alexa Standardization of LC-MS/MS in Clinical Laboratory | OMICS International
ISSN: 2157-7064
Journal of Chromatography & Separation Techniques

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Standardization of LC-MS/MS in Clinical Laboratory

Shuijun Li*

Shanghai Clinical Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences/Central Laboratory, Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital, Shanghai, 200031, China.

*Corresponding Author:
Shuijun Li
Shanghai Clinical Research Center
Chinese Academy of Sciences/Central Laboratory
Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital, Shanghai, 200031, China
Tel: +86-21-5403-1835
Fax: +86-21-5404-3676
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: January 25, 2015; Accepted date: January 26, 2015; Published date: January 30, 2015

Citation: Shuijun Li (2015) Standardization of LC-MS/MS in Clinical Laboratory. J Chromatogr Sep Tech 6:e128. doi:10.4172/2157-7064.1000e128

Copyright: © 2015 Shuijun Li, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Chromatography & Separation Techniques

The technique of liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) undertakes the indispensable role in clinical laboratory because of its unparalleled advantages of specificity, sensitivity, and multiple analytes measurement in highly complex biofluids over other techniques such as immunoassays. In the past two decades, with the continuous improvement in performance, LCMS/ MS has obtained considerable development in clinical laboratory. Currently its application area expanded to endocrinology, screening for inborn errors of metabolism, therapeutic drug monitoring/toxicology confirmation, vitamin analysis, and more recently, the peptide and protein quantitation [1].

However, the application of LC-MS/MS does not necessarily produce accurate results. The limitation of this technique must be recognized. One of the major barriers hampering the successful implementing of LC-MS/MS in clinical laboratory is the method standardization or harmonization. As we know that LC-MS/MS assays are typically home-brewed or laboratory developed tests (LDTs), significant between-laboratory imprecision and inaccuracy may occur if these methods lack of standardization [2]. Errors may be introduced from inappropriately following of guidance for method validation, improperly use of standard materials, mistake of preparation of calibrators and quality controls, inappropriately choice of the alternative matrices, or lack of adequate quality assurance [3].

There is no doubt that inter-laboratory agreement could be improved through standardization of LC-MS/MS analysis. Then how to perform the standardization in clinical laboratory? First of all, it is crucial to follow a practicable guideline of LC-MS/MS in clinical diagnosis environment. Before a new LC-MS/MS method introduce into patient care, it should undergo rigorous and systematic validation to provide confirmation that performance requirements are met and to make sure it will produce accurate, reliable, and reproducible results with respect to the nature of the testing and the environment of regulation. Those key elements for method validation should be included in the guidance: matrix effect, selectivity/interference, linearity, accuracy and sensitivity, precision, stability, reference interval and method comparability. Collaborative efforts have been made from Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA) to publish the guidelines on bioanalytical method validation [4,5]. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) has also published guidelines specifically modeled toward validating assays for clinical laboratory use [6]. However, till now there is not an accepted standard protocol for validating an LC-MS/MS method for clinical use. The use of traceable standard reference materials or commercial kits is essential to the improvement of inter-laboratory performance. Laboratory-developed LC-MS/MS methods generally use their own procedures, instrumentation, reagents, and calibrators. This is the main cause leading to poor agreement between laboratories. Standard reference materials are particularly important for clinical analysis because they are prepared under stringent procedures and verified by strict homogeneity testing and value assignment. Commercial kits are fully validated by manufacture and rigorously reviewed by regulatory administration such as FDA before launched in market. These kits generally include procedures, columns, calibrators, quality controls, and therefore eliminate the efforts to laborious method development and validation in clinical laboratories. It was demonstrated that the between laboratory agreement improved significantly for LCMS/ MS assays by using a common standard or a cleared kit [7,8]. However, for many LC-MS/MS methods new to clinical use, standard reference materials or commercial kits are not always readily available. Proficiency testing (PT) or external quality assessment (EQA) is one of the standardization measurement help to make LC-MS/MS assays more comparable with other laboratories by using similar methods for a specific test. Generally it is mandatory for a clinical laboratory to participate PT/EQA programs. However most of these programs still base on peer-group mean value to estimate the closeness of the results. The successful outcome of qualification in PT/EQA may only prove your test results being precisely wrong. Accuracy based or trueness verification PT/EQA with target value assigned by reference measurement procedure is more desirable. In the worst circumstances, there is no availability for any of above mentioned standard reference materials, commercial kits or PT/EQA programs for LC-MS/MS analysis, a commutable comparison with patient samples between clinical laboratories should be helpful.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12762
  • [From(publication date):
    March-2015 - Jul 18, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8891
  • PDF downloads : 3871

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

nutrit[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version