alexa Resin Tags Have No Contribution On Push-Out Bond Strength Of Self-Adhesive Resin Cement | OMICS International
ISSN: 2161-1122
Dentistry
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Resin Tags Have No Contribution On Push-Out Bond Strength Of Self-Adhesive Resin Cement

Crivano E1, Reis KR2*, Reis C3 and De-Deus G4

1Department of Prosthodontics, Veiga de Almeida University, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

2Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, School of Dentistry, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

3Department of Dental Clinic, Espírito Santo Federal University, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil

4School of Dentistry, Grande Rio University (UNIGRANRIO), Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

*Corresponding Author:
Kátia Rodrigues Reis
Rua Prof. Rodolpho Paulo Rocco 325/2º andar
Ilha da Cidade Universitária
Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil 21941-590
Tel: +55 21 2562-2024
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date : February 10, 2014; Accepted date : February 19, 2014; Published date : February 21, 2014

Citation: Crivano E, Reis KR, Reis C, De-Deus G (2014) Resin Tags have no Contribution on Push-out Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Resin Cement. Dentistry 4:216. doi:10.4172/2161-1122.1000216

Copyright: © 2014 Crivano E, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



Visit for more related articles at Dentistry

Abstract

Aim: To assess the contribution of resin tags in the interfacial bond strength of self-adhesive cement used to lute fiber posts into root canals.
Methodology: Twenty extracted human canine teeth were selected and root filled. Roots were randomly assigned into two groups (n=10) according to pre-treatment of root dentin: non-etched (G1) or etched using 37% phosphoric acid (G2). Glass fiber posts (White Post) were luted into the root canals using the self-adhesive cement RelyXTM UniChem. Before insertion of the post, the cement was labeled with Rhodamine B isothiocyanate. Roots were sectioned transversally into slices of 1.5 mm thickness to perform the tests at the coronal, middle and apical regions of the root canal. Each slice was analyzed using confocal laser scanning microscopy to determine the presence or absence of resin tags, and then, subjected to a push-out test. Bond strengths data (MPa) were analyzed by Student t-test (α=0.05).
Results: The qualitative analysis of the post-dentin interface revealed that was not possible to observe the formation of resin tags into the root dentin in G1, whereas all slices belonging to G2 exhibited the presence of resin tags. For the push-out test, there were no significant differences between G1 (10.5 ± 3.53) and G2 (10.61 ± 3.84) groups (p<0.05) in all root canal regions.
Conclusions: Resin tags, as a result of root dentin etching, did not affect the push-out bond strength of fiber posts to root canals when using the self-adhesive cement RelyXTM Uni Cem.

Keywords

Confocal laser scanning microscopy; Root dentin; Resin cement; Smear layer

Introduction

The achievement of an effective adhesion to the dentin tissue is a real challenge task mainly due to its specific microstructural features and inherent moisture [1,2]. Moreover, the scenario became still more challenger within the spatial geometry of the root canal. In a noteworthy review, Schwartz highlighted the critical conditions for an optimal intra-radicular bonding [3]. Concerning these challenges and limits, alternative bonding strategies, as well as the development of new adhesive cement generations have been frequently introduced with the purpose of producing a reliable bonding to the root dentin tissue.

Some years ago, a new class of resin cement was developed and introduced to the dental market and it was so-called as self-adhesive universal resin cement (Rely X UniCem, 3M ESPE Dental Products, St. Paul, MN, USA). Rely X UniCem combines adhesive and cement in one single application. The manufacturer states that the cement is a paste/paste, fluoride-releasing and radiopaque dual-cured resin cement that is formulated for luting crowns, bridges, inlays, onlays and posts. In addition, the fact that it is thought to bond to dentin without the requirement of any kind of dentin conditioning or pre-treatment is a point that must be considered [4,5]. In this way, the interesting features related to the self-adhesive resin cement support the large body of scientific investigation around this material over the last years.

Traditional adhesive systems have dentin-hybridization process as the base to achieve an effective adhesion. On the other hand, selfadhesive universal resin cement relies on the properties of phosphoric acid methacrilate acid-esther monomers [6,7] to produce adhesion by a direct chemical reaction between dentin hydroxyapatite and fluoroaluminosillicate glass fillers-a property that had already been proved in glass-ionomer cements [8,9]. According to De Munck et al. [6], RelyX™ UniCem reacts to dentin surface, but a real hybrid layer and resin tags are not produced. As a point of fact, dentin hybridization is a collagen-depended approach where the presence of resin tags inside the dentine tubules occurs as a natural consequence of the interplay between chemical nature of the adhesive and smear layer removal. Pashley et al. [10], using a theoretical modeling study, concluded that the dentin bond strength, created by etch-and-rinse adhesives, is a sum of the strengths of resin tags, hybrid layer and surface adhesion. Nevertheless, the contribution of the resin tags to the bond strength is controversial and this subject has been the target of previous studies [11,12]. To our knowledge, there is no peer-reviewed study on the influence of resin tags on the bond strength of the RelyX™ UniCem self-adhesive resin cement. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to assess the potential correlation between the presence of resin tags and the intracanal final bond strength created by RelyX™ UniCem selfadhesive resin cement on fiber post cementation. Based on the main purpose of the study, two null-hypotheses were formulated and tested:

(1) The resin tags are observed in etched and non-etched root dentin;

(2) There is no significant difference in the bond strength achieved in etched or non-etched root dentin.

Methods

Sample size calculation

The ideal sample size for the study was determined using a correlation bivariate normal model (Exact family, G* Power 3.1 for Macintosh). The following values were used: r2=0.5, α=0.05, β=0.85 and correlation P for H0=0. The results indicated a minimum sample size of 8 teeth and a critical r of 0.375 as the upper limit for accepting H0.

Sample selection and specimen preparation

This study was revised and approved by the Ethics Committee, Nucleus of Collective Health Studies, Veiga de Almeida University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. A sample of 20 extracted human maxillary canines, being 20 ± 1 mm in length with straight roots and complete apices, was selected after patient’s informed consent.

Endodontic procedures

Standard access cavities were made and the working length established by placing a size 15 K-file (Dentsply/Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) through the apical foramen into the canal until visible at the apical foramen and subtracting 1 mm. The coronal and middle third of each canal was prepared using Gates Glidden drills (Dentsply/ Maillefer) sizes 6, 5, 4, 3, and 2 at 1 mm increments creating a 0.02 mm·mm-1 taper [13]. The apical third was prepared with FLEXOFILES® (Dentsply, Maillefer) sizes 60, 55, 50, and 45 in a balanced force technique [14].

The canals were irrigated between each file with 0.5 mL of freshly prepared 5.25% NaOCl using a disposable syringe and 27-gauge needle. In order to remove the smear layer, 3 mL of 17% EDTA was used for 3 minutes as a final rinse. The canals were dried with paper points (Dentsply-Maillefer).

The prepared teeth were filled by the same operator using the single cone technique and Grossman sealer. A size 40 file was used to pick up a measured amount of sealer (20 μL) which was determined by the employment of fixed-volume semi-automatic micropipette. The sealer was placed into the canal while rotating the tooth counterclockwise. A size 550.02 taper gutta-percha cone (Diadent, Chongchong Buk Do, Korea) was placed in the canal up to the full working length. The filled roots were stored for 7 days in physiological saline solution at 37°C.

Post preparation procedures

The coronal-middle gutta-percha fillings were removed of all teeth with a size 2 Gates Glidden drill until a depth of 14 mm. The WHITE POST SYSTEM (FGM Produtos Odontológicos Ltd., Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil) was elected for the present study and the post #3 size was selected. In this way, the root canal space was enlarged with a number 3 low-speed, pre-shaping drill (White Post, FGM Produtos Odontológicos) leaving a 6 mm long apical seal. The depth of the post space preparation was 14 mm. A final rinse with 10 ml saline solution was used to remove debris.

Prior to posts cementation, the teeth were randomly assigned into two groups, using a computer algorithm (http://www.random.org). In G1, no acid etching was performed in root canal (non-etched, control group). In G2, the post space was etched with 35% phosphoric acid gel (VOCO – Cuxhaven, Germany) for 15 s and rinsed thoroughly (etched group).

Post cementation procedures

The root canal post spaces were dried lightly with paper points. Each post was cleaned with ethanol and air-dried. One dose of RELYX™ UNICEM was dispensed on a glass plate, mixed and labeled with 0.1% Rhodamine B isothiocyanate to enable the fluorescence mode under confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) [15-17]. A lentulo bur (Maillefer) was used with a conventional engine of low rotation of 500 rpm to pick up a measured amount of sealer (30 μL) into the post space. WHITE POST number #3 (FGM Produtos Odontológicos) was inserted through the root canal until achieving the total post space length. The resin cement was allowed to set by light-curing through the post for 40 seconds with the tip of the LED positioned at the top of the fiber post. The output intensity (1000 mW/cm2) was constantly measured during the experiment with the aid of a Demetron light radiometer (DENTSPLY, De Trey, Konstanz). After post cementation, specimens were stored in a humidity atmosphere at 37oC for 48h.

Confocal laser scanning microscopy

After that, each specimen was transversally sectioned at 6, 8, 10 and 12 mm from the apex using a low-speed saw (Isomet, Buhler, Ltd. Lake Bluff, NY, USA) with a diamond disc (diam. 125 mm×0,35 mm×12,7 mm – model 33°C), with continuous water irrigation to prevent overheating. In this manner, 3 slices of 1.4 ± 0.2 mm per root were created, resulting in 36 slices/group. The thickness of each slice was confirmed with a digital caliper to an accuracy of 0.001 mm (Avenger Products, North Plains, OR) [18].

A metallographic preparation was performed only on the coronallyfacing surface of each slice [19]. Then, these surfaces were examined under CLSM (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and images were recorded using the fluorescent mode (laser wavelengths of 568 nm) with the maximum resolution of about 220 nm laterally and 330 nm axially. In this way, nondestructive images were obtained from subsurface regions down to about 20.5 μm. One photomicrography of the full root dentine perimeter was taken for each slice to provide the analyses of intracanal resin tags.

Micro push-out assessment

The sectioned roots were then stored in a humidity atmosphere at 37°C for 24h for rehydration and the micro push-out test was made. The fine-tune parallelism was ensured by a laser beam device, and the root filling of each sample was loaded with a 0.5-mm-diameter cylindrical plunger. The plunger tip was sized and positioned to touch only the root filling. The load was always applied in an apical-coronal direction to avoid any constriction interference as a result of root canal taper during push-out testing. Loading was performed on a universal testing machine (EMIC DL200MF, São José dos Pinhais, PR, Brazil) at a speed of 0.5 mm/min until debonding occurred. A load x time curve was plotted during the test by using a real-time software [18]. The area of the bonded interface was calculated using the formula, A=2πr×h, considering r=0.75 mm (root canal space radius) and h=slice thickness (high). To express the bond strength in Megapascals, the load at failure, recorded in Newtons, was divided by the area of the bonded interface [20].

Data presentation and statistical analysis

An operator, blinded, to which samples were matched to each group, analyzed the resin tags on a dichotomy mode: present or absent. The analyses were repeated twice to ensure reproducibility.

A Student t-test for intragroup comparisons assigned the “group/root canal portion” interaction of bond strength data. Then, the analysis of the raw pooled data revealed a bell-shaped distribution (D’Agostino & Person omnibus normality test). Further, statistical analysis was performed by using parametric tests to compare the two groups. Due to the same response to the mechanical test, Student t-test was also used for statistics. The alpha-type error was set at 0.05. Prisma 5.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) and Origin 6.0 (Microcal Software, Inc, Northampton, MA) were used as analytical tools.

Results

Interfacial analysis

In general, CLSM analysis of the post-dentin interface revealed a quite regular pattern of resin tags distribution between the two tested groups. In G1 resin tags free interfaces were always found in the samples of non-etched control group (Figures 1 and 2).

dentistry-push-out-bond-strength

Figure 1: Box-plots of the push-out bond strength (MPa). Similar letters indicate no significant statistical differences between groups; P < .05.

dentistry-subsurface-confocal-image

Figure 2: A representative subsurface confocal image of a resin tag-free region of a specimen from G1 group displaying the absence of tubular penetration of the cement into the root dentin.

On the other hand, in G2, which root dentin was etched with 35% phosphoric acid gel, all samples showed resin tags formation into the root dentin (Figures 3-6)

dentistry-resin-tag-free

Figure 3: Subsurface confocal image of a resin tag-free region of a specimen from G1 group; the absence of tubular penetration of the cement into the root dentin is clearly observed.

dentistry-abundant-tubular-penetration

Figure 4: Subsurface confocal image of a resin tag-contain region of a specimen from G2 group revealing the abundant tubular penetration of the cement into the root dentin. Resin tag-free regions (arrows) are also observed in less quantity.

dentistry-long-resin-tags

Figure 5: A close-up subsurface confocal image displaying a region with vast formation of long resin tags and a region with absence of resin tags into the root dentin (arrows) of a specimen from G2 group.

dentistry-abundant-presence-resin-tags

Figure 6: Subsurface confocal image of a specimen from G2 group displaying the abundant presence of resin tags into the root dentin. The arrows display regions where there was no formation of resin tags.

Micro push-out assessment

The result of the interaction analysis ‘group/root region’ was not significant (P>0.05). This allowed the pool of the data obtained at different root regions to perform a single statistical analysis by group. In other words, the variable ‘root region’ was excluded from the statistical analysis. Thus, it was possible to calculate only a single mean and a standard deviation, from all 36 slices, per each group.

In general, all samples, without exception, revealed a minimal measurable bond strength that could be detected by the present experimental design. Figure 7 presents the results in Box-whisker plots. In, G1 the bond strength mean value was 10.5 ± 3.53 MPa, being 7.5 the minimum and 15.2 the maximum values. In G2, the mean value was 10.61 ± 3.84 MPa, being 7.2 the minimum and 13.6 the maximum values. The Student t-test did not show any differences between the two tested groups (P<0.05) (Figure 7).

dentistry-root-dentin-around

Figure 7: Subsurface confocal image of a specimen from G2 group displaying the abundant presence of resin tags into the root dentin around all the perimeter of the root canal.

Discussion

As a consequence of the CLSM interfacial analysis, the first null hypothesis of the present study was completely rejected. In general, the two tested groups demonstrated different interfacial patterns, clearly revealed by the images (Figures 1-6). The G1-control group-the use of non-etched specimens followed the manufacturer’s instructions and revealed a complete absence of resin tags into the dentine tubules. The opposite effect was found on all samples of G2 experimental group. Thus, it is clear that the RelyX™ UniCem self-adhesive universal resin cement is able to penetrate deeply into the root dentin tubules when intracanal surface is etched with 37% phosphoric acid gel.

Nevertheless, the second null hypothesis formulated in the present study was fully accepted, because there were no significant differences in bond strength between the control and the experimental groups. Thus, it was impossible to determine a significant correlation between resin tags formation and intracanal adhesion quality when RelyX™ UniCem self-adhesive universal resin cement was used. Therefore, it suggests that the adhesion mechanism of this material is not dependent upon the dentin hybridization as well as the formation of resin tags. This finding corroborates with the results of previous studies that also described a superficial morphological interaction with the dentin substrate after the use of this cement when the manufacturer’s instructions were followed [15,21]. A chemical adhesion between dentin hydroxiapatite and fluoro-aluminosillicate glass fillers had been reported and it demonstrated a similar pattern to the glass ionomer cements (3M ESPE RelyX™ UniCem product file).

The present results underscore the lack of effectiveness of dentin pre-treatment with 37% phosphoric acid for the use of RelyX™ UniCem self-adhesive resin cement. This finding is relevant for a twofold reason: (1) It stresses the efficacy of the adhesion mechanism of the self-adhesive resin cement; (2) It elucidates that the manufacturer’s recommendations are correct, since the absence of penetration of the self-adhesive cement into the root dentine tubules or even the presence of the smear layer on intracanal dentin did not influence the overall adhesion quality.

The good performance of the RelyX™ UniCem self-adhesive resin cement for fiber post cementation may also be attributed to the clinical use simplicity, in comparison to conventional resin cements. Indeed, the technical sensitivity of resin cements is claimed to be decreased, since the advent of the self-adhesive resin cements allowed the elimination of the critical clinical steps of acid etching, primering and adhesion [5].

The results of the present study are also in accordance with previous studies that used the same experimental model to assess the intracanal adhesion quality obtained with RelyX™ UniCem [5,21-26]. The similarity of the data states the reproducibility of the push-out test and restates itself as the main experimental model to determinate the intracanal adhesion quality.

The introduction of CLSM, associated to the use of fluorescent labels was responsible for a significant improvement on the analysis of the adhesive interface and adjacent structures, such as hybrid layer and resin tags.

Previous studies have already used CLSM to investigate the quality of endodontic fillings [27] and the penetration of sealers into the root dentin tissues [28]. However, the present investigation followed a methodology focused on dentin adhesion-an approach that revealed to be more adequate for the analysis of the quality of interfacial integrity [29].

Some advantages related to the use of CLSM may also be taken into consideration, especially in comparison to the high vacuum scanning electron microscopy (SEM) the most traditional image method used to analyze the dentin tissues and root filling materials. CLSM almost does not produce any type of technical artefact, because samples are observed in environmental conditions of temperature, pressure and humidity. Moreover, CLSM does not require sample metallization, neither special vacuum conditions to obtain the images [30]. The use of epoxy resin replicas is also unnecessary, because the absence of special vacuum conditions avoid the creation of false gaps. In addition, it is important to emphasize the non-destructive character of the CLSM, which allows the superposition of two distinctive experimental models by using the same specimens.

Another positive aspect related to CLSM refers to its ability to generate an analysis in deep (under-superficial observation). In the experimental conditions of the present study, 25 images were obtained on regular vertical gaps of 0.86 μm - allowing observations up to ~20,53 μm in deep. This depth is dependent of several factors, such as: the nature and translucence of the sample, the quality of surface preparation and the type of lenses used. Therefore, it is possible to verify if the interfacial gap is deep or shallow, or even if it is solely an artefact created during the observation and capture of the image. Future studies that use this resource may take volumetric measurements of the interfacial gaps areas (tridimensional measurements), which, without a doubt, will be more interesting than the bidimensional images.

Several tests are available for the evaluation of intracanal adhesion quality. The push-out test is one of them. In fact, it determines the intracanal post retention, which reflects the pattern of adhesion quality achieved between post and root dentin. Push-out tests are well adjusted model for this purpose [20] and this may justify the large body of investigations using this experimental model.

When the micro-tensile test is employed for intracanal bond strength evaluation, a high sample loss value occurs during specimen’s preparation. It is a result of premature failures probably due to the low bond strength values achieved into the root canals, compromising the results obtained using this methodology [31].

One of the disadvantages of the push-out test was attributed to the creation of non-uniform forces at the adhesive interface [32]. However, the use of thinner slices (approximately 1.5 mm), such as those used in the present study, might eliminates this disadvantage [20]. In the present study, as root possesses a total length of 12 mm, more than three slices by specimen could be used in the push-out test, which also contributed to balance some distortion derived from the generation of non-uniform forces in the adhesive interfaces.

A clear advantage of the push-out test is that this experiment generates statistically normally-distributed data, which means that data distribution is close to a Gaussian curve [18]. This characteristic may be taken into consideration as an advance face to other experimental models usually employed in dental researches, because it reflects more reliable data. Additionally, it is worth to point out that generate wellbehaved data from biological samples is a difficult and uncommon task in dental research.

In conclusion, the dentin pre-treatment with 37% phosphoric acid gel and the subsequent formation of resin tags did not influence the quality of intracanal adhesion obtained with the self-adhesive resin cement RelyX™ UniCem.

Acknowledgements

The authors deny any conflicts of interest.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11674
  • [From(publication date):
    April-2014 - Dec 17, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7902
  • PDF downloads : 3772
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version