alexa Phytochemical Characterization and Biological Activities of Docynia indica (wall) Fruit Extracts | OMICS International
ISSN: 1747-0862
Journal of Molecular and Genetic Medicine
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Phytochemical Characterization and Biological Activities of Docynia indica (wall) Fruit Extracts

Shende KM, Singh NI and Negi PS*

Department of Fruits and Vegetable Technology, CSIR-Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore, India

Corresponding Author:
Negi PS
Department of Fruits and Vegetable Technology
CSIR-Central Food Technological Research Institute
Mysore-570020, India
Tel: 8212525653
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: November 12, 2015 Accepted date: February 29, 2016 Published date: March 05, 2016

Citation: Shende KM, Singh NI, Negi PS (2016) Phytochemical Characterization and Biological Activities of Docynia indica (wall) Fruit Extracts. J Mol Genet Med 10:204 doi:10.4172/1747-0862.1000204

Copyright: © 2016 Shende KM, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Molecular and Genetic Medicine

Abstract

With increase in awareness about adverse effects of chemical use in food, there is a continuous effort for search of natural alternatives. Several plant extracts and their purified compounds are being explored for their biological efficacy. In the present study, Docynia indica, which grows as a wild tree in North Eastern region of India has been explored for its possible use as a source of natural preservatives. Although some reports about biological activities of D. indica fruit exist in literature, not much is known about its phytochemical profile. Various fruit extracts prepared at different maturity stages of D. indica fruits were analysed for their in vitro antioxidant and antimicrobial potential, and phytochemical profile of their methanolic extracts were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. The immature fruit extract showed high concentration of total phenolics (upto 196.15 mg gallic acid equivalent/ g extract) and flavonoids (up to 100.49 mg rutin equivalent/ g extract) depending on the extraction solvent; and also showed higher antioxidant activity in in vitro assays. Although no definite trend was observed for antibacterial activity based on maturity stages, extraction with the mixture of methanol, acetone and water (1:1:1) was found to show least minimum inhibitory concentration for all the maturity stages. Catechin and ferulic acid were the major phenolics present in D. indica fruits. The antioxidant and antibacterial compounds present in various extracts of D. indica indicate its potential for utilization as food preservative.

Keywords

Docynia indica; Antioxidant; Antibacterial; Phenolics; Preservative

Introduction

Fruits and vegetables are reported to contain varying amount of biologically active compounds, which give them value beyond their nutritional importance. Antioxidants present in various plants have the capacity to scavenge free radicals and thereby reduce the risk of certain diseases [1,2]. Currently, wild plants are being explored to discover potential antioxidant. Many wild fruits are still unknown or inadequately exploited despite their good nutritional and nutraceutical values. The dietary intake of these fruits has a strong inverse correlation with the risk of developing coronary heart disease and cancer. In fruits, vitamins C, A and E, and polyphenols are known to be responsible for their antioxidant activity, with polyphenols being the most active [3]. Furthermore, fruits and vegetables are rich source of antimicrobial compounds. Several plant parts showing high phenolic content has been reported to possess good antimicrobial properties. Plants contain certain bioactive compound which hampers the growth of microorganism [4,5], and in developing countries, people still use plants as a medicine to treat infectious bacterial diseases [6]. Extensive studies are going on to establish antimicrobial activity of several plant extract, and there is a possibility to find out encouraging alternative for synthetic medicine [7,8].

Docynia indica (wall.) is a wild edible plant, and the fruits of this plant are well known in North-eastern area of India for their nutritive value. The fruit of D. indica are sour in taste, and are reported to contain sugar, organic acid, phosphorus and iron. For a long time the fruit has been used as natural remedy for treatment of infectious diseases, digestive aid and it also showed hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic effect [9]. Although some reports about biological activities of D. indica fruit exist in literature [9,10], they provide a very limited information. Further, not much is reported about the phytochemicals present in D. indica fruits. Therefore, in the present investigation, a systematic effort was made to analyse various biological activities of D. indica fruits at different stages of maturity. The phytochemical profile of fruit methanolic extracts was also determined using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in order to identify compounds responsible for various biological activities.

Materials and Methods

Reagents

Most of the solvent used for extraction (AR grade) were purchased from Qualigens Fine Chemical (Mumbai, India). Diethyl ether and ammonium acetate were purchased from Rankem (New Delhi, India), and Folin ciocalteu (FC) reagent was from Sisco Research Laboratory (Mumbai, India). 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and standards used in HPLC (gallic acid, catechin, chlorogenic acid, p-coumaric acid, quercetin, ferulic acid, caffeic acid, syringic acid, tannic acid, cinnamic acid and rutin) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Bangalore, India).

Preparation of fruit extract

Docynia indica (wall.) fruits at different maturity stages (mature and immature) were collected from Manipur, India. Fruits were cleaned and cut into slices and dried in hot air oven at 50 to 55°C. One set of mature fruits were treated with potassium metabisulfite (KMS, 0.5%) and dried under similar conditions. Dried fruit slices were powdered in a grinder, and passed through a screen (250 μ). Fruit powder (2 g) was then used for the preparation of extract in 50 ml of solvent (Methanol, Acetone, Ethanol, mixture of Methanol: Acetone: Water (1:1:1), and Water) by placing over a magnetic shaker (2 h, 50°C). Fresh fruit extract was prepared by macerating fresh mature fruit followed by extraction in the above mentioned solvent (1:5; weight by volume). Extract thus obtained were filtered through Whatman filter paper No. 1, and the filtrate was concentrated in vacuum at 55°C on rotary evaporator (Buchi, Model R-205, Germany). These crude extract were dissolved in known volume of solvent used for their extraction (50 mg/mL), and stored under refrigerated conditions until further analysis.

Determination of total polyphenol content

The total polyphenol content (TPC) was estimated by spectrophotometry, using Gallic acid as standard [11]. Briefly, 100 μL of the diluted sample extract was transferred to separate tubes containing 5.0 mL of a 1:10 dilution of Folin-Ciocalteu’s reagent in water. Then, 4.0 mL of a sodium carbonate solution (7.5% w/v) was added. The solution was made up to 10 mL with water, mixed and all the tubes were then allowed to stand at room temperature for 45 min. Then absorbance was measured against reagent blank at 765 nm using UV-visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-1601 PC, Kyoto, Japan). TPC was expressed as mg Gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g extract by comparing with a standard gallic acid (5-100 μg) curve.

Estimation of flavonoid content

Flavonoid concentration in D. indica fruit extract was measured by the Aluminium chloride colorimetric assay [12]. Standard used was Rutin prepared in a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL. Aliquot of all extract or standard (0.1 mL-0.9 mL) was added to 10 mL volumetric flask, mixed with 0.3 mL of 5% NaNO2. After 5 min, 0.3 mL of 10% AlCl3 was added. At 6th min, 2.0 mL of NaOH (1N) was added and total volume was made up to 10 mL with distilled water. The solution was mixed well in a vortex and the absorbance was read against reagent blank at 510 nm. All the extracts/standard (rutin, 10-90 μg) were taken in triplicate, and total flavonoid content was expressed as mg Rutin equivalents (RE)/g of extract.

Determination of the free radical scavenging activity by 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (dpph) free-radical scavenging assay

The antioxidantactivity of different extract of the D. indica fruit was evaluated using the DPPH free radical scavenging assay [13]. Test sample (20-500 μg) was added to 4 mL of 100 μM methanolic DPPH. It was incubated for 20 min at room temperature in the dark and the absorbance was measured at 517 nm using methanol as blank. Ascorbic acid (10-100 μg) was used as standard. Control was prepared without adding standard or test compound. The capability to scavenge the DPPH radical was calculated using the following equation.

image        (1)

The IC50 was calculated from the graph of concentration versus % inhibition, and it was determined in triplicate.

Determination of ferric reducing antioxidant potential (FRAP)

FRAP method is based on the principle of reduction of a ferrictripyridyltriazine complex to its coloured ferrous form in the presence of antioxidants [14]. The FRAP reagent [2.5 mL of a 10 mM/L TPTZ (2,4,6-tripyridy-s-triazine) solution in 40 mM/L HCl plus 2.5 mL of 20 mM/L FeCl3 and 25 mL of 300 mM/L acetate buffer, pH 3.6] was prepared freshly and warmed at 37°C. Aliquots of 0.1 mL sample supernatant were mixed with 0.2 mL distilled water and 1.8 mL FRAP reagent, and the reaction mixture was kept for incubation (10 min at 37°C), after which the absorbance of reaction mixture was measured at 593 nm spectrophotometrically. The FeSO4 solution (200 mg/L) was used as the standard solution. Results were expressed as mM Fe2+/g extract using a FeSO4.7H2O calibration curve (5-20 μM).

Antibacterial activity

The antibacterial study of extracts was carried out against Bacillus cereus (F 4810, Public Health Laboratory, London, UK), Staphylococcus aureus (FRI 722, Public Health Laboratory, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), Listeria innocua (CFR 1309, maintained in culture stock at CSIR-CFTRI, Mysore), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922, American Type Culture Collection, Minnesota, USA), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853, American Type Culture Collection, Minnesota, USA) and Yersinia enterocolitica (MTCC 859, Microbial Type Culture Collection, Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India) by broth microdilution assay [15]. The bacterial culture was prepared by transferring a loop full of individual culture from stored slants at 4°C to sterilized Muller Hilton Broth (MHB) and it was incubated at 37°C overnight. The grown culture was diluted to 7 log cells using serial dilution method in MHB for use in experiments. The known concentration of extract (0.5-15 mg/ mL) diluted in MHB was added into the 96 well plates. Wells without extracts were used as control and well with equal quantity of solvent served as negative control to check the effect of solvent on bacterial growth. All the wells were inoculated with 5 log cells of bacterial culture. The plate was incubated at 37°C for 24 hours and observed for growth. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was defined as the concentration at and above which no visible growth of the organism was observed. The MIC was confirmed in four separate experiments.

Chromatographic conditions

A Shimadzu chromatograph (LC-10A Japan) with a Shimadzu SPD-M10A PDA detector at 280 and 320 nm was used for HPLC analysis. The phenolics present in D. indica fruits extracted in methanol were separated by liquid chromatography [16]. A supelco C18 (5 μm) column of 15 cm length and 4.6 μm id (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) and diode array detector operating at 280 and 320 nm were used for separation and identification of phenolics. The samples were eluted according to gradient program with flow rate of 1 ml/min. Acetonitrile (A) and 2% acetic acid in water (B) were used as mobile phase, and the following conditions for HPLC were applied: 0.01-30 min 100% of B; 30-50 min 85% of B; 50-55 min 50% of B; and 55-60 min 100% of B. Total duration for chromatographic analysis was 60 min. All solvent used for HPLC were degased using vacuum filter. Mixture of standards of phenolics (2-10 μg) were used for identification and quantification of individual phenolics.

Statistical analysis

Data were presented as mean value ± standard deviation. ANOVA was performed and means were compared using Turkeys test. Significance was determined at 5% level. The correlation coefficients (R) to determine the relationship between two variables were calculated using MS Excel software (CORREL statistical function).

Results and Discussion

Total phenolic and flavonoid content

The total phenolic content (TPC) and total flavonoid contents (TFC) were investigated in fresh mature fruits, powders obtained from immature (IDIFE), mature (MDIFE) and KMS treated fruit (KDIFE), and the results are presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Except a few cases, the TPC and TFC extracted by various solvent differed significantly (p < 0.05). The maximum concentration of phenolic compounds was observed in IDIFE, and highest extraction of phenolics (196.13 mg GAE/g extract) was obtained with methanol which was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than other solvents. Similarly, IDIFE showed highest concentration of flavonoids by extraction with mixture of methanol, acetone and water (100.49 mg RE/g extract), indicating no definite trend for extraction of phenolics and flavonoids with different solvents. Phenolics and flavonoids in immature fruits were higher than mature fruits for all the solvent extracts. Significantly low amount of phenolics and flavonoids were extracted by water extraction, with exception of flavonoids for extraction with mixture of methanol, acetone and water. Flavonoids and polyphenol concentration in fruit extracts vary according to polarity of solvents used in the extract preparation [17,18]. However, there was a general trend of decrease in their extraction with increase in polarity of solvents.

Extract Fresh fruit MDIFE IDIFE KDIFE
Methanol 80% 22.48±0.27a 36.82±0.34a 196.13±3.07a 96.39±2.65a
Ethanol 80% 13.34±0.12c 24.22±0.69d 127.93±2.4b 64.5±1.46c
Acetone 80% 20.97±0.16b 32.60±0.29c 104.87±0.89d 79.89±0.92b
MAW* 11.35±0.10d 34.81±0.22b 115.1±3.74c 74.71±1.53b
Water 4.90±0.06e 19.53±0.28e 55.21±3.62e 41.83±0.94d

Table 1: Total phenolic content (Mg GAE/G of Extract) of Docynia Indica fruit extract.

Extract Fresh fruit MDIFE IDIFE KDIFE
Methanol 80% 11.76±0.21a 22.62±0.21a 87.97±3.32b 52.11±1.33a
Ethanol 80% 7.64±0.05c 21.39±0.26a 77.82±1.46c 38.16±0.44b
Acetone 80% 13.21±0.65b 22.80±0.61a 77.88±3.55c 58.10±4.27a
MAW* 5.47±0.15d 21.98±0.46a 100.49±4.14a 34.18±0.64b
Water 1.11±0.11e 15.49±0.48b 46.91±0.40d 39.37±1.86b

Table 2: Total flavonoid content (Mg RE/G of Extract) of Docynia Indica fruit extract.

The results showed that IDIFE showed highest phenolic and flavonoid content for all the solvents, which was followed by KDIFE. In many food industries, KMS is used for preservation and to prevent browning. Potassium in KMS inhibits enzyme polyphenol oxidase [19], which might be a possible reason of high phenolic content in KMS treated fruit powder extract. The fresh fruit extract had lowest phenolics and flavonoids, which is an expected result as other extracts were prepared from dry powder, where phenolics and flavonoids were concentrated.

DPPH radical scavenging activity

Free radicals have crucial role in auto-oxidation of food. By contributing hydrogen from the phenolic hydroxyl groups, polyphenol interrupt the free radical chain of oxidation as stable radicals are formed, which cannot propagate further [20]. The ability of the polyphenol extracts to act as free radical scavengers against the DPPH radical was tested spectrophotometrically by measuring drop in absorbance at 517 nm after adding the different extract solutions. The results indicate that among the five solvents used, acetone and water exhibited the highest and the least scavenging activity (p < 0.05), respectively. The IC50 value in KDIFE and IMDIFE were found to be lower than fresh fruit extracts (Table 3). Similar IC50 value for methanol extract of D. indica fruit has been reported in literature [10], however, variation in DPPH radical scavenging activity similar to D. indica among various extracts was also reported for Garcinia cowa [21].

Extract Fresh fruit MDIFE IDIFE KDIFE
Methanol 80% 121.52±0.47d 49.05±0.22b 46.11±0.84b 36.78±0.3d
Ethanol 80% 185.58±0.62b 43.46±0.98c 42.3±0.52c 42.27±0.74c
Acetone 80% 116.17±0.32e 33.58±0.46d 32.89±0.69d 32.62±0.45e
MAW* 127.26±0.75c 45.18±0.81c 40.85±0.90c 47.85±0.56b
Water 209.99±0.96a 68.51±0.78a 70.05±0.92a 114.53±1.42a

Table 3: Antioxidant activities of Docynia indica fruit extract (DPPH assay, IC50 value, μg/mL).

Ferric reducing antioxidant potential (FRAP)

The antioxidant potential of different extract of D. indica fruit was also determined on the basis of their ability to reduce ferric (III) iron to ferrous (II) iron using FRAP reagent [22]. At low pH, reactants reduce the ferric tripyridyl triazine [Fe (III) TPTZ] complex to ferrous tripyridyltriazine [Fe (II)-TPTZ], which has an intense blue colour. The change in absorbance was correlated to the reducing power of the electron donating antioxidants present in the D. indica fruit extract. The FRAP activities of all extracts of D. indica fruit were expressed as the concentrations of antioxidant having a ferric reducing ability equivalent to mM of FeSO4 (Table 4). Among all the stages, the FRAP value was the highest for IDIFE, and among extracts, ethanol extract showed significantly (p < 0.05) highest FRAP value. KDIFE also showed higher FRAP values, however, methanol was the best (p < 0.05) solvent for KMS treated fruits. FRAP value is reported to change with change in bioactive compounds [23], and probably variable phenolics (Table 1) and flavonoids (Table 2) were responsible for differences in the variable FRAP values of D. indica fruit extract.

Extract Fresh fruit MDIFE IDIFE KDIFE
Methanol 80% 14.25±0.46b 80.68±2.16b 352.07±2.49b 151.87±6.16a
Ethanol 80% 8.28±0.02d 100.1±2.02a 405.87±6.56a 121.69±4.93b
Acetone 80% 19.52±0.45a 94.66±4.03a 346.37±6.86b 129.32±1.55b
MAW* 10.63±0.07c 94.83±1.18a 258.41±6.14c 130.49±2.19b
Water 5.92±0.23e 6.42±0.24c 9.14±0.24d 7.57±0.51c

Table 4: Antioxidant activities of Docynia Indica fruit extract (FRAP Assay, Mm Fe2+/G of Extract).

Antibacterial activity

The antibacterial activity of various extracts (Figure 1) was determined against 3 Gram positive (B. cereus, S. aureus, and L. innocua) and 3 Gram negative (E. coli, P. aeruginosa and Y. enterocolitica) bacteria using broth micro-dilution method. Methanolic extract of IDIFE; and extraction of fresh fruit, MDIFE and KDIFE with mixture of methanol, acetone and water were most effective as they showed lowest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values against all the tested bacteria. Although, there was no definite trend for antibacterial effect among extracts, KDIFE showed the lowest MIC values; and among solvents used for extraction, extraction with water showed the highest MIC values. However, these MIC values were much higher than the standard Nisin. The lowest MIC values among various maturity stage and solvent used for extraction observed were 0.78, 0.78. 0.68 and 0.91 mg/ mL for B. cereus, S. aureus, Y. enterocolitica and E. coli, respectively, which were 8-10 times higher than Nisin for the same bacterial cultures (0.10, 0.09. 0.07 and 0.09 mg/mL, respectively) reported in our earlier study [24]. Use of methanol resulted in better extraction of antimicrobial compounds in this study, and higher activity of methanolic extract is also reported in literature for seabuckthorn seeds [18] and Peltophorum ferrugineum flowers [25]. Although various plant extracts are shown to be more effective against Gram positive bacteria than Gram negative bacteria [7], in the present study we did not observe a definite trend. Variable antibacterial activity has been reported against various bacteria for D. indica [26], and differences in antibacterial activity of among extracts of Nigella sativa [27] and Plectranthus ambonicus [28] also have been reported. Various mechanisms for antimicrobial effect of plant extracts are proposed [7], and probably fruit extract of Docynia indica are acting on genetic material of bacteria similar to the fruit and bark extracts of Dillenia indica [29].

molecular-genetic-medicine-extracts-against-various

Figure 1: Antibacterial activity of D. indica fruit extracts against various Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria.

HPLC analysis

As the methanolic extract of fruits showed highest phenolic concentration at various maturity stages (Table 1), identification of phenolic compounds present in methanolic extract of fresh fruit, IMDIFE, MDIFE, and KDIFE was done by HPLC (Figure 2). Phenolic compound were tentatively identified by comparing with retention times of standards. Gallic acid was detected only in fresh fruit and tannic acid was present only in MDIFE. Catechin (82.85 mg/g of extract) was most predominant phenolic acid observed in fresh fruit extract, followed by rutin (5.89 mg/g of extract), ferulic acid (4.71 mg/g of extract) and gallic acid (3.36 mg/g of extract). KDIFE showed higher concentration of catechin (127.90 mg/g of extract) and ferulic acid (1.83 mg/g of extract) than IMDIFE (113.98, 1.35 mg/g of extract) and MDIFP (1.69, 0.18 mg/g of extract), respectively. Caffeic acid was present only in IMDIFE (3.30 mg/g of extract) and KDIFE (2.11 mg/g of extract); similarly syringic acid was quantified in fresh fruit (11.21 mg/g of extract) and IMDIFE (0.64 mg/g of extract). Quercetin was recorded in IMDIFP and KDIFE, and it was found to be 0.43 and 0.40 mg/g of extract, respectively. Chlorogenic acid and cinnamic acid were not detected in any of the extract. There is no study on quantification of individual phenolics in D. indica, however variable levels of phenolics in stem [24] and leaf [30] extracts of Plectranthus amboinicus are reported in literature.

molecular-genetic-medicine-HPLC-chromatogram

Figure 2: HPLC chromatogram of various Docynia indica fruit methanolic extracts. (A): Fresh fruit, (B): Mature D. indica fruit extract (C): Immature D. indica fruit extract, (D): Potassium metabisulfite treated mature D. indica fruit extract KDIFE 1-Tannic acid, 2-Gallic acid, 3-Catechine, 4-Caffeic acid, 5- Chlorogenic acid, 6- Syringic acid, 7- Rutin, 8- Ferulic acid, 9- Querceitin.

Correlation among phytochemicals and biological activity

The correlation analysis between phytochemicals and biological activity gave mixed correlation coefficient. While there was a high correlation between TPC and DPPH (0.86 for KDIFE), TPC and FRAP (0.82 for IDIFE, 0.87 for fresh fruit, and 0.91 for KDIFE), Flavonoid content and DPPH (0.90 for MDIFE), flavonoid content and FRAP (0.94 for MDIFE and 0.87 for fresh fruit), all other combinations showed coefficient below 0.80. Similarly, the correlation coefficient between TPC and antibacterial activity were 0.86 against P. aeruginosa, 0.85 against E. coli for KDIFE, 0.90 against Y. enterocolitica and 0.82 against B. cereus for IDIFE. Total flavonoid content showed high correlation only in case of IDIFE (P. aeruginosa, 0.93; B. cereus, 0.91; Y. enterocolitica, 0.87; L. innocua, 0.86; and E. coli, 0.79). Literature survey also reveals that relationship between polyphenol content and antioxidant activity is contradictory. While in some study a high correlation between the two has been observed [31], other study showed that there is no or very weak correlation [32].

Conclusion

In the present study, it was observed that the immature D. indica fruit extracts had high concentration of total phenolics and flavonoids, and they exhibited higher antioxidant activity in DPPH and FRAP assay. Although no definite trend was seen in antibacterial activity assay, extraction with mixture of methanol, acetone and water showed higher antibacterial activity against tested bacteria. However, their potential as antifungal agent or antiviral agents need to be studied, as D. indica fruit extracts are rich in various phenolic compounds, which are known to be good antiviral agents. The antioxidant and antibacterial compounds present in various extracts of D. indica showed its potential for utilization as food preservative, however their behaviour in food system needs deeper study.

Acknowledgement

Authors thank Director, CSIR-CFTRI, Mysore for constant encouragement. The help in HPLC analysis by Mr. Mukund P., CIFS Department, CSIR-CFTRI, Mysore is duly acknowledged.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 9070
  • [From(publication date):
    March-2016 - May 28, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8769
  • PDF downloads : 301

Review summary

  1. þerafettýn yetkin
    Posted on Oct 06 2016 at 6:48 pm
    With multi-drug resistance continuing to spread the need for new antimicrobials is increasing by the day. Hence studies such as this are essential.
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7