alexa NADPH: Quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1609C>T) Polymorphism and Gastric Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis | OMICS International
ISSN: 2157-2518
Journal of Carcinogenesis & Mutagenesis
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

NADPH: Quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1609C>T) Polymorphism and Gastric Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis

Manzoor Ahmad Malik1, Haq S1, Yetoo DM2, Baba RA1, Nissar S1, Gull A1, Malik SA2 and Shah ZA1,2*

1Cancer Diagnostic and Research Centre, Department of Immunology and Molecular Medicine, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Soura, Srinagar, Kashmir-190011, J&K, India

2Department of Immunology and Molecular Medicine, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Soura, Srinagar, Kashmir-190011, J&K, India

*Corresponding Author:
Shah ZA
Department of Immunology and Molecular Medicine
Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences
Soura, Srinagar, Kashmir-190011, J&K, India
Tel: +91-9419415278
Email: [email protected]

Received date: December 31, 2015; Accepted date: January 22, 2016; Published date: January 25, 2016

Citation: Malik MA, Haq S, Yetoo DM, Malik SA, Shah ZA (2016) NADPH: Quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1609C>T) Polymorphism and Gastric Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis. J Carcinog Mutagene 7: 249. J Carcinog Mutagene 7:249. doi: 10.4172/2157-2518.1000249

Copyright: © 2015, Malik MA, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Carcinogenesis & Mutagenesis

Abstract

Evidence is increasingly emerging about multiple roles for the NAD (P) H quinine oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) enzyme in gastric cancer (GC). The NQO1609C>T (Pro187Ser) null polymorphism of the NQO1 gene contributes significantly to the variation in enzymatic activity across different populations. NQO1609C>T polymorphism was thoroughly investigated with respect to gastric cancer susceptibility. The results were inconsistent partly due to low sample sizes. The aim of the present work was to perform a meta-analysis to assess association for gastric cancer. Present meta-analysis involved eligible studies including 722 cases and 853 controls. Present metaanalysis found a statistically significant association between the variant T allele and overall cancer risk in the worldwide population (for the TT vs CC; co-dominant model, OR=1.568; 95%CI=1.096-2.244; P=0.014). At allele level, NQO1609C>T polymorphism was significantly correlated with increased GC risk (OR=1.302; 95%CI=1.111-1.525; P=0.001). In subgroup analysis positive association was also found for gastric cancer in recessive (OR=1.456; 95%CI=1.050-2.020; P=0.024) model. Stratified analysis revealed that this association was largely attributed to the Assian ethnicity (for the TT vs CC model, OR=1.227; 95%CI=1.022-1.473; P=0.028). Present results indicate that the 609C>T polymorphism of the NQO1 gene is an important genetic risk factor in gastric cancer.

Keywords

NQO1; 609C>T; Meta-analysis; Gastric cancer

Introduction

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. It is estimated that the burden of cancer will increase up to 22.2 million new cases diagnosed annually worldwide by 2030, which represents an increase by 75% compared with statistics of 2008 [1] Among human cancers, gastric carcinogenesis appears to be a complex multistep processes with multifunctional etiologies, where environmental, geographical, and genetic factors have been attributed to play major roles in causation of cancers. Gastric cancer (GC) has diverse incidences, patterns, and risk factors (like tobacco, alcohol, dietary pattern, sex, family history and Helicobacter pylori infection) [2].

Most of the carcinogens generally undergo bioactivation and inactivation by phase I and phase II enzymes. Quinone oxidoreductases (NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase 1 (coded by NQO1) is phase II cytosolic enzymes that catalyze metabolism of quinones. NQO1 is ubiquitously expressed in all tissue types and induced along with a battery of defensive genes in response to stresses including xenobiotics, antioxidants, oxidants, heavy metals, UV light, and ionizing radiations [3]. The coordinated induction of genes for these enzymes provides necessary protection for cells against free radical damage, oxidative stress, and neoplasia.

The NQO1 gene is located on chromosome 16q22.1. A nonsynonymous SNP has been described by Traver et al., at nucleotide position 609 (rs2070999) [4]. The variant is a C-to-T transition and results in a proline to serine amino acid substitution at codon 187 in the protein. The variant allele results in reduced enzymatic activity according to in vitro studies [5,6]. Compared with the wild type (CC), the homozygous variant has only 2% to 4% of the quinone reductase activity, whereas the heterozygote variant has a 3-fold decrease in enzyme activity [7]. The Pro187Ser polymorphism has been linked to benzene toxicity [8], therefore it has also been hypothesized to affect cancer susceptibility by modifying the internal exposure to bioactivated carcinogens. A wide variation of the allele frequency has been observed across ethnic groups. The homozygous variant genotype is as rare as 2% in white populations but as frequent as 20% in Asian populations [9]. Also, there are several epidemiological studies reporting association of NQO1 609 C>T polymorphism with GC [10-13].

Large number of studies investigated the role of NQO1 609C>T polymorphism and the susceptibility of gastric cancer. However, the results were inconsistent rather than conclusive, possibly due to the small sample size in the majority of studies. Therefore, a meta-analysis of these studies was undertaken to investigate the association of the NQO1609C>T polymorphism with susceptibility to gastric cancer in co-dominant, recessive and allele level. In addition, present study analyzed available data to explore any role of ethnicity on the association of NQO1609C>T polymorphism in gastric cancer risk.

Materials and Methods

Identification and eligibility of relevant studies

To identify all articles that examined the association of NQO1 609C>T polymorphism with GC, literature search was conducted in the Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane, google and dogpile, and CBM database, up to December 2015 using the following terms and keywords: “NQO1”, ‘‘Quinone oxidoreductases (NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase 1’’, ‘‘polymorphism’’ and ‘‘gastric cancer’’. Additional studies were identified by a manual search from other sources (e.g., Web of Knowledge), references of original studies or review articles on this topic.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

To minimize heterogeneity and facilitate the interpretation of results, studies included in the current meta-analysis had to meet all the following criteria: (1) evaluation of the NQO1609C>T and GC risk, (2) use of a case control design, (3) recruitment of confirmed GC patients and disease-free controls, (4) have an available genotype frequency, and (5) an unrelated case-control study, if studies had partly overlapped subjects, only the one with a larger sample size was selected, (6) sufficient published data for estimating an odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), and (7) papers published in English.

The major reasons for exclusion of studies were (1) overlapping data (2) case-only studies, (3) all three genotype frequency missing, (4) family based studies, (5) review articles, (6) age and gender unmatched studies, (7) ethnicity unmatched studies, (8) the studies which were not in HWE and (9) papers published in other languages other than English.

Data extraction

All investigators independently assessed the articles for inclusion/ exclusion and extracted data, and reached a consensus on all of the items. For each study, the following information was extracted: name of the first author; publication year; ethnicity (country); sample size (numbers of cases and controls); gene polymorphisms investigated; types of disease; sources of samples; genotyping methods; and the minor allele frequency in the controls with the Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) p-value, respectively.

Statistical analysis

The association between NQO1609C>T polymorphism and gastric cancer was estimated by calculating pooled odd ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. The significance of the pooled OR was determined by Z test (P<0.05 was considered statistically significant). The risk of NQO1609C>T TT genotype on gastric cancer was evaluated by comparing with their reference wild type homozygote and then evaluated the risks of (CT+TT vs CC) and (CC+CT vs TT ) on gastric cancer, assuming dominant and recessive effects of the variant TT allele, respectively. A random-effects or fixed-effects model was used to calculate pooled effect estimates in the presence (P<0.10) or absence (P>0.10) of heterogeneity. Publication bias was detected for the overall pooled analysis of NQO1609C>T TT genotypes, and recessive model. Additionally funnel plot was drawn, symmetry of the funnel plot means a potential publication bias. For the one-way sensitivity analysis, one single study was excluded each time, and the new pooled results could reflect the influence of that deleted study to the overall summary OR. All Meta-analysis tests were performed through comprehensive Meta-analysis version 2.0.

Results

Ten studies were preliminarily retrieved. Six studies were excluded after reading the titles and abstracts (Figure 1).

carcinogenesis-mutagenesis-study-selection

Figure 1: Flow chat of study selection.

According to inclusion and exclusion standards, four studies were finally included [10-13], the publication years of the literatures was between January 2000 and December 2015. The general features of the researches were included (Table 1).

Reference Author Year Country Ethnicity Study Design Genotyping Method Cases Controls HW E Sample Pubmed ID
10 Hamajima et al. 2002 Japan Asian HB PCR-RFLP 143 241 0.25 Blood PMID: 12018106
11 Zhang et al. 2003 China Asian HB PCR-RFLP 124 165 0.39 Blood PMID: 12854127
12 Sarbia et al. 2003 Germany Eropean HB PCR-RFLP 320 252 0.60 Blood PMID: 14506737
13 Malik et al. 2011 India Asian HB PCR-RFLP 135 195 0.30 Blood PMID: 22736108

Table 1: Characteristics of studies included in the NQO1609C>T meta-analysis.

Potential publication bias and sensitivity analysis

The influence of TT genotype at 609C>T locus on NQO1 was taken as the analysis index and inverted funnel plot was drawn. Due to the small amount of the included research and unobvious distribution trends, the inverted funnel plot showed trend symmetry, indicating that the publication bias was not big (Figure 2).

carcinogenesis-mutagenesis-symmetric-distribution

Figure 2: Funnel plots showed symmetric distribution. Log OR is plotted against the standard error of log OR for studies on NQO1609C>T.

Meta-analysis database

In an attempt to obtain a common estimate of the NQO1609C>T polymorphisms effect on risk for GC and provide compelling evidence for association, a meta-analysis was performed combining all available genotype and allele frequency data from published studies. The detailed characteristics of each study included in the meta-analysis are presented in Table 1, and the NQO1609C>T polymorphism genotype distributions from each study are presented in Table 2.

Reference Author Year Cases Controls Cases (Allele) Controls (Allele) Cases dominant model Controls dominant model Cases Recessive model Controls Recessive model
      CC CT TT CC CT TT CC TT CC TT CC CT+TT CC CT+TT CC+CT TT CC+CT TT
10 Hamajima et al. 2002 48 71 24 154 179 66 167 119 487 311 48 95 154 245 119 24 333 66
11 Zhang et al. 2003 40 55 29 52 86 27 135 113 190 140 40 84 52 311 95 29 138 27
12 Sarbia et. al 2003 200 10 10 185 63 4 510 130 433 71 200 120 185 67 310 10 248 4
13 Malik et al. 2012 51 39 18 112 68 15 141 75 292 98 51 57 112 83 90 18 180 15

Table 2: NQO1609C>T polymorphism genotype distribution of each study included in the meta-analysis.

By pooling all the studies and NQO1609C>T polymorphism was associated with GC risk in co-dominant model (OR=1.568; 95%CI=1.096-2.244; P=0.014) (Figure 3).

carcinogenesis-mutagenesis-polymorphism

Figure 3: Forest plots of the association between NQO1609C>T (co-dominant model; CC vs. TT) polymorphism and GC risk. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effect estimates. The squares and horizontal lines correspond to OR and 95% CI of specific study, and the area of squares reflects study weight (inverse of the variance). The diamond represents the pooled OR and its 95% CI.

In subgroup analysis, present study found that NQO1609C>T polymorphism was significantly correlated with increased GC risk at allele level (OR=1.302; 95%CI=1.111-1.525; P=0.001) (Figure 4).

carcinogenesis-mutagenesis-allelic-model

Figure 4: Meta-analysis under allelic model (C vs. T) for the association between GC risk and the NQO1609C>T polymorphism.

When stratified by dominant and recessive models, significant association was found between NQO1609C>T polymorphism and risk of GC in recessive model (OR=1.456; 95%CI=1.050-2.020; P=0.024) but not in dominant (OR=1.116; 95%CI=0.905-1.376; P=0.030) model (Figures 5 and 6). Present study also examined the association between NQO1609C>T polymorphism and GC risk at ethnicity level; the overall result showed that NQO1609C>T polymorphism was correlated with GC risk, this association maintained in Asians (OR=1.227; 95%CI=1.022-1.473; P=0.028).

carcinogenesis-mutagenesis-recessive-model

Figure 5: Meta-analysis under recessive model (CC + CT vs. TT) for the association between GC risk and the NQO1609C>T polymorphism.

carcinogenesis-mutagenesis-dominant-model

Figure 6: Meta-analysis under dominant model (CC vs. CT+TT) for the association between GC risk and the NQO1609C>T polymorphism.

Discussion

After a comprehensive evaluation of the NQO1 gene C609T polymorphism among 1575 subjects (722 cases and 853 controls), present metaanalysis provided the evidence that the NQO1 609T allele is associated with a significantly increased risk of gastric cancer occurrence, especially in Asians. Although between-study heterogeneity, albeit disturbing, could not be easily eliminated, present results indicated that the NQO1 gene could be a genetic marker for gastric cancer.

The wide geographical variation in the incidence of GC suggests that there are major genetic and environmental influences in the development of this cancer. NQO1 is cytosolic flavoproteins that catalyze the two-electron reduction of quinones and quinoid compounds to hydroquinones, thereby promoting detoxification and preventing the formation of highly reactive oxygen species, which lead to DNA and cell damage [14].

The results of present meta-analysis also suggest that this genetic variant may play a more substantial role in gastric cancer (OR=1.568; 95%CI=1.096-2.244; P=0.014). The underlying mechanism of the correlation of NQO1 609 C>T polymorphism with increased risk for developing gastric cancer may be related to the different enzyme activities encoded by the different NQO1 genotypes. Thus, lack of NQO1 activity encoded by the homozygous TT genotype results in a reduced detoxification of exogenous carcinogens which causes cells to be easily damaged by oxidation, and thereby increasing the susceptibility to chemically induced cancers. NQO1 null alleles have shown to be associated with other cancers like lymphoblastic leukemia [15] cancer of lung [16] colon [17] breast cancer [18] and colorectal cancer [19]. Chang Gun Cho and coworkers concluded that NQO1 139Arg alleles were associated with tobacco dose-dependent increase in risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and NQO1 genotype polymorphisms may play an important role in the development of smoking-related HNSCC [20]. However, Hongwei Chen et al. found no relation between NQO1 null allele and lung cancer [21] (Figure 7).

carcinogenesis-mutagenesis-ethnicity-level

Figure 7: Meta-analysis under ethnicity level for the association between GC risk and the NQO1609C>T polymorphism.

It is well known that NQO1 specifically inihibited by benz-o-pyrine which is a major component of tobacco smoke. The results from NQO1-/- mice suggests that loss of these protein leads to alteration in intracellular redox state and decrease in p53 protein and apoptosis, which leads to hyperplasia and lymphomas [22,23]. It has also been demonstrated that NQO1 and NQO2 act as endogenous factors in protection against hyperplasia. Individuals carrying both polymorphic genomic alleles are completely lacking in NQO1 activity, whereas individuals who are heterozygous with one polymorphic allele have low-to-intermediate NQO1 activity compared with wild type individuals (5). These findings together raised intriguing questions regarding the susceptibility of NQO1-/- mice and humans deficient in these proteins to develop carcinoma in response to exposures to nitrosamines, radiation and benzene.

A wide variation of the allele frequency has been observed across ethnic groups. The homozygous variant genotype is as rare as 2% in white populations but as frequent as 20% in Asian populations [9]. In the present metaanalysis the overall result showed that NQO1609C>T polymorphism was correlated with GC risk on ethnicity level, this association maintained in Asians (OR=1.227; 95%CI=1.022-1.473; P=0.028).

In summary, present study expand previous individual studies on gastric cancer by indicating that the NQO1 C609T polymorphism may increase the risk of GC, especially in Asians. Also, present observations leave open the question regarding the heterogeneous effects of the C609T polymorphism across different ethnic populations. Future studies within a genetic and functional framework are warranted to elucidate the relationship between the C609T polymorphism and gastric cancer, and mechanisms of the NQO1 gene and gastric cancer.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Article Usage

  • Total views: 8233
  • [From(publication date):
    February-2016 - Feb 20, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8153
  • PDF downloads : 80

Review summary

  1. Angelica
    Posted on Jul 20 2016 at 12:17 pm
    The article represents a meta-analysis on the polymorphism of the NADPH: Quinone oxidoreductase 1 in 722 subjects in order to determine the cancer risk associated with NADPH polymorphism. The T allele variation was pointed out the chief factor controlling incidence of gastric cancer is cosmopolitan population. The information obtained in the present analysis could be harnessed in designing a genetic diagnostic tool for the screening of specific population or organism susceptible to gastric cancer.
  2. Yang S
    Posted on Jul 14 2016 at 11:27 pm
    The topic of the article is interesting. The authors studied the correlation between (NQO1609C>T) Polymorphism and gastric cancer. It was found that a positive association exists for gastric cancer in the dominant model with an OR of 1.116. The results are unique but lack statistical significance. Further analysis recommended to produce statistically significant results..
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version