Reach Us +44-1764910199
Prevalence of High-Risk Underlying Conditions for Pneumococcal Disease Among People Over 50 Years in Catalonia, Spain | OMICS International
ISSN: 2167-1079
Primary Healthcare: Open Access
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Prevalence of High-Risk Underlying Conditions for Pneumococcal Disease Among People Over 50 Years in Catalonia, Spain

Angel Vila-Corcoles1,2*, Imma Hospital1, Olga Ochoa-Gondar1,2, Cinta de Diego1, Eva Satue1, Maria Aragon3

1Primary Health Care Service “Camp de Tarragona”, Institut Catala de la Salut, Tarragona, Spain

2Primary Care Research Institute (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, Spain

3Information System for the Improvement of Research in Primary Care (SIDIAP), Primary Care Research Institute Jordi Gol, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

*Corresponding Author:
Angel Vila Corcoles
Primary Health Care Service
“Camp de Tarragona”
Institut Catala de la Salut
Tarragona, Spain
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: July 14, 2016; Accepted Date: August 04, 2016; Published Date: August 11, 2016

Citation: Vila-Corcoles A, Hospital I, Ochoa-Gondar O, de Diego C, Satue E, et al. (2016) Prevalence of High-Risk Underlying Conditions for Pneumococcal Disease Among People Over 50 Years in Catalonia, Spain. Primary Health Care 6:234.doi:10.4172/2167-1079.1000234

Copyright: © 2016 Vila-Corcoles A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Primary Healthcare: Open Access


Background: Published data on the frequency and distribution of high-risk factors for pneumococcal disease are limited. This study investigated the prevalence of high-risk underlying conditions for pneumococcal disease among people over 50 years in Catalonia, Spain. Methods: Cross-sectional population-based study including 2,033,465 individuals aged 50 years or older registered at 01/01/2015 in the Catalonian Health Institute. A previously validated institutional research clinical Database was used to identify high-risk conditions to suffer pneumococcal disease (functional or anatomic asplenia, cochlear implants, cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] leaks and/or immunocompromising conditions). Prevalence of risk conditions was compared according to gender and age strata. Results: Of the total 2,033,465 study population, an amount of 176,600 persons (8.7%) had any high-risk condition. Prevalence of high-risk subjects did not substantially differ by gender (9.2% in men vs. 8.2% in women; p<0.001), but considerably increased with increasing age (5.1% in 50-64 years vs. 10.6% in 65-79 years vs. 16.1% in people 80 years or older; p<0.001). Overall, 294 individuals (<0.1%) had anatomical or functional asplenia, 76 (<0.1%) cochlear implants, 41 (<0.1%) CSF leaks, 3,854 (0.2%) had immunodeficiency/AIDS, 16,815 (0.8%) had severe renal disease (nephrotic syndrome or renal failure), 5,034 (0.2%) had received bone marrow transplantation, 103,948 (5.1%) had recent cancer (diagnosed within 5 prior years) and 72,040 (3.5%) received immunosuppressive medication/radiotherapy. Conclusion: In our setting, almost ten percent of people over 50 years have any high-risk factor for pneumococcal vaccination, basically immunocompromising conditions.


Streptococcus pneumonia; Risk factors; Underlying conditions; Pneumococcal disease; Pneumococcal vaccines


Infections due to Streptococcus pneumoniae are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. According to the World Health Organization, pneumococcal disease causes an estimated 1.6 million deaths annually among all-age populations throughout the world [1]. To date, after the introduction of routine childhood immunization, high-risk individuals and older adults suffer the greatest burden of pneumococcal disease in developed countries. At present, two antipneumococcal vaccines are available for using in adults: the “classical” 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) and the “new” 13-valent protein-polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (PCV13).

Among adult populations, apart from the presence of low socioeconomic status or high-risk behaviours (e.g. smoking and/ or alcohol abuse), it is known that the risk of developing invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) is greatest in persons with certain highrisk underlying medical conditions, such as anatomic or functional asplenia, cochlear implants, cerebrospinal fluids (CSF) leaks, immunodeficiency’s and immunocompromising conditions [2-4].

Although some studies have reported major comorbidities and underlying conditions among hospitalised patients with IPD, population-based data on the prevalence of these high-risk conditions is limited. Indeed, despite these patients are considered a major target group for pneumococcal vaccination, data about its true prevalence in most settings is unknown [4-10].

The accurate knowledge of prevalence for distinct risk conditions is important to estimate the true magnitude of at-risk groups and estimate the size of distinct target populations to implement different antipneumococcal vaccination strategies. In the present study, we investigated the prevalence of distinct high-risk medical conditions for pneumococcal disease among middle-aged and older adults in Catalonia, Spain.


This is a cross-sectional study involving 2,033,465 individuals aged 50 years or older, who were registered in any of the Primary Health Care Centres (PHCCs) of the Catalonian Health Institute on January 1, 2015 (date of survey). The study was approved by the ethical committee of the institution (file P14/134) and was conducted in accordance with the general principles for observational studies.

In Catalonia, there are 358 PHCCs (comprised by family physicians, nurses, social workers and support staff) which are distributed by geographical area and are responsible for the health care of the population in their areas. The Catalonian Health Institute manages 274 PHCCs (76.5%), serving a population of approximately five millions people; the remaining 84 PHCCs are managed by other providers. Doctors and nurses systematically use electronic medical records to record medical diagnoses, underlying conditions, prescriptions, and other clinical, patient management activities coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10the Revision (ICD-10).

The Catalonian Health Institute Information System for the Development of Research in Primary Care (“SIDIAP” database) compiles coded clinical information from the Electronic PHCC’s records, and it has been used as main data source for this report. Quality criteria for clinical data and research utility of the SIDIAP database have been reported [11,12]. The SIDIAP sample is representative of the general Catalan population in terms of geography, age and gender distributions, according to the official census [11].

The “SIDIAP” research database was used to identify the following high-risk conditions in each study subject: functional or anatomic asplenia (ICD10 codes D57, D73 and Q89), cochlear implants (Z96.2 and Z45.3), CSF leaks (Z98.2), immunodeficiency/AIDS (D80-D84 and B20-B24), severe renal disease (including nephrotic syndrome [N04 and N39.1] and/or chronic renal failure with glomerular filtration ≤ 30 ml/min), bone marrow transplantation (Z94), solid organ or haematological neoplasia diagnosed within previous 5 years (C00-C97) and/or immunosuppressive medication/radiotherapy in prior 12 months (specific SIDIAP codes). We assumed that information in electronic clinical records was complete, so a condition was considered absent if it was not recorded.

The statistical differences between prevalence for distinct risk conditions according distinct population subgroups were evaluated using the Chi-squared tests or Fisher’s test as appropriate, considering statistical significance at p<0.05 (two-tailed). Data were analyzed using the SPSS 18 statistical package.


Of the total 2,033,465 study population, mean age was 66.1 years old (SD: 11.5), being 935,705 (46%) men and 1,097,760 (54%) women. By age strata, 1,021,648 (50.2%) were 50-64 years old, 691,283 (34.0%) were 65-79 years old and 320,534 (15.8%) were aged 80 years or more.

Overall, 294 persons (<0.1%) had anatomical or functional asplenia, 76 (<0.1%) cochlear implants, 41 (<0.1%) CSF leaks, 3,854 (0.2%) immunodeficiency/AIDS, 16,815 (0.8%) had severe renal disease, 5,034 (0.2%) had received bone marrow transplantation, 103,948 (5.1%) had recent cancer and 72,040 (3.5%) received immunosuppressive medication/radiotherapy.

A total of 176,600 persons (8.7%) had any of the above mentioned risk condition and may be considered high-risk subjects for pneumococcal vaccination. Of them, 152,221 presented one high-risk condition, 23,301 presented two conditions and 1,078 presented three or more conditions.

Prevalence of high-risk subjects did not substantially differ by gender (9.2% in men vs. 8.2% in women; p<0.001), but considerably increased with increasing age (5.1% in 50-64 years vs. 10.6% in 65-79 years vs. 16.1% in 80 years or older; p<0.001). Prevalence for each one of the distinct high-risk conditions, according to gender and age strata, is shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.

Gender Risk condition MEN
n (%)
n (%)
p Total
n (%)
Asplenia 141 (<0.1) 153 (<0.1) 0.504 294 (<0.1)
Cochlear Implant 27 (<0.1) 49 (<0.1) 0.067 76 (<0.1)
CSF Leaks1 17 (<0.1) 24 (<0.1) 0.559 41 (<0.1)
Immunodeficiency/AIDS 2,762 (0.3) 1,092 (0.1) <0.001 3,854 (0.2)
Severe Renal Disease2 6,931 (0.7) 9,884 (0.9) <0.001 16,815 (0.8)
Bone Marrow Transplantation 3,096 (0.3) 1,938 (0.2) <0.001 5,034 (0.2)
Recent Neoplasia3 55,475 (5.9) 48,473 (4.4) <0.001 103,948 (5.1)
Immunosuppressive Medication/Radiotherapy4 29,408 (3.1) 42,632 (3.9) <0.001 72,040 (3.5)

Table 1: Prevalence of distinct high risk conditions for pneumococcal disease, by gender among Catalonian people 50 years or older.

Age group Risk condition 50-64 years
n (%)
65-79 years
n (%)
=80 years
n (%)
Asplenia 186 (<0.1) 83 (<0.1) 25 (<0.1) <0.001
Cochlear Implant 23 (<0.1) 31 (<0.1) 22(<0.1) <0.001
CSF Leaks1 11 (<0.1) 16 (<0.1) 14 (<0.1) <0.001
Immunodeficiency/AIDS 3,111 (0.3) 618 (0.1) 125 (0.0) <0.001
Severe Renal Disease2 1,605 (0.2) 4,783 (0.7) 10,427 (3.3) <0.001
Bone Marrow Transplantation 2,415 (0.2) 2,251 (0.3) 368 (0.1) <0.001
Recent Neoplasia3 30,339 (3.0) 47,047 (6.8) 26,562 (8.3) <0.001
Immunosuppressive Medication/Radiotherapy4 22,319 (2.2) 28,902 (4.2) 20,819 (6.5) <0.001

Table 2: Prevalence of distinct high risk conditions for pneumococcal disease, according to age strata in study population.


Published data about population-based prevalence of risk factors/ underlying conditions to suffer pneumococcal diseases is limited [7,13,14]. The present study, which included more than 2 millions people 50 years or older in Catalonia (Spain), estimates the prevalence for most high-risk factors/conditions related to severe pneumococcal infections described in the literature [4,7,15].

According our results, almost ten percent (8.7%) of the general population over 50 years in our setting have any high-risk condition to suffer pneumococcal disease. This proportion is too similar in men (9.2%) and women (8.2), but it is considerably higher in older than in younger subjects (5.1% in 50-64 years vs. 16.1% in 80 years or older).

Our results may have implications for policy makers, having special interest to known the true magnitude of certain target population subgroups and evaluate possible cost-effectiveness of different prevention strategies. To date, there are not universal consensus for pneumococcal vaccination schedules in adults [1,9,10,16,17].

At present, experts are evaluating different alternative vaccination strategies for adults (basically, maintaining “classical” PPV23 recommendations for adults, changing PPV23 for “new” PCV13 recommendation in some risk groups, or adding PCV13 recommendation for all or some target adult population subgroups). Nevertheless, a direct comparison between clinical effectiveness of PPV23 vs. PCV13 in adults, together a better knowledge of the magnitude of possible indirect effects from PCV13 childhood vaccination in adults, is necessary before a well informed decision can be made [18]. Apart from its possible better efficacy than PPV23, the lower serotype coverage of the PCV13 is a shortcoming for routine use of PCV13 alone in adult populations. A sequential strategy using both PCV13 and PPV23 vaccines could be a way to achieve greater effectiveness among high-risk subjects. In this way, according to current recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) of the Center for Diseases Control and Prevention, a sequential dual pneumococcal vaccination (PCV13 plus PPV23) is recommended for persons aged 65 years or older (with or without underlying conditions) and persons 19- 64 years with CSF leaks, cochlear implants, functional or anatomic asplenia, sickle cell disease or other hemaglobinopathy, congenital or acquired asplenia, immunocompromised persons (congenital or acquired immunodeficiency, human immunodeficiency virus infection, chronic renal failure, nephrotic syndrome, leukemia, lymphoma, Hodgkin disease, generalized malignancy, iatrogenic immunosuppression [treatment with immunosuppressive drugs, including long-term systemic corticosteroids and radiation therapy], solid organ transplant and multiple myeloma) [10,16]. At present, ACIP recommends pneumococcal vaccination using exclusively PPV23 for immunocompetent persons 19-64 years with other comorbidities or risk conditions such as pulmonary or cardiac disease, diabetes mellitus, alcoholism and smoking) [9].

Our study has several strengths. Study design was populationbased and large enough to assess accuracy prevalence of main high-risk conditions related to invasive pneumococcal infections. As limitation, although the validity of clinical data source was previously checked, information bias may have occurred if some comorbidity/underlying condition was not recorded, but such misclassification would likely be small considering that the prevalence observed for most risk conditions fit with data previously reported in the literature [7,12,15]. In North Europe, a population-based study including 5.2 million Finnish allage people, approximately four percent of the population had any high-risk condition for pneumococcal disease (organ or bone marrow transplantation, chronic renal failure, cancer diagnosed within previous 5 years, immunodeficiency or HIV infection) [19]. The impact of possible information bias may be higher in relation to diseases such as AIDS (stigma and legal problems if the patient does not authorize registration) or diseases that are managed in the hospital setting (especially if survival after diagnosis was short).

We have not available data about the prevalence of some high-risk conditions (e.g. solid organ transplantations); so, the global burden of high-risk group for pneumococcal infections may have been slightly underestimated. In addition, the global magnitude of certain highrisk conditions may also have been underestimated in some cases considering that the study population did not include persons less than 50 years of age.


Our data shows that a considerable proportion (almost ten percent) of overall people 50 years or older in our setting have any high-risk condition (especially immunocompromising conditions) to suffer invasive pneumococcal disease and, consequently, they should be considered serious candidates for pneumococcal vaccination. We emphasize that it is important to estimate accurately the prevalence of high-risk individuals because these persons are at the center of the current debate on whether or not to extend the possible vaccination programs (PPV23, PCV13 or PPV23+PCV13) for all or only certain high-risk individuals.


This work is supported by a grant from the “Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria” (FIS) of the ”Instituto de Salud Carlos III” (call 2015) for the “Acción Estratégica en Salud 2013-2016 del Programa Estatal de Investigación Orientado a los Retos de la Sociedad”, framing in the “Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016”; code file PI15/01230, cofinanced by the European Union through the “Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional” (FEDER). This work is also funded by a grant from the IDIAP Jordi Gol, Barcelona (grant SIDIAP 13/049). The authors thank Angel Vila-Rovira for his help in the production of this paper.


A. Vila-Corcoles and O. Ochoa-Gondar designed the study, assessed outcomes, wrote and edited the paper; M. Aragon obtained the data; O. Ochoa- Gondar did statistical analyses.

* The following persons are members of the EPIVAC study group: A. Vila- Corcoles, O. Ochoa-Gondar, I. Hospital, C. de Diego, E. Satue, E. Salsench, J. Blade, X. Ansa, JA. Guzman, F. Gomez, X. Raga, MO. Perez, F. Ballester, R. Magarolas, L. Esteban, E. Figuerola and F. Ramos.

A. Vila-Corcoles, I. Hospital, O. Ochoa-Gondar, C. de Diego and E. Satue designed the study, assessed outcomes wrote and edited the paper; M. Aragon obtained the data; I. Hospital did statistical analyses; the two first listed authors contributed similarly to this work.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Article Usage

  • Total views: 8436
  • [From(publication date):
    September-2016 - Dec 16, 2019]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8359
  • PDF downloads : 77