alexa Reasons for Aripiprazole Discontinuation in Schizophrenia A Retrospective | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2155-9562
Journal of Neurology & Neurophysiology
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Reasons for Aripiprazole Discontinuation in Schizophrenia ? A Retrospective

Aurelie Millier1*, Benjamin Briquet1, Nadia Georges2, Venkatesha Murthy3 and Mondher Toumi4

1Creativ-Ceutical, 215 rue du Faubourg Saint Honoré 75008 Paris, France

2Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Gmbh Thurgauerstrasse 130, Zurich, Switzerland

3Medical Director, Clinical Neuroscience, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc, United Kingdom

4University Claude Bernard Lyon I, UFR d'Odontologie 11, France

Corresponding Author:
Aurelie Millier
Creativ-Ceutical 215 rue du Faubourg Saint Honoré
75008 Paris France
Tel: (+33)176704797
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: June 16, 2014; Accepted dat: September 06, 2014; Published date: September 15, 2014

Citation: Millier A, Briquet B, Georges N, Murthy V, Toumi M (2014) Reasons for Aripiprazole Discontinuation in Schizophrenia – A Retrospective. J Neurol Neurophysiol 5:226. doi:10.4172/2155-9562.1000226

Copyright: © 2014 Miller A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Neurology & Neurophysiology

Abstract

Objectives: Patients with schizophrenia taking first- or second-generation antipsychotic drugs may switch to
treatment with Aripiprazole due to side effects. This atypical antipsychotic launched in Europe in 2004, and has a
better reported safety profile. However, patients also discontinue Aripiprazole, despite the lack of a comparable
alternative antipsychotic. As very few data are available in the literature, it seems important to investigate the
reasons for Aripiprazole discontinuation.
Methods: A retrospective multicenter observational study of 287 patients with schizophrenia was conducted in
France, Germany and Sweden. Eligible patients were treated with aripiprazole in the last two years and were
switched to another antipsychotic. Their psychiatrists were asked to report online the reasons for discontinuation of
aripiprazole and of previous antipsychotic treatments.
Results: Considering the whole sample, reasons for aripiprazole discontinuation were poor efficacy with respect
to positive (44%) and negative (31%) symptoms and intolerable side effects (27%). No significant difference was
found between antipsychotic-naïve patients and the rest. These reasons were given for 40%, 25% and 52% of
patients, respectively, for discontinuation of previous antipsychotic treatments.
Conclusion: Aripiprazole seems to be prescribed mainly after intolerable side effects are observed with other
therapies. Aripiprazole was discontinued due to lack of efficacy for positive and negative symptoms at rates greater
than those for intolerable side effects.

Keywords

Schizophrenia; Aripiprazole; Discontinuation; Antipsychotics; Survey; Safety; Efficacy

Introduction

Schizophrenia is a chronic and disabling psychiatric disorder affecting approximately 1% of the population world-wide [1]. Symptoms are frequently categorized as positive, negative and cognitive [2]. The degree of suffering and disability in schizophrenia is considerable, with 80-90% not working [3] and an overall mortality rate twice to three times as high as in the general population [4]. Pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia consists mainly of antipsychotic drugs. None of these are completely satisfactory, and the pharmaceutical industry continually seeks improved alternatives.

Typical antipsychotic drugs (also called first-generation antipsychotics (FGA) have traditionally been used as first-line agents for people with schizophrenia [5]. FGAs are known to cause many kinds of side effects, including mainly extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). Second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) have proven to be at least comparable in efficacy to FGAs, and have a more favorable overall side effect profile, though many of them have metabolic issues or cardiac side effects [6]. Weight gain is one of the major drawbacks associated with the SGAs: compared to patients on FGAs, these patients have higher rates of morbidity and mortality, largely due to weight gain and metabolic syndrome [7].

Switching to an antipsychotic with a lower propensity to induce weight gain is an attractive strategy, and aripiprazole seems a candidate for such a treatment strategy. Aripiprazole was approved by the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) in 2002 for treatment of schizophrenia.

It has shown acceptable efficacy, and good safety: adverse effects include akathisia, somnolence, headache, gastrointestinal upset and light headedness [8]. The recommended target dose for aripiprazole is 10-15 mg per day (dose range 10-30 mg/day) [9].

In 2006, El-Sayeh et al. [10] published a systematic review suggesting that aripiprazole did not differ significantly from some typical or other atypical antipsychotics in terms of several global outcomes and adverse effects. Nevertheless the authors acknowledged the lack of available evidence, and the limited numbers of comparator drugs used in the included trials. In 2012, a review of use of aripiprazole in the management of schizophrenia in adults was published [11]. It reported that improvements in remission rates and response rates favoured aripiprazole over haloperidol, but that improvements in positive and negative symptom scores mostly favoured olanzapine over aripiprazole. Longer-term treatment generally favoured patients switched to receive aripiprazole compared with standard-of-care oral antipsychotics. Aripiprazole was generally well tolerated in patients with schizophrenia, and aripiprazole was associated with a favourable cardiovascular tolerability profile compared to olanzapine. Later in 2013, Leucht et al. [12] published a multiple-treatments meta-analysis comparing 15 antipsychotics. Aripiprazole showed similar efficacy than most of antipsychotics (except clozapine, amisulpride and olanzapine, reporting a significantly higher efficacy), and a good safety profile. Finally, in 2013, 12 trials comparing aripiprazole to olanzapine, risperidone or ziprasidone were reviewed. Considering global state, no difference in efficacy was found between the products, but olanzapine was better with regards to mental state. Regarding safety, no significant difference in EPS was shown, but aripiprazole was found less likely than comparators to increase cholesterol levels or cause weight gain and it is an antipsychotic with a variant but not absent adverse effect profile.

Patients, who switch to aripiprazole to mitigate weight gain and metabolic problems associated with other antipsychotics, may switch therapy again. Little has been described regarding discontinuation of aripiprazole treatment and it seemed important to better understand why patients discontinue treatment with aripiprazole in real life.

Methods

Data collection

The objective of this study is to determine why patients with schizophrenia stopped treatment with aripiprazole; their reasons were assessed by their psychiatrists. To that purpose, we conducted an online survey in Sweden, Germany and France.

We contacted psychiatrists having more than 5 years of experience treating patients with schizophrenia, and more than 5 patients with schizophrenia currently followedup. The study source population included patients with schizophrenia treated by the participating psychiatrists, who met the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria, as per the following:

Age 18–75 years

Diagnosis of schizophrenia as assessed by DSM-IV for at least 2 years (paranoid, undifferentiated, catatonic, residual or disorganized type)

Outpatient treatment by a psychiatrist

Treatment with aripiprazole during the last 12 months, and switch to another antipsychotic (no more than 2 weeks without treatment between aripiprazole and the other antipsychotic)

Exclusion criteria included:

Treatment with aripiprazole during the last 2 years in combination with another antipsychotic for more than 25% of the duration of aripiprazole therapy

Any active substance abuse disorder (except alcohol, nicotine and caffeine) within the previous 6 months

Chronic hospitalization during the whole previous year

Not being continuously followed by the participating psychiatrist since initiation of aripiprazole

Data were collected retrospectively by psychiatrists from electronic records at each participating psychiatrist’s practice location. Each psychiatrist retrieved patients with schizophrenia meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria in consecutive, reverse chronological order to avoid selection bias, starting with the patient who most recently switched from aripiprazole to any other antipsychotic. Psychiatrists were limited to inclusion of 4 patients, to ensure results are not driven by a low number of psychiatrists.

All data were recorded in anonymous-coded electronic forms. Patients were identified on the data collection form only by a unique number linked to the site number. Patient informed consent was not sought for this study since anonymised patient data do not fall within the scope of data protection laws. These data are no attributable to any individual patient, and the patient is neither identifiable nor definable.

Once the first 10 psychiatrists were enrolled, data were verified to identify any issues related to quality, accuracy or consistency of data collection requiring clarification or further explanation before data collection continued.

The study sample has not been based on a statistical calculation but has been chosen pragmatically, as the study is descriptive and does not involve any intervention on patients. A sample size of 300 patients (100 in each country) was considered appropriate for this study.

Collected data included prescriber demographic characteristics, demographics and other patient characteristics, disease history, antipsychotic treatment and concomitant medication.

Reasons for discontinuation included in the survey were poor efficacy with respect to positive symptoms (worsening of symptoms or lack of improvement), poor efficacy with respect to negative symptoms (idem), lack of access or financial reasons, intolerable side effects, co-morbid mental condition, co-morbid physical condition, cardiovascular or metabolic event, or other reason. Several answers were allowed.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses are mainly descriptive. Quantitative variables are summarized using usual descriptive statistics, including number of missing values, number of valid values, and their observed mean and standard deviation. Qualitative variables are summarized presenting numbers of missing and valid values, and frequency and percentage of each level of the variable. Reasons for discontinuation were described separately for antipsychotics-naïve patients (receiving aripiprazole as a first-line antipsychotic), and patients having received other treatment(s) previously. Relevant test (Chi-Square or Student tests) were undertaken to compare different populations.

Results

Prescriber and patient demographic characteristics

In the 3 countries, recruitment started in November 2012. Recruitment ended in December 2012 in France and Germany and in January 2013 in Sweden. Ninety-five psychiatrists were recruited for this project: 37 in France, 39 in Germany and 19 in Sweden. Together they reported information for 287 patients (123 in France, 121 in Germany and 43 in Sweden). The average number of patients was 3.0 overall, 3.3 in France, 3.1 in Germany and 2.3 in Sweden.

Table 1 presents prescriber and patient demographic characteristics. Psychiatrists were mainly practicing in urban environments (79% overall), in public (France) or in specialty clinics (Germany and Sweden), with on average 16 years of experience.

    FRANCE GERMANY SWEDEN ALL PVALUE
Psychiatrists   N=37 N=39 N=19 N=95  
Practice Environment Rural 1 (2.70%) 4 (10.26%) 0 5 (5.26%) p = 0.16
Semi-urban 9 (24.32%) 4 (10.26%) 2 (10.53%) 15 (15.79%)
Urban 27 (72.97%) 31 (79.49%) 17 (89.47%) 75 (78.95%)
Practice type Private 7 (18.92%) 3 (7.69%) 0 10 (10.53%) p < 0.0001
Academia 1 (2.70%) 7 (17.95%) 0 8 (8.42%)
Specialty clinic 1 (2.70%) 17 (43.59%) 13 (68.42%) 31 (32.63%)
Public 25 (67.57%) 3 (7.69%) 3 (15.79%) 31 (32.63%)
Combined private/public 3 (8.11%) 7 (17.95%) 3 (15.79%) 13 (13.68%)
Other 0 2 (5.13%) 0 2 (2.11%)
Number of years since thesis Mean (SD) 16.81 (6.36) 17.44 (9.65) 11.84 (5.73) 16.07 (8.00) p = 0.03
Patients   N=123 N=121 N=43 N=287  
Gender Male 75 (60.98%) 78 (64.46%) 30 (69.77%) 183 (63.76%) p = 0.57
Female 48 (39.02%) 43 (35.54%) 13 (30.23%) 104 (36.24%)
Age Mean (SD) 32.90 (11.08) 34.15 (11.52) 35.79 (8.52) 33.86 (10.94) p = 0.31
Family situation Single 97 (77.60%) 73 (81.11%) 59 (75.64%) 219 (76.31%) p = 0.27
Couple 28 (22.40%) 17 (18.89%) 19 (24.36%) 68 (23.69%)
Living conditions Alone 52 (41.60%) 44 (48.89%) 36 (46.15%) 117 (40.77%) p = 0.002
Family 59 (47.20%) 39 (43.33%) 37 (47.44%) 142 (49.48%)
Other 14 (11.20%) 7 (7.78%) 5 (6.41%) 28 (9.76%)
Number of children No children 98 (79.67%) 67 (79.76%) 58 (76.32%) 220 (79.42%) p = 0.45
1 or more children 25 (20.33%) 17 (20.24%) 18 (23.68%) 57 (20.58%)
Employment and occupational status Paid 18 (14.40%) 11 (12.22%) 12 (15.38%) 44 (15.33%) p = 0.002
Voluntary/Sheltered employment 18 (14.40%) 16 (17.78%) 17 (21.79%) 45 (15.68%)
Unemployed/Other 89 (71.20%) 63 (70.00%) 49 (62.82%) 198 (68.99%)
Highest completed level of education Primary 39 (31.20%) 26 (28.89%) 24 (30.77%) 87 (30.31%) p < 0.0001
Secondary 52 (41.60%) 39 (43.33%) 41 (52.56%) 129 (44.95%)
Tertiary 20 (16.00%) 18 (20.00%) 12 (15.38%) 46 (16.03%)
Other 14 (11.20%) 7 (7.78%) 1 (1.28%) 25 (8.71%)
Schizophrenia type Paranoid 91 (72.80%) 54 (60.00%) 50 (64.10%) 189 (65.85%) p = 0.0002
Catatonic 3 (2.40%) 4 (4.44%) 5 (6.41%) 13 (4.53%)
Disorganized 15 (12.00%) 13 (14.44%) 8 (10.26%) 32 (11.15%)
Undifferentiated 11 (8.80%) 10 (11.11%) 13 (16.67%) 38 (13.24%)
Residual 5 (4.00%) 9 (10.00%) 2 (2.56%) 15 (5.23%)
Number of years since schizophrenia diagnosis Mean (SD) 9.81 (8.25) 10.59 (9.56) 9.81 (7.89) 9.57 (8.36) p = 0.55
Any concomitant mental conditions No 106 (84.80%) 76 (84.44%) 60 (76.92%) 243 (84.67%) p = 0.51
Yes 19 (15.20%) 14 (15.56%) 18 (23.08%) 44 (15.33%)
Any concomitant physical conditions No 106 (84.80%) 80 (88.89%) 70 (89.74%) 255 (88.85%) p = 0.41
Yes 19 (15.20%) 10 (11.11%) 8 (10.26%) 32 (11.15%)

Table 1: Prescriber and patient demographic characteristics

Patients were predominantly male (64%), and average age was 34 years. They were generally single (76%), lived alone or with their family (respectively 41% and 49% of all patients), had no children (79%), were unemployed (69%), and had completed at best their primary or secondary education (75%). These demographic results were generally similar across countries.

Paranoid schizophrenia was the most frequent diagnosis among the five schizophrenia diagnoses (66%), followed by undifferentiated (13%) and disorganized schizophrenia (11%). The schizophrenia diagnosis of patients was made on average 9.57 years before their psychiatrist responded to the survey. Some 15% of the patients were suffering concomitant mental conditions, such as depression, insomnia, anxiety and alcohol abuse, and 11% suffered from concomitant physical conditions (for example diabetes or cardiovascular events were reported for 6% of patients).

Antipsychotic treatment

Table 2 presents antipsychotic treatment taken before aripiprazole and during aripiprazole treatment. Of the 287 patients included in the study, 89 (31%) were prescribed aripiprazole as their first antipsychotic treatmentand 198 (69%) were using other antipsychotic treatments before aripiprazole. Before using aripiprazole, 93% of these patients were treated with monotherapy (only one antipsychotic treatment prescribed at a time), and 7% with combination therapy (more than one antipsychotic treatment at a time). Before aripiprazole, mainly SGAs were prescribed (76% of patients received oneSGA, and 17% received one FGA). The antipsychotics most prescribed prior toaripiprazole were risperidone (33%), olanzapine (28%), haloperidol (10%) and quetiapine (10%). The frequency of use of the various antipsychotic treatments varied from one country to another.

    BEFORE ARIPIPRAZOLE (N=198) DURING ARIPIPRAZOLE (N=199) PVALUE
Type of therapy Monotherapy 185 (93.43%) 185 (92.96%) p = 0.85
Combination therapy 13 (6.57%) 14 (7.04%)
Type of AP treatment FGA 33 (16.67%) 5 (35.71%) NA
FGA-FGA 4 (2.02%) 0
SGA 151 (76.26%) 9 (64.29%)
FGA-SGA 6 (3.03%) 0
FGA-FGA-SGA 1 (0.51%) 0
SGA-SGA 2 (1.01%) 0
SGA-SGA-SGA 1 (0.51%) 0
Duration of treatment (days) Mean (SD) 1476.48 (1843.46) 478.18 (579.73) p < 0.0001
ARI initial dosage Mean (SD) - 10.31 (5.15) NA
ARI final dosage Mean (SD) - 19.67 (7.30) NA
Any AE No 51 (25.76%) 116 (58.29%) p < 0.0001
Yes 147 (74.24%) 83 (41.71%)
AE Weight gain 90 (45.45%) 10 (5.03%) p < 0.0001
Dizziness 13 (6.57%) 10 (5.03%) p = 0.52
Appetite change 20 (10.10%) 10 (5.03%) P = 0.06
Fatigue 46 (23.23%) 10 (5.03%) p < 0.0001
GI Disturb 2 (1.01%) 7 (3.52%) p = 0.17
Akathisia 33 (16.67%) 51 (25.63%) p = 0.03
Sedation 51 (25.76%) 11 (5.53%) p < 0.0001
Cognitive 34 (17.17%) 1 (0.50%) p < 0.0001
Movement 32 (16.16%) 7 (3.52%) p < 0.0001
White blood disorder 1 (0.51%) 0 p = 1.00
Libido loss 40 (20.20%) 3 (1.51%) p < 0.0001
Vision disturbance 4 (2.02%) 3 (1.51%) p = 1.00
Vision changes 0 0 p = 1.00
Other 11 (5.56%) 15 (7.54%) p = 0.42
Any diabetes or cardiovascular events No 186 (93.94%) 189 (94.97%) p = 0.66
Yes 12 (6.06%) 10 (5.03%)
Diabetes or cardiovascular event Stroke / Transient Ischemic Attack 0 0 NA
EKG changes cardiac rhythm disturbance 1 (0.51%) 1 (0.50%) NA
Hypertension or blood pressure change 7 (3.54%) 4 (2.01%) p = 0.36
Chest pain 0 1 (0.50%) p = 1.00
Diabetes / hyperglycemia 7 (3.54%) 7 (3.52%) p = 1.00

Table 2: Antipsychotic treatment characteristics

Of patients who were prescribed aripiprazole, 5.9% were prescribed another antipsychotic (2.4% a SGA, and 3.5% a FGA). Antipsychotic treatments used before aripiprazole were used for about 4 years, on average, while aripiprazole was used for 1.7 years.

Dosage of aripiprazole increased over time; the average initial daily dosage was at about 10.52 mg, whereas the final dosage was at about twice this quantity (19.51 mg).

Once aripiprazole was discontinued, most often prescribed antipsychotics after aripiprazole were risperidone (27%), quetiapine (26%) and olanzapine (17%).

Adverse events during antipsychotic treatment

Before the use of aripiprazole, 74% of patients experienced adverse events. This proportion was significantly lower during aripiprazole treatment, at about 42% (p<0.0001). Weight gain was the most prevalent adverse event occurring during the treatment used before aripiprazole (45%). Sedation (26%), fatigue (23%), libido loss (20%), cognitive (17%) and movement disorders (16%) were the other most common adverse events. During aripiprazole treatment, only 6% of the patients suffered weight gain; the only adverse event commonly occurring was akathisia, affecting 26% of patients, whereas before aripiprazole therapy this condition affected only 17% of patients. These results were generally consistent across the countries.

Reason for antipsychotic treatment discontinuation

Reasons for discontinuation of antipsychotics taken before aripiprazole and for aripiprazole are described in Figure 1.

Figure

Figure 1: Reasons for discontinuation

The most prevalent reasons for discontinuation of the antipsychotic treatment used before aripiprazole were the intolerable side effects (52%), poor efficacy against negative symptoms (25.3%) and poor efficacy against positive symptoms (39.9%) (more than one reason could have been reported by the psychiatrist.) Other conditions accounted for 12.1% of the reasons for discontinuation of agents prior to the use of aripiprazole. Reasons were similar across the three countries surveyed.

Reasons for discontinuation of aripiprazole were primarily poor efficacy with respect to positive symptoms (43.6%), poor efficacy with respect to negative symptoms (31.4%), and intolerable side effects (27.2%). Again, reasons were similar across the three countries surveyed.

The most prevalent reasons for discontinuation were respectively for antipsychotics-naïve patients and other patients: poor efficacy against positive symptoms (38.6% and 45.7%), poor efficacy against negative symptoms (31.8% and 31.2%), intolerable side effects (20.5% and 31.2%). No significant difference was found. Nevertheless, the rate of discontinuation due to other reason was significantly higher for anti-psychotic naïve patients (28.4% vs. 15.6%, p<0.05). This is shown in Figure 2.

Figure

Figure 2: Reasons for discontinuation for patients under aripiprazole; NS Not Significant, *** p<0.0001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05

Several clear associations between patient characteristics at initiation of aripiprazole and reasons for aripiprazole discontinuation were found (data not shown). Demographics characteristics did not differ in terms of gender or age, nevertheless patients stopping treatment with aripiprazole because of negative symptoms or intolerable side effects were more likely to live alone (p=0.01). Patients belonging to paranoid type were found to be more likely to stop aripiprazole treatment because of lack of efficacy on positive symptoms than other patients (p=0.03). Patients with a co-morbid mental condition (depression, insomnia, anxiety, insomnia, and others) were more likely to stop aripiprazole because of intolerable side effects (p=0.03), and patients with a physical condition, such as hypertension or diabetes, were more likely to stop aripiprazole because of lack of efficacy on positive symptoms (p=0.06). Although the type of therapy (monotherapy or polypharmacy) did not differ between reasons, patients under SGA were more likely to stop aripiprazole because of lack of efficacy on positive symptoms (p=0.38) and patients under FGA were more likely to stop because lack of efficacy on negative symptoms (p=0.04).

Concomitant medication

For each concomitant medication reported by the psychiatrist, the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system was used to classify indications. All indications for concomitant medications, based on the ATC code (4th level), are described. The most often prescribed concomitant medications included hypnotics and sedatives (7% in France, 2% in Germany and 21% in Sweden), anxiolytics (17% in France, 8% in Germany and 12% in Sweden) and antidepressants (6% in France, 4% in Germany and 5% in Sweden). Rates for other medication (anticholinergic agents, antiepileptics, antihistamines, beta blocking agents, blood glucose lowering drugs or lipid modifying agents) were all below 3%.

Discussion

In our study, information on why patients with schizophrenia started their antipsychotic treatment on aripiprazole, and why they decide to discontinue it/switch to another antipsychotic treatment was obtained through a web survey targeting psychiatrists in France, Germany and Sweden. Germany and France are the two biggest markets in Europe for aripiprazole, and Sweden was considered to fairly represent the Nordic countries. The sample of psychiatrists was found to be representative.

The demographic profile of patients included in this survey was consistent with published literature [13]. The distribution of schizophrenia by type of schizophrenia was also representative, with paranoid schizophrenia the predominant diagnosis [13,14]. The dosage of aripiprazole increased over time: the average initial dosage was at about 10.52 mg, whereas the final dosage was about twice this quantity (19.51 mg), more in line with literature [15,16].

As anticipated, the percentage of patients experiencing at least one adverse event was higher with other antipsychotics than with aripiprazole. For example, weight gain was found to be the most prevalent adverse event experienced with antipsychotic treatment used before aripiprazole (74%); this was considerably higher than the rate seen with aripiprazole (42%). The published literature about adverse events under aripiprazole treatment was recently found to be low [12], and it was difficult to compare this result to findings in clinical practice.

Surprisingly, length of antipsychotic treatment was much longer for the antipsychotics used before aripiprazole (4 years) than for aripiprazole (1.7 years). This suggests that psychiatrists may be more comfortable with other antipsychotic treatments, and/or that patients better tolerated other antipsychotic treatments, despite the safety profile of aripiprazole with regards to metabolic adverse events.

It is noteworthy that the most frequent reasons for aripiprazole treatment discontinuation and for discontinuation of the antipsychotic treatment received before aripiprazole differed: more patients stopped treatment with aripiprazole because of poor efficacy with respect to positive symptoms and fewer because of intolerable side effects. This are in line with results of previous published studies. A recent study aimed at identifying the reasons leading physicians to decide to switch antipsychotic treatment in outpatients with schizophrenia [17]. Using data from an observational 18-week including 574 patients, authors found that the main reason for switching antipsychotic treatment was lack of tolerability (65.0%), followed by lack of efficacy (43.8%). This supports our findings.

This study has several limitations. First, patients may have received some or part of their treatment in hospitals separate from the psychiatrist site, and the available data may not be as detailed as that from the hospital. However, psychiatrists are expected to ask and report this information in patient medical records. Second, the number of psychiatrists and patients included in the study is small. Although multivariate statistical analyses lacked power when investigated, descriptive results illustrated strong trends, and the results are thought to be generalizable overall. A larger study would allow further statistical analysis and further qualitative exploration of the reasons why patients with schizophrenia stop aripiprazole treatment.

Conclusion

This retrospective online survey of psychiatrists who treat patients with schizophrenia shows that aripiprazole seems to be prescribed mainly after intolerable side effects are observed with other therapies. The main reasons for aripiprazole discontinuation are lack of efficacy and, secondarily, intolerable side effects. The lack of alternatives with a reduced propensity for metabolic adverse events, especially weight gain, highlights a significant unmet need.

Acknowledgement

This article was funded by Takeda Pharmaceuticals. Nadia Cadi-Soussi and Venkatesha Murthy are employees of Takeda Pharmaceuticals. AurélieMillier and Benjamin Briquet are employees from Creativ-Ceutical which received funding from Takeda Pharmaceuticals. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11546
  • [From(publication date):
    September-2014 - Oct 20, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7794
  • PDF downloads :3752
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords