alexa Prognostic Value of Bone Marker Beta-Crosslaps in Patients with Breast Carcinoma | Open Access Journals
ISSN-2155-9929
Journal of Molecular Biomarkers & Diagnosis
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Prognostic Value of Bone Marker Beta-Crosslaps in Patients with Breast Carcinoma

Nicole Zulauf1, Ingo Marzi2 and Gerhard M Oremek1*

1Department of Laboratory Medicine Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main Germany

2Department of Surgery Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main Germany

*Corresponding Author:
Gerhard M Oremek
Department of Laboratory Medicine
Internal Medicine, Hospital of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe University
Theodor Stern Kai 7 , D-60590 Frankfurt/Main, Germany
Tel: +49(0)69/ 6301-5024 or 7823
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: August 20, 2014; Accepted Date: September 25, 2014; Published Date: September 27, 2014

Citation: Zulauf N, Marzi I, Oremek GM (2014) Prognostic Value of Bone Marker Beta-Crosslaps in Patients with Breast Carcinoma. J Mol Biomark Diagn 5:193. doi:10.4172/2155-9929.1000193

Copyright: © 2014 Zulauf N, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Molecular Biomarkers & Diagnosis

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the usefulness of bone markers Alkaline Phosphatase (AP) and Beta- Crosslaps (ß-CTx) to diagnose, treat and monitor patients with breast carcinoma. AP is a marker of bone formation, while ß-CTx are markers of bone resorption. ß-CTx are expressed as degradation products of collagen type I and can be measured in blood and urine.

Objectives: The aim of this project was to evaluate the significance of bone markers ß-CTx and AP with regard to their usage for early diagnostics of bone metastases and pathological bone metabolism in pre- and postmenopausal patients with known breast cancer.

Materials and Methods: Peripheral blood samples of patients with mammarial diseases (benign and malign) were collected and the bone markers AP and ß-CTx determined. A total number of 110 patients had benign mammarial diseases, BMD (30 fibroadenoma, 50 mastopathy and 30 hypertrophy patients). 30 patients were suffering from a malignant breast cancer without bone metastases. 50 patients had known bone metastases. The determination of ß-CTx was conducted based on the Immunoassay “ECLIA”, the analysis approach Elecsys 2010 and cobase by Roche Diagnostics (Mannheim, Germany). The analysis of AP was performed with the HYDRAGEL ISO-PAL kits and HYDRASYS electrophoresis system of Sebia (Fulda, Germany).

Results: For the detection of bone metastases, the study showed a sensitivity of 94.0% with 86.67% specificity for AP. Results for ß-CTx had a sensitivity and specificity of 100.0%. An elevated ß-CTx activity was associated significantly with bone metastases in the study groups (p=0.000000). Furthermore there were significant differences (p=0.000000) due to the menopausal status of patients.

Conclusion: In conclusion ß-CTx are more sensitive and specific to detect bone metastases and bone turnover than AP. In patients with multimorbidity the origin of AP is not clear due to its multi-organic appearance. Hence ß- CTx are considered to be helpful in the diagnostic procedure of breast cancer-patients to detect bone metastases. Moreover they can be utilized to indicate patients with early dysfunctions in bone metabolism and allow inducing early treatment. ß-CTx as indicators of bone resorption are capable to provide a significant differentiation between mamma-carcinoma patients with and without bone affection.

Keywords

Bone marker; Tumor marker; Bone metastases; Malignancy; Alkaline Phosphatase (AP); Beta-Crosslaps (Beta-CTx; ß-CTx); CA 15-3; Breast cancer; Breast carcinoma; Mammarial diseases

Introduction

Breast cancer and metastases induced by this disease are topics of medical research through decades. Bone is a typical location for metastases which often increase pain, morbidity and mortality. Through the past years several laboratory methods and markers have been developed to assist the diagnosis of bone lesions.

The accurate diagnostic of bone metastases and early induced antiresorptive/ cancer therapies are essential to reduce morbidity and mortality. Bone is a tissue which underlies continuous resorption and formation. Malignant tumors which spread to bone are able to cause osteolytic, osteoblastic or mixed lesions. Bone is resorbed by osteoclasts rather than through the tumor cells [1-4]. Under these circumstances bone turnover is elevated and some of the involved enzymes and metabolic products can be measured.

Several markers of bone turnover with different sensitivity and specificity values have already been described in various studies.

The Alkaline Phosphatase is one marker of bone formation which is often used due to its common availability in laboratory analysis [5,6]. It is a membrane-bound enzyme which can be found in diverse tissues of the body, such as bone, liver, kidney and intestine. Though the exact function in bone metabolism is unknown, AP increases when mineralization of bone is in progress [7,8].

In a healthy adult 50% of the total amount of AP are originated from liver and 50% from bone. In children and growing infants up to 90% of the total amounts are of bone origin due to the higher expansive bone metabolism. If liver disease is ruled out, AP provides an overview of the osteoblastic activity [9-14].

The ß-CTx are fragments of collagen type I, which are released during bone resorption [15]. These C-terminal cross-linking telopeptides of collagen type I are specific fractions of C-terminal end of collagen, which are directly abounded at the beginning of collagen depletion [16]. They are detected in blood via specific antibodies. With increasing bone degradation an elevated amount of these segments can be verified in blood [15]. A correlation between ß-CTx and other markers of bone turnover or bone mineral density has also been observed [17-19].

As the C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I, its usefulness as a marker of bone turnover has been described earlier; especially in osteoporosis management [20]. Although these markers are potential instruments for the diagnostic of bone metastases, further analysis has been recommended to confirm their prediction to diagnose bone turnover and monitor antiresorptive treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of AP and ß-CTx to detect bone metastases and pathological bone metabolism in a collective of different patients with diagnosed breast cancer. To achieve comparable results, the clinically well-established bone marker AP in combination with further special tumor markers (CA 15-3 and partially CEA) were evaluated and compared with respect to bone metabolism.

Methods

The total of 190 serum samples which were collected within one year by the gynaecological department of JWG University Clinic Frankfurt a. M. were analyzed with regard to AP, CA 15-3 and ß-CTx and divided into following populations to allow a differentiated evaluation, comparison and conclusion: 110 patients with benign mammarial diseases (BMD: 30 Fibroadenoma, 50 Mastopathy and 30 Hypertrophy patients). 80 patients with breast cancer (30 without and 50 with bone metastases). Furthermore additional 200 proband samples were leveraged for the determination of reference values for ß-CTx as well as for CA 15-3 (50 pre- and 50 postmenopausal healthy women for each marker). These subjects (consent presumed) were selected into mentioned populations during their hospitalization in gynaecological department of JWG University Clinic Frankfurt a. M. concerning their respective diagnoses. Due to exact knowledge of the particular diagnosis, participants were allocated to appropriate groups instead of random selection (open-label study).

The analysis of AP was performed with HYDRAGEL ISO-PAL kits and HYDRASYS electrophoresis system of Sebia (Fulda, Germany). The determination of ß-CTx was conducted based on the Immunoassay

“ECLIA” and the analysis approach Elecsys 2010 and cobas e by Roche Diagnostics GmbH (Mannheim, Germany) with two specific monoclonal antibodies.

After incubation of the antigen of sera samples with biotinylated-antibody and ruthenium-conjugated-antibody a sandwich-complex is assembled. This complex is fixed on the solid phase via the assignment of streptavidin-coated microparticles. Finally the resulting product can be measured with photomultiplier and electrochemiluminescence.

The colorimetric measurement to determine ß-CTx activity was executed with the ElectroChemiLuminescenceImmunoAssay ECLIA on Elecsys and cobas e systems (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany).

Statistical Analysis

All the statistical calculations were operated with SPSS Statistics 21.0.Microsoft Word 2007 and Microsoft Excel 2007.

Results

The results of AP and ß-CTx activity in the different study groups are summarized in Table 1.

The mean activity of AP in the group without malignancy was 134.43 ng/ml (median: 135.0 ng/ml), in patients with malignant disease but without bone metastases 129.1333 ng/ml (median: 115.0 ng/ml) and in patients with bone metastases 284.24 ng/ml (median: 277.0 ng/ml).

The serum levels of ß-CTx activity in patients without malignancy showed a mean of 0.4521 ng/ml (median: 0.32 ng/ml). The highest activities were found in patients with malignancy and additional bone metastases (mean: 75.382 ng/ml, median: 67.0 ng/ml) and in patients with malignancy (mean activity of 0.893 ng/ml, median: 0.905 ng/ml).

Bone-metastases-positive patients offered significantly higher ß-CTx serum concentration (p=0.000000) compared to the bone-metastases-negative collectives. Moreover there were significant differences observed within the standard values (p=0.000000) related to the menopausal status with tendency to higher values in postmenopause. Among the benign mammarial diseases pathological elevated results were identified for fibroadenomas with no evidence for any malign process. No significant difference compared to patients with carcinoma without skeletal affection was shown in contrast to the other two BMD populations (p=0.820069). For diagnostics of osseous metastases, ß-CTx achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 100.0%. By comparing the covered areas (AUC) of Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves (ROC) the very positive diagnostic performance of 1.0 of ß-CTx was carved out. This outperformed CA 15-3, which represented results of 0.960667 as well as AP with results of 0.940333. Demonstrated on the basis of a patient example (therapeutic conditions: operation and chemotherapy) the serum concentration of ß-CTx declined (175.8 ng/ml to 80.4 ng/ml), though it increased again massively in case of relapse (199.4 ng/ml).

A significant difference between the patients without malignant diseases, those with malignancy and the patients with additional bone metastases was therefore be pointed for AP (p=0.000060 and 0.000000) and ß-CTx (p=0.000000). The distribution of AP and ß-CTx in the gynaecological patients is posed in Figures 1 and 2.

molecular-biomarkers-diagnosis-breast-cancer

Figure 1: Distribution of median ß-CTx in the study. Activity of ß- CTx (ng/ml) against patients without a malignant disease (BMD), patients with breast cancer but without bone metastases, patients with breast cancer and bone metastases

molecular-biomarkers-diagnosis-metastases

Figure 2: Distribution of median AP in the study. Activity of AP (ng/ml) against patients with BMD, patients with breast cancer but without bone metastases, patients with breast cancer and bone metastases

Figures 3 and 4 indicate the categorized results of AP and ß-CTx whether they were normal or above normal activity. For both bone markers a significant difference in the different study groups (p=0.000000) was figured out. We found a significant association between the occurrence of bone metastases and elevated parameter activity in the study.

molecular-biomarkers-diagnosis-pathological-elevated

Figure 3: Distribution of ß-CTx in the study groups. In patients with BMD (no tumor) 75.45% were of normal activity, 24.55% were pathological elevated. Patients with tumor but without bone metastases showed normal activity in 13.33% and elevated levels of ß-CTx in 86.67%. The ß-CTx levels were normal in 0.0% of all patients with known bone metastases and elevated in 100.0%

molecular-biomarkers-diagnosis-pathological-study

Figure 4: Distribution of AP in the study groups. In patients with BMD (no tumor) 100.0% were of normal activity, 0.0% were pathological elevated. Patients with tumor but without bone metastases showed normal activity in 86.67% and elevated levels of AP in 13.33%. The AP levels were normal in 6% of all patients with known bone metastases and elevated in 94%

For the detection of bone metastases the sensitivity of AP was 94.0% and for ß-CTx 100.0% with a specificity for AP of 86.67% and for ß-CTx of 100.0%.

Discussion

In the last years several different bone markers have been investigated to assist the diagnostic of bone turnover. However the accuracy of those markers does not allow being the only diagnostic instrument to predict the appearance of bone metastases. So far none of the known markers could be solely used as screening parameters for patients to diagnose metastases to bone.

The measured sensitivity and specificity for AP and ß-CTx to detect bone metastases in our study are partially contrary to results of earlier investigations: for example the sensitivity of AP is 67.0% and the specificity 100.0%, whereas ß-CTx are not able to verify the presence of bone metastases or the sensitivity/ specificity of ß-CTx is only 53.0%/ 45.0% and concisely lesser than our results demonstrate [21-24].

The slightly poorer sensitivity and specificity for AP in comparison to ß-CTx appear to be caused by the multimorbidity of our patients and the known composition of total-AP by different isoenzymes.

No one of our patients with known malignancy and bone metastases does not show pathological elevated serum levels of ß-CTx (Figure 3).

As investigated before, we find a very strong (spearman coefficient of correlation: 0.8355) and high positive significant correlation on level α=0.05 between our measurements of AP and ß-CTx relating to breast carcinoma-patients [19].

In comparison to AP, the ß-CTx are the more specific bone markers to detect bone metastases in our study. Namely they outperform parameters established in today’s routines by providing improved sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore they exhibit adequate characteristics to monitor ongoing therapies. Based on the detected values it is possible to determine a specific therapy’s success and to monitor its progress accordingly. A significant correlation between the activity of ß-CTx and the occurrence of bone metastases is statistically proved (p=0.000000). In addition ß-CTx show a significant rise in postmenopausal patients (p=0.000000) in our study. It is known that endocrinological changes affect the bone metabolism and osteoporosis with bone degradation occurs more often. Due to increased postmenopausal occurrence of osteoporosis, the inherent accelerated bone resorption and increased ß-CTx-concentrations, for the diagnostic of bone metastases higher cutoff-values should be considered for the postmenopausal women compared to the collective of men and premenopausal women.

We suggest a further investigation and evaluation of ß-CTx as markers of bone turnover. They seem to be helpful diagnostic parameters of pathological elevated bone metabolism and should be used in follow up examinations of breast cancer-patients. Moreover they appear not to be only a beneficial instrument to get an idea of the bone metabolism, but may be also profitable to assist an antiresorptive treatment in time to those patients with progressive affection of bone [25].

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

  • 9th International Conference and Expo on Molecular & Cancer Biomarkers
    August 23-24, 2017 Birmingham, UK
  • 2nd International Conference on Medical Imaging and Diagnosis
    London, UK
  • 22nd International Conference on Cancer Drugs and Therapeutics
    Paris, France
  • International Conference on Oncology Nursing and Cancer Care
    Singapore City, Singapore
  • World Summit on Cell Signalling and Cancer Therapy
    Toronto, Canada
  • International Conference on Radiology and Imaging
    New York, USA

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11654
  • [From(publication date):
    October-2014 - Jul 22, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7888
  • PDF downloads :3766
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords