Reach Us
+441474556909

**Franck Delplace ^{*}**

ESI group scientific committee 100 Avenue de Suffren, Paris, France

- Corresponding Author:
- Delplace F

ESI group scientific committee 100 Avenue de Suffren

75015 Paris, France

**Tel:**+33(0)615319558

**E-mail:**[email protected]

**Received Date:** May 30, 2016; **Accepted Date:** June 10, 2016; **Published Date:** June 18, 2016

**Citation: **Delplace F (2016) Reynolds Number and Spacetime Curvature. Fluid Mech Open Acc 3:125. doi:10.4172/fmoa.1000125

**Copyright:** © 2016 Delplace F. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

**Visit for more related articles at** Fluid Mechanics: Open Access

The reference length or scale length used in Reynolds number definition is of considerable importance. A quick review of Reynolds number definitions used in batch and continuous flow systems showed that this reference scale can be theoretical or conventional. Using curvature quantity coming from general relativity theory, we showed that Reynolds number could be seen as the ratio of two curvatures. This result could give interesting information for the design of high performances exchangers. Moreover, the use of curvature allowed establishing a relationship between momentum diffusivity and velocity gradient tensor. Applied to general relativity equation, we showed a strong link between gravity theory and hydrodynamics.

Reynolds; Navier-Stokes; Einstein; Curvature; Viscosity; Reference length; Shear rate; Momentum diffusivity; Gravity; Fluid dynamics

In fluid mechanics, the Reynolds number is certainly the most important dimensionless quantity used in research and engineering. It is defined as the ratio of momentum to viscous forces and it quantifies the relative importance of these two phenomena for given flow conditions. When viscous forces are predominant, the flow regime is laminar and stream-lines are parallel to each other. Reynolds number values are low and for constant flow conditions in a duct of arbitrary cross section shape, stream-lines velocity varies from zero at the duct walls to a maximum value at the centre of the duct. Turbulent flow regime occurs at higher Reynolds number values when inertia forces become predominant. In that conditions, stream-lines behaviour is more chaotic giving eddies, vortices and other flow instabilities. Between these well-defined flow regimes, there is an often called transition region delimited by critical Reynolds number values. As shown by many authors (Leuliet [1], Delplace, [2] Delplace [3] critical Reynolds number values can vary a lot depending on ducts geometry. Changes of flow regime have a considerable importance for heat and mass transfer industrial applications (heat exchangers, reactors.).

From these well-established results, it is clear that geometry of flow systems is essential to explain and quantify flow phenomena. In the Reynolds number definition, geometry is described through a "reference length" *L _{R}* sometimes called "scale length". Sometimes,

Recently, fluid mechanics concepts were introduced in theoretical physics for general relativity (Padmanabhan [4], Delplace [5]) and quantum mechanics (Delplace [5]). From these results, it appears that Einstein general relativity equation is similar to Navier-Stokes equation and, if spacetime is considered as fluid; it could be possible to apply Navier-Stokes equation at both astronomic and atomic scales.

General relativity equation tells that spacetime geometry described by its curvature (Einstein tensor) is proportional to stress energy tensor. In every flow system, one can consider we have a spacetime (*x, y, z, t* in Cartesian coordinates) deformed by stresses produced by the mechanical energy transferred to the liquid by the pumping or mixing device.

The main objective of the present publication is then to revisit the Reynolds number definitions used for batch and continuous flow systems by use of the general relativity concept of curvature available for continuous spacetime medium.

**Fully established laminar flow of Newtonian fluids in pipes**

Solving Navier-Stokes equation in that well known case gives a parabolic velocity profile. For practical use, it is common to use a correlation between the Fanning friction factor *f*/2 and the Reynolds number *Re*. This correlation often called friction law takes the following form:

with,

and,

In these equations, *τ _{w}* (

In that perfectly defined case, the reference length found for Reynolds number is the pipe diameter and we have *L _{R}*=D.

**Fully established laminar flow of Newtonian fluids in ducts of arbitrary cross section**

In that case, Navier-Stokes equation reduces to the following well known Poisson partial differential equation:

*u(x, y)* is the scalar velocity field in the duct cross section, *ΔP (Pa)* is the pressure drop *L (m)*, is the pipe length and *η (Pa. s)* is the dynamic viscosity.

Even for simple geometries like rectangular or triangular ducts, analytical solutions of equation (4) are not simple. Shah et al. [6] gave a complete review of these solutions for a wide variety of regular ducts. For non regular ducts, only numerical approaches are available and are always an intense field of research (Delplace [7] Sestak [8] Sochi [9]).

As reported by Midoux (1993), for a complex cross section shape, a balance between pressure and friction forces allows determining *f*/2 (equation 2) in a simple way:

*D _{H} (m)* being the hydraulic diameter defined by:

*S (m ^{2})* is the cross section area and

This definition is of considerable importance because it allows writing friction laws for ducts of arbitrary cross section in the following general form in agreement with equation (1):

As shown analytically and experimentally by many authors (Miller [10] Leuliet [1] Delplace [3]), parameter ξ values depend only on ducts geometries. A good example is the case of rectangular ducts from square duct to well known infinite parallel plates. Solving equation (4), it is possible to calculate for each rectangle of cross section length 2b and cross section width 2a the parameter ξ value as followed:

In the case of a square duct, numerical calculations gave the well known value 7.1136 (Shah & London [6]). In the other limit case often called infinite parallel plates where b>>a, the exact solution is:

Then, for rectangular ducts, for aspect ratio *b/a* varying from 1 to +∞, ξ values increase from 7,1136 to 12 which is the well-known value for the symmetric case of infinite parallel plates comparable to the other symmetric case of cylindrical duct or pipe giving ξ=8 (equation 1).

The case of cylindrical ducts of arbitrary cross section shape is often called two dimensional flows (2D). The case of three dimensional flows (3D) is much more complex because solving analytically the Navier- Stokes equation is not possible. But the use of dimensionless numbers and particularly the Reynolds number gives powerful tools to engineers.

As a conclusion, for the laminar 2D flow in regular ducts of arbitrary cross section shape, we use *L _{R}=D_{H}*. This definition of scale length

**Fully established laminar flow of Newtonian fluids in complex geometries**

As expressed above the case of 3D flows is much more complex than the case of 2D flows. 3D flows are encountered in continuous flow systems in the case of complex shape channels like those built in compact heat exchangers. Because of their extensive use in chemical and food industries, plate heat exchangers are a good example of these complex 3D flow geometries. For laminar flow conditions, plate heat exchangers were studied by many authors and reported in reference encyclopaedias (Cooper [11] Leuliet [1] Delplace [12]).

For plate heat exchangers, all authors used as hydraulic diameter *D _{H}=2 e. e* being the maximum gap between two plates. ξ values obtained experimentally varied a lot depending on plates geometry or design and on plate heat exchanger flow arrangement. Typical values varied in the range

Another important case of 3D flow is encountered in mixing systems or mixing tanks. In industrial reactors like fermentors, turbines of various designs are used to create 3D flow patterns and obtain a maximum mixing efficiency. A huge amount of scientifical work has been performed to predict power consumption of mixing systems. An accurate review and analyse of this work can be found in Delaplace [12]. Two dimensionless numbers defined below are used to characterise these complex flow systems: the power number *N _{p}* and the rotational Reynolds number

In these equations, *P (W)* is the power consumption of the turbine, *N (rad.s ^{−1})* its rotational speed,

The complex geometry of mixing systems makes the reference length for both *Re _{R}* and

The correlation between *N _{p}* and

Parameter *K _{p}* value depends on batch mixing system geometry like parameter ξ value depends on duct geometry.

Couette system used in rheology for viscosity measurements is a simple and good example of equation (12) application. The simple geometry (two cylinders) allows flow equation to be solved analytically and then *K _{p}* value to be calculated as a function of cylinders diameters. The narrower is the gap between the two cylinders, the greater is the

To conclude, for complex flow systems including batch devices like mixing tanks, we use a conventional reference length for *L _{R}* in the Reynolds number definition.

**Free falling sphere**

In the laminar flow regime, the flow equation of a Newtonian liquid around a sphere is given by the following equation (Midoux [13]):

with,

and,

In these equations, *T (N)* is the flow resistance,* Ω (m ^{2})* is the frontal area,

Considering that *C _{X}* can be related to

Equation (13) takes the same form than equations (1), (7) and (12). This approach is also available for particles having different shapes and the reference length *L _{R}* used in Reynolds number definition is the diameter in the case of a spherical particle.

**Reference length in Reynolds number definition**

As expressed in the introduction of this paper, we have shown above, through classical uses of Reynolds number in fluid mechanics, how important is the reference length *L _{R}* definition. It is clear that when geometry complexity increases,

This analysis is based on the hypothesis of laminar flow regime. It is well known that the same Reynolds number definition is used for transition and turbulent flow regimes. Correlations between Reynolds number and Fanning friction factor can be obtained giving the wellknown Blasius law for the turbulent flow in a smooth pipe or others correlations in different geometries (Delplace [7]).

In turbulent flow regime, it is interesting to consider Kolmogoroff's scales theory. It explains how inertia of large scale eddies is transferred to smaller scales until it reaches a microscopic scale where viscous dissipation occurs and kinetic energy is converted into heat (Midoux [13]). The Kolmogoroff Reynolds number is defined as followed:

Where is the turbulent fluctuation velocity and *L _{K}(m)* is the Kolmogoroff scale of turbulence. The value of

To conclude, the reference length used in the Reynolds number definitions is of considerable interest whatever is the flow geometry and even whatever is the flow regime.

As described in §2, friction laws are correlations between the Fanning friction factor and the Reynolds number. The Fanning dimensionless number we called *f*/2 is the ratio of wall shear stress *τ _{w}* and kinetic energy concentration in the fluid (equation 2). The wall shear stress is related to another important quantity in fluid mechanics: the wall shear rate through the following relationship:

Equations (18) and (2) make the wall shear rate for the flow of a Newtonian liquid in a pipe easy to calculate:

being the mean fluid velocity and *D(m)* the pipe diameter. This theoretical quantity, coming from the parabolic velocity profile obtained for the laminar flow in a pipe was generalized to more complex geometries according to the Reynolds number definition. For a regular pipe of non circular cross section (2D flow), the wall shear rate definition is then:

For a mixing tank, giving complex 3D flow, another definition of shear rate was necessary. This definition being representative of the entire system can be seen as a mean value:

In this equation, *N (rad.s ^{−1})* is the turbine rotational speed and K

This equation is, for a circular motion, the fundamental relationship between angular velocity N, linear velocity u and circle curvature *1/R(m ^{-1})*. Using equation (22), it is fundamental to notice that equations (19), (20) and (21) take the same form whatever is the flow complexity (2D or 3D). Moreover, it is also very important to consider the coherence between the reference lengths

**Fluid flow system as spacetime continuum**

Every flow system can be considered as a continuum where small particles of fluid move in a container of fixed geometry. These small particles are analogous to "Atoms of spacetime" introduced by Padmanabhan [4]. Depending on the container geometry and the mechanical energy given to the continuum (the fluid), particles position *(x, y, z)* in Cartesian coordinates will change with time *t*.

In the general case, we can consider we have a spacetime continuum delimitated by a rigid container. In this container of given geometry, Navier-Stokes equation describes the motion of the particle *M (x, y, z)* vs. time t.

The spacetime continuum concept is usual in theoretical physics to describe planets motion through Einstein general relativity theory. But as showed above, the same principles are used in fluid mechanics explaining why Navier-Stokes and Einstein equations can be considered as very similar (Padmanabhan [4]). In order to use general relativity in fluid mechanics we have to change our definition of dimensions. What we call 2D flow in fluid mechanics is 3D flow for general relativity because time is considered as a length in this theory. For the same reason, 3D flow in fluid mechanics is a 4D flow in general relativity. In the following paragraphs, we will use 3D and 4D descriptions replacing respectively 2D and 3D coordinates previously used.

**Spacetime curvature definition**

In general relativity theory, one of the most important quantities is the Riemann curvature tensor often called the Einstein tensor *G** _{ij}* (m

This complex equation is the general curvature definition available whatever is the 4D spacetime continuum geometry. Moreover, this quantity giving a local value of spacetime curvature is not well adapted to the case of Reynolds number definition being a global quantity for a given fluid and container system as described in §4.1.

Let us consider the simple case of a circular motion in a 3D spacetime continuum *(x, y, t)*. This is the typical case of what we previously called 2D flow. Scalar curvature *C _{3D}* (m-1) can simply be defined as the inverse of circle radius

As reported in equation (22), *C _{3D}* is the well known scalar curvature converting a linear velocity into an angular velocity. For the 4D

The dimension of *C*_{4D} is m^{-2} according to the dimension of *G** _{ij}* and we propose to use this simple definition as a mean to characterize the flow geometry in a complex shape container. The use of these equations appears well adapted to circular geometries. As showed in §2.2, the hydraulic diameter is used in Reynolds number definition when duct cross section is not circular. We propose then to use the hydraulic diameter as a mean to characterize curvature of a non-circular duct cross section.

**Reynolds number definition using spacetime curvature**

For a cylindrical duct of arbitrary cross section, using * L_{R} = D_{H}*, we obtain the following well known Reynolds number definition:

Using curvature definitions introduced in §4.2, we have:

This relationship shows that Reynolds number can be considered as the ratio of two curvatures: the curvature of pipe wall *C*_{3D} and the curvature of the flow itself due to inertia and viscosity:

Let us use this Reynolds number definition for the case of a pipe of circular cross section in order to illustrate the influence of *C*_{3D} on Reynolds number value. Developing equation (27) gives the following Reynolds number definition as a function of volumetric flow rate Q(m^{3}.s^{−1}):

For a given flow rate *Q* of a Newtonian liquid with density *ρ* and dynamic viscosity *η*, in a pipe of circular cross section, increasing cross section curvature i.e., decreasing pipe radius will increase Reynolds number value as expected. If you modify pipe wall geometry as described in (**Figure 1**), you will increase the mean value of wall curvature and then increase the Reynolds number value for the same flow rate and the same liquid physical properties.

It is well known that modified pipes wall geometries improve heat and mass transfers and this new way of considering Reynolds number in terms of curvatures could be of huge interest for the design of high performances geometries. Increasing *C*_{3D} will enhance heat and mass transfer performances.

Moreover, a comparison between the circular cross section case and others geometries in the same conditions i.e., the same liquid, the same flow rate and the same wall curvature gives an interesting result in term of critical Reynolds number and then in term of laminar flow stability. In equation (29), the numerical value is 2⁄ π≈0.637 for circular cross section. For a square duct, this factor is 1/2 and for an equilateral triangular duct, the same value is 2⁄3 √3 ≈0.385. These values could be representative of experimental critical Reynolds number values reported by Delplace [3]): 2100 for circular duct, 1150 for square duct and 780 for equilateral triangular duct.

The same approach can be performed in the case of 4D flow encountered in mixing systems. Using equation (11) and equation (25), we obtain:

This equation is the equivalent of equation (27) for a complex geometry 4D flow system. The use of relationship between linear and angular velocities (equation 22) allows converting equation (27) into equation (30).

To conclude, we showed that Reynolds number can be interpreted as the ratio of two curvatures. Even if the calculation of polygons curvature is always an important field of research in mathematics (Liu [14] Cantarella [15] Cufi [16]), the use of hydraulic diameter in regular ducts of polygonal cross section as a mean to quantify cross section curvature appeared of great interest to compare geometries hydraulic performances using Reynolds number.

**Shear rate, momentum diffusivity and spacetime curvature**

As reported in §3, shear rate is a very important quantity related to shear stress through equation (20). Another very important parameter is the ratio *η ⁄ρ* often called kinematic viscosity *v* in m.s^{-2}. This quantity can be seen as momentum diffusivity (Midoux [13]).

In equation (28), we defined the flow curvature as followed:.

Introducing momentum diffusivity in this equation allows the mean velocity to be written as followed:

The same approach can be done for 4D flow using equation (30) giving:

Using shear rate definitions reported in §3 give the following definitions for 3D and 4D flows:

Even if these equations describe two different flows: 3D and 4D, they are very similar and of considerable importance. First of all, they show that shear rate or velocity gradient is proportional to momentum diffusivity ν(m².s^{-1}) and a volumetric curvature in unit m^{-2}.

From a mathematical and theoretical physics point of view, this result allows to write the Einstein tensor *G** _{ij}* in a new way giving the link between Riemann curvature and velocity gradient tensors:

To be accurate,is the symmetric part of the velocity gradient tensor often called the rate of strain.

According to equations (34) and (35), constant k value only depends on flow system geometry through ξ and K_{S} values.

The well-known Einstein general relativity equation can then be rewritten as followed:

and then,

.

This relationship between the Einstein stress energy tensor *T** _{ij}* (Pa) and the velocity gradient tensor is very similar to the rheological equation describing the deformation of a Newtonian fluid without volume modification (Midoux [13]):

* τ_{ij}* (Pa) being the stress tensor and the rate of strain tensor. Equation (39) can be considered as the definition of dynamic viscosity (the ratio of stress and velocity gradient tensors) then, the constant term in front of velocity gradient tensor in equation (38) could be interpreted as the definition of a dynamic viscosity in general relativity theory.

It is well known that dynamic viscosity plays a key role in momentum transfer. If *η*=0, then momentum cannot be transferred between two streamlines in the fluid and then the momentum flux density * τ_{ij}* will be null. As a consequence, equation (38) could signify that, if planets motion exists in Einstein curved spacetime, it is due to the existence of a non-zero value of spacetime dynamic viscosity.

At this time where many physicists consider that spacetime could be a fluid, the non-zero dynamic viscosity result given by equation (38) could be of great importance.

Finally, this new way of writing Einstein general relativity equation shows how deep is the relationship between gravity and hydrodynamics.

The purpose of this paper was trying to give a new vision of Reynolds number using spacetime curvature. This mathematical quantity is of major interest in theoretical physics because it tells us how space is deformed by energy concentration through the well-known Einstein general relativity theory.

Considering 3D and 4D flow systems, a first result of this approach is a Reynolds number definition as the ratio of two curvatures: the curvature of the flow container and the curvature of the flow itself. This definition could signify a deeper signification of Reynolds number than the well-known ratio of inertia and viscous forces.

Direct practical consequences of this new definition are both the design of modified pipes geometries and the determination of critical Reynolds numbers for transition between laminar and transition flow regimes. The design of modified pipes is of great importance for example in high performances heat exchangers manufacturing. Determination of critical Reynolds number values being also very important for heat transfer applications.

Moreover, because fluid mechanics models are more and more in use in theoretical physics at both astronomic and atomic scales, we tried to find a link between curvature and velocity gradient tensors. This approach gave an important relationship between shear rate, curvature and momentum diffusivity (the ratio of dynamic viscosity and density). Einstein general relativity was then modified in order to obtain an equation similar to the rheological equation describing the deformation of a Newtonian fluid without volume modification. This result allowed the definition of a spacetime dynamic viscosity.

To conclude, recent discoveries like the fluid or liquid nature of Einstein spacetime make essential to build the link between fluid mechanics and cosmology. The famous Reynolds number could play a key role in this approach.

- Leuliet, JC (1988) Comportementshydrauliqueetthermique des échangeurs à plaques traitant des produits non newtoniens. PhD Thesis, Henri Poincaré University, Nancy, France.
- Delplace F, Leuliet JC (1995) Generalized Reynolds number for the flow of power law fluids in ducts of arbitrary cross section. The ChemEng J. 56: 33-37.
- Delplace F, Delaplace G, Lefebvre, Leuliet JC (1997) Friction curves for the flow of Newtonian and non Newtonian liquids in ducts of complex cross-sectional shape. Proceedings of the 7th international congress on engineering and food. Sheffield Academic Press Sheffield 1: 36-39.
- Padmanabhan T (2011) The hydrodynamics of atoms of spacetime: gravitational field equation is Navier-Stokes equation. Int. J. of Modern Physics 20: 2817-2822.
- Delplace F (2015) Viscous liquid spacetime and its consequences. Infinite Energy Magazine 21: 34-38.
- Shah RK, London AL (1978) Laminar flow forced convection in ducts. Academic Press New York San Francisco London.
- Delplace F (1995) Identification des échangeurs à plaques application à l'encrassement par les produitslaitiers. PhD Thesis Henri Poincaré University Nancy France.
- Sestak J, Zitny R (1998) Non Newtonian flow and heat transfer in ducts of arbitrary cross-sectional geometry. Proceedings of the 11th International Heat Transfer Congress Taylor and Francis London, 3: 63-67
- Sochi T (2015) Using the stress function in the flow of generalized Newtonian fluids through conduits with non circular or multiply connected cross sections. arXiv : 1509.01648v1 [physics.flu-dyn].
- Miller C (1972) Predicting non Newtonian flow behavior in ducts of unusual cross-section. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 11: 524-528.
- Cooper A, Usher (1983) Plate heat exchangers: friction factor correlations-heat transfer correlations. Heat Exchangers Design Handbook 3.
- Delaplace G (1998) Agitation de fluidesfortementvisqueuxnewtoniensou non par des agitateurs de proximité types ancresetrubanshélicoïdaux. PhD Thesis Henri Poincaré University Nancy France.
- Midoux N(1993)Mécaniqueetrhéologie des fluides en géniechimique. Tech and Doc Lavoisier Paris Londre New York, USA.
- Liu H, LateckiLG, Liu W (2008) A unified curvature definition for regular polygonal and digital planar curves. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 80 104-124.
- Cantarella J, Grosberg AY, KusnerRB, Shonkwiler C (2012) The expected total curvature of random polygons. arXiv: 1-27
- Cufi J, ReventoA, Rodriz CJ (2015) Curvature for polygons. The American Mathematical Monthly 122: 332-337.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

- Total views:
**10940** - [From(publication date):

July-2016 - Sep 19, 2019] - Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views :
**10656** - PDF downloads :
**284**

**Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals**

International Conferences 2019-20