Reach Us +441414719275
Residual Feed Intake towards Efficient Animal Production: A Paradigm Shift | OMICS International
ISSN: 2157-7579
Journal of Veterinary Science & Technology

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Residual Feed Intake towards Efficient Animal Production: A Paradigm Shift

M.S. Mahesh*

Dairy Cattle Nutrition Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute (Deemed University) Karnal, Haryana, India

*Corresponding Author:
M.S. Mahesh
Dairy Cattle Nutrition Division
ICARNational Dairy Research Institute
(Deemed University) Karnal, Haryana, India
Tel: +919541853329
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: December 25, 2014; Accepted date: December 29, 2014; Published date: December 30, 2014

Citation: Mahesh MS (2015) Residual Feed Intake towards Efficient Animal Production: A Paradigm Shift? J Veterinar Sci Technol 6:e113. doi:10.4172/2157-7579.1000e113

Copyright: © 2015 Mahesh MS. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Veterinary Science & Technology


Modern methods of selection have contributed greatly to the genetically superior high yielding animals of current animal production systems [1]. While this being the case of the developed world, animal production in the tropics is constrained by the everlasting deficit in feed supply [2]. Therefore, a method based on lower feed intake without affecting mature weight and production will have a greater implication in agri-food industry. This was initially conceptualized in 1963 by Koch et al. [3], who introduced Residual Feed Intake (RFI), and defined it as the difference between actual intake and the expected requirements of feed for maintenance and body weight gain, in beef cattle. Assumption behind using RFI as a selection tool is that the biological processes regulating feed consumption and efficiency are similar in younger and older animals (as there exist high genetic correlation between postweaning intake and maturity) [4]. RFI is a moderately heritable trait in cattle (h2=0.25-0.48) which is independent of body size and production [5]. One approach for measuring RFI is by recording individual animal data on intake and growth for a minimum period of 35 days [5], while the second is by pre-screening for blood metabolites such as insulin like growth factor-1 followed by selection through RFI for increasing growth rate, feed efficiency and proportion of lean meat [4]. Expected dietary intake is estimated by means of a multiple regression equation of consumption, as determined by the metabolic live weight and weight gain [4,6].

Animals differing in RFI (i.e., low vs. high) differ in their efficiency for utilizing nutrients for maintenance and production, and those with low or negative RFI are most efficient [6]. Physiological basis for such varied efficiency has been ascribed to a range of factors including intake, digestion and metabolism of feed, physical activity, thermoregulation, synthesis and breakdown of proteins, genes encoding different biochemical processes, gene expression of gut microorganisms and hypothalamus, reticulo-rumen functions and mitochondrial respiration rate etc. [7-9]. Furthermore, RFI did not adversely influence blood metabolites in beef cattle [10] and Sahiwal calves [6], while maintaining optimum growth rate. Though majority of RFI studies have focused on beef cattle, it is plausible that the efficient dairy cows be identified based on RFI [11]. Expected intake of cows can be determined by regressing intake on metabolic body weight, change in body weight and energy corrected milk yield. Efficient cows in RFI test exhibited decreased feed/energy intake, slower rate of consumption and its flow rate leading to an improved nutrient digestibility [11] with the simultaneous reduction in manure nutrient losses [5].

One of the potential environmental benefits demonstrated in low RFI cattle is the decreased methane (CH4) emission, which was noted in temperate [12] as well as tropical regions [6]. Factors like lower maintenance requirement and thus lower dry matter intake, reduced ruminal retention of feed, higher ruminal fermentation rate [5] and a changes in methanogen genotype abundance [13], altogether favorably decreasing methanogenesis. As CH4 production is positively correlated with RFI and has low to moderate heritability and repeatability, it is possible to select and breed cattle for low CH4 emission for environment friendly livestock production [5].

As livestock are largely considered to be unsustainable [14], considering RFI in selection process, may offer scope for sustainability, as efficient animals will have economic growth and milk production with minimum CH4 emission. Furthermore, it is advised to improve animal productivity rather than maintaining large unproductive herds [2]. In this direction, as RFI selects animals for higher efficiency, it’s possible to maintain a low number of efficient stocks in the herd requiring low inputs, whilst minimizing carbon foot print of cattle enterprises.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12283
  • [From(publication date):
    January-2015 - Jan 23, 2019]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8436
  • PDF downloads : 3847

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2019-20
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri and Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

ankara escort

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

pendik escort

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2019 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version