Reach Us
+44-1522-440391

Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

**Vladimir DZHUNUSHALIEV ^{*}**

Department of Physical and Microelectronical Engineering, Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University, Kievskaya Str. 44, 720021 bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic

- *Corresponding Author:
- Vladimir DZHUNUSHALIEV

Department of Physical and Microelectronical Engineering

Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University,

Kievskaya Str. 44, 720021

bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic

E-mail:

**Received date: ** May 31, 2007;** Revised date:** July 07, 2007

**Visit for more related articles at** Journal of Generalized Lie Theory and Applications

An operator constraint for a slave-boson decomposition in t-J model of high temperature superconductivity is considered. It is shown that the constraint can be resolved by introducing a non-associative operator. In this case the constraint is an antiassociative generating relation of a new algebra. Similar constraint is offered for splitting the gluon.

Everybody knows that the algebra of non-perturbative operators in quantum theory exists but nobody knows its exact form. In this paper the idea is discussed that the constraint (2.2) in t-J model of high-temperature superconductivity is a new generating relation for an algebra of operators the product of which gives us the electron operator. On the perturbative level the algebra of quantum fields is defined by canonical (anti)commutative relations. The algebra of non-perturbative operators should be more complicated and should be generated not only by canonical (annti)commutative relations but should exist other generating relations as well. In this paper we discuss the idea that the constraint (2.2) is an antiassociator in a non-associative algebra of quantum non-perturbative operators.

In [14,10,11], the authors apply non-associative algebras to physics; the topics ranging from algebras of observables in quantum mechanics, to angular momentum and octonions, division algebras, triple-linear products and Yang - Baxter equations are covered. The non-associative gauge theoretic reformulation of Einstein’s general relativity theory is also discussed. In [1] one can also find the review of mathematical definitions and physical applications for the octonions.

It is widely believed that the low energy physics of high temperature (High-T_{c}) cuprates (for a review see [**9**]) is described in terms of t-J type model, which is given [8] by

where for the nearest, second nearest and 3rd nearest neighbor pairs, respectively. The effect of the strong Coulomb repulsion is represented by the fact that the electron operators and ciσ are the projected ones, where the double occupation is forbidden. This can be written as the inequality which is very difficult to handle. A powerful method to treat this constraint is the so-called slave-boson method [2,4]. In this approach the electron operator is represented as

where are the fermion operators, while *b _{i}* is the slave-boson operator. This representation together with the constraint

reproduces all the algebra of the electron operators. The physical meaning of the operators *f* and *b* is unclear: do these fields exist or not

In this paper we would like to show that the constraint (2.2) can be considered as a generating relation for a new algebra of operators from which the electron operator is constructed.

At this stage we ignore all indexes in the constraint (2.2). In this case Eq. (2.2) has the form

Now we want to compare this equation with the one of generating relations in a non-associative algebra proposed in [5,6]. Let us assume that there exists a non-associative algebra *G*. The algebra *G* is generated with associators and antiassociators (shortly speaking (±)associators). One of the (−)associators has the form

(Q_{1}Q_{2})Q_{3} + Q_{1} (Q_{2}Q_{3}) = (something) (3.2)

where Q_{i}, i = 1, 2, 3 are non-associative operators and it is the antiassociator (5.2) from Section 5.2. In the simplest case (something) = 1. Let us compare both Eq’s (2.2) and (3.2). It is easy to see that they are identical if we assign

f^{†} = Q_{1}Q_{2}, f = Q_{3}, b^{†} = Q_{1}, b = Q_{2}Q_{3} (3.3)

Immediately we can see that by using Eq’s (3.3), Eq. (3.2) can be rewritten in the following way:

(b^{†}Q_{2}) f + b^{†} (Q_{2}f) = 1 (3.4)

here for the simplicity we assume that r.h.s of (3.2) is unity. Eq. (3.4) tells us that the constraint (3.1) can be resolved in a non-associative algebra by the introduction of a nonassociative operator Q_{2}.

Thus the idea presented here is that the slave-boson decomposition is nothing else than the decomposition of an associative operator on non-associative operators. Such non-associative algebra should have an associative subalgebra with the elements c given as

c = f^{†}b (3.5)

where *f* and *b* are non-associative operators. In other words, in a non-associative algebra *G* the observables c have the slave-boson decomposition (3.5) where non-associative operators *f* and *b* are unobservables quantities.

Now we can restore the spin index σ and write

where σ = {↑, ↓} is the spin index. In this case the (−)associator (3.2) has the form

Analogously to Eq. (3.4) the non-associative solution of (2.2) is

where Q_{2σ} is unknown non-associative operator.

The problem of such interpretation of the constraint (2.2) is evident: does there exist a non-associative algebra with (−)associators (3.2) and (3.6)

The title of this section is the same as the title of Ref. [12] where it is shown that there exists the decomposition of gluon in Yang-Mills gauge theory similar to the slave-boson decomposition in High-T_{c} superconductivity. In Ref. [3] the similar construction (spin-charge separation) for the gauge boson is offered as well. The physical ground is that in both cases we are dealing with strong interactions: between electrons in High-T_{c} superconductivity and gauge bosons in quantum chromodynamics.

In Ref. [12] the slave-boson decomposition of the * SU(2)* gauge field (a = 1, 2, 3 and μ = 0, 1, 2, 3) proceeds as follows [7,13]: at first the diagonal Cartan component from the off-diagonal components is separated, and combined the latter into the complex field Then a complex vector field with the properties

is introduced; two spinless complex scalar fields Ψ_{1} and Ψ_{2} are introduced as well. The ensuing decomposition of W_{μ} is [7]

This is a direct analogue of Eq. (2.2), a decomposition of W_{μ} into spinless bosonic scalars 1,2 which describe the gluonic holons that carry the color charge of the W_{μ}, and a color-neutral spin-one vector which is the gluonic spinon that carries the statistical spin degrees of freedom of W_{μ}.

In Ref. [3] the spin-charge separation of *SU(2)* gauge potential is given by a little another way

where a = 1, 2, 3 is the *SU(2)* color index; i = 1, 2, 3 is an inner index and μ = 0, 1, 2, 3 is the Lorentzian index. The decompositions (4.1) and (4.2) are the decompositions of the classical fields. If we trust the quantum slave-boson decomposition for strongly interacting electrons in High-T_{c} superconductivity then we can apply this idea for the strongly interacting *SU(3)* gauge potential. In this case the non-perturbative operator can be decomposed in the following way

where we follow to the decomposition (4.2); B = 1, · · · , 8 is the *SU(3)* color index. Following to the slave-boson idea we assume that there is the constraint

Analogously to (2.2) the resolution of this constraint is a (−) associator

with

where is an unknown non-associative operator.

In the next section we will present a non-associative algebra where (±)associators are given on the level of the product of three operators.

In this section we will follow [5]. At first we would like to note that: (a) non-associative algebras proposed in [5,6] are the operator generalization of the octonions; (b) the full definition of this algebra is jet unknown and here we give the (±)associators for the product of three operators only.

**Octonions**

In this subsection we give a very short description what are the octonion numbers. Let splitoctonion numbers are denoted as In Table 1 we present the multiplication rule of the split-octonion units and I.

**Quantum (±)associators**

In this section we present the quantum (±)associators for the product of three operators. The anticommutators are

{Q_{i}q_{j}}+ = 0, {Q_{i}q_{j}}+ = 0, {Q_{i}q_{j}}+ = 0, {Q_{i}Q_{i}}+ = 0

The quantum (±)associators with different indices *m ≠ n*, *n ≠ p*, *p ≠ m* are

where *H _{3,i}* are operators (but may be they are numbers); Eq. (5.1) means that the quaternioniclike subalgebra spanned on Q

The quantum associators, such as q(QQ) or Q(qq), and with two different indices *m ≠ n* are

where *H _{3,i}*(

**.Self-consistency of quantum (±)associators**

The self-consistency of the (±)associators for the product of three operators can be proved according to the commutative diagram (5.3). For this we permute the first and third factors in the product a(bc) by following the commutative diagram

In [5, 6] it is shown that the (±)associators with the product of three operators are self-consistent. On this level it is impossible to define operators *H _{3,i}*.

In this paper we have shown that the constraint (2.2) can be resolved by an unexpected manner: the constraint is a generating relation for a new non-associative algebra. The bilinear combination of operators of this algebra make up an operator of an observable physical quantity. Probably: (a) such decomposition can be done only in the case if these physical quantities have strong interaction; (b) there exists an associative subalgebra of the above-mentioned nonassociative algebra where associative operators can be decomposed by non-associative operators following to the slave-boson way. In [6] such observable physical quantities are called white (colorless) operators. One can say that this hypothesized decomposition of an associative operator on non-associative operators (similar Eq’s (2.1) and (4.3)) is in some sense the generalization of quark confinement hypothesis: in both cases we have observable physical quantities which are build from unobservable quantities.

The author thanks D. Ebert, M. Mueller-Preussker and the other colleagues of the Particle Theory Group of the Humboldt University for kind hospitality. This work has been supported by DAAD.

- Baez JC (2002) TheOctonions. Bull Amer Math Soc39: 145-205math.ra/0105155.
- Barnes SE(1976)New method for the Anderson model. J Phys F6: 1375-1383.
- ChernodubMN (2006) Yang-Mills theory in Landau gauge as a liquid crystal. PhysLett B6 37: 128-132.
- Coleman P (1984)New approach to the mixed-valence problem. Phys Rev B29: 3035-3044.
- DzhunushalievV, Hamilton’s equations in a non-associative quantum theory; hep-th/0602047.
- Dzhunushaliev V White operators in a non-associative quantum theory. PhysLett A355: 298-302; hep-th/0507032.
- Faddeev LD, Niemi AJ (2002) Aspects of Electric magnetic duality in
*SU(2)*Yang-Mills theory. PhysLett B525: 195-200. - 8 Lee PA, NagaosaN (1992)Ginzburg-Landau theory of the spin-charge-separated system.Phys Rev B45: 966-970.
- Lee PA, Nagaosa N, Wen XG (2006) Doping a Mott insulator: physics of High Temperaturesuperconductivity. Rev Mod Phys 78: 17-86cond-mat/0410445.
- L ~ohmusJ, PaalE, SorgseppL (1994)Nonassociative Algebras in Physics. Hadronic Press, PalmHarbor.
- L ~ohmusJ, PaalE, SorgseppL (1998) About Nonassociativity in Mathematics and Physics. ActaAppl Math 50: 3-31.
- Niemi AJ,WaletNR (2005) Splitting the gluon? Phys Rev D72 054007-054019.
- NiemiAJ (2004) Dual superconductors and
*SU(2)*Yang-Mills. J High Energy Phys 0408: 035. - Okubo S (1995) Introduction to Octonion and Other Non-Associative Algebras in Physics. CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

- Adomian Decomposition Method
- Algebra
- Algebraic Geometry
- Analytical Geometry
- Applied Mathematics
- Axioms
- Balance Law
- Behaviometrics
- Big Data Analytics
- Binary and Non-normal Continuous Data
- Binomial Regression
- Biometrics
- Biostatistics methods
- Clinical Trail
- Combinatorics
- Complex Analysis
- Computational Model
- Convection Diffusion Equations
- Cross-Covariance and Cross-Correlation
- Deformations Theory
- Differential Equations
- Differential Transform Method
- Fourier Analysis
- Fuzzy Boundary Value
- Fuzzy Environments
- Fuzzy Quasi-Metric Space
- Genetic Linkage
- Geometry
- Hamilton Mechanics
- Harmonic Analysis
- Homological Algebra
- Homotopical Algebra
- Hypothesis Testing
- Integrated Analysis
- Integration
- Large-scale Survey Data
- Latin Squares
- Lie Algebra
- Lie Superalgebra
- Lie Theory
- Lie Triple Systems
- Loop Algebra
- Matrix
- Microarray Studies
- Mixed Initial-boundary Value
- Molecular Modelling
- Multivariate-Normal Model
- Noether's theorem
- Non rigid Image Registration
- Nonlinear Differential Equations
- Number Theory
- Numerical Solutions
- Operad Theory
- Physical Mathematics
- Quantum Group
- Quantum Mechanics
- Quantum electrodynamics
- Quasi-Group
- Quasilinear Hyperbolic Systems
- Regressions
- Relativity
- Representation theory
- Riemannian Geometry
- Robust Method
- Semi Analytical-Solution
- Sensitivity Analysis
- Smooth Complexities
- Soft biometrics
- Spatial Gaussian Markov Random Fields
- Statistical Methods
- Super Algebras
- Symmetric Spaces
- Theoretical Physics
- Theory of Mathematical Modeling
- Three Dimensional Steady State
- Topologies
- Topology
- mirror symmetry
- vector bundle

- Total views:
**12061** - [From(publication date):

October-2007 - Dec 19, 2018] - Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views :
**8247** - PDF downloads :
**3814**

Peer Reviewed Journals

International Conferences 2018-19