alexa Single Molecule Oscillations of an RNA/DNA Duplex in a Plasmonic Nanocavity | OMICS International
ISSN: 2157-7439
Journal of Nanomedicine & Nanotechnology

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Single Molecule Oscillations of an RNA/DNA Duplex in a Plasmonic Nanocavity

Sagnik Basuray1, Avinash Pathak1, Biyan Chen1, Drew Menke2, Charles M Darr3, Keshab Gangopadhyay1,4, Peter V Cornish2* and Shubhra Gangopadhyay1*

1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 349 Engineering Building West, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA

2Department of Biochemistry, 117 Schweitzer Hall, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA

3Department of Bioengineering, 349 Engineering Building West, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA

4Author Contributions Equality

*Corresponding Author:
Shubhra Gangopadhyay
141A Engineering Building West
University of Missouri
Columbia, MO 65211-2300, USA
Tel: 1-573-882- 4070
Fax: 1-573-884-0312
E-mail: [email protected]
Peter V Cornish
117 Schweitzer Hall
University of Missouri
Columbia, MO 65211, USA
Tel: 1-573-882-0443
Fax: 1-573-882-5635
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: April 06, 2015; Accepted Date: May 05, 2015; Published Date: May 15, 2015

Citation: Basuray S, Pathak A, Chen B, Menke D, Darr CM, et al. (2015) Single Molecule Oscillations of an RNA/DNA Duplex in a Plasmonic Nanocavity. J Nanomed Nanotechnol 6:293. doi:10.4172/2157-7439.1000293

Copyright: © 2015 Basuray S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Nanomedicine & Nanotechnology


We report the visualization of single molecule dynamics in epifluorescence mode through extraordinary plasmonic enhancement provided by silver grating with embedded nanocavities. Cy3/Cy5-labeled DNA/RNA hybrid duplexes were affixed to SiO2-capped silver gratings produced by soft lithography process. Tracking single-molecule fluorescence revealed damped sub-1 Hz periodic Cy3 intensity fluctuations with strong dependence on the bulk MgCl2 concentration. Extreme concentration of electric field at the nanocavity edge induces plasmonic heating, which sets up convection deep within the nanocavity. Local fluctuations in Mg2+ ion concentration promote a bent or unbent duplex conformational state, respectively, by varying degrees of negative charge screening along the duplex backbone. These oscillations continue until the duplex conformational state stabilizes or the dyes bleach. This unique molecular behavior in the nanocavity could be used to study duplex complementarity, structural polymorphisms, and protein-nucleic acid interactions at the single molecule level.


Plasmonics; Silver; Gratings; RNA/DNA duplex; Singlemolecule fluorescence; Epifluorescence; Oscillation


Single-molecule (SM) analytical techniques have proven capable of revealing elusive biomolecular interaction fundamentals critical to advancing our knowledge of complex cellular pathways, mechanisms of disease pathogenesis, and next-generation translational research in novel drug design [1-4]. SM studies monitor the stochastic behavior of individual biomolecules under specific experimental conditions (e.g. temperature, salt concentration, enzyme substrates, analytes of interest, etc.) through the lens of a high-fidelity reporter (e.g. fluorescence). Elucidation of SM dynamics by fluorescence requires experimental setups that isolate individual molecules and simultaneously overcome the poor intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of single fluorophore labels over background. Using quartz as the immobilization substrate mitigates glass auto fluorescence, but epifluorescence microscopes introduce additional noise through excitation of the bulk solution. This is most often addressed through the use of complex optical setups such as total internal reflection (TIR) microscopes [5-7]. Alternatively, SM fluorescence and SNR can be improved through resonant photon coupling to surface plasmon polaritons extant at a metal-dielectric interface (SPR) [8]. SPR coupling to plasmonic active metals (e.g. gold, silver) generates a highly-concentrated evanescent electric (E-) field that is typically several-fold higher magnitude than the incident field, significantly increasing excitation rate as well as radiative decay rate of fluorophores immobilized near the plasmonic surface with respect to a quartz surface [9-11].

Matching the optical momentum of incident light to the propagation constant of the surface plasmons is difficult to achieve with flat metal films except through the use of high index prisms, but may be realized in free space by introducing wavelength-scale periodic perturbations on the metal-dielectric interface (i.e. gratings) [12-14]. Plasmonic E-field enhancement can also be produced locally (LSPR) by concentrating coupled light using nanostructured surface morphologies with geometric singularities such as bowties/ nanoantennae, [15,16]. nanolenses, [17] tip resonators, [18] and nanohole arrays [19]. Integrating LSPR light concentration through nanoscale geometric singularities with SPR coupling substrates leads to size-tunable, additive field enhancement and concentration [20-22]. Such enhancement may be sufficient to permit visualization of single molecules using less expensive and complex epifluorescence optical setups.

In this work, we have used a nanoscale periodic metallic grating with embedded nanocavities fabricated by a cost-efficient soft lithography process to achieve fluorescence enhancement factors sufficient to visualize single molecule dynamics in an epifluorescence microscope. The plasmonic substrate takes advantage of the strong free space light coupling properties of silver SPR gratings and field concentration at the discontinuities in the metal provided by the randomly generated 20-200 nm nanocavities, which we have previously shown to provide fluorophore enhancement exceeding 100-fold with respect to glass [14]. We demonstrate the single molecule fluorescence capabilities of this system using a fluorophore-pair-labeled RNA/DNA hybrid duplex. Moreover, we report a unique observation that those duplex molecules identified as residing deep within the nanocavities exhibit ion-concentration-dependent conformational rearrangements in the form of fluorescence intensity oscillations. This behavior is related back to the duplex structure, nanocavity dimension, and significant charge screening set up by the high ionic strength in the nanocavity. We anticipate this observation could be extended to identify polymorphisms or duplex-target interactions through frequency modulation at a specific ion concentration.

Materials and Methods

Sample preparation for single molecule experiments

Silver gratings were fabricated on silicon substrates using a soft lithography stamping process replicating an HD DVD grating mold as described previously [14]. Briefly, poly-(methylsilsesquioxane) (PMSSQ, GR650F, Techneglas) was stamped onto a cleaned silicon wafer followed by sputter deposition of a 2 nm titanium adhesion layer and 100 nm silver layer. Mechanical stresses incurred in the stamping process result in formation of randomly sized and distributed nanocavities. A 10 nm SiO2 capping layer was then deposited by e-beam physical vapor deposition.

Cy3/Cy5 dye pair-labeled DNA-RNA (duplex) hybrid molecules were immobilized on both SiO2-capped silver gratings with embedded nanocavities and unmodified glass coverslips for comparison. A 50 μL aliquot of 1× T50 buffer solution (10 mM TRIS, 50 mM NaCl, pH 8.0) was first dispensed on the substrate surfaces followed by 10 min incubation with an additional 50 μL of 1 μg/μL biotinylated bovine serum albumin (BSA-Biotin) in T50 buffer. Excess BSA-Biotin was removed by rinsing with 50 μL fresh T50 buffer. Neutravidin (50 μL) was then added and incubated for 5 minutes followed by another T50 buffer rinse. Finally, the duplex molecules were dispensed on the surface in imaging buffer (20 μL 5× T50 buffer, 15 μL 2 M MgCl, 1.6 μL D-Glucose, 1 μL Gloxy, and 74.2 μL Trolox) to avoid fluorophore blinking.

SiO2-capped silver grating platforms were cleaned using highpressure nitrogen flow just prior to flow cell fabrication. Solvent-based washing was avoided to prevent damage to the silver or underlying PMSSQ layer. The flow cell was constructed by drilling entry and exit holes through a glass or quartz slide using a Dremel tool with a 0.75 mm diamond-coated bit. Glass spacers were secured at the edges by 5-minute epoxy (Devcon Home) and the grating was secured between the entry/exit holes. Slides and coverslips were cleaned by high-pressure N2 flow, passed over a diffuse flame, and allowed to cool. Double-sided tape was then used to separate each set of holes and define the ends and the cell was capped by a N2-cleaned coverslip. Finally, the ends were closed using a 5-minute epoxy.

Instrumentation and measurement details

Single molecule fluorescence measurements were performed on an Olympus IX-71 inverted microscope with custom epifluorescence excitation setup. Excitation sources were 100 mW 532 nm or 642 nm diode-pumped solid-state lasers (Spectra Physics, Excelsior One) to monitor Cy3/Cy5 FRET or only Cy5 emission, respectively. Laser power was attenuated to appropriate fluence (4.6 mW) by a 532 nm or 633 nm zero-order half-wave plate (Thor Labs, WPH05M-532/-633), respectively, and neutral density filters (ThorLabs, NE40B, NE30B, NE20B, NE10B, NE06B, NE05B, NE04B, NE03B, and NE02B). Fluorophore emission was collected using either an UPlanSApo 100× oil-immersion objective (Olympus, NA=1.40) or UPlanSApo 60× water-immersion objective (Olympus, NA=1.20) using a zt532rdc dichroic and HQ545lp long-pass filter (Chroma) with additional 630dcxr dichroic/shot-pass filter to separate Cy3 and Cy5 emission into individual channels. Fluorescence intensities were recorded on an Andor iXon+ EMCCD camera at a rate of 10 frames per second (fps) for a total length of 1200 frames and 100 ms integration time per frame. Camera gain and scaling factors were kept constant for all substrates to allow for direct comparison of intensity values, signal-to-noise ratio, and calculation of fluorescence enhancement factors.

Fluorescence recording analysis

Fluorescence recordings were analyzed by MATLAB® for singlemolecule fluorescence intensity and power spectral density (PSD) of the intensity-time plots. Considering the low (pM) concentration of duplex added to the substrates, molecules are assumed to be sufficiently isolated so that intensity above the background noise represent individual molecules. Pixel intensities above the average first-frame intensity were recorded and analyzed across all frames as potential single-molecule fluorophores while below-average values are ignored. Presence of solitary dye-labeled duplex molecules was confirmed by identification of a single-step photobleaching event. FRET efficiency was analyzed by evaluating relative pixel intensity in both the donor and acceptor emission channel. Correct pixel mapping was confirmed daily prior to any experiment by running a plain glass slide with immobilized red fluorescent beads.

PSD calculation was performed using a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) on the entire frameset from a fluorescence recording (1200 frames per 2 min recording). The Nyquist criterion [23]. gives a maximum recordable frequency of 5 Hz. Once a FFT command was executed on each trace file, the conjugate of the resultant FFT value was multiplied by the FFT values to derive the ultimate power contained within each frequency. This was then plotted with frequencies from 0 to 5 Hz along the x-axis. Pre- and post-photobleaching regions were isolated with the post-photobleaching region then representing the background for calculating enhancement and PSD.


Plasmonic-enhanced single molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) studies were performed using an RNA-DNA hybrid structure hereafter referred to as ‘duplex’ (Figure 1A) affixed to our SiO2-capped silver plasmonic gratings with embedded nanocavities (Figure 1B) [14]. The duplex consists of a 137-base RNA backbone with 29-bp biotinylated DNA tethered to the substrate, 11-base open RNA region, 20-bp DNA labeled with Cyanine 3 (Cy3) donor and Cyanine 5 (Cy5) acceptor at opposite ends, and 77-base RNA tail extending into the medium. The 6.8 nm (20-bp) Cy3-Cy5 dye separation provides only ~20% FRET efficiency given the nominal Förster distance Ro=5.4 nm, [24]. so that the Cy3 donor fluorescence typically dominates under normal circumstances. The conformal 10 nm SiO2 acts as a spacer layer to prevent metal-based fluorescence quenching, mitigate silver degradation in the aqueous environment, and provide a hydroxylterminated (-OH) surface to promote adsorption of biotinylated BSA. Biotin-streptavidin linkage immobilizes the duplex to the surface, providing a Cy3-dominated fluorescence intensity map visible in epifluorescence mode (Figure 1C). As can be seen in Figure 1C, there is a distribution of fluorescence intensities across the surface with highest intensity located along the grating-nanocavity interface. These were confirmed to be single molecules by the presence of single-step photobleaching, indicating the intensity distribution was due to some variation in the enhancement of individual fluorophores across the substrate.


Figure 1: (A) Structure of the dye-labeled RNA/DNA duplex; (B) Schematic of the grating with embedded nanocavity; (C) Representative frames from the split-channel Cy3/Cy5 FRET recordings; (D) Simulated electric field distribution at the nanocavity-grating interface (black dashed line indicates the level of the base of the grating); and (E) Electric field depth profile along the middle of the nanocavity (white dashed line in (D))

The plasmonic nanocavities result from shear stresses incurred in the stamp and polymer ink during fabrication and range in size from 20-200 nm in width and 20-100 nm in depth, intersecting the grating in randomly distributed and oriented arrangements [14]. Quantitation of the morphology-mediated plasmonic-enhanced E-field strength is fundamental to understanding the associated fluorescence enhancement phenomena. Figure 1D shows an electric field distribution at the cross-section of gratings with a 50 nm wide and 100 nm deep vertical nanocavity by finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulation (details in Supplementary Section 1 (Figures S1-S6)) [14]. For the simulation, the plasmonic substrate was illuminated using 532 nm light at the associated resonance angle given by the dispersion relation for 400 nm grating spacing (θSP=8°). Figure 1D shows E-field enhancement (Ez/ Ez,0) of as much as 19× the incident field strength where the propagating surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) are concentrated at the upper edge of the grating intersection with the nanocavity. Meanwhile, the waterfilled depths within the nanocavity experience much lower E-fields due to field concentration at the geometrical singularity of the nanocavity edge. E-field magnitude increases with increasing height through the nanocavity edge from ~1× up to 2.5× the incident field strength in the area just above the nanocavity as shown by the field intensity profile (Figure 1E) of the middle of the nanocavity (the white dashed line in Figure 1D).

Figure 2 shows smFRET time traces extracted from multiple SM fluorescence movies recording intensity dynamics across a range of MgCl2 concentrations from 10 mM to 1 M. Duplex mounted on quartz (Figure 2A) or on plasmonic grating surface away from the nanocavities (Figure 2B) exhibit no anticorrelated FRET behavior or intensity fluctuation observable above the noise prior to single-step photobleaching. Such behavior was expected as the dyes were separated to the lower limit of FRET efficiency. However, analysis of the molecules localized in the nanocavities such as those in Figure 2C displayed sub- 1 Hz fluorescence intensity oscillations, especially at extremely high MgCl2 concentrations (Figures 2D - 2F). Statistical analysis showed that these oscillations were not unique to only a few molecules, but seen in more than 50% of duplex single molecules immobilized within nanocavities (Supplementary Figure S7). It is important to note that Cy3 intensity oscillations occurring for dyes in the nanocavities (Figure 2D) were recorded in the same movies as non-fluctuating dyes outside the nanocavities (Figure 2B), which suggests there is a unique property of the nanocavities giving rise to this phenomenon. There is also a notable lack of anticorrelated Cy5 intensity fluctuation in those traces showing oscillatory behavior. This will be addressed in the discussion section below.


Figure 2: (A and B) Cy3/Cy5 smFRET traces measured at 100 mM MgCl2 for duplex on (A) quartz and (B) the grating surface; (C-F) smFRET traces of duplex localized in the nanocavity measured at (C) 10 mM, (D) 100 mM, (E) 300 mM, and (F) 1 M MgCl2. The data for quartz substrate was taken with TIRFM, and those for gratings and nanocavities were taken with epi-fluorescence microscope.

Power spectral density (PSD) analysis was performed on the smFRET traces exhibiting fluorescence intensity oscillations to identify the characteristic frequencies for each MgCl2 concentration (Figure 3A). After removal of external noise sources (i.e. Brownian, instrument dark current, etc.), PSD analysis showed that oscillation frequency decreased with increasing [MgCl2]. from 0.4 Hz at 100 mM MgCl2 to 0.1 Hz at 1 M MgCl2. At 10 mM MgCl2, there were no apparent intensity oscillations observed (Figure 2C). By extrapolating from the frequencies at higher [MgCl2]., we find that the most likely frequency for 10 mM MgCl2 would be obscured by the instrument dark current noise (~1 Hz) found by PSD analysis of the instrument response postphotobleaching (Supplementary Figure S8).


Figure 3: (A) Fluorophore intensity oscillation frequency as a function of Mg2+ ion concentration (open points represent frequencies extracted from individual recordings) and (B) Oscillation frequency as a function of MgCl2 concentration and initial fluorophore intensity.

Fluorescence intensity oscillations report underlying physical phenomena, the identity of which relies on the physical and chemical conditions near the duplex molecule. We know that duplex molecules exhibiting oscillatory behavior are found only at points identified as being part of a nanocavity (Figure 1C). Possible explanations for duplex oscillation in the nanocavities in our case include quenching effects by close proximity to silver, E-field variation resulting in higher localized plasmonic enhancement of Cy3, changes in laser power, and conformational changes in duplex resulting in higher FRET efficiency. The laser power was held constant across all samples at 4.6 mW and so is not responsible for intensity changes between different samples. Silver quenching effects on Cy3/Cy5 have been largely negated by inclusion of the 10 nm SiO2 spacer layer, which insures the dyes are at least beyond the critical quenching distance for silver (~8 nm) [14]. Variable plasmonic enhancement would rely on a sharp E-field gradient in the vicinity of the Cy3 label. Such gradients are located at the grating–nanocavity interface where the E-field magnitude is highest (Figure 1D). However, duplex molecules localized at the edges of the nanocavities exhibiting highest intensity and, therefore, experiencing highest local E-field displayed no observable periodic oscillations (Supplementary Section 2 and 4). Exclusion of these physical principles as sources of oscillatory behavior leaves conformational changes in the duplex, namely, bending and unbending behavior resulting in increased FRET efficiency between Cy3 and Cy5.

The lack of anticorrelated Cy5 intensity indicative of FRET is attributed to a combination of low FRET efficiency resulting from the dye separation and directional emission of Cy5 wavelengths away from the detector by surface plasmon-coupled emission (SPCE) [10,25-27]. SPCE occurs when the emitted wavelengths and angular conditions satisfy the dispersion relations for plasmonic gratings in a particular environment, converting normally isotropic emission into directional emission in a narrow angular distribution. The CCD camera window has a 5.1°×10.2° acceptance cone in these experiments (Figure S4) [25]. As a result, any fluorescence emission occurring at angles larger than the objective capture angle will be lost. SPCE significantly reduced emitted photon capture by the detector of Cy5 emission wavelengths. This reduced capture efficiency is illustrated by the study of Holliday Junction molecules (two adjacent arms are labeled with Cy3 and Cy5 molecules while a third arm is tethered to the surface) on two different substrates: quartz substrate (using TIRF), which does not have an angle-dependent emission profile, and silver gratings with embedded nanocavities, which have highly angle-dependent emission and excitation properties (Figure S5). Anticorrelated behavior is apparent for the molecules on quartz, with the on and off states averaging 0.7 and 0.3 FRET efficiency, respectively. The Cy3 channel intensity is 8-10× higher on gratings in epifluorescence mode than the molecules on quartz in TIR mode. Meanwhile, the acceptor emission capture is shown to be severely compromised, corresponding to FRET efficiencies in the on and off states of 0.28 and 0.08, respectively. Assuming that the molecules behave similarly on the two platforms, the energy lost by moving from isotropic (quartz, TIR) to directed (gratings, SPCE) emission can be calculated. The change in FRET on and off states represents a loss of 60% to 75% of acceptor emission capture.

Periodic DNA motion has been observed in the presence of external forces such as a secondary laser, pH modulation, and chemical changes [28-30]. Based on the above observations, the origin, amplitude, and frequency of the oscillatory bending behavior must be strongly dependent on [MgCl2]. while independent of silver proximity and variation in E-field magnitude. We further posit that the molecules displaying oscillatory behavior should be located deep within the nanocavity. This is supported by the fact that molecules residing on the gratings display no oscillatory behavior (Figure 2B) in the same sample in which nanocavity-bound molecules do oscillate (Figure 2D). Furthermore, the E-field magnitude deep within the nanocavity is much lower than that at the edges and varies by less than 10% of the incident field strength (Figure 1E), which is consistent with our observation that those molecules at the edges of the nanocavities display no oscillatory behavior.


The bending of DNA strands shorter than the persistence length (<50 nm or <150 bp) [31] is retarded in ambient conditions due to high entropy costs, though there have been observations to the contrary [32,33]. Further, it is well established that high [Mg2+]. significantly reduces the persistence length due to the screening of electrostatic repulsion between the negatively charged phosphate groups on the DNA backbone [34]. The increased charge screening effect with increasing [Mg2+]., leads to more stable collapsed conformational state of the DNA as is illustrated on the right in Figure 4B. The collapsed conformation pulls the dye pair closer together, which could be viewed in our FRET system as a generally lower initial Cy3 intensity at higher salt concentrations (Figure 3B), the Cy5 emission lost outside the viewable range of the camera due to SPCE as explained above. The collapsing effect of increased salt concentration can also be seen in the overall decay in fluorescence intensity at 300 mM and 1M MgCl2 (Figures 2E and 2F). This decay is inconsistent with the single-step photobleaching observed in Figures 2A-2D. Instead, the higher salt concentration perturbs the duplex molecules deep within the nanocavities, inducing the cyclical bending/unbending behavior as in Figure 2D, but ultimately trends toward a more stable bent or collapsed duplex conformation.


Figure 4: (A) Schematic of the ion concentration distribution within the nanocavity against that in the bulk and the convection induced by the laser source and (B) Bending behavior of duplex in the presence of variable ion flux.

A similar charge screening effect occurs within the negatively charged SiO2-coated nanocavity; the counterion in the nanocavity should form a double layer with length λ on each wall. Using the classical relation equation , λ is found to be ~5 nm for the lowest ion concentration (10 mM). As the channel dimension (h) approaches h ~ λ, as in a nanocavity, the double layers start to overlap resulting in ion-selective membranes [35]. However, ion selectivity in nanocavities can occur even for h>2λ [36]. An overlapped double layer effect can be seen here, even though the nanocavity dimensions (w=20-200 nm, d=20-100 nm) are much larger than the predicted double layer length. If the negatively charged duplex was located deep within the negatively charged SiO2 nanocavity, it will lead to the formation of a roughly unipolar solution of Mg2+ and other positive ions while negatively charged ions are simultaneously expelled (Figure 4A), an effect similar to ion-selective nanopores [36].

To determine the physics behind the initiation and continuation of the nanocavity based duplex fluctuations, it is necessary to examine the convective and diffusive mechanisms in the nanochannel and examine the possibility of plasmonic heating causing the oscillations. For plasmonic heating, an external E-field produces localized heating when it undergoes focusing in nanocavities, setting up a convective electroosmotic flux known as the thermal end effect [37]. This thermally-induced ion flux can create convective fluxes leading to disturbances in the concentration profile proportional to the charge inside the nanocavity [38]. However, here as the plasmonic enhanced field focusing is limited to the upper rim of the nanocavity (Figure 1D), thus any associated plasmonic heating will be limited to the surface only. Further, it is well established that diffusive forces dominate over convective forces in plasmonic systems, as illustrated by the associated small dimensionless thermal Péclet number (Pe) of ~10-9 when calculated using any standard temperature-based method (details in Supplementary Section SI-6). [38]. Thus, there is negligible increase in temperature near the duplex due to plasmonic heating, failing to melt or denature the duplex deep within the nanocavity. This arrangement is confirmed by the presence of fluorescence from molecules in the nanocavity, which would be rapidly removed if plasmonic heating above the melting temperature (~65°C for the 20-bp duplex region) [39]. occurred near the duplex itself. Further, the diffusive forces relax at the order of μs and, thus, will not contribute to the frequencies observed here.

However, exchanging the thermal velocity flow with an equivalent electroosmotic flow (due to free charges), the field gradient (osmotic pressure) induced convective flow due to plasmonic E-field focusing can be accounted for using an ionic Peclet number. This ionic Pe (2.95×10-3) is relatively higher (details in Supplementary Section SI-6), which indicates increased convective forces, specifically near the rim of the nanocavity where the field focusing is highest (Figure 1D). Thus, we identify the source of the oscillations as an axial ionic gradient flux resulting in a curved ion concentration profile from the increased convective forces similar to that observed in the thermal end effects from external E-field focusing in nanocavities [37]. The ion concentration profile can propagate into the nanocavity, leading to a subsequent Maxwell stress profile near the DNA duplex and providing sufficient osmotic forces to bend the duplex and begin the oscillatory cycle.

We can now assert that the initial oscillation frequencies are determined by the [Mg2+]. and localization of the duplex deep within a nanocavity to form an overlapped double layer and have sufficient E-field magnitude to induce thermally stimulated electroosmotic flow. Due to size and depth variations in the randomly generated nanocavities in this experiment, there is an equally wide variety of E-field magnitudes as well as double layer lengths within the nanocavities, leading to high variation in backbone flexibility, initial intensity, and oscillation frequency in the presence of moderately high bulk [Mg2+] (Figures 2 and 3B). Meanwhile, the 1 M MgCl2 results in sufficient high [Mg2+] concentration to induce stable collapsed conformational state of the duplex regardless of location, which is evidenced by the lower initial fluorescence intensity and oscillation frequency (Figure 3). This is also illustrated through linking the donor intensity with the salt concentration, which shows wide variation due to the random nanocavity dimensions, but overall lower oscillation frequency and frequency variability with increasing salt concentration (Figure 3B). In the presence of high salt concentration, the molecule oscillates, but the oscillation amplitude damps with time in a system resembling an underdamped mass-spring-dashpot system (Figures 2D and 2E). In this case, the DNA is the mass, the electroosmotic flow and [Mg2+]. gradient is the spring, and stabilization by charge screening is the dashpot or damper. This explains the oscillation of the duplex, for the charge screening effect at high [Mg2+]. is reversible and depends on system entropy [34]. The end convective flux of Mg2+ will lead to lowering of the positive ions in the cavity leading to duplex straightening [34]. After duplex straightening, there will be excess surface charge inside due to duplex charged backbone. To satisfy this changed electro-neutrality condition inside the nanocavity, it will lead to excess Mg2+ ions inside the cavity. These excess positive ions should leading to DNA bending. Thus, the energy necessary to reverse the bending process is supplied by the laser fluence and plasmonic field focusing effect [29]. A more quantitative explanation of these phenomena will require detailed simulation and experimentation with focus on characterizing the nanocavity dimension and length-height aspect ratio to optimize plasmonic field focusing and, thus, concentration gradient.

In summary, we have detailed a preliminary observation of unique oscillatory DNA/RNA duplex bending behavior in a single molecule fluorescence study using an epifluorescence mode microscope setup. The oscillation frequency was found to be governed by the bulk cation concentration, location of the duplex within the nanocavity, and the duplex molecular composition (Figure S9). This study sets the framework for further analysis of complex molecular interactions with the local environment. Characterizing oscillation frequency, amplitude, and damping rate with respect to varying duplex length, nucleotide content, and base-pair matching could provide abundant information for a library of hybrid duplex structures. Monitoring subsequent changes in a given duplex oscillation amplitude and frequency on addition of a ligand or analyte of interest allows tracking of DNA-ligand interactions as well as single nucleotide polymorphisms, leading to a better understanding of those systems and environmental effects on their interactions. Follow-up studies will be performed with greater focus on molecule- and ion-concentration-specific oscillation frequency and damping rates as well as the influence of the nanocavity dimensions on the extent of this behavior.


Funding for this work was provided by a grant from the National Science Foundation (Award No. ECCS-1102070).

Author Contributions†

S. B. and A. P. contributed equally to this work. All authors contributed to conception of the experiments, analysis, and interpretation of results. A. P. and D. M. performed primary single molecule experiments. S. B., A. P., B. C., D. M., and C.M.D. analyzed the results. B. C. developed the nanocavity model and simulations. K. G., P. V. C., and S. G. advised on planning and executing the research. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the editing of the manuscript.

Competing Financial Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests that stand to benefit financially from the publication of this work or might be perceived to influence the results and discussion in this work.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

  • 2nd World Congress on Nano Science and Nano Technology
    August 10-11, 2018 Osaka, Japan
  • 25th Nano Congress for Future Advancements
    August 16-18, 2018 Dublin, Ireland
  • 20th Asia Pacific Nanotechnology Congress
    July 23-24, 2018 Sydney, Australia
  • 26th International Conference on Advanced Nanotechnology
    October 04-05 2018 Moscow, Russia
  • Nanotechnology & Materials Engineering
    Oct 25-26, 2018 Budapest, Hungary

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12111
  • [From(publication date):
    June-2015 - Jul 18, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8314
  • PDF downloads : 3797

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7