alexa Production of Fermented Milk with Autochthonous Lactobacilli for Newborn Calves and Resistance to the Dairy Farm Conditions | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2155-9821
Journal of Bioprocessing & Biotechniques
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Production of Fermented Milk with Autochthonous Lactobacilli for Newborn Calves and Resistance to the Dairy Farm Conditions

Natalia Cecilia Maldonado and María Elena Fátima Nader-Macías*

 

Centro de Referencia para Lactobacilos (CERELA-CONICET), Chacabuco 145., 4000. San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina

Corresponding Author:
María E Fátima Nader-Macías
Chacabuco 145., 4000. Tucumán, Argentina
Tel: 54-381-431-1720 extn. 141
Fax: 54-381-400-5600
E-mail: [email protected]

Received April 04, 2016; Accepted April 24, 2016; Published April 29, 2016

Citation: Maldonado NC, Nader-Macías MEF (2016) Production of Fermented Milk with Autochthonous Lactobacilli for Newborn Calves and Resistance to the Dairy Farm Conditions. J Bioprocess Biotech 6:278. doi:10.4172/2155-9821.1000278

Copyright: © 2016 Maldonado NC, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

 

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Bioprocessing & Biotechniques

Abstract

Four different autochthonous calves’ strains: Lactobacillus johnsonii CRL1693, L. murinus CRL1695, L. mucosae CRL1696 and L. salivarius CRL1702 were evaluated by their resistance and survival to dairy farm conditions and were used to prepare probiotic fermented milk for young calves. The strains were previously isolated from calf’s faeces and selected by their beneficial properties. The resistance of the microorganisms to water, colostrum and raw milk was by using those of the environment of a dairy farm. Compatibility assays were performed to know if the strains can be combined in the final fermented product. For the elaboration of fermented milk, different inoculum, incubation times and acidifying capability of the strains were determined and also their survival and the maintenance of beneficial properties during storage at low temperature. Antibiotic resistance profiles were applied to differentiate the strains throughout the experiments. The results indicate that bacteria survive in colostrum (1, 3 or 5 days after calving) and water for 2 or 4 hours. All the strains grow in raw milk, and were compatible between them. The optimum fermentation time was 8 hours at 37°C, reaching 3.78 × 108 CFU/ml from an inoculum of 3 × 109 CFU of each strain in sterile milk. Surface properties as auto-aggregative and hydrophobicity patterns were maintained after the process. Bacteria remained viable during 30 days at refrigeration temperature at a concentration of 3.37 × 107 CFU/ml. The dose suggested is 10 ml of fermented milk prepared at the laboratory and stored at 4°C for younger animals. For older calves, a second fermentation in the farm is proposed to reach 3.94 × 106 CFU/ml. Animal experiments are being performed to determine the efficacy of the fermented milk for diarrhea prevention.

Keywords

Fermented milk; Beneficial lactobacilli; Probiotic product; Calves; Storage

Introduction

The immune system of calves is immature at birth because they do not receive antibodies from their mothers during intrauterine life. After birth, the antibodies are incorporated by colostrum’s, supporting the increase of different immunoglobulin’s types, IgM, IgA and IgG, which triggers the passive immunity of calves, Colostrum contains cellular components and nonspecific immunological factors [1], is the first postpartum secretion of the cow, and the first food consumed by the newborn, being of main importance for their survival during the first days of life [2].

Neonatal diarrhea is one of the leading causes of death in calves in dairy farms and produce high economic losses to this sector [3]. The use of antibiotics for therapy and prevention is not recommended by the acquired resistance of indigenous microbiota and residues in animal’s products [4]. At present, probiotics as novel additive foods for preventing intestinal infections are being commercialize [5]; the use of probiotics is supported by the beneficial characteristics of specific strains, being administered to restore the balance of intestinal microbiota and avoid imbalances that could favor the colonization of pathogenic or potentially pathogenic bacteria [6-8]. Probiotics are defined as "live microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a beneficial health benefit on the host”. Different scientists have reported the efficacy of probiotics in a range of animal´s host as calves, pigs and poultry [8,9].

A wide range of publications show the benefits of consumption of milks fermented with beneficial microorganisms, mainly lactic acid bacteria, on human health, [10,11]. Fermented dairy products are widely used as a matrix to vehiculize probiotic strains. Nevertheless, the benefits of probiotics products on the host are highly dependent on the specific strain used in the design of the formula, and later complemented by the maintenance of their beneficial properties [12].

Referred to a probiotic product, the lower number of viable cells recommended for daily consumption should be between 108 and 1011 CFU/d [13] to produce a benefit effect on the host, then the product must contain 107-109 colonies forming units CFU/g or ml [14].

In this work, autochthonous strains isolated from calf’s faeces and selected by their beneficial properties were evaluated for their survival to dairy farm conditions and were used to elaborate fermented milk for young calves. The effect of different factors as culture conditions, fermentation time, storage and maintenance of the beneficial properties of the strains were also evaluated to support that the number and activity of viable lactobacilli are into the recommended levels in the final product, or in the formula administered to calves.

Materials and Methods

Microorganism and growth conditions

Lactobacillus johnsonii CRL1693, L. murinus CRL1695, L. mucosae CRL1696 and L. salivarius CRL1702 were used to elaborate the fermented milk. The strains were previously isolated from calf´s faeces and selected by their beneficial properties [15]. Also, their resistance profiles to antibiotics were assayed [16] (Table 1). The microorganisms were stored in milk yeast extract (13% skim milk, 0.5% yeast extract, 1% glucose) added with 20% glycerol at -20°C up to use.

Strains Beneficial Properties Susceptibility profiles MICs1(µg/ml) References
AMP CIP VAN [16,17]
L. johnsonii CRL1693 Hydrophobic and auto-aggregative <0.25 8 0.5
L. murinus CRL1695 Auto-aggregative 2 1 >128
L. mucosaeCRL1696 Peroxide production <0.25 32 >128
L. salivarius CRL1702 Hydrophobic <0.25 2 >128

Table 1: Beneficial properties and susceptibility profiles of lactobacilli strains selected for the design of fermented milk for calves.

Lactobacilli resistance to environmental conditions: Water, colostrum and raw milk

Samples of water, raw milk and colostrum’s pools (1, 3 and 5 days after calving) were obtained in sterile conditions from different dams in a dairy farm in Trancas Department (Tucumán, Argentine). The samples were stored at -20°C up to their use at laboratory. Before the experimental assays, they were defrosted and maintained at room temperature for one hour. Chlorination treatments were applied to water for animals´ consumption, then the concentration of hypochlorite added was defined by the owners of the farm following standardized protocols of chlorination. Also, the initial lactic acid bacteria populations in raw milk and colostrum were determined.

The strains were subcultured twice in MRS (Merck, Damstadt, Germany) broth incubated for 16 h at 37°C. The last sub-culture was used to perform the resistance studies. Then, the cells were harvested by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 15 minutes (5415D Eppendorf, USA), and washed with sterile saline solution. The pellets were resuspended in water, raw milk and colostrum (and in MRS broth as control) and incubated at 37°C.

The number of viable cell was determined at the beginning of the incubation and after 2 and 4 h at room temperature. The viable cells were quantified by the serial dilution method in 0.1% peptone water and aliquots plated in MRS agar (by duplicate).

Compatibility assays between strains

The compatibility between the Lactobacillus strains was performed by using the plate diffusion technique described by Maldonado et al. [15] with brief modifications. Agar plates with indicator strains were inoculated with 108 CFU. Culture supernatants were neutralized with sterile 1 N NaOH to avoid the acidic effect of the supernatants to the cells in the fermented milk. An inhibition zone of at least 6 mm diameter was considered positive.

Elaboration of the fermented milk

Bacteria inoculation: The strains were inoculated into MRS broth and incubated for 24 h at 37°C; then (2% inoculum) were subcultured twice at 12 h and 16 h at 37°C in the same medium. The last sub-culture was used to inoculate milk. 500 ml Low-fat milk (Milkaut, Santa Fe, Argentine) was sterilized for 12 min at 110°C by autoclaving (Rocker, Buenos Aires, Argentine) and stored at 4°C up to inoculation of the strains. The sterile milk bottles were kept at room temperature for 1 hour before the inoculation of microorganisms.

The four strains grown in MRS broth were used to inoculate the milk. One mL (2% inoculum) of each microorganism was added to 500 ml of milk and then incubated for 8, 12 and 16 h at 37°C. The fermented milk was stored later at 4°C. The number of viable cells and pH were determined at the beginning of the inoculation and after 2, 4 and 8 h by the serial dilution method as described before. Control was performed in MRS broth under the same conditions.

Fermented milk storage and second fermentation process

The viable bacteria number in the fermented milk was determined after 5, 10, 20 and 30 days of storage at 4°C by using the agar plate technique described before. Control was performed with the strains in Saline. To define the number of viable microorganisms for older animals, 25 μl of the product was inoculated in 2 ml of raw milk for 2 h at room temperature. Refrigeration survival was determined after 2, 3 and 5 days (period of maintenance of milk in farm tanks before feeding calves). Viable cell numbers were determined throughout the experiment by the plate count technique.

Maintenance of beneficial properties

Quantification of lactobacilli by their growth in selective media: The strains were differentiated by their resistance profile to antibiotics [16] by using culture media added with different combination of antibiotics: Vancomycin (VAN) (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, USA), Ciprofloxacin (CIP) Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, USA) and Ampicillin (AMP) (Trifacilina, Bagó, Argentine). Plates containing antibiotics were prepared by adding 1 ml to 9 ml MRS agar to reach a concentration of Vancomycin (3.2 μg/ml)+Ciprofloxacin (6.4 μg/ml) that support the growth of L. mucosae and Vancomycin (3.2 μg/ml)+Ampicillin (1 μg/ ml) for the growth of L. murinus.

After fermentation processes, dilutions of fermented milk were plated onto differential culture media with antibiotics. The plates were incubated for 48 h in microaerophylic conditions at 37°C. One or two colonies were selected and grown in MRS broth for further studies

Maintenance of beneficial properties: Autoaggregation and hydrophobicity assays

Hydrophobicity and auto-aggregation patterns of the strains were evaluated by the method described by Maldonado et al. [15]. Briefly, modifications of the optical density of cells in saline solution were monitored for 2 hours and the auto aggregation index calculated.

Genetic identification of colonies

The colonies grown in the differential cultured media and evaluated by their surface properties were later genetically identified according to Hébert et al. [17] by the 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing.

Statistical analysis

The survival, elaboration and storage experiments were performed by duplicate. The analysis of variance in one way (one way ANOVA) was applied to determine the survival of the strains to dairy farm conditions (water, colostrum and raw milk) and the effect of water, raw milk and colostrum on the growth of the microorganisms was evaluated by Tukey´s Test. Significant differences of the main effects of the strains, time and assay conditions on the growth were obtained from the number of viable cells data.

Results

Resistance of the strains to environmental conditions: Water, colostrum and raw milk

No significant differences were observed in the number of viable cells of L. mucosae, L. salivarius, L. murinus and L johnsonii after incubation in raw milk and colostrum during two or four hours (Figure 1). The mean effects of the strain, time and condition under study on the growth were determined; no differences were obtained, except for L. johnsonii CRL1693 (Figure 2). The water resistance assays showed that all the strains maintained their viability (Figure 3).

Compatibility of the strains

L. johnsonii CRL1693, L. murinus CRL1695, L. mucosae CRL1696 and L. salivarius CRL1702 showed to be compatible between them, because there was no inhibition (Figure 4) in the agar plates, by using the strains both as indicators or producer strains.

Elaboration of fermented milk

Process applied to prepare the fermented milk: The final flow chart applied for the elaboration of the probiotic fermented milk and the further administration to calves is summarized in Figure 5. Four strains of lactobacilli were used to inoculate milk (A in flow chart). The final inoculum of each strain was: Lactobacillus johnsonii CRL1693 6.6 × 107; L. murinus CRL1695 1.17 × 109; L. mucosae CRL1696 2.04 × 109 and L. salivarius CRL1702 1.09 × 109.

The optimal fermentation time was 8 hours, because longer incubation times (12 or 16 h) produced a coagulation of the milk, which is not adequate to feed calves (B in flow chart). The number of viable lactobacilli and milk pH during the process is plotted in Figure 6.

Storage and administration to older animals

The survival of the strains was evaluated for 30 days obtaining similar viable cell numbers during the period, as shown in Figure 7 (C in flow chart), with a lower number of bacteria in control maintained in saline, indicating some type of protective effect of the milk on the viability of the strains.

Figure

Figure 1:Resistance of lactobacilli strains to dairy farm conditions: bacteria survive to Colostrum and Raw Milk after 4 h incubation. The strains in MRS broth were used as control.

Figure

Figure 2:Main Effects Plots obtained from Minitab software, indicating the main effects of each one of the factors under study on the bacteria compatibility.
The points represent the mean of all the experimental data: number of viable bacteria in Raw Milk or Colostrum, time of incubation, or number of viable bacteria of each strain. The line represents the tendency of the results. Different letters indicate statistical differences as determined by an ANOVA/Tukey’s test (p<0.05) using data means.

Figure

Figure 3:Resistance of lactobacilli to dairy farm conditions: bacteria survival to water. The strains in MRS broth were used as control.

The fermented milk will be administered to newborn animals by using a syringe delivering 10 ml/day directly in the oral cavity (E). For older animals, the fermented milk will be administered from buckets, “ad libitum” (F). Therefore, 500 ml of fermented milk will be used to inoculate 40 liters raw milk in storage tanks, and incubated at room temperature for 2 h. For this second fermentation stage, the number of viable cells was 2.88 × 106 CFU/ml. The milk pH was 6.59 at the beginning of the fermentation and 5.98 after incubation. Then, in the refrigerated tank, the bacteria showed to maintain similar numbers during five days. No differences in the viable cells numbers were observed during the storage (Figure 8). Considering that the older animals (three months age) drink around 4 liters/day, the number of viable bacteria that will be administered to young and old animals will be similar.

Maintenance of beneficial properties

The surface properties of the strains were maintained during the storage: L murinus CRL1695 showed the high auto-aggregating characteristic, while L. mucosae CRL1696 maintained the hydrophobicity. L murinus CRL1695 auto-aggregation index was 68 ± 5% and the hydrophobic index 15 ± 3%. For L. murinus CRL1695, a value of 25 ± 2% auto-aggregation index was obtained, and also a hydrophobic pattern. The four strains were later grown in media with antibiotics and identified by and genetic techniques.

Figure

Figure 4:Compatibility of the strains by the agar plate diffusion method. Each one of the Lactobacillus strain was used both as an indicator (included into the
agar plate) and as a producer of inhibitory substances (supernatant of liquid culture). The picture shows only when L. salivarius was used as indicator strain.
The supernatant of L. johnsonii CRL1693, L. murinus CRL1695, L. mucosae CRL1696 and L. salivarius CRL1702 did not inhibited the growth of the other
strains, and as shown in this picture, to L. salivarius.

Discussion

The intensive management systems applied in dairy farms reduce the period of lactation in calves, and produce some disequilibrium of the Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT) microbiota, and in some situations, frequent diarrhoea [18]. Our research group has been working in the design of a probiotic product with autochthonous lactobacilli for calves. Some authors have described that young animals prefer liquid feed [19] then we decided to go further in the design of liquid fermented milk to fit with these preferences. A common procedure in dairy farms is the administration of raw milk to new born calves, being a cause of frequent diarrhoea [20]. In this context, the administration of fermented milk containing a high number of lactic acid bacteria is proposed, that could favour the inhibition of pathogens in raw milk, supported by the inhibitions evidenced previously [15]. Other cause for young calves’ diarrhoea is the exposition to a contaminated environment, and then if the pathogen colonization of this environment is reduced by the lactic acid bacteria included in the fermented milk, it could be an adequate alternative to reduce its occurrence [20]. It has been proposed that the administration of fermented milk will increase the colonization of lactic bacteria in the farm (pens, soil, feeding utensils) after the treatments. Then, we are performing experiments with administration of fermented milk in small tanks to 2 to 3 months calves.

Probiotic administration to calves can be proposed from the first days of life when they receive colostrum’s from their mothers. According to our results, the immune properties and antibacterial effect of colostrum do not affect the lactobacilli strains included in the fermented milk. As the colostrum quality depends on the immunoglobulin’s concentration (affected by the dam condition and time after calving) a pool of colostrum was assayed Champagne et al. have shown that bovine colostrum could promote the growth of some probiotic bacteria and inhibit intestinal pathogens such as E. coli. [21], and also could be used for the design of a combined product.

The survival of the beneficial strains in the conditions studied in this work, and the number of viable cells obtained after the fermentation process is higher than the minimum level suggested (107 cfu/ml) for a probiotic product. Also, the viability of the bacterial cells was maintained during 30 days that is the regular shelf life of most of the dairy fermented products. Donnet-Hughes et al. [22] observed that lower daily dose of 108 cfu/d of L. johnsonii LA1 produced no significant effect in contrast with a daily dose of 109 cfu/d that modulate defense mechanisms in humans. Considering a daily consumption of fluid fermented dairy products is around 4 l in 2 to 3 months age animals, while an oral administration of 10 ml fermented milk is given to newborns calves, the product or formula should contain between 106 CFU/ml to 109 CFU/ml bacteria, viable cells numbers obtained in this work. Experimental animal’s assays are being performed in order to evaluate the beneficial properties of the designed fermented milk in calves and the prevention of calves’ diarrhea.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by PICT 1187 from ANPCYT (Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica Agencia, Argentine) and PIP 0744 from CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentine).

The strains were included in a patent “Leche fermentada y/o tratamiento de las infecciones intestinales en terneros y procedimientos”. INPI (Instituto Nacional de la Propiedad Intelectual, Argentine). N°20150102316- Date: 21/07/2015.

Figure

Figure 5:Flow chart showing all the stages applied for the elaboration and administration of fermented milk to calves.

Figure

Figure 6: Bacteria cells counts during fermentation at 37°C for eight hours and modifications of the milk pH. Control indicates the growth of the strains in MRS
broth.

Figure 7: Storage of fermented milk for 30 days at refrigeration temperature.a

Figure

Figure 8:Storage of milk in the farm after second fermentation for 2-3 months age calves during five days at refrigeration temperature.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

  • 2nd World Biotechnology Congress
    December 04-06, 2017 Sao Paulo, Brazil

Article Usage

  • Total views: 8101
  • [From(publication date):
    April-2016 - Nov 22, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8009
  • PDF downloads : 92

Review summary

  1. Husam Al Din
    Posted on Sep 19 2016 at 2:42 pm
    In general, this article is informative and provides useful and comprehensive information with regards to the production of fermented milk with autochthonous lactobacilli. This evaluation provides the beneficial properties of the designed fermented milk in calves and the prevention of calves’ diarrhea.
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords