Atul Sharma, Ph. D
Dr. Atul Sharma is one of those passionate Open Source developers who believe that “Future is Open Source”. Author is technically-sophisticated, business-savvy management-level professional, software architect and developer with inclination for OSS for last 10 years.
Dr. Atul Sharma has been involved with many Open Source technologies like Linux, Ubuntu, CentOS, OpenVZ, Joomla, WordPress, Drupal, Magento, OpenCart, OJS, phpBB, Asterisk PBX, just to name a few.
Dr. Atul Sharma in his educational basket has a Doctorate degree in Computer Science, two Master’s degree in Computers, a Bachelor degree in computer Application / Statistics, along with International Certifications from Cisco & Polycom.
Visit for more related articles at International Journal of Advancements in Technology
Open source technologies need no formal introduction. In a technological era where major giants like Microsoft are coming up with new versions of their software in each quarter, there are open source players like Ubuntu, which are gaining popularity at amazingly crazy rates. Global community consisting of thousands of best brains in this world are coming up together to build up robust Open Source technologies which are in no way lesser in features when compared to their commercial counterparts. In fact if we go out and ask Open Source enthusiast, we find that they are far more efficient, reliable, and over all customizable. From IBM to Google, Firefox to Wikipedia – some of today's best software is based on an open-source model . Open Source communities like Ubuntu share the principle of “Shared efforts. Shared principles. No cost.”, that’s why what we get is a world class “free” software.
Look into any technological field, and we find a reliable Open source available at our disposal. Talk about Web-Servers, and we have a big name of Apache HTTP Server  probably outshining  its commercial counterpart “Microsoft IIS”. For ecommerce, initiating a new branch of the economy, even in small company is nowadays not so hard, all credited to OSS like osCommerece, Magento and OpenCart . We have OSS in internet browsers like Mozilla Firefox , VoIP applications like Asterisk (PBX) , and office suite of inter-related desktop applications in form of OpenOffice . We keep on counting and the list keeps becoming larger and larger. For a more exhaustive list, watch Appendix A
According to Lakhani et al. , research into open source software development projects has been largely focused on how the major tasks of software development are organized and motivated. But in addition to this, it requires execution of certain “mundane but necessary” tasks as well. Danny Bradbury  reported in his article in 2005 that “Over the last 10 years Open Source has exploded onto the enterprise scene, with support from governments growing each year”. Mockus et al  in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology said that Open Source Software development has the capacity to compete successfully, and in certain cases even displace, traditional commercial development methods. In order to investigate the efficiency of OSS development process, two major projects were earmarked – “Apache” web server and “Mozilla’ browser. Based on email archives, source code change history, problem reports, developer participation, core team size, code ownership, productivity, and problem resolution intervals it was concluded that high-performance open source are attainable at better rate.
A recent trend in open source model has shown a very interesting change – “Firm participation” . From unpaid volunteers working from home, we now see major corporations coming in for development of OSS in a more planned and disciplined manner. Many organizations are coming out with Open source and proprietary software of each product in same market. Many open source products have seen a great commercial success. That’s why we have both Community Edition (open source) and Enterprise Edition (proprietary) for many OSS in market. Some examples of which being Sugar CRM –Community Edition, which can be downloaded for free and used, while Sugar CRM – Enterprise Edition has some added benefits, security and features, for which the user has to shelf out some money. Also many companies are moving towards a mixed source strategy, wherein some of the products (or components of a product) are distributed under proprietary licenses, while others are distributed as open source. This type of model has a key benefit of quick bug-detection-and-fixing since the code is being developed in a public domain.
Open Source development leads to a totally different set of incentives for R&D development than the traditional proprietary development. As per Maurer and Scotchmer  analysis, developers are roping in for Open Source for various reasons like “Intellectual property”, “Own use”, “Complementary goods and services”, “Signaling”, “Social psychology” and more.
In 2010 a massive survey of more than 2,300 companies in 15 countries was conducted out by Lerner and Schankerman , which found that more than 25% of all firms surveyed develop both open source and proprietary software programs. This is a clear indication of shifting of scales into the direction of Open Source. That’s why many people say “Open Source Software are Here To Stay !!”, and I personally believe this.
“What is future of Open Source?” This might sound to be a real trivial question. But ask any Open Source enthusiast and he will rubbish this question with his statement “The Future IS Open Source”. You search around any Open Source Community or Discussion Forum, and you find it filled with a whole bunch of passionate and die hard contributors. Contributors, who are eager to help out fellow members with any issues or bugs, since there is a high level of belongingness prevailing in their minds. Gone are the days when people used to doubt Open Source for any enterprise level applications.
 K.R. Lakhani, E. von Hippel / Research Policy 32. “How open source software works: “free” user-to-user assistance “.Elsevier Science B.V. (2003) pp. 923–943
 R.T. Fielding and G. Kaiser, The Apache HTTP Server Project, IEEE-Internet-Computing 1(4) (1997) pp. 88–90.
 "October 2011 Web Server Survey". http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2011/10/06/october-2011-web-server-survey.html. Netcraft Ltd. 6 October 2011.
 P. Hetka, W. Zabierowski, and A. Napieralski, “The development of a new branch of the economy: e-commerce. Practical use with Content Management Systems Joomla! and enlargement VirtueMart,” in CAD Systems in Microelectronics, 2009. CADSM 2009. 10th International Conference - The Experience of Designing and Application of, pp. 413–419, Feb. 2009.
 Krishnamurthy S. (2005). The Launching of Mozilla Firefox - A Case Study in Community-Led Marketing, MIT, http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/sandeep2.pdf
 T.Abbasi, S.Prasad, N.Seddigh, I. Lambadaris, "A comparative study of the SIP and IAX VoIP protocols," IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, pp. 179-183, Saskatoon, SA, Canada, May 2005.
 C. Benson, "Evaluations of GNOME Usability: Expanding the Appeal of GNOME", presented at the Fourth Annual GNOME User and Developer European Conference (GUADEC), 2003. http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/articles/guadec-s2003/guadec-paper.html
 http://www.silicon.com/legacy/research/specialreports/opensource/0,3800004943,39150625, 00.htm
 Mockus, A., Fielding, R., Herbsleb, J., 2002. Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and mozilla. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 11 (3), pp.1–38.
 Neil Gandal, A brief look of the economics of open source software, September 2011, http://voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/6979
 Maurer, S.M., Scotchmer, S., 2006. Open source software: the new intellectual paradigm, NBER Working Paper 12148. http://www.nber.org/papers/w12148.pdf
 Lerner, J, and M Schankerman (2010), The Comingled Code: Open Source and Economic Development, MIT Press.