Performance Evaluation of the Free Water Surface Constructed Wetland Treating Nonpoint Source Pollutants in the Agricultural Area
Received Date: Feb 06, 2015 / Accepted Date: Feb 24, 2015 / Published Date: Feb 28, 2015
Water quality impairment from nonpoint source pollution is one of the critical causes of surface water eutrophication in rivers and lakes surrounding agricultural area, Korea. In the Songchon Constructed Wetland (SCW) located in Yeongsan (YS) watershed which has about 1,000 km2 (total watershed area: 3,471 km2) for agricultural area, 19 times of intensive field monitoring in 2010 were conducted with various rainfall patterns and about more 1,000 water samples were measured and analyzed in field and laboratory. To identify the relationship between meteorological conditions and removal efficiency of the constructed wetland, principal component analysis (PCA) and ternary plot analysis was used for 19 field experiment data. Mean treatment performance of TSS, BOD5, COD, TN, and TP was 16.4%, 42.1%, 43.7%, 36.6%, and 57.1%, respectively, as a method of pollutant load reduction for multiple tests of storm events. PCA results revealed that rainfall depth, rainfall intensity, and antecedent dry days (ADDs) can be major components as a representative in each component. Also, ternary contour plots results showed that the treatment performance of SCW in agricultural area during storm events can be affected by three meteorological conditions. These results and phenomena can be applicable to develop the NPS discharge model and to elucidate the relationship between rainfall and storm water runoff using rain radar in a drainage area.
Keywords: Free water surface constructed wetland; Nonpoint source pollution; Ternary analysis; Principal component analysis
Constructed wetlands (CWs) as a kind of detention pond systems are generally used and preferred to remove naturally the nonpoint source (NPS) pollutants for urban or agricultural runoff [1-6]. Because CWs can be designed and engineered to control hydrological aspects, removal mechanisms using vegetation and hydraulic loading to use the natural removal mechanisms which are similar with natural wetlands. From this reason, many researchers and engineers tried to use the CWs in terms of storm water management. The first adaptor who tried to use CWs as a storm water treatment system is Reddy in 1982 . Higgins was a first user of full-scale CWs as an agricultural storm water control in 1993 . The results from Reddy and Higgins were potentially a chance to expand the storm water control system using CWs. A number of studies show that the treatment performances were relatively reasonable to remove the NPS pollutants including nitrogen, phosphorus, suspended solids, organics, heavy metals, and pesticides [4,8-12]. These researches were not only to identify the treatment performance of CWs but also to imply several methodologies how to improve and optimize the removal efficiency.
To optimize the treatment efficiency about NPS pollutants in the CWs, one or more treatment ponds which have different removal functions including settling pond and facultative pond are installed with aquatic vegetation such as reeds, cattail, and lotus. These structural characteristics for the various functions to remove the NPS pollutants are based on the biological, physical, and chemical removal mechanisms . The performance evaluation of the CWs used for the control of the NPS pollutants in the agricultural area usually depends on the a number of dependent factors such as shape of CWs, size compared to drainage area, hydrological detention time, vegetation conditions, runoff characteristics related to the rainfall types, and human activities including land development, cultural practices for production, pest management, and irrigation practices [6,14]. Many studies dealt with the importance of these factors address that the CWs performance is affected by all factors related with the operating of the CWs [15-18].
However, in case of CWs for storm water treatment, the performance mainly depends on a function of inflow or hydraulic loading rate (HLR), detention time which have the information about the storm intensity, runoff volume, and wetland size[19-21]. As an extension of the previous research, Braskerud suggested a method to determine the critical factor affecting the NPS pollutants retention using a first-order model .These results mentioned that the removal efficiency of CWs is affected by the hydraulic retention time (HRT) which related with hydraulic loading with respect to the meteorological conditions such as rainfall depth, rainfall intensity, and antecedent dry days (ADDs)
This study investigated the performance of a CW which is a free water surface constructed wetland for treating the agricultural storm water runoff with an operating time for one year. Based on the field and laboratory experiment data analysis, the objectives are 1) to statistically identify the key meteorological parameters affecting storm water runoff 2) to generalize the removal efficiency related with meteorological conditions in a free water surface constructed wetland.
Materials and Methods
Description of study area
As one of the techniques for nonpoint source pollution management, Songchon Constructed Wetland (SCW) is spherically located in 126°35'43" as east longitude, and 35°01'57" as north latitude and is administratively located in Naju (NJ) city, South Jeolla province, Korea. SCW, as a test-bed wetland to mitigate the nonpoint source pollutants in the agricultural area, was designed and constructed from 2006 to 2008 from Ministry of Environment, Korea.
SCW, as a free water surface wetland, is comprised of four ponds which have different volume and hydraulic retention time (HRT) as shown in Table 1. The size of SCW is 250 m for length, 50 m for width. Total volume for four ponds is 13,127 m3. HRT is 59.8 hour that depends on the base flow and meteorological conditions such as rainfall depth, rainfall intensity. Each pond is linked with polyvinyl chloride culvert (φ 450 mm) to convey the treated water to next pond or stream (only last pond). In the inflow part of this system, the maximum flow rate is about 500 CMH (Cubic Meter per Hour) in accordance with the monitoring data from 2008 to 2010. SCW has some planted vegetation area including reed, cattail, iris, and lotus to mitigate the NPS pollutants in the second and third pond (Figure 1, Table 1).
Figure 1: Representative pictures of Songchon constructed wetland (SCW) in spring 2011: (a) inflow point with movable weir and ultrasonic wave water gage; (b) 1st treatment process with vegetation; (c) site overview of 2nd treatment process and observation deck; (d) a culvert to connect each pond; (e) outflow point to the main drainage canal.
|Minimum HRT (hr)||3.78||4.54||14.21||4.72||26.52|
Table 1: Detail information of each pond in Songchon Constructed Wetland (SCW).
Field Experiment and Data Acquisition
Intensive field experiments during rainfall events were conducted for one year from January to December 2010. Total experiments were 19 times including two times for spring, eleven times for summer, five times for autumn, and one time for winter (Figure 2). All water samples were collected after the excessive rainfall and transported to the laboratory within six hours under 4°C. For this study, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), total suspended solid (TSS) were measured by standard method (APHA, 1995) and other measuring methods used in general.
The flow rate was measured by electronic vortex flow meter installed in the inlet and outlet of SCW. The vortex flow meter is a product of Woojin Inc., Korea and basic principle of the vortex flow is von Karman Vortex shedding street theory. Precipitation was measured and automatically logged by stainless steel tipping bucket rain gage made by WEDEAN (Model number: WDR-205) and automatic logger installed in SCW. The accuracy of rain gage was validated by Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA).
Analysis of variance test and t-test: In this study, analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and t-test was used to statistically identify the difference of mean for the meteorological parameters including rainfall depth, rainfall intensity, and ADDs and five water quality parameters including TSS, BOD, COD, TN, and TP. Three meteorological parameters are well-known as key factors in diffuse pollution. Also, five water quality parameters are key factors for management of diffuse pollution in Korea. In this study, meteorological parameters are used as grouping variables because they are independent variables during storm water runoff event.
Both methods finally provide the p-value which can be an objective criterion for whether there is difference between mean/variance of each group at the significance level.
Principal component analysis: Principal component analysis (PCA), as a nonparametric method of classification, can be defined as a linear combination of optimally-weighted observed variables. It is commonly used to condense a number of variables by eliminating relatively irrelevant variables, which means that some variables are correlated with other variables. Based on this reason, PCA provides reasonable information with minimum loss of original variables data . In this study, PCA was used to identify whether the parameters related with rainfall conditions including ADD, rainfall intensity, and rainfall depth are reasonable. ANOVA test, t-test, and PCA were carried out using SPSS 17.0 for windows (IBM Corporation).
Ternary plot analysis
Ternary plot, as a barycentric plot on three variables which sum to a constant K, is widely used in chemical engineering, geology, and petrology as a practical method to illustrate the distribution of observed data concerning three compositional components. K should be 1 or 100. To set up the ternary plot, three variables which have representativeness in all variables of data should be selected by reasonable methods such as principal component analysis. Then, the variables selected should be normalized and transformed to make coordinates in the ternary plot. Finally, each coordinate will indicate the treatment performance of each storm event. In this study, ternary plot was performed using MATLAB R2009b.
Treatment performance of SCW and meteorological conditions
The treatment performance of SCW was calculated by the method of pollutant load reduction for multiple tests of storm events with five water quality parameters such as TSS, BOD5, COD, TN, and TP. Table 2 shows the information of the field experiment, meteorological conditions and the SCW treatment performance for 19 monitoring events. Mean removal efficiency of five water quality parameters is 30.1% for TSS, 37.8% for BOD, 44.4% for COD, 37.1% for TN, and 59.4% for TP. In the paired t-test results of five water quality parameters, except for the mean of TSS and TP, p-values are greater than 0.05 (p>0.05) when the significance level α=0.05 (Table 3C). It can be explained that the removal efficiency in each water quality parameter do not have statistical difference at the significance level α=0.05. This result implies that removal efficiency of each water quality parameter is independent except for TSS and TP.
|Meteorological condition||Treatment Performance|
|Date||Dep.(mm)||Intensity(mm/hr)||ADDs(days)||TSS (%)||BOD (%)||COD (%)||TN (%)||TP (%)|
|13||08/27/2010||1.5||1.0||1.0||-51.6||< -100||23.4||< -100||23.4|
ADDs: Antecedent Dry Days Dep.: Depth
StDev: Standard Deviation
Table 2: 19 Field experiment information and SCW treatment performance.
|A. Group Statistics|
|Season||# of samples||Mean||Standard Dev.|
|B. ANOVA test results|
|Rainfall depth||Rainfall intensity||ADDs|
|C. Paired t-test results (p-value)|
ADDs: Antecedent Dry Days
Table 3: Results of seasonal ANOVA test for three meteorological conditions.
ADDs has the range from 1 to 15 and analysis of variance (ANOVA) test results shows that ADDs between rainy season from June to August and non-rainy season from September to May was significant difference (p<0.05) at the significance level α=0.05 (Table 3B). In case of rainfall depth and rainfall intensity, there is no significant difference between two seasons (summer and non-summer) (p>0.05).
Extraction of key variables
The PCA can explain the entire data set by eliminating the less important parameters with minimum loss of original information. To elucidate the suitability of treatment performance data set for factor analysis, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett test were conducted. KMO is a measure of sampling adequacy that indicates the proportion of variance. If KMO is close to 1, it means that factor analysis may be useful with data set. In the case of this study, KMO value shows 0.501 and this data is useful for the application of PCA (Table 4). Also, Bartlett test of sphericity means whether correlation matrix is an identity matrix, which world indicates that variables are unrelated. If significance level was less than 0.05, there are significance relationships among variables which are the case of this study: significance level=0.000. Table 4 shows the loading matrix extracted PCs and water quality parameters described as NPS pollutants. The values in loading matrix have a range from -1, as a negative relationship, to 1 as a positive relationship. The loading matrix results showed that the eigenvalues of three principal components stand for 73.46% of the total variance (PC1 33.54%; PC2 26.74%; PC3 13.18%) of the observation based on the Kaiser criterion which means that eigenvalues is greater than 1 and assessment of scree plots. As shown in Figure 3, the treatment performance of SCW was interpreted as three components. Extraction method is principal component analysis and rotated method is Varimax with Kaiser normalization. The rotated PCs by Variamax rotation contain some parameters such as rainfall conditions. PC1 was related to two meteorological terms with rainfall duration (0.765) and rainfall depth (0.573). PC2 was related to two meteorological parameters with rainfall intensity (0.694) and ADDs (-0.841). PC3 was correlated with one meteorological parameter with rainfall intensity (0.501). Each PC has at least one factor related with the meteorological parameters. Based on the loadings about meteorological factors, rainfall duration for PC 1, ADDs for PC 2, and rainfall intensity for PC 2 were selected as the representative of meteorological parameter in each PC.
ADDs: Antecedent Dry Days
Table 4: Rotated loading matrix by VARIMAX.
As shown in Figure 4, there are five 2-dimensional ternary plots to illustrate the treatment performance of the SCW and one data point plot to provide the meteorological information of each rainfall event. The three axes of the ternary plot in this research correspond to rainfall depth, rainfall intensity, and ADDs. On the color index, blue index indicates the low treatment performance and red index indicates the removal efficiency of each pollutant in SCW. Group A, B, and C means the predominant area for rainfall intensity, rainfall depth, and ADDs, respectively. Overall patterns for removal efficiency in SCW revealed that the relatively high rainfall intensity showed the low treatment performance in all parameters.
Group A and B showed the relatively low ADDs. In overall, the removal efficiency of Group A and B described as growing season (summer and early autumn) was reasonable than Group C described as the summer, autumn, and winter. The reason is assumed that the NPS pollutant removal function of SCW was increased by aquatic plants during growing season. In case of meteorological parameters, Group B, as the predominant area for rainfall depth, showed the most reasonable removal efficiency in BOD5, COD, and TP, Group A, as the predominant area for rainfall intensity, indicated the relatively high removal efficiency for TSS and TN (Table 5). The characteristics of removal efficiency in each group can be summarized as follows.
|Group||Season||Mean Removal Efficiency (%)|
Table 5: Mean removal efficiency of three groups in ternary plot.
• Group A: Summer (growing season), relatively high removal efficiency for TSS, BOD5, and TN, dominant area for high rainfall intensity.
• Group B: Summer (growing season) and autumn, relatively high removal efficiency for COD and TP, dominant area for high rainfall depth.
• Group C: Winter, summer, and autumn, relatively low removal efficiency in TSS, BOD, and TP, dominant area for high ADDs.
Conclusion and Discussion
The water quality of streams or rivers surrounded in the agricultural area is exposed to be deteriorated during rainfall events and human activities because of massive discharge of NPS pollutants. To mitigate the negative impact of NPS pollution to the aquatic environment, SCW was operated and monitored from 2008. Data analysis from the field and laboratory experiments revealed that removal efficiency of SCW can be explained by meteorological parameters such as rainfall intensity, rainfall depth, and ADDs. The ternary contour plots show that the removal efficiency of SCW.
To generalize the treatment performance of BMPs is considerably difficult because of many factors affecting the removal mechanisms.
This study was tried to apply the ternary plot using three meteorological variables extracted from PCA. On the ternary plot, there are three groups to explain the treatment performance of SCW. Each group has own physical meaning about meteorological conditions and seasonal characteristics. If NPS management area using the constructed wetland is located in the Group A, we can expect the relatively high removal efficiency for TSS, BOD5, and TN. In the same concept, if TSS is target component, we can expect high removal efficiency when meteorological condition is Group A.
Of course, there is no doubt that 19 field monitoring are not enough to determine the exact factors and performance prediction in all constructed wetland. However, this study revealed that 1) rainfall characteristics such as ADD, rainfall intensity, and rainfall depth are obviously dependent factors and 2) seasonal characteristics related with hydrological aspects have potentially their own treatment performances. These results and phenomena can be applicable to develop the NPS discharge model and to elucidate the relationship between rainfall and storm water runoff using rain radar in a drainage area.
This research was supported by National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2012R1A6A3A03037921).
- Gu B, Dreschel T (2008) Effects of plant community and phosphorus loading rate on constructed wetland performance in Florida, USA. Wetland 28: 81-91.
- Lee BH, Scholz M (2006) Application of the self-organizing map (SOM) to assess the heavy metal removal performance in experimental constructed wetlands. Water Research 40: 3367-3374.
- Lu SY, Wu FC, Lu YF, Xiang CS, Zhang PY, Jin CX (2009) Phosphorus removal from agricultural runoff by constructed wetland. Ecological Engineering 35: 402-409.
- Nakamura K (2009) Performance and design of artificial lagoons for controlling diffuse pollution in Lake Kasumigaura, Japan. Ecological Engineering 35: 141-151.
- Persson J, Wittgren HB (2003) How hydrological and hydraulic conditions affect performance of ponds. Ecological Engineering 21: 259-269.
- Zhang L, Scholz M, Mustafa A, Harrington R (2008) Assessment of the nutrient removal performance in integrated constructed wetlands with the self-organizing map. Water Research 42: 3519-3527.
- VyDal J (1998) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in Europe. Leiden : Backhuys Publishers.
- Dunne EJ, Culleton N, O’Donovan G, Harrington R, Olsen AE (2005) An integrated constructed wetland to treat contaminants and nutrients from dairy farmyard dirty water. Ecological Engineering 24: 221-234.
- Katsenovich YP, Hummel-Batista A, Ravinet A, Miller JF (2009) Performance evaluation of constructed wetlands in a tropical region. Ecological Engineering 35: 1529-1537.
- Sim CH, Yusoff MK, Shutes B, Ho SC, Mansor M (2008) Nutrient removal in a pilot and full scale constructed wetland, Putrajaya city, Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Management 88: 307-317.
- Sindilariu PD, Brinker A, Reiter R (2009) Factors influencing the efficiency of constructed wetlands used for the treatment of intensive trout farm effluent. Ecological Engineering 35: 711-722.
- Tanner CC, Clayton JS, Upsdell MP (1995) Effect of loading rate and planting on treatment of dairy farm wastewaters in constructed wetlands-II Removal of Nitrogen and phosphorus. Water Research 29: 27-34.
- USEPA (2000) Constructed wetlands treatment of municipal wastewater. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
- Bianchi M, Harter T (2002) Nonpoint source of pollution in irrigated agriculture: Farm Water Quality Planning Series. Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, USA.
- Ong SA, Uchiyama K, Inadama D, Ishida D, Yamagiwa K (2010) Performance evaluation of laboratory scale up-flow constructed wetlands with different designs and emergent plants. Bioresource Technology 101: 7239-7244.
- Reed SC, Crities RW, Middlebrooks EJ (1995) Natural systems for waste management and treatment. (Second Edition), McGraw-Hill, New York.
- Scholz M, Harrington R, Carroll P, Mustafa A (2007) The integrated constructed wetlands (ICW) concept. Wetlands 27: 337-354.
- Vera I, Garcia J, Saez L, Moragas L, Vidal G (2011) Performance evaluation of eight years experience of constructed wetland systems in Catalonia as alternative treatment for small communities. Ecological Engineering 37: 364-371.
- Carleton JN, Grizzard TJ, Godrej AN, Post HE (2011) Factors affecting the performance of storm water treatment wetlands. Water Research 35: 1552-1562.
- Cohen MJ, Brown MT (2007) A model examining hierarchical wetland networks for watershed storm water management. Ecological Modelling 201: 179-193.
- Tanner CC, Headley TR (2011) Components of floating emergent macrophyte treatment wetlands influencing removal of stormwater pollutants. Ecological Engineering 37: 474-486.
- Braskerud BC (2002) Factors affecting phosphorus retention in small constructed wetlands treating agricultural non-point source pollution. Ecological Engineering 19: 41-61.
Citation: Lee SH, Cha SM, Lee JC, Lee JY (2015) Performance Evaluation of the Free Water Surface Constructed Wetland Treating Nonpoint Source Pollutants in the Agricultural Area. J Environ Anal Toxicol 5: 280. Doi: 10.4172/2161-0525.1000280
Copyright: © 2015 Lee SH, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Share This Article
- Total views: 12087
- [From(publication date): 7-2015 - May 21, 2019]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 8273
- PDF downloads: 3814