Received date: May 09, 2014; Accepted date: June 28, 2014; Published date: June 30, 2014
Citation: Olsson H (2014) Organ Specific Killing af a Dispensable Organ or a Cell Population in an Organ- A Successful Design for Cancer Therapy-A Hypothesis. J Carcinog Mutagen 5:179. doi: 10.4172/2157-2518.1000179
Copyright: © 2014 Olasson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Visit for more related articles at Journal of Carcinogenesis & Mutagenesis
Cancer therapy; Cancer; Target therapy; Melanoma
Successful cancer therapy has been built on certain dogmas, including that both radiation and cytostatic therapy exert their main effects on dividing cells and that tumor cells have a deficient repair mechanism compared with normal cells. Therefore, fractionating the therapy is a successful way to increase the therapeutic ratio between neoplastic and normal tissue. However, maximizing the therapeutic effects on dividing cells is limited by the generalized side effects on rapidly dividing normal tissue, such as blood cells and the epithelium of the gastrointestinal tract .
An alternative approach to treating cancer would be to target the therapy to a specific organ or its subpopulation of cells, thus avoiding generalized side effects of the therapy. Such an approach would depend on the hypothesis presented in this article supported by recent research.
The hypothesis states that there is a relationship between therapies that have organ specific toxicity and the therapeutic susceptibility of a cancer that originates from the same organ. When the organ function is dispensable or it is possible to substitute its function, the therapy is successful.
Further support for the relationship between the tumor and the organ of origin is data that suggests that tumor biology at least partly reflects the biology of the tissue/epithelial cell of origin at the time of initiation [2-4].
Examples supporting the hypothesis as described in tables 1 and 2
|Target||Experimental data||Clinical data|
|Ab (Mabthera)||CD20+ lymphocytes Lymphoma||+||+|
|Immunotoxin (CAT- 3888, CAT- 8015)Antibody-drug conjugate (Brentuxi-mab)||CD22+ lymphocytes (Lymphoma, leukemia) CD30+ lymphocytes (Hodgkin lymphoma)||+ +||(+) (+)|
|Ab (HER2/neu) Toxin (orellanine)||HER2+ tumor cells Kidney cancer/tubulecells||+ +||+ -|
|Radiotherapy||lymph nodes/lymphoma Hodgkin’s disease||+||+|
|Platinol||Testicular cancer/ Teratoma||+||+|
|Ab (CTLA4)||T cell function Autoimmune reaction Melanoma, lung, kidney cancer||+||+|
|Ab (PD-1)||T cell function Autoimmune reaction Melanoma, lung, kidney cancer||+||+|
|T-cell (transplantation)||Leukemia (graft vs. host)||+||+|
Table 1: Examples of therapies that, either through experimental or clinical data, exploit the hypothesis that by injuring the cell of origin of the tumor, the tumor could also respond to therapy. Ab=antibody, + = positive relationship, (+)= studies underway, - = no studies performed yet .
|Ab (Mabthera)||B-cell dysfunction, infusion-related cytokine release, hypersensitivity, cardiac arrythmias |
|Immunotoxin (CAT-3888,CAT-8015)||Drug-related toxicities in 25-60% of the 28 patients included (indecreasing frequency), grade 1-2 hypoalbuminemia, edema, fever, ALT and AST elevations, headaches, and nausea [19,20]|
|Antibody-drug||Hematosuppression neutropenia, neuropathy  conjugate (Brentuximab)|
|Ab (HER2/neu||Cardiomyopathy, infusion-related cytokine release |
|Toxin (orellanine)||Severe injury to tubule cells in the kidney |
|Radiotherapy||Immune defect, infectious complications |
|Platinol||Renal insufficiency, hearing loss, neuropathy |
|6-OH DOPA||Severe neurotoxicity |
|Ab (CTLA4)||Autoimmune reaction |
|Ab (PD-1)||Autoimmune reaction |
|T-cell (transplantation)||Graft vs. host |
Table 2: Main toxicities associated with the therapy. Ab=antibody.
The following research supports the suggested strategy. Antibodies directed towards B-cells carrying the CD20 antigen are very efficient in the treatment of patients with lymphoma carrying the CD20 antigen  because the possible cellular origin is from the normal CD20 lymphocyte subpopulation. For the patient, it is tolerable to target both the normal and neoplastic CD20-expressing cells. Studies targeting CD22 and CD30 in patients with lymphoma with a possible similar therapeutic benefit are underway [6,7].
In a similar manner, it is possible to target HER2/neu positive breast cancer with the antibody Herceptin without severely compromising the patient  as the normal HER2/neu positive epithelial cells were functional in the breast at a younger age.
The toxin orellanine from the mushroom Cortinarius orellanus and Cortinarius speciocissimus is known to cause irreversible kidney failure but does not severely damage other organs, offering a possible new approach to treat metastatic kidney cancer . Preliminary data suggest that orellanine would be effective in killing kidney cancer originating from the tubular cells, the same cell type that experiences the toxic effect from the fungus. After therapy, the patient would need dialysis or kidney transplantation.
To consider transplantation, the prognosis of the patient must be taken into account and the patient must have a good functional status.
An unexplored therapeutic potential would be to target therapy against melanoma by targeting the melanocyte and the melanin pathway. This could be accomplished by using an intermediary atoxisk metabolite of DOPA, 2,4-dihydroxyfenylalanin (DHPA). DHPA can be converted by tyrosinase to the highly toxic substance 6-OH-Dopa and it has shown great antitumour activity in two melanoma cell lines [10,11] but has not yet been tested in humans. The glutathione system is upregulated to protect against the oxidative stress . Experimental data would support that also using butioninsulfoxim, BSO, against glutathione synthetase could be beneficial. It has been shown that the glutathione system in human melanoma cells decrease by 99% by adding BSO .
That a targeted activity against the melanocyte could be a fruitful approach in melanoma therapy is supported by the clinical finding that patients having vitiligo have a lower risk of melanoma . Patients with vitiligo suffer from an autoimmune reaction against melanocytes.
In testicular cancer, the remnants of embryonic cells may be the origin of malignant teratomas that can be differentiated and cured by Platinol therapy without injuring more developed organs in the individual .
Tumor-involved lymph nodes can be eradicated by radiotherapy in Hodgkin’s disease without compromising the immediate health of the patient. The target and doses are adapted to mainly kill the lymphocytic tissue .
The hypothesis is also indirectly supported by recent results of melanoma immunotherapy using antibodies against CTLA4 and the PD1 antigen, which modulate T cell function and thus enhance the antibody response against the tumor while inducing a generalized autoimmune response . If the autoimmune reaction is tolerable for the patient, the therapy is successful.
In a similar manner, allogenic bone marrow transplantation of leukemia has a higher chance of success if the patient experiences a tolerable graft versus host reaction .
As an alternative approach, preventing hereditary cancer via prophylactic operations on target organs, such as the breast, ovary, colon and thyroid, represent examples where the removal of the cell of origin prevents cancer initiation. These procedures were not well understood at first, and there was criticism regarding prophylactic operations before the procedure was shown to be effective in humans [16,17].
Strategies for future clinical research should include the following approaches.
In high risk patients, organs that are dispensable or have a function that can be partly reconstituted or substituted should be identified and strategies should be developed for the prophylactic removal of such organs at optimal ages among high risk patients.
In cancer patients, at diagnosis or at a metastatic stage, organs that are dispensable or have a function that partly can be reconstituted or substituted should be identified. Therapies that have organ specific toxicity should be developed, and the response of the cancer originating from such an organ to the organ specific therapy should be studied.
After therapy, efforts should be made to reconstitute the organ. This reconstitution can be done by transplantation, stem cell renewal or a functional substitution.
An unsolved problem is how to target certain exposed epithelial tissues to prevent cancer from developing. Smoking-associated epithelial mutations in the respiratory and urinary tract and UV-light induced mutagenesis of the skin are examples of tissues that would be the focus of further research. Additionally, therapeutic strategies to prevent heterozygous cells from becoming mutationally homozygous using the concept of synthetic lethality in cancer prone tissues that may harbor BRCA mutations remain challenging. Thus far, this approach has only been attempted for therapy in BRCA-associated tumors (homozygous state)  and not for the prevention of tumors (heterozygous state).
Data strongly support the idea that identifying organ specific toxins would be a helpful way to find new therapeutic agents against cancer if the loss of organ function is amendable or can be reconstituted. This approach may be easier when the tumor originates from a more differentiated cell or a progenitor cell, and not a stem cell, allowing for the reconstitution of organ function by available stem cells.
The author has no actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with people or organizations that could inappropriately influence this work.
This work was supported by the Swedish Cancer Society, Swedish Research Council and ERC advanced grant (ERC-2011-AdG 294576-risk factors cancer).