades in three blade handle was just a minute more than the conventional single blade handle.

Observation for special features

•All three blades remained intact, firmly, into blade slots.

•Removal and placing of blades into the handle was quite easy.

•The blade length adjustment option with just a push of finger to a precision of millimeter (1 mm to maximum 4.5 mm) is also a noteworthy advantage of three blade handle.

•Less efforts and concentration was required to maintain the angle and inter-site distance, compared to single blade handle.

•Despite comparatively larger in size, the light and smooth feel of handle, made from titanium, provided firm and comfortable grip throughout the procedure.

Conclusion

The above study has shown significant superiority and efficiency of new instrument of three blade handle, over the conventional single blade handle. This could innovatively reduce the time for creation of quality recipient sites, shortening the time of procedure and therefore, improve the overall quality of work in hair transplant procedure. The instrument is available at this conference for the physicians to inspect.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11613
  • [From(publication date):
    August-2015 - Sep 21, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7873
  • PDF downloads :3740
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords