alexa Steatosis, Glycation and Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Diabetes | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2155-6156
Journal of Diabetes & Metabolism
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Steatosis, Glycation and Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Diabetes

Marty M1,2*, Hiriart JB2,3, Vergniol J3, Foucher J3, De Ledinghen V2,3, Gin H1,2 and Rigalleau V1,2

1Nutrition-Diabétologie, Bordeaux hospital, F-33600 Pessac, France

2Université Bordeaux, F-33000 Bordeaux, France

3Hepatogastroenterologie Bordeaux Hospital, F-33600 Pessac, France

*Corresponding Author:
Marie Marty
Hôpital Haut- Lévêque, Avenue de Magellan
33600 Pessac, France
Tel: 33557656078
Fax: 33557656079
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: November 01, 2015; Accepted date: December 24, 2015; Published date: December 30, 2015

Citation: Marty M, Hiriart JB, Vergniol J, Foucher J, De Ledinghen V, et al. (2015) Steatosis, Glycation and Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Diabetes. J Diabetes Metab 6:633. doi: 10.4172/2155-6156.1000633

Copyright: © 2015 Marty M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Diabetes & Metabolism


Introduction: Non Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is frequent and progresses to fibrosis among patients with diabetes. The roles of hepatic steatosis and of the accumulation of Advanced Glycation Endproducts (AGEs) can now be analyzed by new non-invasive methods. Patients and methods: Among hospitalized patients with diabetes, we assessed liver fibrosis by liver stiffness measurement (LSM), steatosis by the attenuation coefficient of an ultrasonic wave (CAP) and AGE accumulation by skin autofluorescence (sAF). The patients with severe fibrosis were compared to the others by ANOVA and Chi-2, and the relations between fibrosis, steatosis, and skin AF were studied by regression analysis. Results: 178 patients were included: 60% male, age 59 ± 11 years, BMI 31 ± 6 kg/m2, 79% with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D), poorly controlled (HbA1C 9.0 ± 2.4%). sAF were available in all patients, LSM in 139 and CAP in 93 subjects. Severe fibrosis (LSM>8.7 kPa) was evidenced in 32 (23%) patients, mainly T2D (n=31/32), with higher BMI and waist circumference (p<0.0001). They had higher CAP: 319 ± 53 dB/m (No fibrosis: 268 ± 59, p<0.005), whereas their sAF did not differ. LSM was correlated to the CAP (r=0.40, p<0.0001) and the waist circumference (r=0.46, p<0.0001), but not to sAF. CAP was related to waist circumference and triglycerides level (r=0.70 in multivariate analysis). 1.4 Conclusion: More steatosis and similar skin autofluorescence in patients with diabetes and severe liver fibrosis support that steatosis promotes fibrosis, and suggests that AGEs do not accelerate this progression.


Non alcoholic fatty liver disease; Diabetes; Fibrosis; Steatosis; Advanced glycation endproducts; Skin autofluorescence


AGEs: Advanced Glycation End Products; AER: Albumin Excretion Rate; ALAT: Alanine Aminotransferase; ASAT: Aspartate Aminotransferase; AU: Arbitrary Unit; BMI: Body Mass Index; CAP: Controlled Attenuation Parameter; GGT: Gamma Glutamyl Transferase; GFR: Glomerular Filtration Rate; HbA1C: Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1C; HBs Ag: Hepatitis B Antigen; HCV Ab: Hepatitis C Antibody; HDL-cholesterol: High-Density Level Cholesterol; HIV Ab: Human Immunodeficient Virus Antibody; kPa: Kilopascals; IDF: International Diabetes Federation; IQR: Interquartile Range; LDL-cholesterol: Low-Density Level Cholesterol; LSM: Liver Stiffness Measurement; NAFLD: Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; PAL: Phosphatase Alcaline; sAF: Skin Autofluorescence; T2D: Type 2 Diabetes; T1D: Type 1 Diabetes; TG: Triglycerides; VCTETM*: Vibration-Controlled Elastography


Non Alcoholic Fatty Liver Diseases (NAFLD) causes serious hepatic damage and can lead to fibrosis, cirrhosis and liver cancer [1]. Their natural history includes two phases: first the accumulation of triglycerides due to insulin resistance makes a vulnerable steatotic liver, and then a second hit, involving oxidative stress, leads to inflammation and fibrosis [2] . These events are not clinically apparent, and diagnosis is delayed. NAFLD is a cause of “cryptogenetic” cirrhosis [3]. A direct histological follow-up is rarely performed because the liver biopsy is an invasive procedure, indicated only when advanced lesions are suspected, whereas a simple steatosis is benign [4]. Whether triglycerides by themselves are toxic for the liver is even uncertain, some reports suggest that their accumulation may be a mechanism of defense against liver injury [5,6]. Noninvasive procedures of evaluation of liver fibrosis and steatosis, by Fibroscan (Liver Stiffness Measurement LSM and Controlled Attenuation Parameter CAP) seem adapted to study early stages of NAFLD in high risk populations, like patients with diabetes [7]. Are the levels of steatosis high in patients with diabetes and hepatic fibrosis?

NAFLD are especially frequent among patients with diabetes [8]; mainly Type 2, but Type 1 Diabetes is also concerned [9]. They progress more to liver fibrosis, rates of severe fibrosis detected by Fibroscan are as high as 15% in patients hospitalized for diabetes [10,11]. The mechanism for the acceleration of NAFLD by diabetes is unknown, the role of Advanced Glycation Endproducts (AGEs) is suspected because they activate hepatic stellate cells [12]. The accumulation of AGEs in tissues can now be estimated by the measurement of the skin autofluorescence (sAF) [13]. sAF is high in poorly controlled diabetes [14], and in non-diabetic patients with cirrhosis [15]. Is sAF high in patients with diabetes and hepatic fibrosis?

In 178 patients hospitalized for their poorly controlled diabetes, we measured the sAF, and we proposed a non-invasive screening for NAFLD; liver fibrosis was assessed by the LSM, and steatosis by the CAP. We compared the levels of sAF and hepatic steatosis according to the presence of severe liver fibrosis, and we searched for a relation between sAF, steatosis, and liver fibrosis.

Patients and Methods


From August 2010 to June 2013, we enrolled diabetic patients hospitalized at the Diabetology unit of Bordeaux’s University Hospital. We measured the sAF and we proposed a non-invasive screening for NAFLD. Patients with active sepsis or ongoing foot ulcer were excluded to avoid their movement to the centre for non-invasive screening of fibrosis that was located three floors below the Diabetology Hospitalization Unit. Patients with diabetes secondary to chronic pancreatitis or haemochromatosis were excluded. Dark skinned patients were excluded because sAF measurements are not valid in these cases. None of the patients had viral (HBs Ag, HCV Ab and HIV Ab negative), autoimmune or genetically induced (haemochromatosis, Wilson’s disease or alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency) liver diseases. Alcohol use was evaluated. For all patients, clinical parameters, blood sample, sAF, LSM and CAP assessment were performed during the same hospitalization. The study protocol was conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinski and patients were included after written informed consent was obtained.

Clinical and biological parameters

Clinical parameters included type and duration of diabetes, weight, height, waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), high blood pressure, alcohol and tobacco use. Metabolic syndrome was defined as follows waist circumference >94 cm for men and 80 cm for women, antihypertensive treatment or blood pressure >130/85 mmHg, type 1 or type 2 diabetes, triglycerides >1.6 mmol L-1 and HDL-cholesterol <1.04 mmol L-1 for men and <1.29 mmol L-1 for women, according to the IDF criteria [16].

Biological parameters included fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, creatinin, albumin excretion rate, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and gamma glutamyltransferase (GGT). Blood sample analysis was centralized in the laboratory of our hospital.

Skin autofluorescence (sAF)

sAF was measured with an AGE-Reader (DiagnOptics BV, Groningen, The Netherlands). The AGE-Reader illuminates approximately 1 cm2 of skin (guarded against surrounding light) with an excitation light source of 300-420 nm (peak excitation ≈350 nm). Emission light and reflected excitation light from the skin is measured with a spectrometer in the 300-600 nm range, using a glass fiber. sAF was computed by dividing the average light intensity of the emission spectrum 420-600 nm by the average light intensity of the excitation spectrum 300-420 nm, multiplied by 100 and expressed in arbitrary units (AU).

sAF was assessed at the volar side of the forearm, 10 cm below the elbow fold. The accumulation of AGEs was estimated with sAF measured by the AGE Reader (DiagnOpticsTechnologies B.V., Groningen, Netherlands) and expressed in AU [13]. The value of sAF was demonstrated by its correlation with the cutaneous concentrations of pentosidine (r=0.55) and Carboxymethyl-lysine (r=0.50) in diabetic and hemodialized patients [13]. The measurement was performed in triplicate at the skin site on the forearm. Subjects with Fitzpatrick skin phototype V and VI were not evaluated due to their skin pigmentation with ultraviolet reflectance <10%.

References of normal sAF depend on age, as reported by Koetsier et al. [18].

Theoretical skin autofluorescence=0.024(age) + 0.83, age in years.

The reproducibility is indicated by a mean coefficient of variation relative error of 5% [17].

Liver stiffness measurement (LSM)

LSM was obtained using signals acquired by the FibroScan® (Echosens, Paris) M probe based on vibration-controlled elastography (VCTETM*). LSM was performed with the patient lying in dorsal decubitus with the right arm in maximal abduction, on the right lobe of the liver, through intercostal spaces. The operator assisted by a timemotion ultrasound image, located a liver portion distance of large vascular structures. When the target area had been located, he pressed the M probe button to start the measurements. The final liver stiffness result was the median value of ten measurements performed between 25 and 65 mm depth and was expressed in kPa. Only procedures with ten valid shots and interquantile range (IQR) inferior to 30% were considered reliable. LSM was performed by the same specialized nurses.

According to cut-offs published in NAFLD patients, severe fibrosis was predicted when liver stiffness was greater than 8.7 kPa [18]. The threshold used (8.7 Kpa) for the diagnosis of severe fibrosis was the cut off value determined in Wong’s study in 2010 with a sensivity of 83.9%, a specificity of 83.2% and a negative predictive value of 94.6% for the diagnostic of advanced fibrosis. This cut off value was interesting for two reasons: firstly the CIF (Fibrosis Investigation Center of Haut Leveque Hospital) participated in this bicentric multinational study and secondly this study was targeted only on patients without any hepatic disease none other than NAFLD [19].

Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP)

Controlled attenuation parameter has been designed to measure liver ultrasonic attenuation (go and return path) at 3.5 MHz on the signals acquired by the FibroScan® [20]. CAP was computed with the same signals as the one used to measure liver stiffness and was only calculated when the LSM was valid. Therefore both stiffness and CAP were obtained simultaneously in the same volume of liver parenchyma (namely between 25 and 65 mm). The final CAP value was the median value of the ten individual measurements and was expressed in dB/m.

Steatosis was predicted as severe when CAP>300 dB/m. This cut value was determined in the study conducted by de Ledeinghen at the CIF and published in 2012, for which the sensitivity is ≥ 90% [7].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software. Variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviations. Continuous variables were compared by ANOVA. Discontinuous variables were compared by the Chi-2. The relations of liver fibrosis and steatosis with potential explicative variables were analyzed by Multivariate regression, step by step. Significance was defined by a p<0.05 (Chi-2) and p<0.01 (ANOVA).


Characteristics of the population (Table 1)

One hundred and seventy eight patients were included and described in Table 1. Their skin autofluorescence was 2.42±0.64 A.U, related to age, micro albuminuria and tobacco use. The patients with type 1 diabetes were younger, had lower BMI and waist circumference and their level of transaminases were lower.

Number (%) 178
Gender: males (%) 106 (60%)
Age (years) 59 ±11
BMI (kg/m2) 31 ± 6
Waistcircumference (cm) 105 ± 16
High blood pressure (%) 140 (79%)
Type 2 diabetes (%) 141 (79.2%)
Alcohol (drinks/week) 9 ±15
Tobacco (pack-years) 19 ±27
Fasting glucose (mmol/L) 8.52 ± 3.20
HbA1C (%) 9.0 ± 2.4
Cholesterol (mmol/L) 4.95 ± 1.64
TG (mmol/L) 2.08 ± 2.12
HDL-C (mmol/L) 1.22 ± 0.36
Estimated GFR (ml/min/1,73 m2) 86 ± 23
AER/24H (mg/24H) 148  ± 394
ALAT (x N a) 1.00 ± 0.85
ASAT (x N a) 0.94 ± 0.84
GGT (x N a) 2.05 ± 5.21
PAL (x N a) 0.62 ± 0.25
sAF (A.U.) 2.42 ±0.64

Table 1: Patients characteristics of the study.

Liver fibrosis

The measurement of liver stiffness was successfull in 139 patients: 107 T2D and 32 T1D. Thirty two patients (23%) had severe fibrosis according to a liver stiffness >8.7 kPa, their characteristics are summarized in the Table 2: they were more T2D, with higher waist and BMI. Their CAP was +19% higher (p=0.002) than for subjects without severe fibrosis, whereas their skin autofluorescence did not differ.

  LSM > 8.7 kPa LSM ≤ 8.7 kPa p
Number (%) 32 (23%) 107 (77%)  
Liverstiffness (kPa) 13.4 ± 4.6 5.2 ± 1.3 0.000
Type 2 diabetes  (%) 31 (96.8%) 77 (71.3%) 0.002
Waistcircumference (cm) 113 ±12 99 ± 14 0.000
BMI (kg/m2) 33.8 ± 4 28.8 ± 4.7 0.000
Alcohol (drinks/week) 12.9 ± 20.9 9.4 ± 14.5 NS
Tobacco (pack-years) 26.6  ± 30.6 15.5 ± 19.6 0.017
HbA1C (%) 8.6 ± 3.5 9.1 ± 2.2 NS
ALAT (x N a) 1.92 ± 1.30 0.83 ± 0.58 0.000
ASAT (x N a) 1.82 ± 1.54 0.74 ± 0.38 0.000
GGT (x N a) 3.31 ± 3.14 1.88 ± 6.36 NS
PAL  (x N a) 0.61 ± 0.20 0.59 ± 0.23 NS
Serumcreatinine (µmol/L) 73 ± 21 82 ± 36 NS
Estimated GFR (ml/min/1.73 m2)b 88.6 ± 19.4 87.2 ± 23.9 NS
AER (mg/24H) 121 ± 230 149 ± 442 NS
CAP (dB/m) 319 ± 53 268 ± 59 0.002
sAF (A.U.) 2.45 ± 0.61 2.35 ± 0.65 NS

Table 2: Clinical and biological characteristics of the subgroup of patients with severe fibrosis (LSM >8.7 kPa) compared to the patients with LSM ≤ 8.7 kPa. Continuous variables were compared by ANOVA and significance was defined by a p<0.01. Discontinuous variables were compared by the Chi-2 and significance was defined by p<0.05.

Liver stiffness was related to age higher than fifty years old, BMI, waist circumference, alcohol and tobacco use, and serum creatinine by univariate regression analysis. By multivariate analysis, the relations with waist circumference, alcohol consumption and serum creatinine were still significant Table 3.

LSM Univariate regression analysis Multivariate regression analysis
β 95% CI p β 95% CI p
Age > 50 0.212 [0.495; 3.962] 0.012 - - -
BMI 0.440 [0.240; 0.491] 0.000 - - -
Waist circumference 0.468 [0.090; 0.174] 0.000 0.46 [0.089; 0.171] 0.000
Alcohol 0.237 [0.019; 0.105] 0.005 0.193 [0.013; 0.088] 0.009
Tobacco 0.267 [0.019; 0.080] 0.001 - - -
Serum creatinin -0.171 [-0.42; -0.001] 0.044 -0.21 [-0.044; -0.008] 0.004

Table 3: Associations between LSM and characteristics of the diabetics patients, univariate and multivariate regression analysis (N=139).

The liver stiffness did not relate to the sAF (r=0.030, p=0.774).

Liver Steatosis

The measurement of the CAP was successfull in 93 patients: 64 T2D and 31 T1D. Forty one percent of the subjects had severe steatosis (CAP>300 dB/m). Liver steatosis was related to age, BMI, waist circumference, triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol by univariate regression analysis. By multivariate analysis, the relations with waist circumference and serum triglycerides were still significant (Table 4).

CAP Univariate regression analysis Multivariate regression analysis
β 95% CI p β 95% CI p
Age > 50 0.301 [14.22; 69.36] 0.003 - - -
BMI 0.553 [4.790; 9.177] 0.000 - - -
Waist circumference 0.641 [1.833; 3.051] 0.000 0.566 [1.543; 2.703] 0.000
TG 0.453 [13.36; 32.07] 0.000 0.296 [7.059; 22.579] 0.009
HDL-C -0.379 [-87.95; -28.48] 0.000 - - -

Continuous variables were compared by ANOVA and significance was defined by a p <0.01. Discontinuous variables were compared by the Chi-2 and significance was defined by a p<0.05.

Table 4: Associations between CAP and characteristics of the diabetics patients, univariate and multivariate regression analysis (N=93).

The CAP was not related to the skin autofluorescence, whereas it was correlated to liver stiffness as shown on the Figure 1 (r=0.40, p<0.001).


Figure 1: LSM values (y axis plotted against the values of CAP (x axis), r=0.40, p<0.001.


The high 23% rate or liver fibrosis we found could be expected. NAFLD are twice more of frequent among subjects with diabetes [20,21]. Studies employing non-invasive methods reported severe fibrosis in 5.6% of outpatients using fibrotest [22] and up to 15% in hospitalized patients in our previous study using LSM [11]. The rate of severe fibrosis confirmed by biopsies reached 35% in another study with Type 2 Diabetes patients [23]. Our main findings are that these fibrosis associate with hepatic steatosis, and not with the accumulation of AGEs evaluated by sAF.

Although not reported yet in diabetes, the relation between fibrosis and steatosis could be expected: steatosis is thought to preceed inflammation and fibrosis in the natural history of NAFLD [2]. Noninvasive studies are however crucial to better assess this history: simple steatosis seems a benign condition, that exceptionally (<1%) progresses to cirrhosis [24]. Two experimental studies in animals have suggested that steatosis may protect rather than promote inflammation and fibrosis. Listenberg et al have reported that the incorporation of saturated fatty acids in the hepatic TG pool prevented their proapoptotic effects [5]. Yamagushi et al. [7] found more inflammation, necrosis and fibrosis in mice whose DGAT inhibition reduced Hepatic TG synthesis [6]. If TG efficiently protected the liver from fibrosis, we should have found an inverse relation between steatosis and fibrosis. Of note, the relations we found between fibrosis and age (p<0.01) [25-27], T2D (p<0.05) [25,26], waist circumference (p<0.01) [25] and tobacco (p<0.05) [25] are well accorded to the literature. Forty-one percent of our patients had severe steatosis according to a CAP>300. The strong relation of CAP with waist circumference (p<0.01) and TG (p<0.01) confirms its dependency on insulin resistance [27,28].

On the other hand, the absence of relation between liver fibrosis and skin autofluorescence was unexpected. The autofluorescence is a reliable marker of the concentration of AGEs in the skin [13], its levels are high in patients with other diabetic complications [14], that relate on organ fibrosis in some cases like nephropathy. AGEs are thought to play a role in the initial steps of liver inflammation [12], and we have previously reported high autofluorescence in non-diabetic patients with cirrhosis [15]. The limited number of patients does not seem a good explanation for our negative result: on this limited population we detected the expected relation between steatosis and fibrosis. The previously reported relations between skin autofluorescence and age (p<0.01) [13,17,27], microalbuminuria (p<0.01) [29] and tobacco (p<0.05) [17] were also present in our patients. Liver-toxic glyceraldehyde-derived AGEs [30] are increased in the serum of progressive Non Alcoholic Steato Hepatite vs simple steatosis [31], but may not be detected by autofluorescence, or may not accumulate in the skin like in the liver. Our result do not argue for an important deleterious effect of AGEs in NAFLD, but further work on this hypothesis seems necessary, due to the limitations of our study.

The first limit of our study is that our study population is not representative of the whole population of diabetics: they were poorly controlled with a HbA1C of 9.0 ± 2.4%, reason for their hospitalization. The screening in hospitalized patients led to a high proportion of T1D, but they should not be excluded from studies on NAFLD, indeed quite frequent in T1D [9,32]. The second limitation is the lack of histological confirmation of our results; the gold standard remains the liver biopsy. It was impossible to perform a liver biopsy in all patients without presumed notion of liver disease. However, the diagnostic performances of Fibroscan and more recently that of CAP have been validated in a number of studies both in terms of positive diagnosis and in terms of severity [7,33,34].The high diagnostic accuracy of CAP has been demonstrated also in non-populations [35]. The third limitation is our failure rate of Fibroscan of 22%, higher than the 15% usually found in the literature, due to the high mean BMI of our patients was 31 ± 6 kg / m2. Besides the failure rate in T1D patients whose average BMI was 27 ± 6 kg/m2 was 13% while that of T2DM whose average BMI was 32 ± 5 kg/m2 was 24%. Now, we have at our disposal the XL probe to measure the LSM and the CAP when the BMI is too high, this will reduce the failure rate for further studies.

Despite these limitations, our study is the first to simultaneously assess liver steatosis, liver stiffness, and skin autofluorescence in patients with diabetes, providing new informations: high rates of severe fibrosis related to high rates of severe steatosis associated to hypertriglyceridemia, waist circumference, and no relation with the skin autofluorescence. Chronic exposure to AGE estimated by sAF does not seem to take part in neither the onset nor the severity of hepatic fibrosis in our study. We already know that there are different AGE and they do not have the same toxicity [30]. Liver biomarkers are needed to support the hypothesis that AGE are or are not involved in hepatic fibrosis.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Article Usage

  • Total views: 7949
  • [From(publication date):
    December-2015 - Jun 29, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7901
  • PDF downloads :48

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version