alexa Production, Physico-Chemical Characterization and Biodistribution Studies of Lipid Nanoparticles | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2157-7439
Journal of Nanomedicine & Nanotechnology
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Production, Physico-Chemical Characterization and Biodistribution Studies of Lipid Nanoparticles

Elisabetta Esposito1, Helga Eveline De Vries2, Susanne M.A. van der Pol2, Federico Boschi3, Laura Calderan4, Silvia Mannucci4, Markus Drechsler5, Catia Contado6, Rita Cortesi1 and Claudio Nastruzzi1*

1Department of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy

2Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

3Department of Computer Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy

4Department of Neurological and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy

5BIMF/Soft Matter Electron microscopy, University of Bayreuth, Germany

6Department of Chemistry, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy

*Corresponding Author:
Claudio Nastruzzi
Department of Life Sciences and Biotechnology
Via Fossato di Mortara, 19 I-44121 Ferrara, Italy
Tel: 39/0532/455348
Fax: 39/0532/455953
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: November 11, 2014; Accepted Date: December 09, 2014; Published Date: January 01, 2015

Citation: Esposito E, Vries HED, Pol SMA, Boschi F, Calderan L, et al. (2015) Production, Physico-Chemical Characterization and Biodistribution Studies of Lipid Nanoparticles. J Nanomed Nanotechnol 6:256. doi:10.4172/2157-7439.1000256

Copyright: © 2015 Esposito E, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Nanomedicine & Nanotechnology


This study describes the preparation, characterization, in vitro uptake and in vivo biodistribution in mice of solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers.

The effect of nanoparticle lipid matrix, presence of fluorescent and functionalization by polysorbate 80 on dimensional distribution and morphology have been studied by sedimentation field flow fractionation, photon correlation spectroscopy and cryogenic transmission electron microscopy. The complementary use of different techniques demonstrated that lipid matrix composition, presence of fluorescent dye and polysorbate 80 functionalization have little effect on nanoparticle morphology and size distribution.

Uptake of fluorescent nanoparticles was determined in vitro by human brain endothelial cells, showing that nanoparticles treated by polysorbate 80 displayed lower uptake values with respect to the corresponding control nanoparticles.

Biodistribution of solid lipid nanoparticles treated by polysorbate 80 was evaluated by fluorescent luminescent imaging after intraperitoneal administration in mice. The in vivo images indicate that nanoparticles were able to reach the brain, even if they prevalently accumulated in liver and spleen.


Solid lipid nanoparticles; Nanostructured lipid carriers; Cryogenic transmission electron microscopy; Sedimentation field flow fractionation; Photon correlation spectroscopy; in vitro uptake; In vivo biodistribution


SLN: Solid Lipid Nanoparticles; NLC: Nanostructured Lipid Carriers; : P80: Polysorbate 80; SLN-P80: Solid Lipid Nanoparticles Treated with Polysorbate 80; NLC-P80: Nanostructured Lipid Carriers Treated with Polysorbate 80; SLNCG: Solid Lipid Nanoparticles containing Cardiogreen; SLN-P80- CG: Solid Lipid Nanoparticles containing Cardiogreen and Treated with Polysorbate 80; SLN-RH: Solid Lipid Nanoparticles containing Rhodamine; NLC-RH: Nanostructured Lipid Carriers containing Rhodamine; SLN-P80-RH: Solid Lipid Nanoparticles containing Rhodamine and Treated with Polysorbate 80; NLC-P80-RH: Nanostructured Lipid Carriers containing Rhodamine and Treated with Polysorbate 80; I.P: Intraperitoneal; Cryo-TEM: Cryogenic Transmission Electron Microscopy; SdFFF: Sedimentation Field Flow Fractionation; PCS: Photon Correlation Spectroscopy; BBB: Blood Brain Barrier; EE: Encapsulation Efficiency; LC: Loading Capacity


In recent years lipid nanoparticles have been proposed in a number of pharmaceutical research studies as drug delivery formulations, due to their versatility and advantages [1,2]. For instance, the lipid based excipients constituting their solid matrix: (i) allow the solubilization of lipophilic molecules in a biocompatible and biodegradable environment with well-established safety profiles, (ii) improve the stability of labile molecules and (iii) ensure controlled release profile [2,3].

The chance of producing lipid nanoparticles by simple emulsification of the molten lipids and subsequent recrystallization, eludes the use of potentially toxic organic solvents [3,4]. Moreover lipid nanoparticles can be administered by different routes and targeted to specific organs, such as the brain. At this regard, many investigations have been published, describing the use of lipid nanoparticles as delivery system able to overcome the blood brain barrier (BBB) [5-7].

Depending on the nature of the lipids constituting nanoparticle matrix, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) or nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) can be distinguished.

The former are composed of lipids in solid state at room and body temperatures, and the latter are constituted of mixtures of solid and liquid lipids [8-10].

Notwithstanding the potential suitability of lipid nanoparticle as drug delivery system, it is to be considered that intravenously injected SLN and NLC are rapidly cleared from the systemic circulation by opsonisation [7,11,12]. In order to overcome this drawback, in recent years, research has been conducted to create “stealth” nanoparticles characterized by longer circulation times, avoiding preferential uptake by the Reticulo Endothelial System (RES) and promoting in this way the possibility of reaching specific organs, like the brain [13,14]. At this regard different approaches have been proposed, based on nanoparticle surface modification by Pluronic F-68, poly(ethylene glycol) or polysorbate 80 (P80) [15-17].

In order to draw lipid nanoparticle as drug delivery system, it is to be considered the relevance of particle characterization for quality control, stability evaluation and biological fate. Physical properties such as morphology, size and size distribution of nanoparticles heavily affect their biological activity, biodistribution and toxicity [18,19]. Meanwhile, since the obtained size distribution strongly depends on the employed method, the combination of complementary measurement techniques is recommended to overcome the impairment of the single ones [20].

Fluorescence molecular tomography can be employed for evaluating nanoparticle biodistribution, enabling a non-invasive detection, visualization and quantification of fluorescence distributed throughout the body of living animals [21,22].

The goal of this study was the design and production of fluorescent lipid nanoparticles suitable for in vitro uptake study by human brain endothelial cells and for biodistribution imaging, focusing on the influence of (a) nanoparticle lipid matrix, (b) presence of fluorescent and (c) presence of P80 on nanoparticle physico-chemical characteristics.

In particular after nanoparticle production and characterization, their uptake was studied in vitro on hCMEC/D3 cell line. Moreover a biodistribution study was performed on mice by in vivo fluorescent luminescent imaging after intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of fluorescent SLN.

Materials and Methods


The copolymer poly (ethylene oxide) (a) –poly (propylene oxide) (b) (a=80, b=27) (poloxamer 188) was a gift of BASF ChemTrade GmbH (Burgbernheim, Germany). Tristearin, stearic triglyceride (tristearin) and polysorbate 80 (P80) were provided by Fluka (Buchs- Switzerland). Miglyol 812, caprylic/capric triglycerides (miglyol) was a gift of Cremer Oleo Division (Witten, Germany). 5(6)-Carboxy-Xrhodamine (rhodamine) and indocyanine green (cardiogreen) were from Sigma-Aldrich (Milano, Italy).

Production of lipid nanoparticles

SLN and NLC were prepared by melt and ultrasonication, following a previously reported method with minor modifications [17]. The lipid phase (5% with respect to the whole weight of the dispersion) was alternatively constituted of pure tristearin, in the case of SLN, or the mixture tristearin/miglyol 2:1 w/w, in the case of NLC. Briefly, an aqueous poloxamer 188 solution (2.5 % w/w) heated at 80°C was added to the molten lipid phase, afterwards the mixture was emulsified at 15000 rpm, 80°C for 1 min, subjected to ultrasonication at 6.75 kHz for 15 min and then let cooling at 25°C. SLN and NLC dispersions were stored at room temperature. In some cases, P80 (16.6% w/w with respect to the lipid weight) was added to the dispersion after the ultrasonication step, during cooling (at 40°C) and left under stirring (250 rpm) for 30 min. Table 1 reports the abbreviations used throughout the text to indicate the different nanoparticles.

Nanoparticle formulation constituents
Disperse nanoparticle lipid phasea Dispersing aqueous phaseb
Tristearin Mygliol Cardiogreen Rhodamine Poloxamer 188 Polysorbate 80
#SLN 100.0 n.p. n.p. n.p. 2.5 n.p.
#SLN-P80 100.0 n.p. n.p. n.p. 2.5 1.0
#NLC 66.6 33.3 n.p. n.p. 2.5 n.p.
#NLC-P80 66.6 33.3 n.p. n.p. 2.5 1.0
#SLN-RH 99.6 n.p. n.p. 0.4 2.5 n.p.
#SLN-P80-RO 99.6 n.p. n.p. 0.4 2.5 1.0
#NLC-RH 66.6 33.3 n.p. 0.4 2.5 n.p.
#NLC-P80-RH 66.6 33.3 n.p. 0.4 2.5 1.0
#SLN-CG 99.6 n.p. 0.4 n.p. 2.5 n.p.
#SLN-P80-CG 99.6 n.p. 0.4 n.p. 2.5 1.0

Table 1: Identification codes and chemical composition of the nanoparticles used in the present study.

Production of fluorescent lipid nanoparticles

In order to produce fluorescent nanoparticles for in vitro uptake and in vivo biodistribution studies, rhodamine and cardiogreen (0.4% w/w with respect to the weight of the lipids) were respectively employed. Two alternative fluorescent dyes have been employed because of technical and methodological reasons. Indeed the fluorimeters employed for in vitro and in vivo studies require different wavelengths for detection of the fluorophore. For in vitro studies the fluorimeter needs excitation wavelength 560 nm and emission 590 nm, while the IVIS Spectrum used in fluorescent modality for in vivo experiments has excitation filter 740 nm and emission filter 800 nm. Accordingly, rhodamine was selected for in vitro experiment while cardiogreen was chosen for in vivo studies, having excitation wavelengths of 570 and 750 nm respectively. The fluorescent dyes were added to the molten lipid phase and mixed before adding to the aqueous phase. The purification of fluorescent particle from free fluorescent dyes and the determination of fluorescence content of nanoparticles were determined as follows. Three hundred microliter samples of nanoparticle were loaded in a centrifugal filter (Microcon unit YM-10 membrane, NMWCO 10 kDa, Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) and centrifuged (Spectrafuge™ 24D Digital Microcentrifuge, Woodbridge NJ, USA) at 8,000 rpm for 60 min. The fluorescence present in the eluate from the centrifugation was thereafter determined by fluorescence spectroscopy, taking as reference the previously made calibration curve. The encapsulation efficiency (EE) and loading capacity (LC) were determined by fluorescent spectroscopy. The encapsulation parameters were determined as follows:

EE=Tfluo− Sfluo/Tfluo×100


where Tfluo stands for the total amount of fluorescent dye added to the nanoparticles; Sfluo for the amount of fluorescent dye measured in the eluate, and Tlipid for the total weight of lipid in the formulation. The association of fluorescent dye to nanoparticle was verified by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) utilizing TLC silica gel 60 F254 (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) with an imaging plate (BAS-SR2040, FujiFilm, Tokyo, Japan) and using a fluorescence imaging system (photodynamic eye (PDE); Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan). TLC was performed applying on the TLC plate 5 μl of the fluorescent dye in nanoparticle or as solution, using as eluents mixtures of ethanol/water 85:15 v/v or 96:4 v/v, for rhodamine or cardiogreen, respectively. The fluorescent spots were quantified 25 min later. TLC plates were put on the imaging plate and then scanned using a phosphor imager FLA- 2000 (FujiFilm, Tokyo, Japan). Fluorescence levels were visualized from the display.

Characterization of lipid nanoparticles

The macroscopic aspect of lipid nanoparticles was evaluated under visual inspection to detect possible phase separation, aggregation and sedimentation phenomena. The visual inspection was also performed after serial dilution with poloxamer 188 solution (2.5 % w/w), resulting in 56, 28, 14, 7 and 3.5 mM final lipid concentration.

Sedimentation Field Flow Fractionation (SdFFF) analysis: A SdFFF system (Model S101, FFFractionation, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, USA), described elsewhere, was employed to determine the size distribution of particles by converting the fractograms, i.e. the graphical results, assuming that the particle density is known [23]. The mobile phase was demineralized water pumped at 2.0 ml/min and monitored in each run. Fifty microliter samples were injected as they were through a 50 μl Rheodyne loop valve. After the SdFFF analyses, the fractions were automatically collected by a Model 2110 fraction collector (Bio Rad laboratories, UK) with a collecting time of 90 sec. The volume of each fraction was 3 ml.

Photon Correlation Spectroscopy (PCS) analysis: Submicron particle size analysis was performed using a Zetasizer 3000 PCS (Malvern Instr., Malvern, England) equipped with a 5 mW helium neon laser with a wavelength output of 633 nm. Glassware was cleaned of dust by washing with detergent and rinsing twice with water for injections. Measurements were made at 25°C at an angle of 90°. Data were interpreted using the “CONTIN” method [24].

Cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) analysis: Samples were vitrified as previously described [13]. The vitrified specimen was transferred to a Zeiss EM922Omega transmission electron microscope for imaging using a cryoholder (CT3500, Gatan). The temperature of the sample was kept below -175°C throughout the examination. Specimens were examined with doses of about 1000-2000 e/nm2 at 200 kV. Images were recorded digitally by a CCD camera (Ultrascan 1000, Gatan) using an image processing system (GMS 1.9 software, Gatan). In addition size distribution of nanoparticles was performed by measuring 1000 nanoparticles for each cryo-TEM image by the digital analyzer ImageJ 1.48 v.

Stability studies

Stability studies were conducted on nanoparticles stored for 180 days at room temperature. PCS size distribution was analyzed in triplicate weekly, up to 60 days and monthly, up to 180 days from nanoparticle production. Morphology of nanoparticles was checked by cryo-TEM observation after 90 days from production.

in vitro uptake experiments

For the in vitro uptake experiments, the human brain endothelial cell line hCMEC/D3 was employed. These cells derived from a primary culture of human adult brain endothelial cells immortalized via lentiviral transduction of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) and simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen [25]. The immortalized human brain endothelial cell line hCMEC/D3, which displays key features of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), was cultured as described previously [25,26]. Nanoparticle uptake by human brain endothelial cell monolayers was analyzed in hCMEC/D3 cells that were seeded at confluence onto collagen-coated 96-wells black plates (Corning Incorporated). Cells were incubated with rhodamine containing nanoparticles, namely SLN-RH, NLC-RH, SLN-P80-RH or NLC-P80-RH, for 24 hours in increasing concentration: 3.125 mg/ml, 1.56 mg/ml, 0.78 mg/ml, 0.39 mg/ml in culture medium. After 24 hours the cells were washed with PBS and uptake was determined using the fluorimeter (ex 560 nm, μem 590 nm).

Biodistribution studies

Male, athymic mice (n=8) (Harlan Laboratories, Italy), about 4-5 weeks old and 25 g in weight, were housed in a temperature- and humidity- controlled environment, having free access to mouse chow and tap water. Animals were handled accordingly with the regulations of the Italian Ministry of Health and to the European Communities Council (86/609/EEC) directives. Mice were divided into two groups, the first group (n=4) was administered with an i.p. injection with 500 μl of SLN-P80-CG, the second group (n=4) was administered by an i.p. injection with 500 μl of SLN-P80. Mice were imaged 4 hours after lipid nanoparticle injection. Optical images were acquired with IVIS Spectrum (Perkin Elmer) in fluorescent modality with excitation filter 740 nm and emission filter 800 nm. Other parameters were: exposure time 1 s, binning B=4, f/stop=2. After the last acquisition, mice were sacrificed through an anaesthetic overdose and they were perfused with solutions of phosphate buffer saline and paraformaldehyde. After perfusion liver, brain, lungs, kidney and spleen were extracted and imaged with the same parameters of the in vivo acquisitions.


Preparation of lipid nanoparticles

Production of SLN and NLC was performed by a two-step protocol based on the emulsification of the molten lipid phase in an aqueous phase containing poloxamer 188 under high speed stirring at 15000 rpm, followed by treatment with probe ultrasound. Table 1 reports the composition of nanoparticles and the batch identification codes.

After preparation, the nanoparticle dispersions appeared milky and free of aggregates and sediment; in the case of fluorescent nanoparticle, the presence of the fluorescent dyes cardiogreen and rhodamine resulted in milky dispersions respectively green or pink coloured (Figure 1). Serial dilutions of the nanoparticle dispersion resulted in a progressive decrease of the scattering intensity and therefore in the milkiness of the formulations.


Figure 1: A: Macroscopic analysis of the investigated empty and fluorescent dye containing nanoparticle formulations. B: Bright and dark field photographic analysis of the effect of serial dilution (with poloxamer 188, 2.5% w/w) of SLN-P80 on the general aspect (i.e. milkiness) of the formulation. The total lipid content of the shown formulations is 56 (1), 28 (2), 14 (3), 7 (4) 3.5 (5) mM, for comparison images of liposomal suspensions constituted of phospahtidylcholine/cholesterol 36/3.6 (6) and 9/0.9 (7) mM are also reported. For nanoparticle identification codes, composition and preparation procedure, please refer to Table 1 and experimental section.

The determination of EE and LC was performed after centrifugation of the dispersions, indicating that both dyes were almost quantitatively encapsulated within the lipid matrix of the nanoparticles, as proved by the very high EE, reported in Table 2. Conversely, the LC values were quite low since the tracking molecules rhodamine and cardiogreen were employed as tools to respectively obtain in vitro and in vivo data about nanoparticle uptake and biodistribution. Therefore only the amounts of trackers needed for the specific determinations were included. Nevertheless, previous studies from our research group demonstrated that different drugs could be entrapped in lipid nanoparticles in amounts higher enough to exert a therapeutic effect [13,17,27].

Identification code Fluorescent encapsulation parameters
Encapsulation efficiencya(%) ± SD Loading Capacityb(%) ± SD
#SLN-RH 99.0 ± 0.3 0.4 ± 0.1
#SLN-P80-RH 95.0 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.1
#NLC-RH 98.1 ± 0.2 0.4 ± 0.1
#NLC-P80-RH 97.0 ± 0.3 0.3 ± 0.1
#SLN-CG 95.2 ± 0.2 0.3 ± 0.1
#SLN-P80-CG 96.1 ± 0.3 0.3 ± 0.1

Table 2: Fluorescent encapsulation parameters in nanoparticles.

The stability of the association between fluorescent dye and nanoparticles was determined by TLC experiment that confirmed the absence of free fluorescent spots. These experiments strongly indicated that the dyes, due to their lipophilic character, were strongly bond to the nanoparticle lipid phase.

Functionalization of nanoparticles by polysorbate 80

SLN and NLC have been largely proposed as drug formulations, nonetheless their suitability to deliver drug to the brain has been not yet completely achieved. The difficulties arose mainly in reason of the nanoparticle adsorption by opsonins and their subsequent clearance from the body by phagocytic cells. At this regard researchers have been trying to design long circulating nanocarriers by introducing the stealth nanoparticle approach. This goal was achieved by modifying the nanoparticle surface in a way to facilitate the evasion of clearance by the body and prolonging the circulation time for extended periods [28,29].

Following this general approach, in the present study the nanoparticles have been treated post-production, with the non-toxic surfactant P80, approved by the Food and Drug Administration also for intravenous administration [30]. Notably, the addition of P80 to the nanoparticle was performed at 40°C, this procedure allowed the formation of a P80 coating on the nanoparticles through the penetration of the hydrophobic chains of the surfactant within the lipid matrix. On the contrary, the polyoxyethylene chains of the surfactant, in reason of their hydrophilic character, protrude into the water phase, creating a hydrophilic cloud at the particle-water interface. The addition of P80 did not change the macroscopic aspect, with respect to untreated SLN or NLC, as shown in Figure 1.

Characterization of nanoparticle dispersions

It is well known that size distribution and shape are important parameters influencing physico-chemical stability and in vivo fate of nanoparticles [19].

Since analytical methods for dimensional and morphology determination are based on different physical principles and can lead to misleading interpretations, in the present investigation three techniques were employed in order to obtain reliable results.

In particular, Table 3 reports the mean diameters measured by SdFFF, PCS and cryo-TEM analyses. In addition, Figure 1 reports the nanoparticle size distributions obtained by SdFFF. The cumulative frequency distributions of lipid nanoparticles produced in the absence (A) and in the presence of P80 (B), or nanoparticles treated by P80 containing the fluorescent dye cardiogreen (C) are compared.

Analytical method
Mean diameter
s.d. Mean diameter§
s.d. Mean diameter
#SLN 44.6 3 166.1 5 113.7 9
#SLN-P80 32.0 2 169.3 4 112.6 2
#NLC 60.6 5 152.5 4 119.0 8
#NLC-P80 59.6 4 162.2 6 78.7 6
#SLN-CG 49.5 3 172.6 7 97.2 7
#SLN-P80-CG 32.9 2 183.4 11 88.7 7

Table 3: Mean diameters of the nanoparticles used in the present study, as determined by SdFFF, PCS and Cryo-TEM.

The lipid matrix composition did not significantly affect nanoparticle mean diameter and size distribution (Figure 1A), SLN and NLC presented indeed very similar values of both size and size distribution. Whereas SLN treated by P80 showed a reduction of the mean diameter and a narrowing of the size distribution with respect to the NLC counterpart (Figure 1B).

In agreement to the macroscopic observation, SdFFF analysis confirmed that the presence of cardiogreen (Figure 1C) had very little effect on nanoparticle dimensions; the addition of polysorbate 80 to fluorescent SLN lead to a slight decrease in mean diameter (Table 3). Rhodamine containing nanoparticles displayed dimensions perfectly superposable to those of cardiogreen nanoparticles (data not shown).

Figure 2 reports the Z-Average (A) and dispersity (B) values determined by PCS technique. The lipid composition and the presence of both fluorescent and P80 slightly affected nanoparticle dimensions, with mean diameters comprised between 166 and 183 nm; the dispersity was always < 0.2, indicating a narrow size distribution.


Figure 2: Effect of lipid nanoparticle constituents, presence of fluorescent dye and production parameters on particle dimensions, as determined by sedimentation field flow fractionation analysis.
Graphs show the cumulative size distribution analysis (by number) of solid lipid nanoparticles (open circles) and nanostructured lipid carriers (closed circles) (A), lipid nanoparticles treated by polysorbate 80 (B) or lipid nanoparticles treated by polysorbate 80 containing the fluorescent dye cardiogreen (C). For nanoparticle identification codes, composition and preparation procedure, please refer to Table 1 and experimental section.

Nanoparticle dimensions were also determined by microscopic analysis. Cryo-TEM images were studied by computer aided image analysis allowing the determination of mean diameters. The results, reported in Table 3, confirmed that nanoparticle were only marginally affected by lipid composition, presence of dye or P80 treatment.

As general comment on size determinations, nanoparticle mean diameters were in decreasing order in the following sequence: PCS > cryo-TEM > SdFFF.

At this regard, the different principles of the three techniques and their limits should be considered. SdFFF allows to separate particles as a function of their specific mass, indeed by knowing the particle density and by supposing a spherical shape, the sizes typify diameter of an equivalent sphere [23]. Therefore by SdFFF the particles are considered as compact spheres of uniform density, thus SdFFF to some extent hinders the mass of anisometric particles in spheres, resulting in this way in smaller dimensional values with respect to PCS. Notably, SdFFF is able to obtain higher resolution with respect to other light scattering methods since by SdFFF different particle fractions are firstly separated in different fractions and then sized, for this reason the technique is more accurate, particularly for those nanoparticles having broad and multimodal size distributions [23].

On the other hand, since PCS weighs particle dimension by light scattering, assuming a spherical shape, it can give misleading results in the case of non-spherical particles. Indeed the diffusion coefficient of anisometric particles is larger with respect to spheres of the same volume, so anisometric particles display a larger hydrodynamic radius by PCS with respect to SdFFF. Furthermore by PCS and in general by light scattering technique large particles monopolize the scattering behaviour of the sample [20]. Therefore by PCS the contribute of even a small number of large nanoparticles results in an appreciable enlargement of both size distribution and particle mean diameter with respect to SdFFF (Figure 3).


Figure 3: Effect of lipid nanoparticle constituents, presence of fluorescent dye and production parameters on particle dimensions, as determined by photon correlation spectroscopy analysis.
Graphs show the Z-average (A) and dispersity (B) (± SD, n=5) of lipid nanoparticles constituted of solid lipids (plain bars), a mixture of solid and liquid lipids (striped bars) or solid lipids plus the fluorescent dye cardiogreen (green bars).After production, lipid nanoparticle were incubated at 40°C, for 30 min, in the absence (light bars) or in the presence of polysorbate 80 (dark bars). For nanoparticle identification codes, composition and preparation procedure, please refer to Table 1 and experimental section.

Finally, cryo-TEM can be considered as a local technique, where not all features of the samples may be imaged or artificially arranged (bigger objects may be excluded, other objects may be artificially arranged by size, orientation etc.). Therefore the use of cryo-TEM for measuring size could give ambiguous results because distances or geometries may be over- or underestimated [17].

Nevertheless cryo-TEM can be successfully employed for visualizing nanoparticles in an almost natural state, allowing to perform morphological assessment [31].

Figure 4 shows cryo-TEM images of SLN, SLN-P80 (panels A and B), NLC, NLC-P80 (panels C and D), fluorescent SLN-CG and SLNP80- CG (panels E and F).


Figure 4: Effect of lipid nanoparticle constituents, presence of fluorescent dye and production parameters on particle dimensions and morphology, as determined by cryo-TEM analysis.
Pictures show a representative microscopic field of lipid nanoparticles constituted of solid lipids (A, B), a mixture of solid and liquid lipids (C, D) or solid lipids plus the fluorescent dye cardiogreen (E, F).
After production, lipid nanoparticles were incubated at 40°C, for 30 min, in the absence (A, C, E) or in the presence of polysorbate 80 (B, D, F).For nanoparticle identification codes, composition and preparation procedure, please refer to Table 1 and experimental section. Bar corresponds to 200 nm.

Since lipids tend to crystallize in non-spherical platelet form, nanoparticles appear as ovoidal and ellipsoidal disk-like structures or as dark “cigars“ when edge-on viewed [32]. Notably, the presence of aggregates is not detectable. In some cases a disk on top of another bigger one can be seen, showing a step or even several steps. Some smaller nanoparticles are a little bit tilted, allowing to clearly discern their ellipsoidal shape. The large particles that are positioned flat in the thickness of the frozen film (typically 200 nm thick) have much lower contrast with a small dark rim. Cryo-TEM analysis also confirmed that nanoparticle size and morphology were not affected by the lipid composition, P80 treatment and dye presence.

Stability studies

Stability studies were conducted in order to detect possible variations of morphology and size during nanoparticle storage, it is indeed known that the evaluation of stability is essential to assess the actual potential of colloidal carriers as drug delivery systems.

In this respect Figure 5 shows the effect of aging on morphology and Z-average mean diameters of SLN, SLN-P80 and SLN-P80-CG up to 6 months from production. As clearly displayed, nanoparticles retained their morphology, in addition all nanoparticle formulations resulted very stable in term of dimensions; mean diameters underwent indeed small variations along the entire period of analysis (i.e. up to 180 days). These data has confirmed previously reported studies from our laboratory [17,33].


Figure 5: Effect of aging on the morphological (A-C) and dimensional (D) characteristics of lipid nanoparticles. Cryo-TEM photomicrographs were taken after 90 days from the preparation of #SLN(A), #SLN-P80 (B) and #SLN-P80-CG (C). Panel D shows the variation of Z-average (± SD, n=5) within the indicated length of time for #SLN (open circles), #SLN-P80 (filled circles) and #SLNP80- CG (filled squares), data are the mean of 3 determinations on different nanoparticle batches. For nanoparticle identification codes, composition and preparation procedure, please refer to Table 1 and experimental section.

in vitro uptake experiments

In order to determine the ability of nanoparticles to be taken up by BBB cells, we have employed an in vitro model of human brain capillary endothelium based on the use of immortalized human brain endothelial cell line hCMEC/D3.

For these experiments, nanoparticles were fluorescently labelled with rhodamine and stability was tested in culture medium by determining the linearity between nanoparticle concentration and their fluorescence. Figure 6 reports the mean fluorescence values obtained after in vitro uptake experiments conducted on hCMEC/ D3 cells, employing fluorescent SLN-RH and SLN-P80-RH (panel A), NLC-RH and NLC-P80-RH (panel B). The analysis of the cellular uptake indicates that SLN and NLC were almost identically uptaken by the endothelial cells. This result suggests that the presence of lipid liquid constituent in the nanoparticle matrix did not greatly influence cell uptake, at least on the cellular model employed in our experiments.


Figure 6: Effect of lipid nanoparticle constituents and production parameters on the uptake by human brain endothelial hCMEC/D3 cells. Data represent the mean ± s.d. (n=3) of the concentration-dependent experiments at 37°C. Graphs show the dose response curve obtained treating the cells with the indicated dose of lipid nanoparticles constituted of solid lipids (A) or a mixture of solid and liquid lipids (B).
Data refer to lipid nanoparticles previously incubated at 40°C, for 30 min, in the absence (open circles) or in the presence of polysorbate 80 (closed circles). For nanoparticle identification codes, composition and preparation procedure, please refer to Table 1 and experimental section.

Concerning P80 effect, both SLN-P80-RH and NLC-P80-RH displayed lower uptake values with respect to the corresponding control nanoparticles. This datum was tentatively attributed to the effect of the hydrophilic shell surrounding the P80 treated nanoparticles. The presence of polyoxyethylene chains responsible for in vivo avoidance of RES uptake appeared to negatively influence in vitro performances of nanoparticles. Probably the polyoxyethylene chains reduced the interactions between nanoparticle lipids and lipophilic membrane constituents, therefore reducing some of the possible internalization pathways postulated for the cell uptake of lipid nanoparticles, such as the formation of caveolae or lipid rafts [34].

Biodistribution studies of SLN-P80-CG in mice

In order to assess the in vivo biodistribution of nanoparticles, athymic mice experiments were performed after i.p. administration. Athymic nude mice were chosen to allow the detection of faint light signals coming from deepest anatomical districts, thanks to the absence of fur and hear bulbs, which are high absorbers and sources of light scattering. Animals were treated with SLN-P80-CG as well as by SLN-P80 administered as control. Notably, since we decided to use an exiguous number of animals for ethical and cost reasons, we performed only a preliminary study, employing SLN-P80-CG on the bases of the following considerations. P80 has a well-recognized stealth effect [35] and more importantly it has been suggested to possess a specific role in brain targeting [28,29]. For instance some studies have indicated that P80 inhibits the transporter P-glycoprotein, that prevents many endogenous and exogenous compounds crossing biological membranes [36]. Other studies have reported that nanoparticle coated with P80 could increase absorption of plasmatic apolypoprotein E on their surface, thus promoting brain passage through receptor mediated endocytosis [37,38].

The analysis of nanoparticle biodistribution was achieved by a preclinical research method based on non-invasive in vivo fluorescent luminescent imaging of small animals [22]. This technique can be considered as a systematic approach able to provide specific localization of nanoparticles, giving the possibility to image a whole animal. In addition, this technique allows performing further studies on specific isolated organs in which a signal was previously detected in vivo [21].

Figures 7 and 8 shows a selection of the acquired images, respectively depicting whole animals and isolated organs. Notably, all organs were imaged after complete perfusion, in order to eliminate traces of fluorescence from the vasculature. Particularly, photographs reported in Figures 7A to 7H refer to mice imaged in dorsal and ventral positions, respectively. In dorsal images fluorescent signals appear to be predominantly localized in the liver and spleen regions; in ventral images, as expected, the signal is diffusely localized in the whole peritoneal region, being the nanoparticles administered through the i.p. route. Notably, in one animal both in dorsal and ventral views, a fluorescent signal, even if of low intensity, is clearly detectable in a region corresponding to the brain.


Figure 7: Optical images of athimic mice after intraperitoneal injection of 500 μl of #SLN-CG-P80. Images were recorded after 4 h from the injection. In vivobody distribution of lipid nanoparticles, as determined by fluorescent luminescent imaging technology of total body.Pictures show the images collected from 2 representative animals that were treated, as described in the experimental section, with a dispersion of nanoparticles by intraperitoneal administration.
Dorsal (A-D) and ventral (E-H) images were recorded after the administration of fluorescent nanoparticles (#SLN-CG-P80) (A, B, E, F) or blank, control nanoparticles (#SLN-P80) (C, D, G, H). Colour bar on the right side indicates the signal efficiency of the fluorescence emission coming out from the animal. For nanoparticle identification codes, composition and preparation procedure, please refer to Table 1 and experimental section.


Figure 8: In vivo organ distribution of lipid nanoparticles, as determined by fluorescent luminescent imaging technology of isolated organs.Pictures show the images of organs isolated from 2 representative animals that were treated, as described in the experimental section, with a dispersion of nanoparticles by intraperitoneal administration.
Organs are from mice treated with fluorescent nanoparticles (#SLN-CG-P80) (A, B) or blank, control nanoparticles (#SLN-P80) (C, D). Colour bar on the right side indicates the signal efficiency of the fluorescence emission coming out from the organ. For nanoparticle identification codes, composition and preparation procedure, please refer to Table 1 and experimental section.

As expected, no fluorescent signals are present in the images of animals treated by plain SLN-P80.

In order to investigate the distribution of nanoparticles in organs and to unambiguously localize the fluorescent dye accumulated in specific districts, different organs have been perfused and isolated.

As observable in Figure 8, showing the images of organs isolated from two representative animals, a predominant accumulation of nanoparticles occurred in the liver and in the spleen, typical store organs, nevertheless fluorescence was clearly detectable in other organs, including lung, kidney and notably in the brain [12].

This latest result is particularly interesting since it suggests that, notwithstanding the unavoidable tropism for RES district of lipid nanoparticles, the P80 functionalization enabled SLN-P80-CG to reach the brain in a detectable amount.


The reported results has evidenced that the complementary use of different techniques enables to fully characterize size, size distribution and morphology of nanoparticles, overcoming the specific drawbacks associated to any characterization technique. Notwithstanding the findings reported by other authors [8-10], in this study no large differences have been evidenced between NLC and SLN in terms of fluorescence loading and stability, at least for the composition of NLC and SLN tested in the current study. Therefore, this manuscript has demonstrated that NLC do not show any major advantage compared to SLN. The in vivo experiment proved that SLN-P80-CG were able to reach the brain, even in small proportion with respect to the injected dose, after i.p. administration. This finding has suggested that nanoparticle functionalization with polysorbate 80 could promote brain delivery, as described by other authors [28,37,38].

Further studies will be undertaken to more specifically clarify if the presence of P80 could result in stealth effect. Poloxamer 188, employed to emulsify nanoparticle lipid matrix, can be also partially responsible for such effect. Indeed, as P80, also poloxamer 188 can modify the surface of SLN, causing a steric hindrance effect that would reduce RES uptake and prolong retention time in plasma.


This work was funded by “Futuro in Ricerca 2010 FIRB “ from the Ministry of the University and Research of Italy.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12093
  • [From(publication date):
    February-2015 - Nov 20, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8258
  • PDF downloads : 3835

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version