Occurrence of Selected Pesticides and PCPs in Surface Water Receiving Untreated Discharge in Pakistan
Received Date: Aug 21, 2017 / Accepted Date: Aug 28, 2017 / Published Date: Sep 03, 2017
This study investigated the presence of four pesticides (carbaryl, methomyl, carbofuran and chlorpyrifos) and two personal care products (PCPs) i.e., triclosan (TCS) and caffeine in River Kabul, upper River Indus and Kalpani stream receiving untreated wastewater from major towns in northern Pakistan. PCPs were also examined in domestic wastewater in Mardan district, Pakistan with untreated sewage disposal as common elsewhere in the country. Analysis were performed using liquid chromatography with a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). All the target pesticides were detected in surface water bodies and in domestic sewage in various concentrations. Methomyl in River Kabul at maximum concentration of 8.3 μg/L was found above its reported LC50 for water fleas. PCPs level in sewage were comparable to other countries but in the absence of any treatment practice, environmental discharge to water bodies was higher by many orders of magnitude compared to treated effluent. Eco-toxicological risk assessment revealed a risk quotient (RQ) of >1 for methomyl, chlorpyrifos and carbofuran for water fleas and fish in River Kabul, River Indus and Kalpani stream and TCS for algae in Kalpani indicating a serious toxicity risk to aquatic organisms in these rivers.
Keywords: Emerging contaminants; Pesticides; Personal care products; Endocrine disrupting chemicals; Environmental risk; Untreated water
Water bodies receive wastewater from different sources in treated and untreated form that contain a variety of physicochemical and biological constituents. In recent years, the presence of trace organic contaminants in surface water has gained increased attention due to their harmful effects in very small concentrations. A broad group of organic chemicals in personal care products (PCPs) and pesticides are amongst the prominent of these emerging micro-pollutants due to their wide ranging eco-toxicological effects and endocrine disrupting potential in living organisms . Recent studies have shown that organic compounds of pesticides and PCPs origin have been frequently detected in aquatic environments around the world such as in the United States, China, Taiwan, Japan, Spain, Netherland, Germany and Canada [2-7]. In Pakistan, PCPs and pesticides are extensively used in domestic, industrial and agricultural sectors. Wastewater from these sources is discharged without proper treatment, allowing these chemicals to enter into water channels and streams and leach into soil or groundwater . The contaminated surface water is further used for agricultural and domestic purposes posing a risk to human health and ecosystem while also entering the food chain. On the other hand, research on prevalence of such compounds in aquatic environment in Pakistan is limited. Few studies have reported the presence of pesticides such as dichloro diphenyl trichloroethane (DDT), cyclodiens, hexa chlorocylo hexane (HCHs) and poly chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in water bodies and in agriculture products such as dairy milk, vegetables and fruits [9-11]. Whereas, occurrence of many other pesticides and PCPs that are extensively used in Pakistan have received little attention.
This research investigated the presence of selected PCPs and pesticides in surface water (River Kabul, River Indus and Kalpani stream) and domestic sewage in Mardan city in the north-west Pakistan having similar wastewater disposal practices as other parts of the country. In Mardan, wastewater is discharged untreated into Kalpani stream that falls into River Kabul. River Kabul also receives untreated effluent from other major urban centres in the region and finally joins River Indus. The target compounds included two PCPs (triclosan and caffeine) and four pesticides (carbaryl, methomyl, carbofuran and chlorpyrifos). Triclosan is used as disinfectant in household products such as detergents, mouthwash, soaps, and cosmetics  whereas caffeine is a stimulant . All these chemical species have known toxicity in aquatic environment while some are banned in developed countries such as carbofuran but still used in Pakistan. The objective of this study was to determine the level of these chemicals in the absence of sewage treatment and to assess any eco-toxicological risk to aquatic organisms in the rivers with these chemicals.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and reagents
Standards for caffeine (C8H10N4O2) was acquired from Cerilliant (Round Rock, Texas), TCS (C17H7Cl3O2) from AVONCHEM, and Carbaryl (C12H11NO2), methomyl (C5H10N2O2S), carbofuran (C12H15NO3) and chlorpyrifos (C9H11Cl3NO3PS) from Dr. Ehrenstorfer GmbtH (Ausburg, Germany). HPLC-grade methanol, formic acid and acetonitrile required for mobile phase were acquired from Merck (Germany). For individual compounds, stock solutions were prepared in methanol as 1000 mg/mL and stored at -18°C. Working standards for calibration were prepared from the stock solution by serial dilution in methanol.
Study area and sampling
Mardan district is situated at 34°12'0"N 72°2'24"E in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) Province, Pakistan with a total area of 1632 km2  (Figure 1). Untreated wastewater from the Mardan city is discharged into five major sewage drains falling into the perennial Kalpani stream. Besides, the stream collects agricultural drainage from a catchment area of 1023 km2 up to Mardan and finally joins River Kabul at Nowshera District to the South. River Kabul originates in Paghman mountains in Afghanistan and enter Pakistan at Khyber Agency in the northwest . It collects drainage (with wastewater discharges) from the densely populated areas of KP Province before finally merging with River Indus (Figure 1). River Indus originates in the Himalaya region and flows through the entire stretch of the country for a total length of 3000 km to the Arabian Sea . Composite samples (at two hour interval) during the day were collected at two points each from River Kabul, River Indus and Kalpani stream and from the five sewage drains in Mardan (Figure 1). Sampling was carried out on dry days in the month of October when there was no rainfall event for at least 48 hours . Samples were collected in 1 litre ultraclean amber-glass bottles pre-rinsed three times with the sample before collection . Samples were immediately taken to the laboratory, stored in refrigerator at 4°C to avoid any degradation and analysed within 48 hours of sample collection . Prior to sample collection, contact with detergent, soap, fragrance and sunscreen was avoided to prevent any interference from constituents in personal care products .
Sample preparation and analysis
The targeted compounds were analysed using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis with Agilent triple quadrupole 6410 paired with Agilent 1200 series LC and C18 LC column . Samples were first filtered through Whatman Glass fiber filters (GF/F 0.7 μm) followed by solid phase extraction (SPE) of the filtered samples (100 ml) using Oasis HLB cartridges [3,19]. Before extraction, cartridges were conditioned with 4 ml methanol followed by addition of 6 ml deionized water at 5 ml/min keeping the sorbent wet. Samples were passed through cartridges at 10 ml/min. Target compounds were collected in test tubes by elution with 5 ml methanol . Extracted samples were further concentrated to a final volume of 500 μl using a gentle nitrogen gas stream [3,20]. The test tubes were then vortex mixed to dissolve any target compounds on the walls of the tube. Samples were then transferred to a 2 ml vial for LC-MS/MS analysis. Nitrogen gas was used as carrier gas and regulated at uniform flow rate of 11.0 ml/ min. Except TCS, the analysis was in positive (ESI+) mode for carbaryl, methomyl, carbofuran, chlorpyrifos and caffeine analytes (Table 1). Temperature of the column was kept at 35°C and the flow rate at 0.5 ml/min. The injected sample volume was 10 μL. For determination of compounds of interest, mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid in deionized water) and mobile phase B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile) were used. For the results, standard deviation was used to show the standard error. Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA)
|Compound||Retention time (min)||Precursor Ion (m/z)||Product ions (m/z)||Fragmentor (V)||Collision Energy (e/v)||Ionization mode|
Table 1: Optimized LC-MS/MS conditions for the target compounds.
For quality control, blank and spiked samples (150 to 1,000 ng/L) were run with each extraction round of six samples. Relative recoveries were computed from these samples. Calculation for limits of quantification (LOQ) were made as 10X the standard deviation of the blank values or as signal-to-noise ratios of 10 in case where no significant blank signals were present for certain analytes .
Results And Discussion
Prevalence in sewage and Kalpani stream
In domestic wastewater, both PCPs (caffeine and TCS) were detected with caffeine in comparatively higher concentration of 92 ± 51 μg/L. Caffeine in sewage could be mainly sourced to tea consumption. In Pakistan, caffeine intake in tea is reported as 150 mg/person/day and of this, 3% is usually excreted in urine [22,23]. Caffeine levels found in sewage in this study were similar to those in other countries such as 7 to 73 μg/L in Switzerland and 33 μg/L in the U.S. [24,25]. However, caffeine discharged into water bodies could be much higher in the absence of any sewage treatment in Mardan. Sewage treatment plants have been reported to reduce caffeine concentration by 90% . TCS in sewage was detected as 4 ± 1 ng/L which was lower compared to the levels usually found in sewage in other countries, for instance 3.8 μg/L in U.S and 4.9 μg/L in Greece [25,27]. Meanwhile, the discharge of such effluent without treatment to surface water bodies and seepage from unlined and broken sewage drains into groundwater poses a serious concern. In the local Kalpani stream, the presence of caffeine and TCS at 8.4 ± 4.6 μg/L and 0.005 ± 0.001 μg/L respectively, seemed in conformity with the load received in domestic wastewater (Figure 2). Whereas among pesticides, methomyl was detected in higher concentration (5.5 ± 0.1 μg/L) compared to the other target pesticides that were present in nano gram range (Figure 2). Pesticides in Kalpani stream were mainly sourced from agriculture drainage received from the catchment area. In principal, levels of all the target compounds in Kalpani stream were below the respective toxicity threshold i.e., lethal concentration (LC50) or effective concentration (EC50) for fish, daphnia and algae [28-33]. Nevertheless, at these levels, potential eco-toxicological risks can be posed to aquatic life in the stream, which is discussed in Section 3.2. In addition, seepage of these compounds to groundwater from excessive field application and reuse of the stream’s water for irrigation downstream is also a concern. In groundwater in the study area, presence of pesticides (chlorpyrifos, dichlorvos, endosulfan and methyl parathion) has been confirmed by Ahad et al. .
Pesticides in River Kabul and Indus
In principal, River Kabul had higher levels of target pesticides compared to River Indus. In both rivers, the occurrence of pesticides based on concentration was in the same order as found in Kalpani stream i.e., methomyl>chlorpyrifos>carbofuran>carbaryl. On one hand, this endorsed the intensive use of pesticides in the region and on the other, established the load received from local tributary streams. Compared to Kalpani stream, concentrations of methomyl, as well as caffeine and TCS increased in River Kabul, which shows the load received from other major towns in the region such Peshawar and Nowshera. The pesticide found in critical concentration was methomyl in River Kabul (max. 8.3 μg/L), which is reported to cause toxicity to water fleas at 7.6 μg/L . For other pesticides, the values were below the respective LC50 or EC50 levels. Methomyl concentrations in both rivers was also found on the higher side compared to rivers in some other countries (Table 2). On the contrary, the other three pesticides had comparatively lower prevalence.
|River Kabul||River Indus||Rivers in other countries|
|Methomyl||5.50 ± 3.90||0.2 ± 0.03||<0.1
Croton River, USA
|Carbaryl||0.001 ± 0.000||0.001 ± 0.001||<0.01
Shinano River, Japan
|Chlorpyrifos||0.009 ± 0.003||0.007 ± 0.000||0.11
Lake Vistonis Basin, Greece
|Carbofuran||0.003 ± 0.003||0.005 ± 0.001||0.025
Buenos Aires Souteast Basin, Argentina
|Triclosan||0.002 ± 0.001||0.002 ± 0.001||0.001-0.034
Europe and America
Liuxi River, China
|Caffeine||30.20 ± 28.30||8.0 ± 0.2||0.087
Danube River, Italy
Mississippi River, USA
Table 2: Comparison of levels detected in River Kabul and Indus to rivers in other countries.
PCPs in River Kabul and Indus
Among the PCPs, caffeine in both rivers was found on the higher side of the reported levels in other countries (Table 2). As discussed earlier, caffeine concentration found in sewage was equivalent to those reported in literature for these countries; however, the increased difference in rivers indicated the role played by sewage treatment in reducing the caffeine concentrations disposed of into water bodies in these countries. TCS concentration on the other hand, in both rivers were mostly in agreement to those detected elsewhere e.g., Europe, America and China (Table 2). In comparison to LC50 or EC50 of caffeine and TCS for aquatic organisms, the levels observed in both River Kabul and Indus were lower [28,43].
Eco-toxicological risk assessment
Eco-toxicological risk associated with the presence of targeted compounds in both River Kabul and Indus as well as in Kalpani stream was evaluated by estimating the risk quotient (RQ). Whereas, RQ is the ratio between measured environmental concentration (MEC) in the rivers i.e., the concentrations (average) detected in this study and the predicted no-observed-effect concentration (PNEC) of the compounds from literature below which an unacceptable effect will unlikely occur . PNEC values were based on LC50 or EC50 Values for water flea, algae and fish as reported in literature (Table 3). An assessment factor of 1000 (i.e., PNEC=LC50 or EC50/1000) was applied to take into account toxicity to other more sensitive aquatic species . A compound is judged to cause adverse effects if the RQ>1.
|Compounds||PNEC (LC50 or EC50/1000) (µg/L)||References|
Table 3: PNEC of target compounds for water flea, algae and fish.
As shown in Table 4, except carbaryl and caffeine, a higher risk was associated with the presence of target compounds in the water bodies. Of concern were methomyl and chlorpyrifos having RQ>1 for fish and water fleas and carbofuran with RQ>1 for water flea in both rivers and Kalpani stream. The relative risk vulnerability for methomyl and chlorpyrifos was assessed as water flea>fish. For TCS, the risk characterization in Kalpani stream showed RQ>1 only for algae. A higher RQs with these compounds indicated a potential threat to the aquatic organisms in these aquatic bodies. The RQ values were relatively higher in Kalpani stream and River Kabul that showed a higher eco-toxicological risks in these two water bodies. In addition, parts of these chemicals can also accumulate in the sediments and hence the risk posed due to both aqueous and particulate phase could be more significant [46-50].
|Compounds||RQ for River Kabul||RQ for River Indus||RQ for Kalpani stream|
|Water flea||Algae||Fish||Water flea||Algae||Fish||Water flea||Algae||Fish|
*RQ higher than 1
Table 4: Risk Quotient (MEC/PNEC) for River Kabul and River Indus.
This study determined the presence of selected PCPs and pesticides in River Kabul, River Indus, Kalpani stream and domestic effluent in Mardan. Among the pesticides, methomyl was found in highest concentration in sewage and in rivers while caffeine and TCS were detected in all samples. The levels found in domestic wastewater were comparable to those in advanced countries but environmental discharge was considerably higher in the absence of sewage treatment. Concentrations of methomyl, caffeine and TCS increased in River Kabul compared to Kalpani distributary indicating a higher contribution from other towns. In River Kabul, methomyl was detected above the reported LC50 for water flea. Caffeine, TCS, carbofuran, chlorpyrifos and carbaryl were also present in the rivers but below their LC50 levels.
From the environmental risk assessment, except for carbaryl and caffeine, RQ was>1 for methomyl, chlorpyrifos and carbofuran for water flea and fish in all three water bodies and in case of TCS for algae in Kalpani stream. The risk characterization indicated a serious ecotoxicological threat to aquatic organisms in both the rivers and Kalpani stream.
The authors appreciate the support provided by Muhammad Hassan and staff of the Forensic Toxicological Lab, AFIP.
- Sauvé S, Desrosiers M (2014) A review of what is an emerging contaminant. Chem Cent J 8: 15.
- Zuccato E, Castiglioni S, Fanelli R, Reitano G, Bagnati R et al. (2006) Pharmaceuticals in the environment in Italy: causes, occurrence, effects and control. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 13: 5-21.
- Samaras VG, Thomaidis NS, Stasinakis AS, Lekkas TD (2011) An analytical method for the simultaneous trace determination of acidic pharmaceuticals and phenolic endocrine disrupting chemicals in wastewater and sewage sludge by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 399: 2549-2561.
- Uslu MO, Biswas N, Jasim S (2011) Chemicals of Emerging Concern in the Great Lakes Region. 2011: International Joint Commission.
- Z Zhang YZ, Tang CY, Song XF, Li FD (2009) Behavior and fate of alkylphenols in surface water of the Jialu River, Henan Province, China. Chemosphere 77: 559-565.
- Huang YQ, Wong CK, Zheng JS, Bouwman H, Barra R, et al. (2012) Bisphenol A (BPA) in China: a review of sources, environmental levels, and potential human health impacts. Environment international 42: 91-99.
- Kolpin DW, Furlong ET, Meyer MT, Thurman EM, Zaugg SD et al. (2002) Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in US streams, 1999-2000: A national reconnaissance. Environmental Science & Technology 36: 1202-1211.
- Khan S, Shahnaz M, Jehan N, Rehman S, Shah MT, et al. (2013) Drinking water quality and human health risk in Charsadda district, Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production 60: 93-101.
- Tariq MI, Afzal S, Hussain I (2004) Pesticides in shallow groundwater of Bahawalnagar, Muzafargarh, DG Khan and Rajan Pur districts of Punjab, Pakistan. Environment International 30: 471-479.
- Eqani SA, Malik RN, Alamdar A, Faheem H (2012) Status of organochlorine contaminants in the different environmental compartments of Pakistan: a review on occurrence and levels. Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology 88: 303-310.
- ul Hassan A, Tabinda AB, Abbas M, Khan AM (2014) Organochlorine and pyrethroid pesticides analysis in dairy milk samples collected from cotton growing belt of Punjab, Pakistan. Pak J Agri Sci 51: 321-325.
- Roach AL (2006) Facilitated Transport of Triclosan in the Receiving Environment of an Onsite Wastewater Treatment System: Agent of Aquatic Concern 2006.
- Fisone G, Borgkvist A, Usiello A (2004) Caffeine as a psychomotor stimulant: mechanism of action. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 61: 857-872.
- Khan M, Hussain F, Musharaf S (2013) Floristic Composition and Biological Characteristics of the Vegetation of Sheikh Maltoon Town District Mardan, Pakistan.
- Yousafzai AM, Khan AR, Shakoori AR (2008) Heavy metal pollution in River Kabul affecting the inhabitant fish population. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 40: 331-339.
- Akhtar S (2011) The south Asiatic monsoon and flood hazards in the Indus river basin, Pakistan. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences p: 7.
- Jackson J, Sutton R (2008) Sources of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in urban wastewater, Oakland, CA. Science of the Total Environment 405: 153-160.
- Peng X, Yu Y, Tang C, Tan J, Huang Q, et al. (2008) Occurrence of steroid estrogens, endocrine-disrupting phenols, and acid pharmaceutical residues in urban riverine water of the Pearl River Delta, South China. Science of the total environment 397: 158-166.
- Zhao JL, Ying GG, Wang L, Yang JF, Yang XB, et al. (2009) Determination of phenolic endocrine disrupting chemicals and acidic pharmaceuticals in surface water of the Pearl Rivers in South China by gas chromatography–negative chemical ionization–mass spectrometry. Science of the Total Environment 407: 962-974.
- Michael E, ThurmanI JZ (2010) Agilent Standard Operating Procedure, Analysis of Emerging Pharmaceutical Contaminants by UHPLC/MS/MS With Agilent 1290 Infinity LC and Agilent 6460 Triple Quadrupole Jetstream LC/MS.
- Jonkers N, Kohler HP, Dammshäuser A, Giger W (2009) Mass flows of endocrine disruptors in the Glatt River during varying weather conditions. Environmental Pollution 157: 714-723.
- Memon S, Shaikh S, Memon N (2014) Effects of profenofos an endocrine disrupting chemical on Leydig's cells in rabbits. JAPS, Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 24: 167-171.
- Spence PL (2015) Using Caffeine as a Water Quality Indicator in the Ambient Monitoring Program for Third Fork Creek Watershed, Durham, North Carolina. Environmental health insights 9: 29.
- Buerge IJ, Poiger T, Müller MD, Buser HR (2003) Caffeine, an anthropogenic marker for wastewater contamination of surface waters. Environmental science & technology 37: 691-700.
- Trenholm RA, Vanderford BJ, Holady JC, Rexing DJ, Snyder SA (2006) Broad range analysis of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals using gas chromatography and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Chemosphere 65: 1990-1998.
- Heberer T (2002) Tracking persistent pharmaceutical residues from municipal sewage to drinking water. Journal of Hydrology 266: 175-189.
- Stasinakis AS, Gatidou G, Mamais D, Thomaidis NS, Lekkas TD (2008) Occurrence and fate of endocrine disrupters in Greek sewage treatment plants. Water Research 42: 1796-1804.
- Kumar KR, Rohini P, Md AR, Devi YP (2015) A review on occurrence, fate and toxicity of triclosan 4: 336-369.
- SIDS O (2002) Caffeine: SIDS Initial assessment report for SIAM 14.
- Van Scoy AR, Yue M, Deng X, Tjeerdema RS (2013) Environmental fate and toxicology of methomyl, in Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology pp: 93-109.
- Xu S (2000) Environmental fate of carbaryl. California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Pesticide Regulation, Sacramento.
- Marine N (1999) Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Winnipeg p: 1-5.
- Dobsikova R (2003) Acute toxicity of carbofuran to selected species of aquatic and terrestrial organisms. Plant Protection Science-UZPI (Czech Republic).
- Ahad K, Anwar T, Ahmad I, Mohammad A, Tahir S, et al. Determination of insecticide residues in groundwater of Mardan Division, NWFP, Pakistan: a case study. WATER SA-PRETORIA-, 2000 26: 409-412.
- Peterson RK (2006) Comparing ecological risks of pesticides: the utility of a risk quotient ranking approach across refinements of exposure. Pest management science 62: 46-56.
- Phillips PJ, Bode RW (2002) Concentrations of pesticides and pesticide degradates in the Croton River watershed in southeastern New York, July-September 2000. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey.
- Tanabe A, Mitobe H, Kawata K, Sakai M, Yasuhara A (2000) New monitoring system for ninety pesticides and related compounds in river water by solid-phase extraction with determination by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Journal of AOAC International 83: 61-77.
- Papadakis EN, Tsaboula A, Kotopoulou A, Kintzikoglou K, Vryzas Z (2015) Pesticides in the surface waters of Lake Vistonis Basin, Greece: occurrence and environmental risk assessment. Science of The Total Environment 536: 793-802.
- De Gerónimo E, Aparicio VC, Bárbaro S, Portocarrero R, Jaime S, et al. (2014) Presence of pesticides in surface water from four sub-basins in Argentina. Chemosphere 107: 423-431.
- Bedoux G, Roig B, Thomas O, Dupont V, Le Bot B (2012) Occurrence and toxicity of antimicrobial triclosan and by-products in the environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 19: 1044-1065.
- Zhang S, Zhang Q, Darisaw S, Ehie O, Wang G (2007) Simultaneous quantification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in Mississippi river water, in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. Chemosphere 66: 1057-1069.
- Loos R, Locoro G, Contini S (2010) Occurrence of polar organic contaminants in the dissolved water phase of the Danube River and its major tributaries using SPE-LC-MS 2 analysis. Water research 44: 2325-2335.
- Orvos DR, Versteeg DJ, Inauen J (2002) Aquatic toxicity of triclosan. Environmental toxicology and chemistry 21: 1338-1349.
- Lindberg RH, Björklund K, Rendahl P, Johansson MI, Tysklind M, et al. (2007) Environmental risk assessment of antibiotics in the Swedish environment with emphasis on sewage treatment plants. Water research 41: 613-619.
- Martín J, Camacho-Muñoz D, Santos JL, Aparicio I, Alonso E, et al. (2012) Occurrence of pharmaceutical compounds in wastewater and sludge from wastewater treatment plants: removal and ecotoxicological impact of wastewater discharges and sludge disposal. Journal of hazardous materials 239: 40-47.
- Fernández-Alba AR, Hernando D, Agüera A, Cáceres J, Malato S (2002) Toxicity assays: a way for evaluating AOPs efficiency. Water research 36: 4255-4262.
- Walsh GE, Alexander SV (1980) A marine algal bioassay method: Results with pesticides and industrial wastes. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 13: 45-55.
- Tien CJ, Chen CS (2012) Assessing the toxicity of organophosphorous pesticides to indigenous algae with implication for their ecotoxicological impact to aquatic ecosystems. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B 47: 901-912.
- Ma J, Lu N, Qin W, Xu R, Wang Y, et al. (2006) Differential responses of eight cyanobacterial and green algal species, to carbamate insecticides. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 63: 268-274.
- Zarrelli A, DellaGreca M, Iesce MR, Lavorgna M, Temussi F, et al. (2014) Ecotoxicological evaluation of caffeine and its derivatives from a simulated chlorination step. Science of The Total Environment 470: 453-458.
Citation: Saad M, Shams DF, Khan W, Ijaz A, Qasim M, et al. (2017) Occurrence of Selected Pesticides and PCPs in Surface Water Receiving Untreated Discharge in Pakistan. J Environ Anal Toxicol 7: 500. Doi: 10.4172/2161-0525.1000500
Copyright: © 2017 Saad M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Share This Article
- Total views: 757
- [From(publication date): 0-2017 - Jul 22, 2018]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 684
- PDF downloads: 73