alexa Nursing Staff Knowledge on Postoperative Delirium in Older Inpatients: An Exploratory Survey | Open Access Journals
ISSN 2573-0347
Advanced Practices in Nursing
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Nursing Staff Knowledge on Postoperative Delirium in Older Inpatients: An Exploratory Survey

Mouchoux C1,2,3,4*, Fassier T5, Rippert P5, Comte B6, Castel-Kremer E6, Barth X7, Carret JP8, Lehot JJ9, Raudrant D10, Ruffion A11, Colin C2,5 and Krolak- Salmon P1,2,3,4

1Hôpital gériatrique des Charpennes, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France

2Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France

3INSERM, U1028, CNRS, UMR5292, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Lyon, France

4Centre de Recherche Clinique “Vieillissement, Cerveau, Fragilité”, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France

5Pôle Information Médicale Évaluation Recherche, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France

6Service de médecine gériatrique, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France

7Service d’urgence viscérale, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France

8Service de chirurgie orthopédique, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France

9Service de réanimation, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France

10Service d’oncologie chirurgicale et gynécologie, Centre hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France

11Service d’urologie, Centre hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France

*Corresponding Author:
Dr. Christelle M
Pharmacie, Hôpital des Charpennes
27 rue Gabriel Péri 69100 Villeurbanne France
Tel: 33472432065
Fax: + 33472432064
E-mail: christelle.mouchoux@chu-lyon.fr

Received date: October 13, 2015 Accepted date: December 04, 2015 Published date: December 20, 2015

Citation: Mouchoux C, Fassier T, Rippert P, Comte B, Castel-Kremer E, et al. (2015) Nursing Staff Knowledge on Postoperative Delirium in Older Inpatients: An Exploratory Survey. Adv Practice Nurs 1:102. doi:10.4172/2573-0347.1000102

Copyright: © 2015 Mouchoux C, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Advanced Practices in Nursing

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Postoperative delirium is common in the elderly and is associated with poor outcome. However, its diagnosis is often missed or delayed. Nursing staff is at the frontline and plays a crucial role in the early detection and management of delirium. This study was designed to explore the knowledge and attitudes of nursing staff about delirium in the scope of an educational program implementation.

Methods: Qualitative and quantitative analyses conducted in four surgical wards and one intensive care unit in an Academic Hospital in France. A questionnaire was administered to 171 nurses and nursing assistants and semistructured interviews were conducted.

Results: A total of 89 questionnaires were completed (response rate of 52%). Regarding symptoms, most of the nursing staff knew about disorientation and incoherent speech. However, few knew about acute onset and fluctuation, and the hypoactive form of delirium was virtually unknown. Regarding risk factors, while many knew about dehydration, drug use and the use of physical restraints, few knew about fecaloma, sensory impairment and infection. The staff globally knew about the main prevention measures, but knowledge on patient management was especially poor. Finally, no respondent knew about or used the Confusion Assessment Method. The qualitative analysis revealed a trivialization of delirium onset among older inpatients and the continuity of preconceived ideas on delirium, its diagnosis and its risk factors.

Conclusions: On the whole, this study provides a clearer understanding of staff learning needs and identifies potential issues to be addressed in order to increase future intervention efficacy.

Keywords

Delirium; Nursing staff; Knowledge; Prevention

Introduction

Delirium is a fluctuating syndrome characterized by inattention, altered level of consciousness and acute global cognitive impairment [1]. There are three forms of delirium, hypoactive, hyperactive and mixed forms, which fluctuate between the hyperactive and hypoactive phases [2]. The mixed forms account for 52% of cases, highlighting the fluctuating course of delirium [2]. The incidence of postoperative delirium in older patients is estimated between 20 and 50% [2]. Moreover, among older patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU), the incidence can reach 70 to 87% [1,2]. Delirium is associated with a significant increase in morbidity and mortality, a higher risk of admission to a long-term care facility and higher healthcare costs [3]. Although delirium can be reversed through treatment of its underlying causes, many patients do not return to their baseline cognitive level [2]. In addition, in patients with dementia, cognitive decline may be accelerated [3].

Despite its clinical significance, postoperative delirium is frequently under-recognized and misdiagnosed by nurses and physicians [4-6]. Fluctuating changes in cognitive function are commonly misattributed to dementia, depression or old age [7]. Nevertheless, diagnostic tools for detecting delirium [8] and measuring its severity have been developed one of which is the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) [9].

The nursing staff play a crucial role in the early detection and management of delirium because of their frequent contact with patients and their families [10,11]. The early detection of delirium is critical for the identification of its causes and for the continuous monitoring of its symptoms [12,13]. However, in many patients, delirium is not detected because of the nursing staff’s insufficient knowledge on cognitive impairment [14,15]. Nurses’ lack of knowledge about the criteria and methods of detecting delirium has been identified as a major factor influencing the under-recognition of delirium [16]. In addition, ageist stereotypes held by many health care professionals appear to represent a major key obstacle in the recognition of delirium [14].

Therefore both knowledge of the nursing staff in terms of delirium recognition [14,17,18] and nursing staff’s perception of delirium [19,20] are key factors for improving patients’ outcomes. The goal of this study was to provide an assessment of these parameters prior the implementation of an educational program in order to adapt educational content to staff’s educational needs. For a maximum knowledge yield, we used a mixed method approach, which combine quantitative and qualitative data [21].

Methods

Setting

The present study was conducted in four surgery wards and in one ICU of a French university hospital. The study was reviewed and approved by an ethics committee.

Date collection

Mixed method survey included a quantitative and qualitative analyses.

Quantitative data

A questionnaire was developed through an interdisciplinary collaboration assessing nursing staff knowledge on postoperative delirium. It explored four knowledge areas: symptoms, risk factors, diagnostic tools and management. The questionnaire was selfadministered by nurses and nursing assistants. This questionnaire was also used in the first step of the CONFUCIUS trial, which aims to measure the impact of a multifaceted program on the postoperative delirium prevention in the elderly inpatients [22]. The CONFUCIUS trial is currently recruiting participants. The final data collection for primary outcome measure is scheduled for April 2016. In order to not modify their current nurses’ management practices, the staff of two wards participating in the CONFUCIUS study did not answer to the management part of the questionnaire.

Qualitative data

The survey questionnaire was complemented by a qualitative approach [21,23]. Field observations were performed during the 18 nursing training sessions of the CONFUCIUS trial. The training sessions were conducted during nursing shift changes and included a total of 72 day staff and 18 night staff. Each standardized session started with an “ice-breaker” question, such as, “Tell us about a recently managed patient with postoperative delirium”, followed by an open discussion on delirium symptoms and diagnosis. Three researchers (CM, TF and PR) actively participated in the collection of qualitative data: the questions and discussion were led by one researcher, while the others observed and took notes.

The data were collected from the nursing staff of wards participating in the CONFUCIUS study, starting with the collection of quantitative data.

Data Analysis

A descriptive analysis of nursing staff characteristics and response rates was performed. Continuous data are presented as mean, and standard deviation (SD) and categorical data are presented as numbers and percentages. Qualitative data were then analyzed by CM (a hospital pharmacist and a PhD student in clinical epidemiology) and TF (a physician in internal medicine trained in qualitative research), using a thematic approach to identify recurrent themes [24]. Data were compared across participants.

Results

A total of 89 questionnaires (52%) were completed by 53 nurses and 36 nursing assistants. The response rates and characteristics of respondents are shown in Table 1. Regarding symptoms, most nurses and nursing assistants knew about disorientation (98%) and incoherent speech (97%). However, few knew about acute onset (53%) and fluctuation (48%) (Figure 1). When questioned about behavioral disorders specific to delirium 51% of the respondents considered agitation an essential feature of delirium, while 45% considered that agitation/lethargy may alternate. Only 4% of the respondents stated that an overlethargic and hypoalert behavior could signal delirium as encountered in the hypoactive subtype. Although half of the respondents had work experience in a geriatric ward, geriatric pathologies such as fecaloma and sensory impairment were rarely identified as risk factors of delirium (49% and 48%, respectively) (Figure 2). None of the respondents knew about or used the CAM. Knowledge on patient management was not accurate, especially regarding patient isolation (6%) and collaboration with geriatric staff (8%). However, the staff globally knew about the main prevention measures: patient reorientation with calendars and clocks (85%) and patient communication (92%).

  Urology Orthopedics General Surgery Oncology ICU Overall
Respondents, N (%) 6 (30) 19 (44) 12 (80) 18 (86) 34 (43) 89 (52)
  Nurse 1 (17) 10 (53) 7 (58) 13 (72) 22 (65) 53 (60)
  Nursing assistants 5 (83) 9 (47) 5 (42) 5 (28) 12 (34) 36 (40)
Work experience in the current position,Years (mean ± SD) 23.2 ± 10 10.5 ± 10 13.1 ± 9 12 ± 11 6.4 ± 9 10.4 ± 9
Specifically trained on postoperative delirium in the elderly, N (%) 0 (0) 1 (5) 0 (0) 7 (39) 7 (21) 15 (17)
Professional experience, N (%)            
  Geriatrics 3 (50) 8 (42) 10 (83) 15 (83) 16 (47) 53 (60)
  Neurology 0 (0) 0 (0) 5 (42) 5 (28) 5 (15) 15 (17)
 Psychiatry 0 (0) 1 (5) 7 (58) 4 (22) 9 (26) 22 (25)

Table 1: Characteristics of the respondents.

advanced-practices-nursing-Nursing-staff-knowledge

Figure 1: Nursing staff knowledge on the symptoms of delirium.

advanced-practices-nursing-risk-factors-delirium

Figure 2: Nursing staff knowledge on the risk factors of delirium.

Three themes were explored during analysis of the semi-structured interviews. First, nursing staff knowledge was approached through examples and through the symptoms spontaneously mentioned during the open discussion. A caricature description of postoperative delirium was noted. The examples proposed by the nursing staff often included stereotyped, complicated cases of confusion, with cast, venous or urinary catheter removal, or marked by very odd delusions. The most commonly mentioned symptoms were disorientation, agitated and aggressive behavior and cognitive impairment. Delusions, ambulation, odd speech and day/night fluctuation of symptoms were less often mentioned. Anxiety, behavior modification, and alert by family members were only mentioned once. Unexpected drowsiness and state of coma were not mentioned.

“Do you remember Mister X? He slit his IV line with his teeth!” (A nurse)

“Usually, they ring, they ring… then what they ask for is totally incoherent!” (A nurse)

“First, he became confused, and then walked around in the corridors.” (A nurse)

Second, several stereotyped risk factors were presented: medication, especially anesthesia, and evening onset were well-known by the nursing staff. However, other risk factors were rarely mentioned, including pain, benzodiazepine and alcohol withdrawal, hyponatremia and dementia. Other risk factors were never mentioned, including sepsis, urinary and fecal retention, and unfamiliar environment.

“I noticed that people with delusions often have hyponatremia.” (A nurse)

“Things are even more difficult when the patients have Alzheimer’s disease.” (A nursing assistant)

“We think that it is normal… We’ve been told that after anesthesia, the patients usually rave for a week.” (A nurse)

Third, information was gathered about how postoperative delirium in older patients was perceived by the nursing staff. Their description of recent, vivid examples illustrated how postoperative delirium emerged as a problem and disruption in their regular work. Although it was perceived as a complication for the patient, it was something expected and somewhat normal for elderly patients, especially those with dementia. The estimated frequency of episodes differed among nurses, depending on the shift: “maybe once a month” for day shift nurses and “at least once a week” for night shift nurses. The nursing staff declared that they did not receive any training, information or support to handle this condition. However, in one unit, night shift nurses exhibited an informal sheet on a wall, recommending a prescription of hydroxyzine in case of agitation.

“After surgery, the patient became confused; we had a hell of a night!” (A night nurse)

“The patient is anxious, it’s strange… We don’t know, actually… We imagine that it probably has consequences for the patient.” (A nursing assistant, a night nurse)

“Residents on call rarely come when you page them at night…” (A night nurse)

Discussion

This study allowed us to draw up an inventory of the nursing staff’s knowledge and perception of delirium and to assess staff learning needs in order to increase future intervention efficacy.

Our findings indicate that nursing staff working with surgical patients in a French University Hospital have an inadequate level of knowledge base on delirium. We found respondents were not familiar with symptoms suggesting delirium. The hypoactive form of delirium, while accounting for one third of delirium cases, was virtually unknown. In addition, knowledge of risk factors, critical to early detection, was limited and no diagnostic tools were used.

Our results are consistent with the literature showing that nurse’s knowledge of delirium is insufficient, particularly regarding risk factors [17,18]. Such limitations can be extended to medical staff since a recent survey have shown that UK training doctors, even though aware of the high prevalence and clinical significance of delirium, had poor knowledge in the diagnosis and management of delirium [25]. It is likely that this knowledge gap in healthcare professionals is a major component of the broadly reported under-recognition of delirium and stems from a historically low educational emphasis on delirium in medical and nursing schools [26].

Consistent with the absence of adequate knowledge, analysis from the semi-structured interviews revealed the persistence of preconceived ideas on delirium, its diagnosis and its risk factors. In particular, most of the staff believed agitation to be an essential feature of delirium. This misconception is widespread [25] and may explain why the hyperactive subtype is still considered the predominant form of delirium, and is best recognized, in spite of its lower prevalence rate.

In addition, this lack of knowledge combined in respondents with what appears as a lack of awareness pertaining to the importance of delirium. This was reflected by the responses in the qualitative survey where little or nothing was known about the consequences of delirium on patients’ outcome. Moreover, qualitative survey revealed a trivialization of delirium viewed by nursing staff as a consequence of surgery on older inpatients rather than as a preventable condition. Postoperative delirium was perceived by respondents both as a natural occurrence in older patients, and as a time consuming disruption to their regular work. These findings resonate with the results of previous studies [19,20,27] suggesting that negative beliefs and attitude are key factors in preventing effective management of older patients with delirium. Overall, our study indicates that healthcare environment in our hospital does not meet the needs of older adults.

The questionnaire used was not subjected to a formal assessment of content validity. There is no previous validated questionnaire to evaluate nursing staff knowledge. This lack of validated questionnaire did not allow us to assess the validity of the questionnaire presented in the study. This can be seen as a limitation of the present study. However, the questionnaire was established by a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals. Another limitation is that only the knowledge of the nursing staff in four surgical wards and in one ICU was assessed. Therefore, the results must be restricted to surgical nursing staff. Finally, qualitative data was only collected during nursing staff training sessions within the CONFUCIUS trial. However, the present study provided rich data on the nursing staff’s perception of postoperative delirium in the elderly.

This survey has been designed as the first step of the CONFUCIUS trial aiming to assess a multifaceted delirium prevention program implemented and coordinated by a mobile geriatric team [22]. Its results will be used to improve awareness and adapt educational content to the needs of nursing staff within the program. Along with geriatric training to address the specific needs of older inpatients, training on diagnostic tools, risk factors and management of patients with delirium will be performed to give nursing staff improved knowledge and control over what will be presented as a preventable medical condition. Special emphasis will be put on the benefits of an early detection of delirium with a specific focus on the hypoactive form. Educational content will include unit case studies [28] with discussions about gaps in care and barriers to change.

However, along with educational programs and training [29-31], there is an urgent need for educational emphasis on delirium in medical and nursing schools. Given the prevalence of delirium among older patients, a change in hospital culture as well as in health care provider’s training is needed.

Acknowledgements

Authors’ contributions

Study concept and design: C Mouchoux, T Fassier and P Krolak-Salmon.

Data collection: C Mouchoux, T Fassier and P Rippert.

Analysis and interpretation of data: C Mouchoux, T Fassier.

Redactions of parts of the manuscript: C Mouchoux and T Fassier.

Critical revision of the manuscript: C Mouchoux, T Fassier, P Rippert, B Comte, E Castel-Kremer, X Barth, J-P Carret, J-J Lehot, D Raudrant, A Ruffion, C Colin and P Krolak-Salmon.

All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethical statement

The study protocol has been reviewed and approved by an ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud-Est IV).

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Journals

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 8316
  • [From(publication date):
    March-2016 - Sep 22, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8210
  • PDF downloads :106
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

agrifoodaquavet@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

clinical_biochem@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

business@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

chemicaleng_chemistry@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

environmentalsci@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

engineering@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

generalsci_healthcare@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

genetics_molbio@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

immuno_microbio@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

omics@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

materialsci@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

mathematics_physics@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

medical@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

neuro_psychology@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

pharma@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

social_politicalsci@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords