alexa
Reach Us +44-7482-864460
Power Regression as an Example of the Third Law of Hotels in Paris: Planets | OMICS International
ISSN: 2329-6542
Journal of Astrophysics & Aerospace Technology
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Power Regression as an Example of the Third Law of Hotels in Paris: Planets

Mikhаil Mishаilоvith Tаenvаt*

Department of State and Municipal Management of the Institute of Law and management, Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service, Vladivostok, Russia

*Corresponding Author:
Mikhаil Mikhаilоvith Tаenvat
Department of State and Municipal Management
of the Institute of Law and Management, Vladivostok State
University of Economics and Service, Vladivostok, Russia
Tel: +7 950 2920795
E-mail: [email protected]?il.ru

Received Date: May 04, 2015; Accepted Date: September 07, 2015; Published Date: October 15, 2015

Citation: T?env?t MM (2015) Power Regression as an Example of the Third Law of Hotels in Paris: Planets. J Astrophys Aerospace Technol 3:124. doi:10.4172/2329-6542.1000124

Copyright: © 2015 T?env?t MM. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Astrophysics & Aerospace Technology

Abstract

All of the linear term regression model: Four ways too functional equation from the normal equations; obtaining normal equations from the functional equation by differentiation; variance analysis; extrapolation in Appell regression; improve the accuracy formula the isochronism; the number of Eulerian model; the statistical reliability, F-statistics; interpolation probabilities. All about power regression: four ways to display a functional equation of the normal equations; obtain the normal equations from the functional equation by differentiating; analysis of variance; extrapolation of the power of the regression flexicurity the accuracy with Juventus of the formula to My Short List's third law Euler number: statistical reliability: F-statistics; interpolation of probabilities, MATLAB, the standard normal probability calculators.

Keywords

The formula; The isochronism; Functional equation; Normal equations; Differentiation; Variance analysis; Extrapolation; The number of Eulerian model; The statistical reliability; F-statistics; Interpolation probabilities; Formula of hotels in Paris third law; Functional equation; Normal equation; Differentiation; Analysis of variance; Extr?p?l?ti?n; Euler number; Statistical reliability; F-statistics; Interp?l?ti?n of probabilities; MATLAB; Standard normal probability calculators

Introduction

Use the regression in the physics celestial bodies

Sustainable related to statistics as to the stress hormones subject can overcome this article. In the minds of most statistics is fundamentally one of the parties-counting manufactured products, physical products, etc. But when such calculations may lead to the opening of world significance, statistics captures the spirit of the! (Figures 1 and 2).

Figure

Figure 1: John Kepler (1571-1630gg) German mathematician, astronomer, mechanics, opticsand astrologer, the discoverer of the laws of motionof the planetsof the solar system.

Figure

Figure 2:The planets in the solar system.

The author as a child lived in a garrison. The toys were on paper, paper plants strategic missiles and thin, like mannequins, anti-aircraft missiles... But childhood continues. So "Astrology and John (Figure 1) was opened by the third act the motions of the planets, for which the current could get Nobel Peace prize , we can now for half an hour repeat his path, historically, as it was.

The author of the article "the laws isochronism" Mr. Chris Impey [1] noted: "The laws isochronism apply to any orbital movement, whether the planet around the Sun, the moon around the Earth, or stars around the center of the galaxy.

The second and third laws were not the result of isochronism attempts to find patterns in orbits planets. The second and third laws isochronism studying mathematical relationship between the distance the planet from the Sun and the speed it is moving around the sun. Both of these are consequences of the application of the law of gravity and Newton's law of conservation since the pulse object, moving on an elliptic trajectory, but "Astrology surprisingly was able to get them without any of these notions!"

But the essence of and those quantitative steps in any items after math processing may result in an important opening and for you. No same any items? This is Sachs [2] produced calculations in healthbiological laboratory; you can take it in any other laboratory.

Methodology

Dr. Mathews and Dr. Fink presented [3] resulted in an excellent example of the use of a regression line: "Applications of numerical techniques in science and engineering involve curve fitting of experimental data. For example, in 1601, the German astronomer Johannes Kepler formulated the third law of planetary motion [4], T = Cx3/2, where x is the distance to the Sun, measured in millions of kilometers, T is the orbital period measured in days, and C is a constant. The observed data pairs (x, T) for the first four planets, Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars, are (58; 88), (108; 225), (150; 365), (228; 687), and the coefficient C obtained from the method of least squares1 is C = 0.199769. The curve T = 0,199769x3/ 2 and the data points are shown in Figure 3".

Figure

Figure 3: The least squares fit T = 0,199769x3/2 for the first four planets, using Mr. Kepler’s third law of planetary motion.

The authors present a power adjustment: "Let us suppose that equation Points with various abscissas.

equation

Since we have only one variable as well – taking private derivatives is not required.

equation

equation

Hence the factor a curve, built least-squares (Table 1), equation Equal to

x y x^3/2 (x^(3/2))*y x^(2*(3/2))
58 88 441,7148 38870,906 195112
108 225 1122,369 252533,01 1259712
150 365 1837,117 670547,82 3375000
228 687 3442,725 2365151,7 11852352

Table 1: The original data for the coefficient as well.

equation

3327103,5/16682176=0,199440616.

In the case described is only a «A» factor, factor «M» is already known. It saves time, when a «A» – already known physical, a constant. But we are interested in, as well as received and the factor «M» and the factor «A». And here comes the assistance table ready normal equations (Table 2) for the most important functional equations of the 42-year-old books on health care and biological statistics, written L. Decided by Dr. Lothar Sachs, which does not become obsolete! Supplement table reduction will affect: (Table 3)

Functional equations Normal equations
equation equation
equation equation
equation equation
equation equation
equation equation
equation equation
equation equation
equation equation

Table 2: Normal equations for the most important functional equations.

Functional equations Normal equation
equation equation
equation equation

Table 3: Supplement to Table 2.

Logarithms on different grounds are mutually go at each other. Here are absolutely accurate conversions between and their formulas:

equation

4,060443*0,434294482 = 1,763427989;

equation

1,763428*2,302585 = 4,060443025;

Logarithm to base 2 - lb (binär):

equation

1,763428*3,321928=5,857981017;

equation

4,060443*1,442695 = 5,85798098 (Table 4).

X y lnx lny ln(x^2) lnx*lny
58 88 4,060443 4,477337 16,4872 18,17997
108 225 4,682131 5,4161 21,92235 25,35889
150 365 5,010635 5,899897 25,10646 29,56223
228 687 5,429346 6,532334 29,4778 35,4663

Table 4: The first option baseline data for the coefficients under normal equations.

equation

4a + 19,18256b = 22,32567;

19,18256a + 92,99381b = 108,5674.

Equations system of the selection can be solved by Gaussian elimination, the decomposition of the triangular matrix or matrix, but saving a place, we will use the calculator equations: answer: ?????: a = - 64515504413/40046318464 = - 1,611022109, b = 3753809803/2502894904 = 1,499787225,

EXP(-1,611022109) = 0,199683412.

Using differentiation will show you how the system of equations is shown.

equation

Since we have two variables «a» and «b» - take private derivative works.

Hold b fixed, differentiate ? (?, b) with respect a, and get

equation

equation

Now hold a fixed and differentiate ? (?, b) with respect b, and get (Table 5)

lgx lgy lg(x^2) lgx*lgy
1,763428 1,944483 3,109678 3,428955
2,033424 2,352183 4,134812 4,782984
2,176091 2,562293 4,735373 5,575783
2,357935 2,836957 5,559857 6,689359

Table 5: The second option baseline data for the coefficients under normal equations.

equation

equation

equation

4a + 8,330878b = 9,695915;

8,330878a + 17,53972b = 20,47708.

Use the calculator equations: answer: ?????: a = - 132105258110/188837937279 = -0,699569483,

b = 566417518315/377675874558 = 1,499745037;

equation

We can also use the MATLAB program:

format long

A=[4.000000 8.330878; 8.330878 17.539720];

det(A)

X=inv(A)*[9.695915 20.477080]'

B=A*X

ans = 0.755351749115995

X = -0.699569482772034

1.499745036608161

B = 9.695914999999985 .477079999999969

10^-0.699569482772034

ans = 0.199724120426936 (Table 6).

log2(x) log2(y) log2(x^2) log2(x)*log2(y)
5,857981 6,459432 34,31594 37,83923
6,754888 7,813781 45,62851 52,78121
7,228819 8,511753 52,25582 61,52992
7,83289 9,424166 61,35417 73,81846

Table 6: The third option baseline data for the coefficients under normal equations.

equation

4a + 27,674578b = 32,20913;

27,674578a + 193,5544b = 225,9688.

Use the calculator equations: answer: ?????: a = - 48432003580/20838054559 = -2,324209462,

B = 62505275423/41676109118 = 1,49978673;

equation

Next will be processing the same sample using the program Microsoft Office Excel, the creature some of its performance indicators we will look at below. The other indicators is well described in the 1 (Tables 7 and 8).

The outcome of the withdrawl

Regression statistics
Multiple R 0.999991
R-square 0.999981
Normalized R-square 0.999972
Standard error 0.004598
Monitoring 4
Variance analysis
  DF SS MS F The significance F
Regression models. 1 2.251954 2.251954 106513,2 9.39 E-06
The Balance 2 4.23 E-05 2.11 E-05    
Total 3 2.251996      
  Rates Standard error T-statistics P-value The lower 95%
Y-intersection -1,61083 0.022157 -72,7004 0.000189 -1,70617
ln(x) 1.499748 0.004595 326.3635 9.39 E-06 1.479976
The balance
Monitoring Predicted ln(y)
1 4.478809 The residue
2 5.411184 -0,00147
3 5.903858 0.004916
4 6.531818 -0,00396

Table 7: Summary regression analysis depending on period completing the first four planets, which used Mr. Kepler, on the distance to the Sun (exponential model), which was established by using the Microsoft Office Excel 2007.

One-Tail F-Test
Critical Value 18,51282051
Two-Tail Test
Lower Critical Value -4,30265273
Upper Critical Value 4,30265273

Table 8: The limit values F and t-statistic.

Since 106513,2 ≥ 18,51282051 and 9,39E-06 ≤ 0,05, ? 95% reliability zero hypothesis is rejected. And further, since 326,3635 ≥ 4,30265273, and 9,39E-06 ≤ 0,05, the zero hypothesis is rejected (Figure 4).

Figure

Figure 4: The Schedule balances.

Homoscedasticity has not been identified.

The model will take a view:

equation

4329,547/365=11,8617726 years, accommodating 2 leap-year, as well as 2 days is 0,005479452, the 11,8617726 +0,005479452 =11,86725205 years.

The site "A large encyclopedia pupil" reports that the period of treatment in the orbit the planet Jupiter is 11.867 years!!!" Mr. Kepler and for today made a perfect calculation.

Dr. Mathews and Dr. Fink presented [3] (3, c.290) in exercises to the chapter "Building a curve on points", resulting in the modern data, which we, and offended in the processing.

The authors give an indication: "The following date give the distances of the nine planets from the sun and their side real period in days. Use it to find the power fit of the form y = Cx3/ 2 for (a) the first four planets and (b) all nine planets" (Tables 9 and 10).

Planet Distance from Sun (кm * 10^6) Sidereal period (days)
Mercury 57,59 87,99
Venus 108,11 224,7
Earth 149,57 365,26
Mars 227,84 686,98
Jupiter 778,14 4332,4
Saturn 1427 10759
Uranium 2870,3 30684
Neptune 4499,9 60188
Pluto. 5909 90710

Table 9: The distance nine planets from the Sun and their star period in days.

The outcome of the withdrawl

Regression statistics
Multiple R 0.999998
R-square 0.999995
Normalized R-square 0.999993
Standard error 0.00227
Monitoring 4
Variance analysis
  DF SS MS F The significance F
Regression models. 1 2.253078 2.253078 437091,8 2.29 E-06
The Balance 2 1.03 E-05 5.15 E-06    
Total 3 2.253088      
 
  Rates Standard error T-statistics P-value The lower 95% The upper 95% The lower 95.0 % The upper 95.0 %
Y-intersection -158,024 0.010892 -145,09 4.75 E-05 -162,711 -153,338 -162,711 -153,338
ln(x) 1.494081 0.00226 661.1292 2.29 E-06 1.484358 1.503805 1.484358 1.503805
The balance
Monitoring Predicted ln(y) The residue
1 4.475789 0.001435
2 5.416761 -0,002
3 5.901763 -0,00115
4 6.530591 0.001714

Table 10: Summary regression analysis depending on the period completing the first four planets, which used Dr. Mathews and Dr. Fink, on the distance to the Sun (exponential model), which was established by using the program Microsoft Office Excel 2007.

Heteroscedasticity in Figure 5 and Table 11. Since 437091,8 ≥ 18,51282051 and 2,29E-06 ≤ 0,05, ? 95% reliability zero hypothesis is rejected. And further, since 661,1292 ≥ 4,30265273, and 2,29E-06 ≤ 0,05, the zero hypothesis is rejected.

Figure

Figure 5: The Schedule balances.

One-Tail F-Test
Critical Value 18,51282051
Two-Tail Test
Lower Critical Value -4,30265273
Upper Critical Value 4,30265273

Table 11: The limit values F and t-statistic.

So, as expected, more than was possible ??????? exact formula:

Exp(-1,58024) = 0.20592567.

equation

We will do the job "b" (Figure 6, Tables 12 and 13).

Figure

Figure 6: The least-squares fit T = 0,201258526x1,4988974 for the all nine planets, using Mr. Mathews and Mr. Fink third law of planetary motion.

The outcome of the withdrawl

Regression statistics
Multiple R 0.9999996
R-square 0.9999993
Normalized R-square 0.9999992
Standard error 0.0023366
Monitoring 9
Variance analysis
  DF SS MS F The significance F
Regression models. 1 53.51453 53.51453 9801780 8.96 E-23
The Balance 7 3.82 E-05 5.46 E-06    
Total 8 53.51457      
           
  Rates Standard error T-statistics P-value The lower 95%
Y-intersection -1,603,165 0.00319 -502,567 3.26 E-17 -161,071
ln(x) 1.4988974 0.000479 3,130,779 8.96 E-23 1.497765
The balance
Monitoring Predicted ln(y) The residue
1 4.4723886 0.004835
2 5.4163946 -0,00163
3 5.9029596 -0,00235
4 6.5338142 -0,00151
5 8.3748542 -0,00098
6 9.2838202 -0,00032
7 10.331313 0.000184
8 11.005275 -4,7E-05
9 11.413607 0.001816

Table 12: Summary regression depending on the completion of all 9 planets in orbit on the distance to the Sun (exponential model), with the use of modern data, created by using the program Microsoft Office Excel 2007.

One-Tail F-Test
Critical Value 5,591447848
Two-Tail Test
Lower Critical Value -2,364624251
Upper Critical Value 2,364624251

Table 13: The limit values F and t-statistic.

Since 9801780 ≥ 5,591447848 and 8,96E-23 ≤ 0,05, ? 95% reliability zero hypothesis is rejected. And further, since 3130,779 ≥ 2,364624251, and 8,96E-23 ≤ 0,05, the zero hypothesis is rejected (Figure 7).

Figure

Figure 7: The Schedule balances.

Since there is a definite ??????????????????, conclusions call for caution.

So, the most accurate formula, which we have been able to calculate:

EXP (-1,603165) = 0,201258526;

equation

The F - statistics with 1 and 7 degrees of freedom and largest errors α = 0,0000000000000000000000896 as well 9801780, with 0,9 999 999 999 999 999 999 999 104 reliability of the null hypothesis is rejected. On 1,11607E + 24 attempts to account for 1 failure. And if we use the first 1000 digits to the right of the decimal point in the number of e (Figure 8), the majority of which the program Microsoft Office Excel does not use, by allowing, as writes Mathews rounding error (3, C. 39), you can speak to the good prospects for success in planetary flights.

Figure

Figure 8: The first 1000 digits to the right of the decimal point in the number of e.

The third law isochronism (9): "The squares periods of planets around the Sun are, as well as Cuba large spindles orbits planets". It is true not only for planetary exploration, but also for their satellites.

equation

Where T - Periods of planets around the Sun, as well as well - the length large spindles their orbits.

So, the formula the third act with increasing accuracy.

equation

Make the conversion, having the formula (2):

equation

We have an obligation to consider and competing option.

equation

Dr. Mathews and Dr. Fink [3] notes that: "In the practice of numerical analysis it is important to be aware that computed solutions are not exact mathematical solutions. The precision of a numerical solution can be diminished in several subtle ways. Understanding these difficulties can often guide the practitioner in the proper implementation and/or development of numerical algorithms (3, C. 37-38)".

Find absolute and relative error:

equation

So, numerically error, not overwhelming. But, as pointed out Dr. Mathews and Dr. Fink [3]: "Error may spread in the follow-up calculations". Next, we can completely eliminate this error, by using formula (1), but for this we will need to pay a distortion factor «A»...

e-called Euler's number after the Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler, e is not to be confused with γ, the Euler–Mascheroni constant, sometimes called simply Euler's constant. The number e is also known as Napier's constant, but Euler's choice of the symbol e is said to have been retained in his honor. The constant was discovered by the Swiss mathematician Jacob Bernoulli while studying compound interest (8).

Natural logarithms (ln) as grounds have a constant

equation

What means 99,99 999 999 999 999 999 999 104% reliability? This means that when throwing coins seventy threefold in a row the emblem is still permitted as likely, while seventy fourfold has already been considered as a "over random". By the theorem of probability for independent events the probability equal to:

equation

I.e. approximately 0,105879?-20% and 0,529396?-21%. So, the statistical reliability 99,99 999 999 999 999 999 999 104% means that accidental emergence circumstances equally incredible, as well as and the event, consisting of the landing emblem in a row 74 times. The likelihood that, when n-purchasable throwing coins each time will fall out emblem, is equal (1/2)n. And is listed in the following table. This is well stated in the 2"(Tables 14 and 15).

n 2n Р
2-n Level
1 2 0,5  
2 4 0,25  
3 8 0,125  
4 16 0,0625 ‹10%
5 32 0,03125 ‹5%
6 64 0,01562  
7 128 0,00781 ‹1%
8 256 0,00391 ‹0,5%
9 512 0,00195  
10 1024 0,00098 ≈0,1%
11 2048 0,00049 ≈0,05%
12 4096 0,00024  
13 8192 0,00012  
14 16384 0,00006 ‹0,01%
15 32768 0,00003  

Table 14: The probability P that when n-purchasable throwing coins each time it falls out one and the same party, as well as model accidental events.

N 2n Р
2-n Уровень
16 65536 0,000015288 ⟩9,39×10−6
17 131072 0,00000762939 ⟨9,39×10−6
18 262144 3,8147´10-6 ⟩2,29×10−6
19 524288 1,90735´10-6 ⟨2,29×10−6
73 9,44473´1021 1,05879´10-22 ⟩8,96×10−23
74 1,88895´1022 6,61744´10-24 ⟨8,96×10−23

Table 15: Supplement to Table 14.

And here we can show how important it is knowledge binary logarithm:

equation

Dr. Lothar Sachs points out: "If we choose a factor in this, saying that the 95% is the correct and only in 5% wrong, we say: with the statistical reliability S in 95% confidence interval a custom statistics includes the parameter general population". In summary, you want to say: we have 5% -s chances to reject a valid factor equation and the 95 % -s - to take is also a valid factor [5-8].

Interpolation Probabilities

This method computational complexity (2, with. 152) The value of F-test for v1 and v2. Degrees of Freedom offered. What is it for? In special cases, above all, when target is dangerous to human life, it is necessary to take smaller, than α=0,001 errors. Thus, for example, in the manufacture of vaccines required limit constant anti-serum. Not in fallible measurements must be detected and eliminated. Dr. Sachs notes that: "An unreasonable decision null-hypothesis "antiserum is correct" means a dangerous error" (2, C. 114). Null-hypothesis - the hypothesis that the two together, the issues from the point of view of one or more signs, are identical, i.e., the actual difference is equal to zero, and the found from experience unlike the zero is random in nature. The average of the μ. The general aggregate, evaluated on the basis random sampling, is not different from the desired values μ0. And further Sachs writes that science makes a cell network, all less than in order to continuously extend and check all the new hypotheses, the most accurate and the most credibly explaining this world. Gamma is the findings and conclusions will never be totally reliable, but they are engaged in the preliminary hypotheses go all the more general and strict theories, a thorough test, have led to a better understanding and peace paradigm (2, C. 112). A summary table value (F=106513, 2, (v1 = 1 and v2 = 2)). Arrange thus between two tabular values (F1, F2) Sound propagation errors equation. Offer cruises and the likelihood that this value will be exceeded. Observed F-value lies between the borders 0,000909091 and 0,000952381% (Table 16).

Reliability S, % 90 95 95,44 99 99,73 99,9 99,99 99,9936 99,999061 99,999771 99,99999999999999999999104
The probability Errors,α % 10 5 4,56 1 0,27 0,1 0,01 0,0064 9,39E-04 2,29E-04 8,96E-21
The number of standard Event, δ 1,645 1,96 2 2,576 3 3,291 3,891 4 3,282648896 3,302014256 5,769823
The limits The values F- Statistics With v1=1 and v2= 2 degrees of freedom 8,526315789 18,51282051 20,44149055 98,50251256 368,8710463 998,5002501 9998,500025 15623,50001 106494,7726 436679,7227 1,11607E+22
With v1=1 and v2 = 7 degrees of freedom 3,589428091 5,591447851 5,891849714 5,891849714 12,24638335 12,24638335 20,52008826 29,24519336 62,16666899 71,45944059 128,1674091 194,887441 9801128,085
The limits The values of t - Statistics With v=2 degrees of freedom -2,91998558 -4,30265273 - 4,521226664 -9,924843201 -19,20601589 -31,59905458 -99,99249984 -124,994 -326,3353683 -660,8174655 -1,05644E+11
With v=2 degrees of freedom 2,91998558 4,30265273 4,521226664 9,924843201 19,20601589 31,59905458 99,99249984 124,994 326,3353683 660,8174655 1,05644E+11
The limits The values of t - Statistics With v=7 degrees of freedom -1,894578605 -2,364624252 -2,427313271 -3,499483297 -4,529910403 -5,407882521 -7,884584262 -8,453368594 -11,32110459 -13,96020921 -3130,67534
With v=7 degrees of freedom 1,894578605 2,364624252 4,521226664 3,499483297 4,529910403 5,407882521 7,884584262 8,453368594 11,32110459 13,96020921 3130,67534

Table 16: Final Standings for reliability, standard deviation, limit values of F and t-statistics for the main error probabilities, supplemented by data Tables 7, 10 and 12.

equation

We will determine the number of standard deviations for the S = 90%. So: P=0.1/2=0.05, z=1.56.

Since in the following table we have t=326.3635, then get confirmation: -331,66 > 326,3635 > 331,66 (Figure 9).

Figure

Figure 9: Interactive Builder standard normal probability plots.

Figures 10-16 using the standard normal probability calculator identified.

Figure

Figure 10: Standard normal probability Calculator [11].

Figure

Figure 11: Standard normalprobability Calculator.

Figure

Figure 12: Standard normalprobability Calculator.

Figure

Figure 13: Standard normalprobability Calculator.

Figure

Figure 14: Standard normalprobability Calculator.

Figure

Figure 15: Standard normalprobability Calculator.

Figure

Figure 16: Standard normalprobability Calculator.

Standard deviation: We will determine the arbitrary empirical F-test (2, P. 152), and in particular for values with a P>0.1, an attacker who successfully exploited this an approximation, the proposed [9,10], which is true for the number of degrees of freedom, not less than three (the greater number of degrees of freedom, the better approximation), and meaningful probability is defined as the area, the corresponding z-the limits on both ends of normal distribution. In Tables 7, 10 and 12 f-value, equal to 106513,2, 437091,8 ? 9801780.

equation

equation

equation

equation

Now it remains to substitute the values found in Table 17. The probabilities are respectively equal to 0,00052 and 0,00048. Substitution in java normal probability calculator (Figure 16) provides answers 0,0 005 141 833, 0,0 004 799 659 and 0,0 000 000 039.

z .00 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09
-4.0 0.00003 0.00003 0.00003 0.00003 0.00003 0.00003 0.00002 0.00002 0.00002 0.00002
-3.9 0.00005 0.00005 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00003 0.00003
-3.8 0.00007 0.00007 0.00007 0.00006 0.00006 0.00006 0.00006 0.00005 0.00005 0.00005
-3.7 0.00011 0.00010 0.00010 0.00010 0.00009 0.00009 0.00008 0.00008 0.00008 0.00008
-3.6 0.00016 0.00015 0.00015 0.00014 0.00014 0.00013 0.00013 0.00012 0.00012 0.00011
-3.5 0.00023 0.00022 0.00022 0.00021 0.00020 0.00019 0.00019 0.00018 0.00017 0.00017
-3.4 0.00034 0.00032 0.00031 0.00030 0.00029 0.00028 0.00027 0.00026 0.00025 0.00024
-3.3 0.00048 0.00047 0.00045 0.00043 0.00042 0.00040 0.00039 0.00038 0.00036 0.00035
-3.2 0.00069 0.00066 0.00064 0.00062 0.00060 0.00058 0.00056 0.00054 0.00052 0.00050
-3.1 0.00097 0.00094 0.00090 0.00087 0.00084 0.00082 0.00079 0.00076 0.00074 0.00071
-3.0 0.00135 0.00131 0.00126 0.00122 0.00118 0.00114 0.00111 0.00107 0.00103 0.00100
-2.9 0.00187 0.00181 0.00175 0.00169 0.00164 0.00159 0.00154 0.00149 0.00144 0.00139
-2.8 0.00256 0.00248 0.00240 0.00233 0.00226 0.00219 0.00212 0.00205 0.00199 0.00193
-2.7 0.00347 0.00336 0.00326 0.00317 0.00307 0.00298 0.00289 0.00280 0.00272 0.00264
-2.6 0.00466 0.00453 0.00440 0.00427 0.00415 0.00402 0.00391 0.00379 0.00368 0.00357
-2.5 0.00621 0.00604 0.00587 0.00570 0.00554 0.00539 0.00523 0.00508 0.00494 0.00480
-2.4 0.00820 0.00798 0.00776 0.00755 0.00734 0.00714 0.00695 0.00676 0.00657 0.00639
-2.3 0.01072 0.01044 0.01017 0.00990 0.00964 0.00939 0.00914 0.00889 0.00866 0.00842
-2.2 0.01390 0.01355 0.01321 0.01287 0.01255 0.01222 0.01191 0.01160 0.01130 0.01101
-2.1 0.01786 0.01743 0.01700 0.01659 0.01618 0.01578 0.01539 0.01500 0.01463 0.01426
-2.0 0.02275 0.02222 0.02169 0.02118 0.02067 0.02018 0.01970 0.01923 0.01876 0.01831
-1.9 0.02872 0.02807 0.02743 0.02680 0.02619 0.02559 0.02500 0.02442 0.02385 0.02330
-1.8 0.03593 0.03515 0.03438 0.03362 0.03288 0.03216 0.03144 0.03074 0.03005 0.02938
-1.7 0.04456 0.04363 0.04272 0.04181 0.04093 0.04006 0.03920 0.03836 0.03754 0.03673
-1.6 0.05480 0.05370 0.05262 0.05155 0.05050 0.04947 0.04846 0.04746 0.04648 0.04551
-1.5 0.06681 0.06552 0.06425 0.06301 0.06178 0.06057 0.05938 0.05821 0.05705 0.05592
-1.4 0.08076 0.07927 0.07780 0.07636 0.07493 0.07353 0.07214 0.07078 0.06944 0.06811
-1.3 0.09680 0.09510 0.09342 0.09176 0.09012 0.08851 0.08691 0.08534 0.08379 0.08226
-1.2 0.11507 0.11314 0.11123 0.10935 0.10749 0.10565 0.10383 0.10204 0.10027 0.09852
-1.1 0.13566 0.13350 0.13136 0.12924 0.12714 0.12507 0.12302 0.12100 0.11900 0.11702
-1.0 0.15865 0.15625 0.15386 0.15150 0.14917 0.14686 0.14457 0.14231 0.14007 0.13786
-0.9 0.18406 0.18141 0.17878 0.17618 0.17361 0.17105 0.16853 0.16602 0.16354 0.16109
-0.8 0.21185 0.20897 0.20611 0.20327 0.20045 0.19766 0.19489 0.19215 0.18943 0.18673
-0.7 0.24196 0.23885 0.23576 0.23269 0.22965 0.22663 0.22363 0.22065 0.21769 0.21476
-0.6 0.27425 0.27093 0.26763 0.26434 0.26108 0.25784 0.25462 0.25143 0.24825 0.24509
-0.5 0.30853 0.30502 0.30153 0.29805 0.29460 0.29116 0.28774 0.28434 0.28095 0.27759
-0.4 0.34457 0.34090 0.33724 0.33359 0.32997 0.32635 0.32276 0.31917 0.31561 0.31206
-0.3 0.38209 0.37828 0.37448 0.37070 0.36692 0.36317 0.35942 0.35569 0.35197 0.34826
-0.2 0.42074 0.41683 0.41293 0.40904 0.40516 0.40129 0.39743 0.39358 0.38974 0.38590
-0.1 0.46017 0.45620 0.45224 0.44828 0.44433 0.44038 0.43644 0.43250 0.42857 0.42465
-0.0 0.50000 0.49601 0.49202 0.48803 0.48404 0.48006 0.47607 0.47209 0.46811 0.46414

Table 17: Standard Normal Probabilities: (The table is based on the area P under the standard normal probability curve, below the respective z-statistic).

On the Figure 17 area under the curve normal distribution from z to ∞ probability that the variable Z will take the value ≥ z ??0,0 000 000 039. Since:

Figure

Figure 17: Java Normal Probability Calculatorhigh Power.

equation

equation

equation

Since equation likelihood of errors equation hence the statistical reliability S=1 -0,0 000 000 078 = 0,9 999 999 922 (Draw.18.). Confirmed waiting, that the condition above (Figure 18).

Figure

Figure 18: The window (15) shader graph normal distribution for 99,99 999 922% reliability.

Let's take a look at link F and 1 /F and v1uv2 (2, C. 150):

equation

For a ratio of 1 to easily calculate the F0,05 With a known F0,05. If given equation Find F for: equation Define for equation (2, C. 138-149), where a search value equal to 1/199.5 =0.00501. The program Microsoft Office Excel provides the answer F = 0,005012531. A method of getting the data manually is still necessary because of the computer crashes, the lack of power sleep, as it was in Abkhazia.

Conclusion

In conclusion, it should be noted that the reliability S=99,999 061%, obtained for legacy Kepler equation even today sounds, because the default is used S=95%. Starting rocket to Mars, you will receive the error α=9,39E-04% - the missiles will not be different, but good will. Why is the same not excellent? Mathews is responsible (3, C. 49- 50): "many real data contain uncertainty or error. This error type is treated as noise. It affects the accuracy for any numerical calculations, which are data. Improving the accuracy is not achieved when successful calculations, using noisy data".

Submitted by Dr. Mathews source, as expected, in the job "a" have greatly reduced error; in the job "b" error on the merits has no disappeared. But the relationship has become less stochastic and more functional [11].

Dr. Uotshem and Dr. Parramou [12] say that the new literature and new methods for applying quantitative techniques, previously used only in physics, at the same time, regurgitation and adapting technology quantitative analysis to the economy. But many economists should be ready to be done and the return path is to raise agriculture and to rebuild factories.

It will be recalled that, and nonlinear models are acceptable for the calculations in the economy. This is difficult, but Russians traveling medicine in Germany and the "MAZ" do not equal "Mercedes" largely on errors in the calculations.

1L. Zachs (2, c. 71-72) writes: "To estimation parameters for selected according to numerous methods have been developed. Particular importance is maximum-likelihood method (R. As well. Fischer); it is a universal method maximum estimation is unknown parameters, applicable in cases, when the view distribution function is known; estimate the unknown parameters in this case are equal values, in which the sample has a maximum likelihood of a, i.e., as a assessments matching values that maximized the function maximum likelihood for the parameters, with the assumption that these options exist. This method of building point parameter estimates is in close connection with the method least squares".

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 10942
  • [From(publication date):
    December-2015 - Jan 24, 2020]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 10794
  • PDF downloads : 148
Top