alexa Regional Capital Mobility within Bulgaria | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2375-4389
Journal of Global Economics
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Regional Capital Mobility within Bulgaria

Yannick Bineau*

Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Science and Technology, France

*Corresponding Author:
Yannick Bineau
University of Science and Technology - Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, France
Tel: + 85512812482
E-mail: [email protected]

Received April 09, 2014; Accepted May 06, 2014; Published May 15, 2014

Citation: Bineau Y (2014) Regional Capital Mobility within Bulgaria. J Glob Econ 2:112. doi: 10.4172/2375-4389.1000112

Copyright: © 2014 Bineau Y. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Global Economics

Abstract

This paper investigates regional savings-investment correlation between 1999 and 2009 within the small and highly open economy of Bulgaria. Results confirm low correlation between regional savings and investment rates. Regional capital mobility has increased over time and openness has a positive effect on regional investment.

Keywords

Bulgaria; Domestic savings; Feldstein-horioka puzzle; Regional data; Panel data

Introduction

Feldstein and Horioka [1] estimate the correlation between savings and investments for a sample of 16 OECD countries. They conclude that almost 85% to 95% of domestic savings were locally invest, suggesting low international capital mobility. These results have led to much research [2-5]. One area focuses on empirical issues with regional data [6-13]. Most studies conclude that intra-national capital mobility is high because the regions are more integrated, whereas nations appear relatively closed [14]1. The correlation coefficients are lower or even negative when compared to OECD countries where frontier effects induce stronger integrated goods markets within countries rather than between them [15], GDP per capital are high, financial systems are intensively developed and openness appears important.

This paper contributes to the FH literature in two ways. First, there are no studies focusing on regional data of Bulgaria, a single small open newcomer EU member, characterized by the lowest average GDP per capita among EU-272. Secondly, the standard FH representation is amended by introducing two new variables: an interactive time trend with the savings rate takes into account the impact of policy measures on savings behavior and intra-national capital mobility, and a regional openness variable is included to estimate the effect of openness on investment rate. This specification is tested with pooled ordinary least squares, fixed effects and random effects models.

The structure of the paper is the following. The second section presents the data and the methodology. Result details the empirical results. Concluding Remarks.

Data and Methodology

Original data was extracted from various Annual Statistical Yearbooks published from the National Statistical Institute of Bulgaria. The availability of this regional data is reduced and spans from 1999 to 2009. Twenty-eight provinces were organized, as a response to the EU enlargement requirement in January 19993. The addition of these districts creates six regions4. Precise direct calculation of regional savings is not possible, because regional consumption data are not available. The assumption is made that regional savings is a constant part of national savings and is proportional to the ratio of regional gross domestic product (GDP) to national GDP. Savings is defined as follows:

Equation      (1)

Where S and Y are savings and GDP, respectively, and i and t describe Bulgarian regions and years, respectively. The GDP at the country level is the sum of the regional GDP. To assess the level of capital mobility within this country, the seminal long-run FH equation is modified. It introduces an interactive time trend and an openness variable and has the following form:

Equation      (2)

Where (Ii,t/Yi,t) denotes the (log) ratio of gross capital formation to GDP of Bulgarian region i at time t, and (Si,t/Yi,t) refers to the (log) ratio of savings to GDP of Bulgarian region i at time t. The time trend is defined by Tr. The variable Op makes reference to (log) regional openness ratio. Greek letter μ stands for an error term (μit ~ (0, σ2)). The regional heterogeneity is captured by the region-specific coefficient αi,t.

The degree of international capital mobility is defined by the value of the savings retention coefficient β1. If estimate of β1 is low, then the link between regional savings and investment rates is not important. Intra-national capital mobility is high, which may imply financial integration. On the opposite, a high level of β1 suggests low regional capital mobility.

An interactive time trend with savings is included [16-19]. It considers, as noted by Kasuga [20] that the financial structure can have an effect on the saving-investment correlation coefficient as a consequence of policy measures undertaken by Bulgarian authorities, and modifications of habit consumption. A negative estimate of β2 indicates that regional capital mobility increases during the period. An likely explanation if β2 is significantly negative is the fact that local credit market is strongly developing and is perceived as a crucial feature for intra-national capital mobility [21,22].

According to Wong [23], openness can influence the savings retention coefficient. The regional openness variable is constructed as the product of the average of trade flows as a percentage of regional GDP and gives information about the effect of trade on the investment ratio. A positive estimate of β3 indicates that any changes in openness exert a similar impact on the regional investment rate and on the domestic economy.

Results

For comparative purposes, Table 1 presents the results of two expressions of equation (2). Columns (1) through (3) refer to the standard FH relation. Interactive time trends with savings rates and openness effects are excluded. Columns (4) through (6) include all effects. Pooled ordinary least squares (POLS), the fixed effect model (FEM) and the random effects model (REM) are employed to check for robustness5.

  (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
  POLS FE RE Pooled FE RE
β0 3.540***
(0.045)
3.223***
(0.151)
3.544***
(0.449)
2.945***
(0.366)
2.990***
(0.125)
3.348***
(0.359)
β1 0.555**
(0.040)
0.268**
(0.120)
0.571**
(0.274)
0.874***
(0.197)
0.146***
(0.067)
0.936***
(0.182)
β2       -0.106***
(0.009)
-0.086***
(0.006)
-0.098***
(0.010)
β3       -0.286**
(0.170)
0.471***
(0.097)
0.033***
(0.174)
R2C 0.734 0.903   0.878 0.941  
F 177.003**     157.561***    
σs     0.439     0.220
ρ     0.326     0.385
F-test for POLS/FE 96.81***     117.69***    
Hausman test     0.001     25.55***

Table 1: Saving-investment specifications.

The POLS regression is estimated on the cross-sectional time-series data for all regions. In column (1), coefficient R2 is 0.73. The savingsinvestment correlation coefficient is significant at the 1 percent level. The point estimate, at 0.555, suggests that regional capital mobility is weak. Any changes in the savings rate have a large positive impact on the investment rate. However, the POLS model is a restricted model, since it tries to capture heterogeneity across individual regions, which is constant over time, estimating only one overall intercept for the whole panel: αi,t=α. It is unlikely that all regions will have identical intercepts, even if this methodology yields consistent and efficient estimates of both the intercept and slope.

In FEM, the heterogeneity across regions is due to parametric shifts of the regression function captured by αi,ti. The advantage of FE over POLS is that the presence of time-invariant, regional-specific effects can be tested. To be able to choose between both models, a Fisher test for a single intercept versus intercepts unique to each region is used. The calculated F statistics, established at 96.81 is significant. The restrictive assumption of homogeneity of the constant from the POLS model is rejected. This model is not adequate to this regional data and could cause misleading interpretations. On the other hand, the REM assumes that the country-specific effect is randomly distributed (ωi,ti,ti,t) and the constant is αi,t=α . Intra-capital mobility is low, because the estimated saving-investment coefficient is 0.571 and significant. The Hausman specification test is implemented to determine whether REM is rejected over the FEM. The results suggest that REM could give more appropriate results.

Results from the extended FH model are presented in columns (4) through (6). The savings investment correlation coefficients of the extended regressions are significant, positive and very high for the POLS as for the RE models Compared to columns (1) and (3), this supports the strong regional saving-investment correlations. However, the regression coefficient from FE estimation is 0.149 and significant. This estimated impact is low compared to columns (4) and (6) and lower than equation (2).

The calculated F statistics is 117.68 and significant. Thus, the FE model gives better estimations than the POLS model. On the other hand, the statistics of the Hausman test is significant. This confirms that the REM is rejected over the FEM. Therefore, both tests support the assumption that an FEM is preferred to the POLS and REM. OLS estimations are used to investigate equation (2) and to discuss column (5) where heterogeneity persists.

The sign of the interactive time trend with the savings rate is negative and significant (estimated impact: -0.086). Structural policy measures adopted by national authorities lead to an increase of intra-national capital mobility over the period, even if the impact on the investment rate is low, compared to the savings rate correlation coefficient. Thus, the important reforms of the financial system over this period leading to an increase in its capacity to collect savings could favor higher intra-national capital mobility. However, while recently implemented economic policy measures appear to promote regional capital mobility, openness has an important positive impact on the regional investment rate. The point estimate is positive and statistically significant: any one percent change in openness induces a change of regional investment rate by 0.47%. Openness increases international competition, which stimulates the investment rate.

Concluding Remarks

This paper uses regional data for Bulgaria to measure savingsretention coefficients. Different models are implemented to extended FH specification. The FEM is the most suitable to the data and gives significant and positive but low savings-retention coefficients. This also finds that intra-national capital mobility has been increasing. Results show that a larger openness supplements domestic investment. Ultimately, further research could test the assumption that the increase in domestic capital stock may affect Bulgaria’s competitiveness through technical progress and enhance the economic region’s catch-up process.

1A recent meta-analysis on the FH literature shows that regional data based studies estimate a systematic lower or even negative effect.

2the average GDP per capita is established at 45 in 2011 (EU-27=100). http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu

3Administrative territorial unit districts were implemented when “Territorial Organization Act of the Republic of Bulgaria” came into force on 5th January, 1999.

4Details of those regions is available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NUTS_of_Bulgaria

5Number of years (T=10) is larger than number of regions (N=6). However, the number of points is too limited to adopt unit root tests and cointegration techniques.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11640
  • [From(publication date):
    September-2014 - Sep 21, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7867
  • PDF downloads :3773
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords