alexa Silent Mutation: Characterization of its Potential as a Mechanism for Sterol 14α-Demethylase Resistance in Cercospora beticola Field Isolates from the United States
ISSN: 2157-7471
Journal of Plant Pathology & Microbiology

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Silent Mutation: Characterization of its Potential as a Mechanism for Sterol 14α-Demethylase Resistance in Cercospora beticola Field Isolates from the United States

James O Obuya1* and William L Stump2

1Center for Viticulture and Small Fruit Research, Florida A&M University, 6505 Mahan Drive, Tallahassee, FL 32317, USA

2Plant Sciences Department-3354, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Laramie, WY 82071, USA

*Corresponding Author:
James O Obuya
Center for Viticulture and Small Fruit Research
Florida A&M University, 6505 Mahan Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32317, USA
Tel: +1(850)412-5195
Fax: +1(850)561-2617
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: June 15, 2015; Accepted date: June 24, 2015; Published date: June 28, 2015

Citation: Obuya JO, Stump WL (2015) Silent Mutation: Characterization of its Potential as a Mechanism for Sterol 14a-Demethylase Resistance in Cercospora beticola Field Isolates from the United States. J Plant Pathol Microb 6:280. doi:10.4172/2157-7471.1000280

Copyright: © 2015 Obuya JO, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Plant Pathology & Microbiology

Abstract

Sterol

demethylation

inhibitors (DMIs) are considered among the most effective fungicides used to control

Cercospora

leaf spot (CLS), caused by Cercospora beticola Sacc., in sugar beet. Resistance to DMI fungicides has been reported in the C. beticola population from the United States, but the molecular mechanism is not known. It is considered that genetic changes in the C. beticola 14α-demethylase (CbCyp51) gene may be contributing to DMI resistance. The study investigated a silent mutation (GAG to GAA) at codon 170 as a potential mechanism for C. beticola DMI resistance. The CbCyp51 gene was obtained from DMI-sensitive and -resistant isolates, cloned into a plasmid vector, transformed in an isogenic yeast R-1, and tested for DMI sensitivity. Transformed yeast showed low ED50 values (0.02 - 0.09 μg ml–1) as compared to high ED50 values from C. beticola DMI-resistant isolates (21 - 65 μg ml–1). The finding did not support our hypothesis that a silent mutation in the CbCyp51 gene may be associated with C. beticola DMI resistance. Furthermore, genetic analysis of the CbCyp51 gene found no mutation in 2 C. beticola DMI-resistant isolates from the Central High Plains. Further studies will be required to investigate additional mechanisms which have been associated with DMI resistance in fungi. Thus, we could not develop a molecularbased assay for the rapid detection of C. beticola DMI resistance, because no

mutation

was found in the CbCyp51 gene. Currently, fungicide sensitivity assay could be the best method screen for C. beticola DMI resistance.

Keywords

Cercospora leaf spot; Silent mutation; DMIs; Sugar beet; Beta vulgaris

Introduction

Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), caused by Cercospora beticola Sacc., is the most destructive foliar disease worldwide [1,2]. Severe disease can cause a reduction in extractable sucrose, root yield, and increased concentration of impurities and leading to higher processing losses [3,4]. CLS can be controlled using integrated pest management (IPM) strategies which include planting resistant varieties, crop rotation, deep tillage, control of alternate host plants, or application of foliar fungicides [5-9]. The disease can be controlled by limiting canopy development through the regulation of water use in irrigated areas and nitrogen fertilization [6,9].

Sterol demethylation inhibitors (DMIs) are most widely used for CLS control in sugar beet [9-11]. DMIs protect plants against foliar diseases such as that caused by C. beticola [10,11], and members of this group have a medium- risk of resistance due to their single mode of action [12]. Resistance to DMIs has been associated with polygeniccontrolled mechanism in which quantitative or additive interaction of several mutant genes can lead to a gradual shift in response to fungicides [9,11,12]. DMI resistance has been reported in fungi, and has been associated with multiple mechanisms [13-27]. DMI resistance in Zymoseptoria tritici (formerly known as Mycosphaerella graminicola) is due to single nucleotide polymorphic sites (SNPs) on the Cyp51 gene which led to alterations of the protein [27,28]. In Penicillium digitatum, a 126 base pair (bp) insert found on the Cyp51 gene was associated with DMI resistance [16]. Genetic analysis of the P. digitatum Cyp51 gene found five tandem repeats on the 126 bp insert. Furthermore, the insert was present in the regulatory region and acted as a transcriptional enhancer, leading to overexpression of the PdCyp51 gene [16]. DMI resistance has been associated with either uptake or efflux of DMIs which involved an adenosine triphosphate binding cassette (ABC) protein [14,15,29-31].

In C. beticola, DMI resistance was reported in field isolates from Greece in which four SNPs were found on the CbCyp51 gene [32]. Two SNPs led to predicted amino acid changes at positions 297 (E297K) and 330 (I330T) and the mutations were present in C. beticola isolates that showed a moderate DMI resistance (MR) phenotype. The third SNP was predicted to lead to an amino acid substitution at position 384 (P384S) and was present in C. beticola isolate with a high DMI resistance (HR). The fourth SNP led to predicted synonymous mutation (‘silent mutation’) at codon 169 and was present on the CbCyp51 gene in a few Greek C. beticola DMI-resistant isolates that showed an overexpression of the Cyp51 gene. The study hypothesized that the silent mutation on may likely be associated with overexpression of the CbCyp51 gene leading to C. beticola DMI resistance [32]. Furthermore, it was indicated that a high ED50 value for tetraconazole (>1.0 μg ml–1) was likely associated with overexpression of the CbCyp51 gene, and was reported in C. beticola DMI-resistant isolates from the Red River Valley (RRV) region in the United States [33].

The research objective was to investigate a hypothesis that a silent mutation, which was found on the CbCyp51 gene, was potentially correlated with C. beticola DMI resistance. First, we analyzed the genetic changes on the CbCyp51 gene for DMI-resistant and -sensitive isolates. Second, we investigated whether a silent mutation on the CbCyp51 gene had a potential role in conferring C. beticola DMI resistance. This was achieved by transforming the CbCyp51 gene from DMI-resistant and -sensitive isolates in an isogenic yeast R-1 (ΔPdr-5), and determined ED50 values (effective dose leading to growth inhibition of 50%) for DMI fungicides used for disease control in sugar beet. Transformed yeast R-1 was chosen because it was the fastest method to test the hypothesis as compared to using the C. beticola, which required a complex transformation protocol.

Materials and Methods

Fungal strains

We analyzed 8 C. beticola isolates which included 4 DMI-resistant isolates (RR-08-553, RR-08-760, RR-08-762, and RR-08-940), a DMIsensitive isolate RR-08-418 from the Red River Valley (RRV) region of the United States; and 2 DMI-resistant isolates (UW11-60 and UW11- 81) from the 2010 CLS survey in the Central High Plains (Colorado, Nebraska, Montana and Wyoming) of the United States. One Greek DMI-resistant isolate GR-10-292 [32] was included in the analysis and compared with isolates from the United States. An isogenic yeast R-1 strain (Ura3- and His1-) was transformed with the Cyp51 gene from either C. beticola DMI-sensitive or C. beticola DMI-resistant isolates. The yeast R-1 was a knockout strain lacking a multidrug ABC transporter-Pdr5 [34]. The yeast R-1 strain particularly lacked the protein required for an efflux mechanism which has been associated with a multidrug resistance in fungi [14,15,35].

Fungicides and growth media

DMIs used for fungicide sensitivity assays included tetraconazole (Sipcam Agro USA Inc., Roswell, GA), propiconazole (Syngenta Crop Protection, Greensboro, NC), and difenoconazole (Syngenta Crop Protection). Transformed and non-transformed yeast R-1 strains were cultured on modified selective dropout medium (SM) plates [36]. The modified SM medium included 68 g of yeast nitrogen base (BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD) and 200 g of ammonium sulfate (Spectrum Quality Products Inc., Gardena, CA). The medium was supplemented with 0.44 μg ml-1 of L-histidine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and amended with 300 μg ml-1 of Geneticin G-418 (Teknova, Hollister, CA). However, control plates were supplemented with 0.44 μg ml-1 of L-uracil (Sigma-Aldrich) because non-transformed yeast R-1 strains required L-uracil in order to grow on the modified SM medium [34].

DNA isolation

Mycelia on dry medium, preserved cryogenic vials (Corning Inc., NY) and frozen at -72°C were obtained using a sterile forcep (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburg, PA) to inoculate ~15 ml of nutrient broth (BD Diagnostics). Inoculated cultures were incubated at 27°C by shaking at 200 rpm on an orbital shaker (Lab-line orbital shaker, Romeoville, IL) for 7 days. Mycelia were harvested by straining the liquid medium through sterile cheesecloth, rinsed three times using sterile distilled water (5 ml), lyophilized for 48 h, and pulverized (~20 mg) under liquid nitrogen using a sterile mortar and pestle. We purified DNA using a plant mini kit (DNeasy®, Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA) and measured absorbance at 260 nm using a spectrophotometer (Nanodrop®-1000, Wilmington, DE).

Sequencing and analysis of Cyp51 gene from C. beticola isolates

Primer pairs (Table 1) were designed based on a consensus sequence of the Cyp51 gene from C. beticola isolates for PCR amplification. PCR reactions (25 μl) included DNA (2 μl), each of the primers (0.4 μM), dNTPs (200 μM each), 1X of a high fidelity buffer with 1.5 mM MgCl2 (Phusion®: ThermoFisher Scientific, Lafayette, CO), 0.4 units μl-1 of a high fidelity DNA polymerase (Phusion®: ThermoFisher Scientific), and a final volume was adjusted by the addition of PCR grade water. PCR run parameters included an initial denaturation at 98°C for 30 s, 25 cycles of denaturation at 98°C for 10 s, annealing at 60°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were separated by gel electrophoresis on a 0.8% agarose gel and 0.5X of Tris borate-EDTA buffer (EMD Chemicals, Gibbstown, NJ), stained with ethidium bromide (IBI Scientific, Peosta, IA), and visualized under UV (570-640nm) illumination (UVP LLC, Upland, CA).

Primer Sequences (5’ to 3’) References
Cbdm-519F gttgtatgccgctttggagt This work
Cbdm208F gcatcgacccgtacaagttc This work
Cbdm906F agaggtggcacacatgatga This work
Cbdm2284F ttgcttcaatactggatgctt This work
CbdmBamHIF cgatggatccgttgtatgccgctttg This work
CbdmNotIR tttgcggccgcagtgtgtccaagg This work
CbdmCyp51F tgccacgcgacgagacattcaagatgagc This work
CbdmCyp51R cagctcctttgctgaccagaccgtagc This work

Table 1: Primers used for PCR amplification of Cyp51 gene.

An aliquot (5 μl) was obtained from each PCR product, treated with ExoSAP-IT® reagent (2 μl) (USB Corporation, Cleveland, OH) to remove unincorporated primer pairs and non-specific fragments. The reaction was incubated at 37°C for 15 min and inactivated at 80°C for 15 min. Cleaned PCR products were sequenced at the Sequetech Corporation (Mountain View, CA) using a set of primers that included Cbdm-519F, CBdm906F, and CBdm2284R (Table 2). Three overlapping sequences of the Cyp51 gene were obtained that included a partial fragment of the promoter region, a complete open reading frame (ORF), and a partial fragment of the 3’ untranslated region (3’ UTR).

  Modified log-logistic model1
C. beticola isolate ED50 b2 c3 d4 e5 f6
DMI-sensitive RR-08-418 0.96 0.81 2.34 7.86 0.005 55.53
  (1.2)7 (-0.2) (-2) (-2.1) (-0.01) (-53.8)
DMI-resistant RR-08-553 34.4 0.81 –4.91 15.15 10.62 24.07
  (-45.9) (-0.7) (-10.6) (-1.5) (-10.7) (-26.8)
DMI-resistant RR-08-760 35.9 0.84 –4.28 13.67 11.19 22.49
  (-52.6) (-0.9) (-10.7) (-1.6) (-11.5) (-26.8)
DMI-resistant RR-08-762 21 1.24 –1.55 14.14 10.77 16.22
  (-41.6) (-2.7) (-11.3) (-1.6) (-6.2) (-21.1)
DMI-resistant RR-08-940 27.7 0.72 –5.04 13.67 4.24 40.68
  (-91.4) (-1.3) (-22.1) (-1.5) (-6.4) (-76.3)
DMI-resistant GR-10-292 65.6 0.78 –5.39 9.43 9.49 37.82
  (-96.7) (-0.6) (-10.9) (-1.5) (-9) (-26.1)

Table 2: Dose-response parameters for C. beticola isolates on potato dextrose agar amended with tetraconazole. Dose-response parameters were obtained using a four-parameter log-logistic model [45] and shown are model parameters and ED50 (medium effective dose reducing growth by 50%) for each C. beticola isolate on PDA amended with tetraconazole and compared with non-amended control.

Characterization of Cyp51 gene from C. beticola isolates

Partial sequences were assembled using the web version of CAP3 program and were analyzed using the DNA Baser Software (HeracleSoftware, Germany). The assembled sequences were analyzed for fidelity in which the predicted nucleotides were compared to chromatograms from sequenced data. An alignment was obtained for assembled partial sequences and a sequence from a C. beticola DMIsensitive isolate (GenBank accession # HM778021) and was performed using the MEGA ver. 5 software [37]. We determined predicted amino acid residues for the Cyp51 protein for each C. beticola isolate, and compared those residues with predicted amino acid residues for C. beticola DMI-sensitive isolate (GenBank accession # ADW54535) using the MEGA ver. 5 software [37]. This was performed to identify any potential amino acid changes which could be present on the C. beticola Cyp51 protein.

Plasmid construction and yeast transformation

Partial fragments of the C. beticola Cyp51 gene were obtained using a pair of primers: Cbdm-519F and Cbdm2284R and a nested PCR was performed using a second pair of primers: CbdmBamHIF and CbdmNotIR (Table 1), to obtain PCR products with an open reading frame (ORF) of the C. beticola Cyp51 gene (~1625 bp). Standard cloning was performed and was followed by sequencing to confirm whether our insert which included the plasmid vector was present and determine its orientation [38]. Partial PCR products of the Cyp51 gene were inserted between BamHI and NotI restriction sites of the pCM189-URA3 vector [39]. Plasmid constructs included a pCM189- URA3::mutCyp51 (CbCyp51 from RRV DMI-resistant isolate), pCM189-URA3::mutCyp51 (CbCyp51 from Greek DMI-resistant isolate), and pCM189-URA3::wtCyp51 (CbCyp51 from DMI-sensitive isolate). Each construct was transformed in E. coli competent cells using a standard heat-shock procedure as described in a QIAgene expression kit (Qiagen, Inc.). Transformed E. coli competent cells were cultured on a Lauria-Bertani (LB) agar plates, supplemented with 100 μg ml-1 of filter-sterilized ampicillin sodium salt (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), and incubated at 30°C overnight. LB broth (5 μl) was inoculated using a single colony of E. coli competent cells and incubated at 30°C overnight by shaking at 200 rpm on an orbital shaker (Lab-line orbital shaker, Romeoville, IL). Plasmid was purified from overnight cultures using a Qiaprep® miniprep kit (Qiagen Inc.), and transformed in isogenic yeast R-1 strain [MATα PDR1-3pdr5::KANMX4 ura3 his1 yor1 pdr10 pdr11 ycf1 pdr3] [34] using a S. cerevisiae direct transformation kit (Wako Chemicals USA, Inc., Richmond, VA).

Detection of C. beticola Cyp51 messenger RNA

Total RNA was extracted from overnight cultures from either transformed or non-transformed yeast R-1 strain using a yeast RNA kit (E.Z.N.A®: Omega Bio-Tek Inc., Norcross, GA). Total RNA concentration was determined by measuring the absorbance at 280 nm using a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop-1000®: Wilmington, DE). Purified total RNA (5 μl) was separated by gel electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel, 1X Tris-borate-EDTA buffer (EMD Chemicals) and visualized as described above. The purified total RNA was reversetranscribed to cDNA using a qScript® cDNA synthesis kit (Quanta Biosciences Inc., Gathersburg, MD), which included random oligonucleotide primers. The cDNA was PCR-amplified using a pair of primers such as CbdmCyp51F and CbdmCyp51R (Table 1). These primer pairs spanned a region of ~425 base pairs that included targeted partial sequence of the Cyp51 gene and a partial fragment of the plasmid vector. PCR products were cleaned using the ExoSAP-IT® reagent (2 μl) and sequenced at the University of Wyoming-Nucleic Acid Exploration Facility (UW-NAEF) in both directions using CbdmCyp51F and CbdmCyp51R (Table 1). Directional cloning of the Cyp51 gene insert within the plasmid vector was confirmed by PCR amplification. The sequences were subjected to nucleotide-nucleotide BLAST search [40] and compared with other sequences in the NCBI/ GenBank® database.

Determination of dose-response

To determine dose-response for C. beticola isolates, a fungicide sensitivity assay was performed on a potato dextrose agar (BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD) using the modified procedure [41]. PDA was amended with each DMI fungicide prepared to a final concentration of 0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 μg ml-1 of the active ingredient and inoculated with C. beticola isolates prepared from sugar beet leaf extract agar (SBLEA) [42] plates. We grew yeast R-1 strain transformed with the C. beticola Cyp51 gene overnight cultures (5 ml) in a yeast extractpeptone- dextrose (YPD) broth (BD Diagnostics). The YPD broth [36] was amended with 300 μg ml-1 of Geneticin G-418 as described above. The overnight cultures were incubated at 30°C by shaking on a 150 rpm orbital shaker (Lab-line orbital shaker) to obtain a cell density of ca. 1 x 106 cells ml-1, which is equivalent to ~0.1 optical density (OD) at 600 nm [43]. Sterile tubes with YPD (5 ml) were either amended with DMI fungicide or non-amended controls, and each was inoculated with 0.5 x 105 ml-1 cells [43]. Additionally, each culture (5 ml) was amended with a DMI fungicide prepared to a final concentration such as 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.1, 0.12, 0.16, and 0.32 μg ml-1. Each amended YPD broth (5 ml) was inoculated either with transformed or non-transformed yeast R-1, and incubated at 30°C by shaking at 150 rpm on an orbital shaker (Lab-line orbital shaker) for 24 h. We measured optical density (OD) at 600 nm for cell cultures (200 μl) in 96-well plate.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed using the language of R statistical computing environment [44] and estimated dose-response using a Cedergreen-Ritz-Streibig modified model [45]. Our null hypothesis was that a silent mutation at codon 170 on the Cyp51 gene had a potential role in C. beticola DMI resistance. Hormesis model (CRS.5) was used because growth stimulation was observed at a low dose of tetraconazole. The model was a modified non-linear regression based on five parameters5 using a dose-response curve (drc) statistical add-on package [46,47]. Below was the expression that defined the relationship between response (y) and dose (x)

image

Parameters from the CRS.5 model were estimated at fixed alpha value (α=0.25). The dose-response estimated ‘y’ which was the maximal response at zero dose, ‘c’ was an estimate of lower limit of the doseresponse curve, ‘b’ estimated the steepness of the curve after the maximal hormetic effect, and ‘e’ had no straightforward interpretation in this model, but it estimated a lower bound on the ED50 value [45]. Whereas (‘d + f’) estimated upper bound on growth stimulation (‘f’>0) whereby a larger value of ‘f’ was correlated with increased growth stimulation (hormesis) as long as its value was positive. For instance, statistical analysis for hormesis was the same as testing for ‘f’ = 0 based on fixed α value (0.25). ED50 value for each C. beticola isolate was estimated based on the modified log-logistic model [45,47] and results were classified as either low (<0.01 μg ml-1), medium (0.01 to 1.0 μg ml- 1), or high (>1.0 μg ml-1) [33]. Dose response-curves were fitted based on radial growth of C. beticola or optical density (OD) at 600 nm of yeast measurements.

Prediction of C. beticola Cyp51 mRNA model structure

Putative secondary structures of the Cyp51 mRNA of C. beticola were predicted based on the DNA sequences of a DMI-sensitive isolate CB6-80 (GenBank accession # HM778021) and a DMI-resistant isolate RR-08-940 (GenBank accession # HM778022) using the RNAfold program of the Vienna RNA Websuite (http://rna.tbi.univie.ac.at/cgibin/ RNAfold.cgi) [48]. Determination of secondary RNA structure was performed using the RNAfold and was based on a comparative sequence analysis [23]. The algorithm constrains prediction of minimum free energy (MFE), and provides the best thermodynamic folding by taking into consideration factors such as base-pairing and unpaired regions of the sequence [49]. Additionally, the algorithm computes MFE on the assumption of a ‘nearest neighbor model’ achieved through the application of empirical estimates of thermodynamic parameters on neighboring interactions and loop entropies, and used as a mechanism for scoring folding structures [23,49].

Results

Fungicide sensitivity

Growth inhibition was determined for each C. beticola isolate from the Red River Valley (RRV) and Central High Plains of the United States and compared with that for a DMI-resistant isolate from Greece. Radial growth was measured from PDA plates amended with DMIs, inoculated with each C. beticola isolate, and compared with corresponding measurements obtained from a non-amended PDA control (Figure 1).

plant-pathology-microbiology-Radial-growth-resistant

Figure 1: Radial growth obtained from a C. beticola DMI-resistant isolate GR-10-292. Radial growth from a non-amended potato dextrose agar (PDA) was compared with PDA amended with tetraconazole (1 μg ml-1).

Results revealed that C. beticola DMI-sensitive isolate RR-08-418 had a low ED50 on tetraconazole of 0.96 μg ml-1 compared to DMIresistant isolates with ED50 values included 21.0 and 65.6 μg ml-1 (Table 3). In addition, all C. beticola isolates showed hormesis [46,50] at low concentrations of tetraconazole (Figure 2). No ED50 value was obtained for propiconazole and difenoconazole, because these DMIs were too effective against the tested C. beticola isolates at doses below 0.01 μg ml-1

  C. beticola isolates Origin of isolate DMI Phenotype Mutation(s)
1 RR-08-418 Red River Valley Sensitive baseline sequence
2 UW11-60 Central High Plains Resistant baseline sequence
3 UW11-81 Central High Plains Resistant baseline sequence
4 RR-08-553 Red River Valley Resistant GAG to GAA at 170 and AAG to AAA at 355 (silent mutations)
5 RR-08-760 Red River Valley Resistant CCT to GCT  (P195A)
6 RR-08-762 Red River Valley Resistant GGC to GGG at 211 (silent mutation) and GAC to AAC (D12N)
7 RR-08-940 Red River Valley Resistant GAG to GAA at 170 (silent mutation)

Table 3: Single nucleotide polymorphic sites (SNPs) from partial sequences of the Cyp51 gene for C. beticola isolates.

plant-pathology-microbiology-Dose-response-curves

Figure 2: Dose-response curves for C. beticola DMI-sensitive and -resistant isolates on potato dextrose agar amended with tetraconazole.

Dose-response curve for a DMI-sensitive isolate RR-08-418 was compared with that for five DMI-resistant isolate RR-08-553, DMIresistant isolate RR-08-760, DMI-resistant isolate RR-08-762, DMIresistant isolate RR-08-940, and DMI-resistant isolate GR-10-292. Points included are radial growth measurements at a given dose of tetraconazole. The lines were fitted using the dose-response curve [47].

Sequence analysis of Cyp51 gene from C. beticola isolates

Approximately 2.4 kb of the C. beticola Cyp51 gene was obtained that included a partial sequence of the promoter as well as an entire coding region for each isolate using a set of four primers (Table 1)Mutations were identified from 4 C. beticola field isolates when compared to a baseline sequence of a DMI-sensitive isolate. First, 2 RRV C. beticola isolates RR-08-553 and RR-08-940 contained an identical SNP (silent mutation) and was predicted not to lead an amino acid change at codon 170 (Figure 3). Second, we identified two SNPs (silent mutations), which was predicted not to lead to an amino change at codon 355 for a DMI-resistant isolate RR-08-553 and codon 211 for a DMI-resistant isolate RR-08-760 (Table 3). Two non-identical SNPs were identified from the C. beticola Cyp51 gene, in which one SNP was predicted to lead to amino acid substitution at position 12 (D12N) for a DMI-resistant isolate RR-08-762. A second SNP was predicted to lead to amino acid substitution at position 195 (P195A) for a DMI-resistant isolate RR-08-760. However, 2 C. beticola DMI-resistant isolates (UW11-60 and UW11-81) were identical to the baseline sequence of the CbCyp51 gene obtained from a DMI-sensitive isolate RR-08-418 (Table 3).

plant-pathology-microbiology-Alignment-partial-sequences

Figure 3: Alignment of partial sequences of the Cercospora beticola Cyp51 gene. Shown are partial sequences from DMI-resistant (RR-08-553; RR-08- 760; RR-08-762, RR-08-940, UW11-60; UW11-81); a point mutation (GAG to GAA) at codon 170 (Δ).

Predicted CbCyp51 Messenger RNA Structure of C. beticola Isolate

Predicted structure of the messenger RNA (mRNA) was determined using RNAfold based on the C. beticola Cyp51 sequence of a DMI-sensitive isolate CB6-80 and a DMI-resistant isolate RR-08-940 (Figure 3). The putative mRNA structure for DMI-resistant isolate RR- 08-940 with a silent mutation which did not lead to predicted amino acid substitution at position 170 had a slightly different folding pattern on the lower region as compared to that from DMI-sensitive isolate CB6-80 (Figure 4).

plant-pathology-microbiology-Putative-messenger-structures

Figure 4: Putative C. beticola Cyp51 messenger RNA structures. The putative mRNA structures were obtained for (A) DMI-sensitive isolate CB6- 80 (WT) and (B) DMI-resistant isolate RR-08-940 (mutant).

The predicted mRNA folding structure from C. beticola DMIresistant isolate RR-08-940 (GenBank accession # HM778022) showed a lower minimum free energy (mfe) of –565.92 kcal mol-1 as compared to a similar mfe of –567.82 kcal mol-1 from DMI-sensitive isolate CB6- 80 (GenBank accession # HM778021).

Heterologous transcription of the C. beticola Cyp51 messenger RNA in yeast

Results showed a C. beticola Cyp51 messenger RNA was produced in transformed yeast R-1 strain and was not found in control (Figure 5). PCR products were sequenced, aligned using ClustalW2 [22] and partial sequences showed a 100% identity (e-value = 0) to partial sequence of C. beticola DMI-sensitive isolate CB6-80 (GenBank accession # HM778021) or DMI-resistant isolate RR-08-940 (GenBank accession # HM778022).

plant-pathology-microbiology-Transcripts-isogenic-yeast

Figure 5: Transcripts from an isogenic yeast R-1 transformed with the C. beticola Cyp51 gene. Shown are transcripts produced in yeast R-1 strain as well as PCR products (~425 bp each). Constructs included pCM189- URA3:Cyp51 (RRV DMI-sensitive RR-08-418), pCM189-URA3:mut Cyp51 (RRV DMI-resistant RR-08-940), and pCM189-URA3:mutCyp51 (Greek DMI-resistant GR-10-292). M: 100 bp DNA Marker (Promega).

Dose-response curves were estimated by measuring an optical density (OD) at 600 nm. Yeast R-1 strains included untransformed, transformed with plasmid, and transformed with Cercospora beticola: DMI-sensitive isolate RR-08-418 [Transformed Sensitive (418)], a DMI-resistant isolate RR-08-940 [Transformed Resistant (940)], and a DMI-resistant isolate GR-10-292 [Transformed Resistant (292)].

Non-transformed yeast R-1 strain, transformed with plasmid, and transformed with constructs with the C. beticola Cyp51 gene from a DMI-sensitive isolate RR-08-418, a DMI-resistant RR-08-940, or DMI-resistant GR-10-292 showed medium ED50 values of between 0.02 and 0.09 μg ml–1 in culture amended with tetraconazole (Table 4). Furthermore, all transformed yeast R-1 strains showed hormesis (growth stimulation) [46,50] at low concentrations of tetraconazole (Figure 6). Growth stimulation was significant especially at low tetraconazole dose (one-sided t-test, p<0.05) for 3 yeast strains (Table 4). However, no response curve was obtained for propiconazole and difenoconazole because the two DMI fungicides were effective at all rates used.

  Modified log-logistic model1
Yeast strain ED50 b2 c3 d4 e5 f6
Untransformed yeast 0.04 5.76 0.15 1.17 0.08 2.07
  (0.004)7 (-1.8) (-0.06) (-0.06) (-0.004) (-0.96)
Transformed Plasmid 0.07 3.21 –0.01 0.64 0.02 20.66*
  (-0.007) (-0.6) (-0.04) (-0.07) (-0.002) (4.06)
Transformed Sensitive (418) 0.05 2.51 –0.30 1.31 0.17 1.78
  (-0.007) (-0.8) (-0.36) (-0.06) (-0.029) (-1.08)
Transformed Resistant (940) 0.02 1.65 –0.00 0.89 0.01 25.87*
  (-0.043) (-0.2) (-0.06) (-0.07) (0.006) (-17)
Transformed Resistant (292) 0.09 2.89 0.28 1.12 0.04 6.93*
  (-0.005) (-0.6) (-0.06) (-0.07) (-0.005) (-2.15)

Table 4: Dose-response parameters and ED50 (medium effective dose reducing growth by 50%) for non-transformed and transformed yeast R-1 strain in yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) broth amended with tetraconazole The parameters were determined using a Cedergreen-Ritz-Streibig modified loglogistic model [45].

plant-pathology-microbiology-Dose-response-tetraconazole

Figure 6: Dose-response curves for yeast R-1 strains in yeast extractpeptone- dextrose (YPD) culture treated with tetraconazole.

Discussion

DMIs are used for CLS control in sugar beet [18] and resistance has been reported in C. beticola field isolates [11,18,33,51,52]. However, the mechanism of C. beticola DMI resistance is not known. DMI resistance has been associated with mutations predicted to lead to amino acid substitution on the Cyp51 gene from other fungi [13-15,27,35]. Partial sequences of the CbCyp51 gene were obtained from C. beticola isolates and analyzed for genetic changes. Genetic analysis found a few single nucleotide polymorphic sites (SNPs) within the coding region of the CbCyp51 gene of five DMI-resistant isolates (Table 3). However, the genetic analysis found no single insertion sequence within the promoter region of C beticola DMI-resistant or -sensitive isolates as was reported for either P. digitatum DMI-resistant strains [16] or Monilinia fruticola DMI-resistant isolates [53]. Results indicated the SNPs identified from 5 DMI-resistant isolates were unlikely associated with C. beticola DMI resistance. This is because the genetic analysis found no mutations on the CbCyp51 gene from 2 Central High Plains DMI-resistant isolates (Table 3). Similarly, a high degree of sequence variation was reported in the coding and the flanking regions for C. beticola isolates from the Red River Valley region in the United States, but none of those mutations could be associated with DMI-resistance because SNPs were present in isolates which showed both low and high ED50 values [33].

It was noted that among the genetic changes includes a silent mutation in the C. beticola 14α-demethylase (CbCyp51) gene which may be associated with C. beticola DMI resistance. Our genetic analysis found a silent mutation (GAG to GAA) at codon 170 (Figure 3). An identical SNP was reported in a few DMI-resistant isolates from Greece [32] as well as two RRV DMI-resistant isolates. Hence, our study investigated whether the silent mutation at codon 170 had a potential role in conferring C. beticola DMI resistance. Putative mRNA structures of C. beticola DMI-sensitive isolate CB6-80 and C. beticola DMI-resistant isolate RR-08-940 were obtained using the RNAfold, (Figure 4). This was to determine whether the silent mutation at codon 170 may lead to changes in the CbCyp51 mRNA structure which could be associated with C. beticola DMI resistance. Genetic mutations could potentially change mRNA structures leading to alteration in the amount of protein produced in cells. The RNAfold is considered to be a reliable program for finding and comparing hairpins free from pseudoknots (non-nested structural elements), in which, “the analysis determines similarities between centroid and minimum free energy structure as well as using base-pair distance ensemble between two predicted structures” [48]. The RNAfold program computes the energy contributions of elementary substructures (which support parts of a structure) leading to prediction of secondary structure associated with the total minimum free energy for each mRNA structure based on the nearest-neighbor thermodynamic method [23,49]. The silent mutation at codon 170 on the Cyp51 messenger RNA for C. beticola DMI-resistant isolate RR-08-940 led to a putative mRNA structure with a total minimum free energy of –565.92 kcal mol-1 as compared to –567.82 kcal mol-1, which was obtained for a C. beticola DMI-sensitive isolate CB6-80 (Figure 4). Low folding free energy has been associated with low translation rates in addition to the occurrence of high transcript turnovers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [54]. Our results found two different stable structures and were predicted to have similar free energies, although a minimum shift of –2.1 kcal mol-1 of predicted minimum free energy was observed between these two putative mRNA structures. The shift, however, was not significant to support our hypothesis that the silent mutation at codon 170 in the CbCyp51 gene may likely be associated with C. beticola DMI resistance.

The genetic analysis of two RRV C. beticola DMI-resistant isolates found a few silent mutations on the coding region of the Cyp51 gene (Table 3). This was determined using a partial fragment of the CbCyp51 gene obtained from C. beticola DMI-sensitive RR-08-418 and DMI-resistant isolates (RR-08-940 and GR-10-292), cloned in a plasmid vector, and transformed into an isogenic yeast R-1 strain. Our results indicated that low concentrations of tetraconazole led to growth stimulation (hormetic response) of C. beticola isolates (Figure 2). Hormesis was first reported in yeast [55], and was later reported in fungi such as Pythium aphanidermatum mefonoxam-resistant strain, the causal organism of damping off disease in sugar beet, in which 10% growth stimulation was observed in culture amended with sub-lethal doses of mefonoxam [56]. A similar effect was reported for Sclerotina homoeocarpa, the causal organism of Dollar leaf spot in turf grass, in which growth stimulation was observed in culture amended with sub-lethal concentrations of trinexapac- ethyl [57]. However, we do not believe that hormesis may be associated with DMI resistance in C. beticola isolates because growth stimulation was mainly observed for low concentration of tetraconazole.

Results from heterologous transcription did not support our hypothesis that the silent mutation at codon 170 could be associated with C. beticola DMI resistance, because transformed yeast R-1 strains showed low ED50 values between 0.01 and 0.17 μg ml–1 (Table 2 and Figure 6). However, we determined that the messenger RNA was produced (Figure 5), which proved that the insert was being transcribed in the yeast R-1 strain. A similar silent mutation was reported from a few C. beticola DMI-resistant isolates from the Red River Valley (RRV) region in the United States, but it was noted that the silent mutation was unlikely associated with C. beticola DMI resistance [33]. The silent mutation, however, was found from three variants of C. beticola isolates that showed either low or high EC50 values, and it was suggested that the mutation was likely not associated with an overexpression in the CbCyp51 gene [33]. The first incidence of DMI resistance was reported for two C. beticola isolates (UW11-60 and UW11-81) from the Central High Plains region, but the genetic analysis of the CbCyp51 gene revealed that the isolates had an identical sequence to that of a DMI-sensitive isolate (RR-08-418). Hence, results did not support the hypothesis that the silent mutation at codon 170 was likely conferring C. beticola DMI resistance. Although propiconazole and difenoconazole were included in the study, no response curves were obtained because the fungicides were effective at low doses (<0.01 μg ml–1) as compared to tetraconazole.

We could not develop a diagnostic assay for the rapid detection of C. beticola DMI resistance because the mechanism is not known. Hence, further studies will be required to investigate additional mechanisms which have been associated with DMI resistance in other fungi [14,15,35]. Currently, screening for C. beticola for DMI resistance could effectively be performed using fungicide sensitivity.

Acknowledgements

Funding support was received from the University of Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Station and the Western Sugar Cooperative. Dr. Gary Secor (North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA) provided 5 RRV C. beticola isolates; Dr. Dimitri Georgakopoulos (Agricultural University, Athens, Greece) provided a Greek C. beticola isolate. Dr. John Golin (Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C., USA) provided an isogenic yeast R-1 strain and Dr. Peter Thorsness of the University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA) provided a pCM189 cloning vector. We thank Dr. Andrew Kniss (Department of Plant Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA) for help with data analysis.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11927
  • [From(publication date):
    June-2015 - Jul 17, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8129
  • PDF downloads : 3798
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

biochemjou[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7