alexa Pattern of Antihypertensive Treatment and Blood Pressure Control among Diabetic Outpatients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia | OMICS International
ISSN: 2155-6156
Journal of Diabetes & Metabolism
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Pattern of Antihypertensive Treatment and Blood Pressure Control among Diabetic Outpatients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Hailu A Mulatu*, Tola Bayisa, Tesfaye Berhe and Esubalew Woldeyes

Department of Internal Medicine, St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, Ethiopia

Corresponding Author:
Hailu A Mulatu
Department of Internal Medicine
St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, Ethiopia
Tel: +2519116782879
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: April 15, 2017; Accepted Date: April 28, 2017; Published Date: April 30, 2017

Citation: Mulatu HA, Bayisa T, Berhe T, Woldeyes E (2017) Pattern of Antihypertensive Treatment and Blood Pressure Control among Diabetic Outpatients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. J Diabetes Metab 8:738. doi:10.4172/2155-6156.1000738

Copyright: © 2017 Mulatu HA, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Diabetes & Metabolism

Abstract

Introduction: Hypertension and diabetes mellitus are currently the usual causes of morbidity and mortality among non-communicable diseases in both developed and developing countries. When occur together, the risk of death from cardiovascular diseases will double.

Objective: This study was intended to assess the antihypertensive drug prescription pattern and blood pressure control among diabetic outpatients at St. Paul’s tertiary Hospital in Addis Ababa.

Methods: A hospital based cross- sectional study design was used to review the medical registries of 484 diabetic-hypertensive outpatients seen between February 1st 2016 and July 30 2016.

Results: The most commonly used antihypertensive drug classes in our patients were angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor in 283 (58.5%), calcium channel blocker in 218 (45%) and beta blocker in 61 (12.8%) patients. The most commonly used monotherapy is angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor in 110 (22.7%), calcium channel blocker in 89 (18.4%) and diuretic in 25 (5.2%). The currently recommended target systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHg was achieved in 176 (36.4%) patients while the majority 308 (63.6%) did not attain the target blood pressure. Renal function was assessed in 484 (100%) patients, of whom 24 (5%) had renal impairment with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m2.

Conclusion: The antihypertensive drug treatment pattern in our patients was in agreement with the current treatment guidelines. However, blood pressure control in the majority of patients is not adequate.

Keywords

Blood pressure; Chronic kidney disease; Diabetes mellitus; Hypertension; Treatment guideline

Introduction

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) is increasing dramatically over the last two decades being the major cause of mortality accounting for 5.1 million deaths or 8% of deaths worldwide in 2013 [1]. Based on the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) 2015 report, the global estimate of DM in adult population aged 20-79 years was 441 million, with an African regional prevalence of 3.2% and an estimate of 0.8-3.5 million people living with diabetes in Ethiopia [2].

Hypertension is also increasing in magnitude and severity, especially in blacks being associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality [3]. It has been identified as a major risk factor not only for the development of diabetes, but also for coronary artery disease, stroke and kidney disease in patients with diabetes [4].

Macrovascular and microvascular complications associated with diabetes and hypertension can be more effectively reduced with control of blood pressure than blood glucose. Therefore, adequate management of hypertension among patients with diabetes mellitus is cost effective [5].

In Ethiopia, the antihypertensive treatment pattern among diabetichypertensive patients was not widely studied. In a study recently conducted in Addis Ababa on a smaller public hospital the antihypertensive treatment pattern was consistent with the current evidence- based guidelines. But, the blood pressure control level to target was not adequate [6].

The importance of evidence based antihypertensive treatment practice in diabetic patients who are at high risk of vascular complications has been stressed in many guidelines, because the inappropriate use of these drugs has deleterious socioeconomic impact for patients and the country [7]. Therefore, it is rational to assess the antihypertensive drug prescription practice in Ethiopia.

Material and Methods

The study was conducted at St. Paul’s Hospital, the second largest teaching hospital in Addis Ababa, which can represent most of the academic hospitals in Ethiopia.

A hospital based cross-sectional study design was used to review the medical records of all diabetic-hypertensive patients who visited St. Paul’s teaching Hospital in the period between February 1st and July 31st 2016.

A total of 484 diabetic- hypertensive patients visited the diabetic clinic during the study period. The medical records of all patients were used to obtain demographic information, diagnostic information, vital signs, laboratory test results and prescribed drugs using a structured questionnaire. The last visit blood pressure and fasting blood glucose measurements were utilized for the study. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated using software with Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation.

All data were entered and analyzed using Statistical Software for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0. Errors related to inconsistency of data were corrected during data clearing. Univariate analysis, such as frequency, percentage, distributions and appropriate graphic presentations besides the measure of central tendency and measure of dispersion were used for describing the data. The independent variables were compared using a chi-square test and considered significant at a p-value of <0.05.

Ethical approval was obtained from St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College institutional review board.

Results

A total of 1200 diabetic patients, of whom 484 (40.3%) diabetichypertensive patients visited the follow up clinic during the study period. Two hundred forty-one (49.8%) patients were males and male to female ratio was nearly 1:1. The mean age of patients was 57.8 ± 10.2 years. The majority of patients lie in the age range of 46-60 years (55.6%) followed by 61-75 years (28.3%) (Figure 1).

diabetes-metabolism-Age-distribution

Figure 1: Age distribution of study population (n=484).

The majority (98.1%) of patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus and the rest (1.9%) had type 1 diabetes mellitus. The mean durations of diabetes and hypertension were 9.6 and 8 years respectively. The means of the most recent systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 143.2 ± 16.3 and 17.3 ± 10.7 mm Hg respectively. The currently recommended target SBP<140 mm Hg and DBP<90 mm Hg was achieved in 176 (36.4%) patients while in the rest 308 (63.6%) patients it was beyond the target. The mean fasting blood glucose level during the last visit of the study subjects was 162.1 ± 55.4 mg/dl. The commonly prescribed anti-diabetic medications were glebenclamide plus metformin in 174 (36%), insulin in 117 (24.2%) and metformin in 90 (18.6%) patients. Only twenty-four (5%) patients had renal impairment with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (Table 1).

Parameter Value
Address (by  region)
Addis Ababa 363 (75%)
Oromia 111 (22.9%)
Amhara 1 (0.2%)
SNNP 9 (1.9%)
Religion
Orthodox Christian 315 (65.1%)
Muslim 87 (18%)
Protestant 81 (16.7%)
Other 1 (0.2%)
Type of Diabetes Mellitus
Type 1 9 (1.9%)
Type 2 475 (98.1%)
Duration Diabetes Mellitus (mean in years) 9.6 (1-41)
Fasting Blood Glucose (mean ± SD in mg/dl) 162.1±55.4
Type of anti-diabetic treatment
Glebenclamide 27 (5.5%)
Metformin 90 (18.6%)
Glebenclamide and metformin  174 (36%)
Insulin   117 (24.2%)
Insulin and metformin 76 (15.7%)
Duration of Hypertension (mean in years) 8.0 (0.5-41)
Systolic blood pressure (mean SD in mmHg) 143.2 ± 16.3
Diastolic blood pressure (mean ±SD in mmHg) 79.3±10.7
Blood Pressure goal for diabetes mellitus
<140 mmHg and <90 mmHg 176 (36.4%)
≥140 mmHg or ≥90 mmHg 308 (63.6%)
Glomerular filtration rate (ml/min/ 1.73m2)
≥60 460 (95%)
<60 24 (5%)
Clinic attendance in the last 1 year
≥75% 481(99.4%)
<75% 3 (0.6%)

Table 1: Characteristics of study population (n=484).

The average number of antihypertensive medications prescribed per patient was 1.7 ± 0.7 (range 1-4). Monotherapy was prescribed for 235 (48.6%) and combination anti-hypertensive for 249 (51.4%) patients.

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and calcium channel blocker (CCB) were the most frequently prescribed anti-hypertensive drug classes in 313 (64.5%) and 248 (51.2%) patients respectively (Table 2).

Drug class, n (%) Overall
N=484(100.0%)
1 Drug
n=235(48.6%)
2 Drugs
n=188 (38.8%)
3 Drugs
n=58(12%)
4 or more Drugs
n=3(0.6%)
ACE inhibitors 313 (64.5%) 110 (46.8%) 151 (80.3%) 49 (84.5%) 1 (33.3%)
Angiotensin II inhibitors 18 (3.7%) 8 (3.4%) 7 (3.7%) 2 (3.4%) -
Calcium channel blockers 248 (51.2%) 89 (37.9%) 106 (56.4%) 50 (86.2%) 1 (33.3)
β- blockers 61 (12.6%) 1 (0.4%) 30 (16.0%) 27 (46.6%) 1 (33.3%)
Thiazide or loop diuretics 156 (32.2%) 25 (10.6%) 82 (43.6%) 46 (79.3%) 1 (33.3%)
α-blockers 2 (0.4%) 2 (0.9%) - - -

Table 2: Patterns of use of anti-hypertensive drugs among patients with single- versus multidrug hypertension.

Among fourteen different combination anti-hypertensive regimens used in the study population, the most frequently prescribed combinations were ACEI plus CCB and ACEI plus diuretic (DI) in 74 (15.3%) and 60 (12.4%) patients respectively. Patients with renal impairment (GFR<60 ml/min/m2) tended to have better blood pressure control as compared to those with no renal impairment, although this was not statistically significant (p=0.069). There were also no significant differences in the overall utilization of antihypertensive drug classes among patients with controlled or uncontrolled blood pressure.

Discussion

We studied the pattern of antihypertensive treatment and control of blood pressure in diabetic patients in a tertiary teaching hospital, whether they were consistent with the current recommendations. Our study showed that a significant number (48.6%) of patients were on a single drug regimen, not reflecting the pattern seen in several previous trials [6,8]. The choice of anti-hypertensive drug is governed by the drug’s capacity to decrease blood pressure, renal and cardiovascular complications associated with diabetes. Among the widely used antihypertensive drugs, ACEIs have shown a reduction in cardiovascular events compared to diuretics or CCBs [9,10].

The most commonly prescribed drugs in our study were ACEI in 283 (58.5%) followed by CCB in 218 (45%) patients. They are recommended as first line drugs in many guidelines, including JNC VII [11]. The most frequently prescribed monotherapy and combination therapies were ACEI (22.7%) and ACEI plus CCB (15.3%) respectively. These findings were similar to studies from Ethiopia, Saudi Arabia and India [6,12,13]. Unlike studies from many other countries, ARB was utilized only in 17 (3.5%) patients, mainly due to cost and unavailability of generic forms of the regimen [6,14].

Several large clinical trials and guidelines recommend the use of multiple antihypertensive drugs in order to achieve adequate and sustained blood pressure control [9,10,15]. The majority of our treated patients (51.4 %) were on multi-drug regimens. But, only one- third of our diabetic patients have reached goal blood pressure below 140/90 mm Hg. Although, the results of this study were similar to the findings of published studies in other countries [16,17], the blood pressure control is better than a similar study conducted in a non-academic hospital in Ethiopia [6]. Despite the presence of clear recommendations about blood pressure goals, the majority of our diabetic patients did not attain adequate control [18,19]. This might be due to poor compliance and inadequate dosing titration. Health professionals also fail to educate them about the nature of their illness and the need for adequate blood pressure control. The cost of the drugs is also another challenge. Unlike in developed countries, the majority of our patients is paying out of their pockets for their health expenses. For this reason, they may not afford to buy multiple antihypertensive medications [18-21].

There is an abundance of literature about the benefit of ACEIs and ARBs for additional vascular and reno-protective effects of decreasing disease progression. Therefore, either are recommended to include in the regimen for those with diabetic kidney disease [17,22,23]. In 24 (5%) of our study subjects, renal impairment with GFR<60 ml/min/ 1.73 m2 was found. ACEI/ ARB was used in 19 (3.9%), either as mono or combination therapy. This shows that among patients with renal impairment, the majority (79.2%) were on ACEI or ARB, which was better than another study in the country, but still lower than studies in other countries [6,13]. In the rest 20.8% of patients with renal disease, ACEI or ARB was not utilized.

Limitations of the Study

Diabetes patients who visited a public hospital were involved in this study. These may be different from patients in private health facilities. Therefore, the results may not be generalizable to all patients with diabetes and hypertension.

Conclusion and Recommendation

In this study, the pattern of antihypertensive medications used was in agreement with the current treatment guidelines. But, the blood pressure control in these patients was not adequate.

Therefore, more strict control of blood pressure is needed to reduce severe complications of diabetes and hypertension.

Authors Contributions

HA conceived and designed the study and oversaw the data collection process. All authors analyzed the data and wrote the final draft and approved it.

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College Research Directorate for funding this work.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

  • International Conference on Internal Medicine May 21-22, 2018 Osaka, Japan
    May 21-22, 2018 Osaka, Japan
  • International conference on Fitness and Expo June 04-05, 2018 Baltimore, Maryland, USA
    June 4-5, 2018 Baltimore, USA
  • Annual Congress on Research and Innovations in Medicine July 02-03, 2018 Bangkok, Thailand
    July 02-03, 2018 Bangkok, Thailand
  • International Conference on Medical and Health Science August 24-25, 2018 Tokyo, JAPAN
    August 24-25, 2018 Tokyo, Japan

Article Usage

  • Total views: 693
  • [From(publication date):
    April-2017 - Dec 13, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 630
  • PDF downloads : 63
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version