alexa Sepsis, an Old Problem for Clinicians | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2327-5073
Clinical Microbiology: Open Access
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Sepsis, an Old Problem for Clinicians

Edmond Puca*

Service of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Center, Tirane, Albania

*Corresponding Author:
Edmond Puca
Service of Infectious Diseases
University Hospital Center, Tirane, Albania
Tel: 0672058624
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: December 29, 2016; Accepted Date: January 5, 2017; Published Date: January 10, 2017

Citation: Puca E (2017) Sepsis, an Old Problem for Clinicians. Clin Microbiol 6:e138. doi: 10.4172/2327-5073.1000e138

Copyright: © 2017 Puca E. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Clinical Microbiology: Open Access

Editorial

Sepsis is a syndrome old as life itself. This syndrome has accompanied human evolution for generations. Ranging from antiquity to the nowadays sepsis definition has gone through several stages. However, the definition and methodology of studying was developed in the last decades. In spite of numerous, high cost studies its physiopathology is still not entirely understood. On the other hand it is quite clear that it is a dynamic heterogeneous disease which leads to a disbalance of the inflammatory network [1]. Nowadays, sepsis diagnostic methods are of extreme importance, not only for following its progress but moreover for establishing a diagnosis as soon as possible. It is an uncommon systemic reaction as a result of a microbe or its toxins. Despite modern technology in sepsis diagnosis, it still remains a potentially lethal and a very high cost syndrome for the health system [2]. Many studies reported a decline in sepsis mortality in recent years from 37% to 31% but again these figures remain high [1-3]. The reasons why the number of sepsis cases is increasing significantly are numerous such as age and other non-modifiable factors. Increased life expectancy has increased the number of patients in the intensive care units (ICU). Other pathologies such as neoplastic, autoimmune, accidents, long term hospital stay and the use of invasive devices are already factors predisposing to sepsis despite patients age [4]. The clinician doctor is the one who must approach appropriately and as soon as possible for early sepsis diagnosis and efficient treatment of. So thanks to the hard work of Dr. Roger C Bones and his colleagues since 1991 we have a definition of sepsis by the following table [5].

Two or more of the following are required:
• Body temperature>38°C or <36°C
• Heart rate>90 beats/min
• Respiratory rate>20 breaths/min (or arterial pCO2<32 mmHg, indicating hyperventilation)
• White blood cell count>12.0×109/L or <4.0×109/L (or >10% immature forms)
Sepsis=Infection+SIRS
Severe sepsis=Sepsis+evidence of organ dysfunction.

Table 1. Definitions of sepsis. (American College of Chest Physicians/ Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference)

Later in time other criteria where added to sepsis evaluation, such as lactate and two other important markers PCR and PTC. It was the evaluation of sepsis physiopathology that made it possible and necessary for assessing other factors in its diagnosis and prognosis. Based on the data from numerous components which play a role in the inflammatory processes more indicators were monitored for the establishment and progress of patients with sepsis. There are currently more than 170 proposed indicators to diagnose and monitor the progress of patients with sepsis [6]. But are these many markers necessary and relevant? Pro-inflammatory and inflammatory cytokines are studied to follow the progress of patients with sepsis [1]. Cytokines are regulatory of the immune system and play an important role in inflammation. It is important for the clinician to have on hand a good marker for sepsis. A good marker would be one which can detect the infection early in its course and easily and have a high sensitivity and specificity, but a low high cost. Unfortunately such marker is still difficult to detect, except for lactate [1,6]. So far two markers such as CRP and Procalcitonin have shown good efficacy in identification and monitoring the progress of sepsis. Both these markers are not ideal but they are helpful in correlation with the patient's clinical situation to establish the diagnosis of sepsis [7-10]. CRP and procalcitonin are two most used tests in diagnosis and follow up. Both these markers are released into the blood as a result of infections or inflammatory processes [2]. Another marker similar to CRP is Pentraxin 3 (PTX3) which it is released by inflammatory cells. Comparing the three markers, the first two CRP and PCT are the most tested and studied for sepsis diagnosis. C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute phase protein that is released by the hepatic cells after inflammation or tissue damage. It has a pro and anti-inflammatory role. Researches in the genetic studies of sepsis seem to be the future in its diagnosis. Maybe development of organ specific delivery of non-coding RNA mediators may be a promising approach as a biomarker and in therapeutic of sepsis.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Article Usage

  • Total views: 543
  • [From(publication date):
    February-2017 - Nov 19, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 490
  • PDF downloads : 53
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords