alexa
Reach Us +447482877761
Removal of Imidacloprid Pesticide by Electrocoagulation Process using Iron and aluminum Electrodes | OMICS International
ISSN: 2380-2391
Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Removal of Imidacloprid Pesticide by Electrocoagulation Process using Iron and aluminum Electrodes

Nasser Ghalwa MA* and Nader Farhat B

Chemistry Department, Al-Azhar University, Gaza, Palestine

*Corresponding Author:
Nasser Abu Ghalwa
Chemistry Department
Al-Azhar University
Gaza, Palestine
Tel: 091-846547
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: August 01, 2015; Accepted date: August 13, 2015; Published date: August 20, 2015

Citation: Nasser Ghalwa MA, Nader Farhat B (2015) Removal of Imidacloprid Pesticide by Electrocoagulation Process using Iron and aluminum Electrodes. J Environ Anal Chem 2:154. doi: 10.4172/2380-2391.1000154

Copyright: © 2015 Nasser Ghalwa MA, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

The main purpose of this work the removal efficiency of the pesticide imidacloprid and chemical oxygen demand (COD) from aqueous solution using the electrocoagulation process. The effect of several parameters such as initial pH, initial imidacloprid concentration, current density, type of electrolyte, salt concentration, and temperature on the pesticide and COD removal efficiency was investigated on EC performance. The obtained results showed that imidacloprid and COD removal were 95% and 89.5% by using Fe electrodes at 60 min and were 80.8% and 73.1% by using Al electrodes at 90 min. Pesticide removal kinetic followed pseudo second and first order kinetics using Fe and Al electrodes respectively. It can be concluded that electrocoagulation process by Fe electrode is very efficient and clean process for imidacloprid removal and COD from wastewater.

Keywords

Electrocoagulation; Aluminum; Iron; Electrode; Imidacloprid; Pesticide; Water treatment

Introduction

The wide use of pesticides gives rise to serious ecological problems due to their negative environmental effects. The water contamination by pesticides is an important problem that the scientists are dealing with over the year [1,2]. Imidacloprid [1-(6-chloro-3-pyridylmethyl)-N-nitroimidazolidin- 2-ylideneamine] is a widely used insecticide introduced for agricultural use in the 1990s, and it is mainly used at the present to control sucking insects in crops (e.g., aphids, thrips, whiteflies and termites) [3,4]. Imidacloprid belongs to the nicotinoid chemical family. Because of their molecular shape, size, and charge, nicotinoid fit into receptor molecules in the nervous system that normally receive the molecule acetylcholine; Imidacloprid is toxic to some species of aquatic animals at extremely low concentrations [3], And classified by the EPA as a class II/III agent [5]. Imidacloprid is moderately toxic if ingested. Oral LD50 values in rats were estimated to be 450 mg/kg for both sexes in one study and 500 and 380 mg/kg in males and females, respectively in another study. In mice, LD50 values were estimated at 130 mg/kg for males and 170 mg/ kg for females. Imidacloprid is very low in toxicity via dermal exposure. The dermal LD50 in rats was estimated at greater than 5000 mg/kg [6]. There are several methods to remove the imidacloprid from water, such as treatment by photolysis [7], photo-Fenton [8], ozonation [9], electrocatalytic oxidation [10] and electrofenton oxidation [11]. Most practical methods are the application of electrocoagulation (EC) which is an electrochemical wastewater treatment technology. The EC process has many advantages like simple equipment requirement, easy operation, no chemical use requirement, rapid sedimentation, sludge stability, low sludge production, and environmental compatibility. It has successfully been employed for the treatment of different wastewaters such as from hospitals [12], baker’s yeast [13], laundries [14], biodiesel [15,16], and slaughter houses [17], wastewaters including surfactants [18], fluoride [19] and heavy metal-containing solutions [20,21]. Different technological processes such as adsorption [22], biodegradation [23,24], nanofiltration [25], electrocoagulation, electrochemical reduction and oxidation, indirect electro-oxidation with strong oxidants, and photocatalytic degradation [26,27], for the removal of pesticides have been reported recently. EC is an electrochemical has attracted increasing interest as a promising powerful method for efficiently removing pesticides from water such as Malathion [28], methyl parathion, atrazine and triazophos [29], Malathion, imidacloprid and chlorpyrifos [30], and abamectin [31]. This study involves the investigated removal efficiency and COD of imidacloprid using iron and aluminum electrodes in aqueous solution by electrocoagulation method.

Experiment

Chemicals

The pesticide used in the present work was imidacloprid, Pesticide Solutions, imidacloprid solutions were prepared from the commercially available pesticide, in distilled water, imidacloprid also known as (konfidor®) 350 SC , at a concentration of 350 g L−1. This concentration is the same as that used by farmers during strawberry cultivation. The properties of the imidacloprid are given in Table 1.

 pesticide  Imidacloprid
Chemical structure    equation
Chemical formula C9H10ClN5O2
Molecular weight (g/mol) M ( 255.7 )   g .mol-1 )
λmax 270 nm

Table 1: Properties of Imidacloprid.

Sodium chloride, potassium chloride, Sodium sulfate, Sodium carbonate, sodium hydroxide, sulfuric acid, potassium dichromate, was of analytical grade and purchased from Merck. Distilled water was used for the preparation of solutions. Standard solutions of potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7), sulfuric acid (H2SO4) reagent with silver sulfate (Ag2SO4), Mercury sulfate (HgSO4) and were prepared to measure the COD. A stock solution of pesticide (500 mg/L) was prepared by dissolving an accurate quantity of the pesticide in distilled water and suitably diluted to the required initial concentrations. Different standard solutions of pesticide with concentration from 30-150 mg L-1 were prepared to measure its removal at different conditions. The pH of the working solution was adjusted to the desired values with 0.1N HCl or 0.1N NaOH.

Equipments and procedures

The electrocoagulation unit consisted of a 100 ml electrochemical reactor with iron and aluminum electrodes with an effective surface area of 5.4 cm2. The electrodes were 17 mm×10 mm and inter electrodes distance was 1 cm. The electrodes were positioned vertically and parallel to each other. The current density was maintained constant by means of a precision DC power supply; model (DZ040019) EZ Digital CO. Ltd. (Korea). The pesticide concentration was determined using a double - beam Uv-Vis spectrophotometer, model UV 1601 is from Shimadzu (Japan) at 270 nm. Hot Plate, model (HB502), BIBBY STERILIN LTD. (U.K.). A pH meter model AC28, TOA electronics Ltd., (Japan). Water bath model SB-650, Tokyo Kikakkai CO. Ltd., (Japan). A closed reflux colorimetric unit was used for the COD determination. Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), HANNA instruments, Thermo reactor, model C9800 Reactor in Hungary - Europe.

Analysis

Two main parameters were measured to evaluate the electrochemical treatment efficiency, the remaining pollutant concentration and the COD. Remaining pollutants (imidacloprid) concentration was measured with the double-beam UV-visible spectrophotometer at λmax=270 nm using calibration curve with standard error ±0.5%. The COD was determined using a closed reflux colorimetric method. The equation used to calculate the pesticide removal efficiency in the treatment experiments was:

image (1)

Where A0 and A are absorbance values of pesticide solutions before and after treatment with respect to their λmax [32].

The calculation of COD removal efficiencies after electrocoagulation treatment was performed using the following formula [33].

image (2)

Where C0 and C are concentrations of wastewater before and after electrocoagulation.

Result and discussion

Mechanism of electrocoagulation process

The mechanism of the electrochemical process in aqueous systems is well known. There are three possible mechanisms involved in the process, i.e. electrocoagulation, electroflotation and electro-oxidation. In EC, with electrical current flowing between two electrodes, the coagulant is generated in situ by electrolytic oxidation of the anode material. By using an iron and aluminum anode the Fe (OH)n and Al(OH)n formation with n = 2 or 3 is released at the anode [32-34].

EC using iron electrodes

Mechanism 1:

At anode:

image (3)

image (4)

At cathode:

image (5)

Overall:

image (6)

Mechanism 2:

At anode:

image (7)

image (8)

At cathode:

image (9)

Overall:

image (10)

EC using aluminum electrodes

The electrochemical reaction with Al anode can be summarized as follows:

At anode:

image (11)

image (12)

At cathode:

image (13)

Overall:

image (14)

The generation of metal hydroxides [Fe (OH)n and Al(OH)n] are followed by an increase in the concentration of colloids (usually negatively charged) in the region close to the anode [35]. The produced ferrous ions hydrolyze to form monomeric hydroxide ions and polymeric hydroxide complexes that depend on the pH of the solution. The polymeric hydroxides, which are highly charged cations, destabilize the negatively charged colloidal particles allowing the formation of flocks. When the amount of iron in the solution exceeds the solubility of the metal hydroxide, the amorphous metal hydroxide precipitates is formed, which causes sweep flock coagulation [36].

Effect of electrolyte concentration

To evaluate the effect of the salt concentration on imidacloprid removal efficiency and COD, different electrolyte solutions were prepared by the addition of different amounts of NaCl varied from (0.5 - 3 g/L) at a current density of 18.5 mA/cm2, initial concentration 50 mg L-1, inter electrode distance of 1 cm, pH of 6.9 and temperature of 20 °C. NaCl was used as a supporting electrolyte to increase the solution conductivity. Figure 1 and Table 2 shows that the pesticide removal efficiency increased from 76.5 to 95% using (Fe) and 67 to 80% using (Al) electrodes, and COD from 65 to 89.5% using (Fe) and 51 to 73% electrodes. As the NaCl concentration increased from 0.5 to 1 g/L. We can see from Figure 1 that increases in the amount of NaCl results in increasing removal efficiency. Therefore, we thought that the EC in the presence of NaCl could improve the imidacloprid removal efficiency by increasing the availability of metal coagulants in the solution and by leading to a reduction of the oxide layer and an enhancement of the anodic dissolution of the electrode material [37].

Fe (a)
Current density (mA/cm2) 9 18.5 37 55 -
COD (%) 65.5 89.5 50.7 50.2 -
pH 2.5 5.2 6.9 8 10
COD (%) 85 83 89.5 84.2 84
Electrolyte KCl Na2CO3 NaCl Na2SO4 -
COD (%) 31.3 26.8 89.5 47.7 -
[NaCl] (g/L) 0.5    1   2    3 -
COD (%) 65 89.5 76 72.2 -
[PESTICIDE] (mg/L) 30 50 100 150 -
COD (%) 86.5 89.5 59.7 38.8 -
Temperature
( o C)
10 20 30 40 -
COD (%) 71.6 89.5 83.5 82 -
Al (b)
Current density (mA/cm2) 9 18.5 37 55  
COD (%) 61.1 73.1 65.6 55.2  
pH 8 5.2 6.9 2.4 10
COD (%) 67.1 61.1 73.1 32.8 65.6
Electrolyte Na2SO4 Na2CO3 NaCl KCl -
COD (%) 63.1 45 73.1 60.1 -
[NaCl] (g/L)    3   1 2 0.5 -
COD (%) 52.1 73.1 54.3 50 -
[PESTICIDE] (mg/L) 150 50 100 30 -
COD (%) 56 73.1 65.6 76.1 -
Temperature
(° C)
40 20 30 10 -
COD (%) 70.1 73.1 71.6 64.1 -

Table 2: Effect of current density, pH, type of electrolyte, concentration electrolyte, pesticide concentration, and temperature on the efficiency of COD removal for imidacloprid using Fe (a) and Al (b) electrodes. Initial concentration of the pesticide = 50 mg/L, volume of the solution = 100 ml, [NaCl] concentration = 1 g/L,a current density of 18.5 mA/cm2, pH = 6.9, inter electrode distance = 1 cm, dimension of the electrodes = 17 mm × 10 mm and temperature = 20°C.

environmental-analytical-chemistry-electrolyte-concentration

Figure 1: Effect of electrolyte concentration on the efficiency of imidacloprid removal using Fe (a) and Al (b) electrodes. Initial concentration of the pesticide = 50 mg/L, volume of the solution = 100 ml, current density of 18.5 mA /cm2, pH=6.9, inter electrode distance = 1 cm, dimension of the electrodes = 17 mm × 10 mm and temperature = 20?C

Effect of current density

Current density is very important parameter that affects the electrocoagulation process because it directly determines both coagulant dosage and bubble generation rates and strongly influences both solution mixing and mass transfer at the electrodes. So current density is the key operational parameter that affecting the system’s response time and also influencing the dominant pollutant separation mode [38].

To examine the effect of current density on removal efficiency of imidacloprid and COD, a series of experiments were carried out with the current density being varied from 9-55 mA/cm². At initial concentration of 50 mg L-1, inter electrode distance of 1 cm, pH of 6.9, NaCl concentration of 1 g L-1 and temperature of 20°C. Figure 2 and Table 2 show the effect of current density for the removal of pesticide and COD from aqueous solutions. The removal efficiency of imidacloprid and COD increased up to 95% and 89.5% using Fe electrodes at 60 min and 80% and 73% using Al electrodes at 90 min. At high current densities, the generation of Fe and Al ions increases due to the increase of anodic dissolution, resulting in a greater pesticide removal rates, indicating that the adsorption depends up on the availability of binding sites for imidacloprid.

environmental-analytical-chemistry-current-density

Figure 2: Effect of current density on the efficiency of imidacloprid removal using Fe (a) and Al (b) electrodes. Initial concentration of the pesticide = 50 mg/L, volume of the solution = 100 ml, NaCl concentration = 1 g/L, pH = 6.9, inter electrode distance = 1 cm, dimension of the electrodes = 17 mm × 10 mm and temperature = 20?C.

Effect of temperature

The electrochemical reaction rate like any other chemical reactions rate increases when temperature of solution increases. In the present work, effect of temperature from 10 to 40°C has been studied for the imidacloprid removal efficiency and COD at a current density of 18.5 mA/cm2, initial concentration of 50 mg L-1, inter electrode distance of 1 cm, pH of 6.9 and NaCl concentration of 1 g L-1. Figure 3 and Table 2 indicate that increasing temperature has a negative effect on removal efficiency of pesticide and COD, where at 20°C the pesticide removal and COD% reached to maximum. While at higher temperature value (30 and 40°C) the pesticide removal and COD% dropped to low values. In this case, the volume of colloid M (OH) will decrease and pore production on the metal anode well be closed [38].

environmental-analytical-chemistry-temperature

Figure 3: Effect of temperature on the efficiency of imidacloprid removal using Fe (a) and Al (b) electrodes. Initial concentration of the pesticide = 50 mg/L, volume of the solution = 100 ml, current density of 18.5 mA /cm2, pH=6.9, NaCl concentration = 1 g/L, dimension of the electrodes = 17 mm × 10 mm and inter electrode distance = 1 cm.

Effect of initial pH

It has been established that the influent pH is an important operating factor influencing the performance of electrochemical process [39]. These experiments were carried out to evaluate the effect of pH, using solutions containing a sample with an initial pH varying in the range (2.4 -10) at initial concentration of 50 mg L-1, inter electrode distance of 1 cm, a current density of 18.5 mA /cm2, NaCl concentration of 1 g L-1 and temperature of 20°C. Figure 4 and Table 3 shows the pesticide removal efficiency and COD after 60 min using (Fe) and 90 min using (Al) electrodes as a function of pH. In (Fe) electrode Figure 4 (a) the removal efficiency of the pesticide and COD is higher in neutral medium (PH6.9), meanwhile, in acidic and alkaline are less. In Al electrodes Figure 4(b) the removal efficiency of the pesticide and COD is low in acidic medium (PH 2.4 and 5.2), meanwhile higher efficiencies were recorded in 6.9-10 pH range which is close to the optimal pH for AI(OH)3 solid formation. The flocks of Al (OH)3(s) have large surface areas, which are useful for a rapid adsorption of soluble organic compounds and trapping of colloidal particles [40].

Pesticide Type of degradation Reference Removal        % Time
Imidacloprid Photolysis P. N. Moza et al. [7] 90% 4 hours
  photo-Fenton C. Segura et al. [8] 50% 1 min
  Electrocatalytic oxidation P. Garrett. [10] 78% 53.2 min
  Electro-Fenton O. Iglesias et al. [11] 100% 120 min
  Electrocoagulation This study using (Fe electrode) 95% 60 min
  Electrocoagulation This study using (Al electrode) 80.8% 90 min

Table 3: Comparison between the Electrocoagulation method for removal of imidacloprid with other methods.

environmental-analytical-chemistry-imidacloprid-removal

Figure 4: Effect of pH on the efficiency of imidacloprid removal using Fe (a) and Al (b) electrodes. Initial concentration of the pesticide = 50 mg/L, volume of the solution = 100 ml, NaCl concentration = 1 g/L, current density of 18.5 mA /cm2, inter electrode distance = 1 cm, dimension of the electrodes = 17 mm × 10 mm and temperature = 20?C.

Effect of initial concentration of pesticide

The effect of initial pesticide concentration on the pesticide removal was examined with solutions including pesticide of 30, 50, 100 and 150 mg/L at a current density of 18.5 mA /cm2, pH of 6.9, inter electrode distance of 1 cm, NaCl concentration of 1 g L-1 and temperature 20°C. According to the Figure 5 and Table 2, it may be seen that increasing initial pesticide concentration results in decreasing removal efficiency. In fact, when the initial concentration varied from 50 to 150 mg/L, the removal percentage was 95% and 79% using (Fe) and 80% and 66% using (Al). Adsorption on iron and aluminium hydroxide is the main pesticide molecule removal pathway. So, for a constant current intensity, there is obviously the same amount of electrogenerated iron and aluminium cations and hence the same amount of coagulating species. It is more likely that with increasing the initial pesticide concentration, less adsorption sites are available to capture organic pesticide molecules in excess [41,42].

environmental-analytical-chemistry-imidacloprid-removal

Figure 5: Effect of initial concentration on the efficiency of imidacloprid removal using Fe (a) and Al (b) electrodes. NaCl concentration = 1 g/L, volume of the solution = 100 ml, current density of 18.5 mA /cm2 , pH= 6.9, inter electrode distance = 1 cm, dimension of the electrodes = 17 mm × 10 mm and temperature = 20?C.

Effect of type of electrolyte

Figure 6 and Table 2 explain the effect of electrolyte type on the removal efficiency of imidacloprid and COD at 60 min using Fe and 90 min using Al electrodes in the presence of different supporting electrolytes including NaCl, KCl, Na2SO4 and Na2CO3, was studied at initial concentration of 50 mg L-1, a current density of 18.5 mA /cm2, inter electrode distance of 1 cm, a temperature of 20°C and pH of 6.9. According to Figure 6 and Table 2, pesticide removal at NaCl, is better than KCl, Na2CO3 and Na2SO4. Higher elimination of pesticide and COD in the presence of NaCl (95%) and (89.5%) using Fe electrodes and (80%) and (73%) using Al electrodes respectively, may be due to higher ionization of this compound. Due to formation of hypochlorite (OCl-) and hypochlorous acid (HOCl). It is well known that Cl− anions can destroy the formed passivation layer on electrode and therefore enhance anodic dissolution rate of metal which lead to produce more metal hydroxide [43,44].

environmental-analytical-chemistry-imidacloprid-removal

Figure 6: Effect of type of electrolyte on the efficiency of imidacloprid removal using Fe (a) and Al (b) electrodes. Initial concentration of the pesticide = 50 mg/L, volume of the solution = 100 ml, current density of 18.5 mA /cm2, pH=6.9, inter electrode distance = 1 cm, dimension of the electrodes = 17 mm × 10 mm and temperature = 20?C.

Kinetic studies

Kinetics studies have important role in determining the rate constant and the order of reaction of this treatment removal [45]. So, rate constant is very significant in the design of wastewater treatment units. It is very essential to know the type of reaction rates for design a wastewater treatment unit. Rate of reaction describes the rates of change in concentration of reactant per unit time. Figures 7 (a) and 7(b) represent the removal of imidacloprid exhibited pseudo second order with good correlation coefficients (>0.98) using Fe electrodes according to following equation:

environmental-analytical-chemistry-Initial-concentration

Figure 7: Relation between 1/At and Ln At against the time for imidacloprid removal using Fe (a) and Al (b) electrodes. Initial concentration of the pesticide = 50 mg/L, volume of the solution = 100 ml, current density of 18.5 mA /cm2, pH=6.9, NaCl concentration = 1 g/L, inter electrode distance = 1 cm, dimension of the electrodes 17 mm × 10 mm and temperature = 20?C.

image (15)

and exhibited pseudo first order with good correlation coefficients (>0.97) for Al electrodes according to following equation:

image (16)

Where A0, At, t, and k are the pesticide absorbance at initial concentration, pesticide absorbance at each time, time of reaction (min), and reaction rate constant, respectively. Figures 7 (a) and 7(b) explain the plot of pseudo second order and pseudo first order equations for the pesticide removal using Fe and Al electrodes respectively. The straight lines in plot show a good agreement of experimental data with the kinetic models for different removal rates. The calculated k values from the plot (straight line) of Figures 7(a) and 7(b) were 0.0212 mol-1dm3 min-1 and 0.0079 min-1 using Fe and Al electrodes respectively.

Conclusion

The removal efficiency of imidacloprid from aqueous solution was examined by electrocoagulation using iron (Fe) and aluminum (Al) electrodes. The effects of initial pH, initial abamectin concentration, current density, type electrolyte, salt concentration, and temperature were investigated on removal efficiency and COD. It was observed that these variables significantly affected the imidacloprid pesticide removal efficiency. The optimum imidacloprid pesticide removal was obtained with typical operating conditions: an initial pH of 6.9, an initial pesticide concentration of 50 mg/L, current density 18.5 mA/ cm2, salt concentration of 1 g/L and temperature of 20°C, the results showed that imidacloprid and COD removal were 95% and 89.5% by using Fe and were 80.8% and 73.1%, by using Al electrodes. The removal of pesticide was exhibited pseudo second order with rate constant 0.0212 mol-1dm3min-1 for Fe electrode and pseudo first order with rate constant 0.0079 min-1 using Al electrodes.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Article Usage

  • Total views: 13743
  • [From(publication date):
    August-2015 - Nov 12, 2019]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 9828
  • PDF downloads : 3915
Top