Nangoli Sudi1, Basalirwa Edith2, Kituyi Mayoka G.3, Kusemererwa Christopher4
Visit for more related articles at International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences
The ability to innovate on a sustainable basis is a desirable, and yet, a rare skill that firms need to nature and develop amongst its business managers/owners and employees. This study was aimed at empirically exploring the Entrepreneurial Tendencies and Behaviors among the business persons that enable them to successfully innovate on a sustainable business. These could then inform managers on the kind of innovation-related behaviors to search for and nature among their human resources in the course of strategizing for firm excellence in Innovation. Responses where sought from business owners/managers and employees in SMEs established in the area with the highest business activity in Uganda (i.e. Kampala). The data collected from the surveyed 50 SMEs all of which had successfully existed for over a year as a test of sustainability were analyzed to extract the salient Entrepreneurial Tendencies and Entrepreneurial Behaviors that characterized the success of their businesses. Descriptive statistics were used. Based on the findings, this study identifies and proposes solutions, key policy interventions and approaches to be adopted for ensuring business sustainability in Uganda.
Strategy, Innovation, Entrepreneurial Tendencies and Behavior, Uganda, Kampala
Today, firms are finding it increasingly challenging to recognize and profitably exploit business opportunities due to the dynamisms in the environment. Kaplan and Norton (1996), in their balanced score card, have emphasized the strategic significance of meeting this challenge and described it with the term ‘innovation’. Horth and Buchner (2009) have indicated that not all strategic managers posses the innovative skill and as such, the services of the entrepreneur have become inevitable for businesses that need to ensure sustainability (Pinchort, 1985; Acs, et. al., 2006, Alutu & Uzamere, 2011). According to Schumpeter (1934), Entrepreneurs are innovators who use a process of shattering the status quo of the existing products and services, to set up new products and new services. Entrepreneurial behavior is thus a preference for changing the status quo over maintaining it. Pinchort (1985) adds that the entrepreneur may not be the overall manager but rather a visionary employee. Business managers and employees always apply their Entrepreneurial Tendencies and Behaviors through introducing new goods or new methods of production or discovering new markets for the enterprise (Bewayo, 1995). The GEM report (2004; 2009) identifies Uganda as one of the most entrepreneurial countries. According to Rwakakamba (2011), Ugandan enterprises are largely informal with approximately 97% unregistered businesses, employing close to 80% of the population and family members constitute the main source of labor in most of these businesses. Other complementary studies have indicated that the bulk of Uganda’s business activity is located in Kampala most of which are small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs). According to Acs, et. al., (2006), SMEs are a major source of innovation (see also Drucker, 1985). The SMEs directly and indirectly provide employment to majority of residents in Kampala and ensuring there continuity and growth not only improves on the residents leaving standards but also the country’s GDP. The inability for many SMEs to attain sustained competitiveness in Uganda (Brüderl et al., 1992; Boden & Nucci, 2000; Walter et al., 2004; Rooks & Sserwanga, 2009), could be attributed to poor saving culture, acts of financial indiscipline, lack of a desire and commitment to achieve greater heights, irresponsibility, laxity, laziness and lack of a vision among other factors. However, amidst the high failure rate of SMEs in Uganda, there are other businesses which have managed to stand a test of time. It is probable that such firms which have existed for long could be displaying some unique tendencies and behaviors uncommon to most SMEs that end up closing within less than a year of operation (GEM 2004;2009). The purpose of this study is therefore to explore the Entrepreneurial Tendencies and Behaviors of business players in those SMEs that have managed to competitively stay in business for more than a year. This will in turn inform policy making and point towards reducing the high rate of business failures currently being experienced in many regions in Uganda. The rest of this paper is organized as follows; the next section reviews literature on Entrepreneurial Tendencies and Behavior, followed by the research methodology, data analysis, discussion of findings, implications, limitations and areas for future research.
Research shows that SMEs are the engine behind proliferation of economic growth in many regions world over. The informal sector in Africa, for example, employs 65% of urban dwellers and 25% of the total labor force according to the United Nations report (UN, 1996). According to Rwakakamba (2011), small businesses play a big role in national development of Uganda. As such, efforts aimed at making them more entrepreneurial can further boost economic growth of the host country. According to Alutu & Uzamere, (2011) and Linda (2002), Entrepreneurship is thus increasingly becoming a strategy of choice for promoting economic transformation through innovation. Many definitions have been tagged on the term entrepreneurship, depending on the area it is being applied (Carlock, 1994; Grant & Perren, 2002; Alutu & Uzamere, 2011). This study assumes Schumpeter’s (1934) and Ocici’s (2006) definitions of entrepreneurs. While Schumpeter (1934) defines entrepreneurs as ‘individuals who exploit market opportunity through technical and/or organizational innovation”, Ocici (2006) indicates that entrepreneurship is a mindset characterized with the ability to blend risk taking, with innovation so as to ensure business sustainability. This study conceptualizes the drive to start something new that has been conceptualized as ‘entrepreneurial tendency’ (Bewayo, 1995). In line with the social development theory of Entrepreneurship, this study assumes that Entrepreneurs are made and that environmental factors like the surrounding community and cultural values shape them (Casson 1995). Although studies to the contrary exist (see for example Rauch & Frese, 2007), most studies have described Entrepreneurs as possessing; “a high marginal propensity to save , an internal locus of control, a high tendency to reinvest their business earnings, high need for achievements (McClelland, 1961) and having a collectively strong desire to secure a better education (Raduan et. al. (2006); Frese & Fay 2001; McClelland, 1961; Sexton and Bowman, 1986). Cooper and Ziemnowicz (2007) also aver that some of the most important manifestations of entrepreneurial behavior are risk-taking and Innovation. Innovation is at the basis of economic development and can be defined as an idea, behavior, or object that is perceived as new by its audience (Les 2009). It can be argued that those SMEs that have managed to survive in business, have as part of their winning strategies, continued to innovate better means of carrying on business. According to Kaplan and Norton, (1996), Innovation and Learning enables organizations to answer the question "How can we continue to improve and create value?” The discrepancy in levels of innovation among SMEs and larger firms has been justified in various angles including the ‘scarcity of ideas’ concept which tries to indicate that SMEs are more entrepreneurial than Large firms (Scotchmer, 2005). In explaining Firm excellence in innovation, this study suspended the chain-linked innovation model (Kline & Rosenberg 1986) since it is more of an operational model whose focus is to ensure technical efficiency which is not a primary concern of a strategist. The study adopts the theory of planned behavior (Ajzen, 2002) and extends that Entrepreneurial Tendencies and behavior can be explained by an entrepreneur’s attitude, social norms which are also culturally influenced and perceived behavioral control (i.e. the perception that the target behavior is within the decision maker’s control). It should be noted that the theory of planned behavior (TPB) is collocated with the Shapero’s entrepreneurial event model (SEE) as it also addresses perceptions of desirability of coming up with something new, feasibility of sustaining the idea and propensity to act independently (Shapero & Sokol 1982; Kolvereid, 1996). The above views agree with those of Atkinson & Birch, (1978), that an individual’s life is a continuous stream of behaviors as set out in the dynamic theory of action. This theory indicates that Variables such as effort, ability, previous experience, age, education, family history, and environment thus influence behavior, such as the choice to become an innovative entrepreneur. It can therefore be postulated that Entrepreneurs in Uganda who have ably sustained their businesses have some unique tendencies and behaviors based on the above literature.
This was an exploratory and Interpretivistic survey that was aimed at establishing facts on the issues under study from the chosen business players in SMEs. This research design thus adopted a Critical Humanism paradigm and involved the people studied in the research process. In line with Brigg (2009) and Asika (1991), such design is used mainly in business and social science research where the researcher aims at describing the current state of affairs with no effort to control and/or manipulate the variables under the study. Using this design, the researchers employed various forms of enquiry to ascertain the state of affairs as guided by (Kothari, 2004). The use of SMEs instead of large businesses was merited by the fact that SMEs are a major source of innovation (Acs & Audretsch, 1987; Drucker, 1985). As a measure of sustainability (GEM 2004; 2009) only SMEs that had existed for over a year where considered. The main type of data was primary data, collected from the field although the researchers reviewed literature to enlighten their understanding of the issues under the study and also prepare themselves for the challenges that could arise during field work and data analysis and presentation of findings. The main sources of secondary data were online research journal articles and other electronically published material. A self administered questionnaire was used to collect data due to its flexibility, ease of analysis, interpretation and high response rate compared to other data collection methods. In line with Rooks & Sserwanga’s (2009) submission that a robust sample is difficult to attain in studies involving small scale businesses in Uganda since most of them are not registered and lack a clear structure, the researchers adopted purposive and simple random sampling techniques to generate a study sample. Other related studies in Uganda have used Cluster sampling method (Rwakakamba, 2011) and random sampling technique (Rooks & Sserwanga, 2009). While Purposive sampling was used to target only those key respondents that must not miss in the study such as business owners, random sampling technique was used to select employee respondents. The study population comprised owners and employees of 50 small businesses in Kampala-Uganda. A total of 10 SMEs were selected purposively in consideration of type of business and location from each of the 5 divisions of Kampala district and 6 employees, including the owner(s) of each business served as the unit of inquiry as seen in table 1 below.
|of||Sampling method||Number of
|Central Division||10||Purposive sampling||6*10=60||Simple Random|
|Nakawa Division||10||Purposive sampling||6*10=60||Simple Random|
|Rubaga Division||10||Purposive sampling||6*10=60||Simple Random|
|Kawempe Division||10||Purposive sampling||6*10=60||Simple Random|
|Makindye Division||10||Purposive sampling||6*10=60||Simple Random|
Source: Primary data
Table 1: sample size design
With the help of SPSS software tool Version 19, descriptive statistics were generated to extract the most important Entrepreneurial Tendencies and Behaviors that characterized the unit of inquiry. Content validity index and Cronbach alpha coefficient were used to test the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. The results as seen in table 2 indicate that the data collection tool was valid and reliable since all variables had a cronbach alpha coefficient >0.7 and content validity index >0.6.
Source: Primary data
Table 2: Reliability and reliability results
As seen in table 3 below, frequencies and percentages were used to determine the respondents’ gender, age bracket, marital status and highest academic qualification. The findings indicated that the majority respondents constituting 62.7% (N=143) were female while male respondents contributed only 37.3% (N=85). The findings also showed that 27.2% (N=62) respondents where in the age bracket of 18-25years while those in the age bracket of 26-30 constituted majority of the respondents at 32% (73). A total of 65 respondents, representing 28.5% of the respondents, were in the age bracket of 31-35 and 27.2% of respondents were in age bracket of 18-25. 22 respondents were in age bracket 36-40 while only 4 and 2 respondents were in age bracket 41-45 and 46-50 respectively. No respondents were aged 50 years and above. Findings also showed that majority of the respondents constituting 56.1% were single. This was followed by respondents who were cohabiting at 37.3%. A total of 13 respondents, contributing 5.7% were married. Respondents who were divorced/separated and widowed tallied 0.4% each respectively. Frequencies and percentages were also used to determine the highest qualification of respondent. Findings indicated that majority of the respondents constituting 45.2% (N=103) had attained undergraduate degrees, 37.3% (N=85) had only certificates and 10.1% had diplomas. Only 6.6% had attained Postgraduate qualifications while 2 respondents, representing (0.9%) had no academic qualification. The findings indicate that SMEs in Kampala that have managed not to collapse within less than a year, have mainly employed youthful staff whose age ranges from 18-35 years. The finding that most organizational staff in SMEs were not married, and that most of them were female may indicate that engaging female persons in business who have less social responsibilities may enable them to concentrate more on helping the firm to build sustainable competitiveness through innovation. Frequencies and percentages were also used to determine the mode of employment in which respondents where, the Period they had spent in current organization. The Findings showed that majority of the respondents constituting 43.0% were employed in family businesses. This was followed by respondents who were working for other people/company (33.8%). The self employed were 53 (23.2%). As regards Period spent in current organization, Findings showed that majority of the respondents had worked in that organization for a period of 1-3 years (60.5%). A total of 66 respondents, constituting 28.9% had worked for the organization for period of 4-6 years while 21 respondents contributing 9.2% had worked for the organization for a period of 7-9 years. Only 3 respondents had worked for their organizations for a period of 10 years and above. This indicates that respondents had good knowledge of their organization’s performance.
|26 - 30 yrs||73||32.0|
|31 – 35yrs||65||28.5|
|Above 50 yrs||00||00|
|Highest academic qualification||No formal education||2||0.9|
|Mode of employment||Self employed||53||23.2|
|Working for another
|Working in family business||98||43.0|
|Period with organization||1-3 years||138||60.5|
|10 years and above||3||1.3|
Valid N (list wise)
Source: Primary Data
Table 3: Background information on the Unit of inquiry
Frequencies and percentages were also used to determine the source of the capital respondents used to run their businesses. The results in table 4 show that majority of the respondents constituting 57.0% used bank loans. A total of 27 respondents representing 15.7% obtained loans from friends. 13 respondents used their own savings, inheritance and loans from relatives respectively. 4 respondents got assistance from relatives while only 2 used assistance from friends and donations/grants. No respondents used government loans and/or assistance to start a business. This could imply that the Use of Bank Loans is still viewed by businesses as the most feasible source of funding.
|Assistance from a relative||4||2.3|
|Loan from a relative||13||7.6|
|Assistance from a friend||2||1.2|
|Loan from a friend||27||15.7|
|Grant/Donation from an NGO||2||1.2|
|Loan from government||0||0.0|
|Assistance from government||0||0.0|
Source: Primary data
Table 4: Source of capital used in running SMEs
Data on behavioral features of respondents were also generated on a 5 point likert scale, where 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree and 5=strongly agree. Descriptive means were also used to analyze the date. Findings in Table 5 show that respondents strongly agreed that they are creative and innovative (Mean=4.56), aggressive (Mean=4.47), hardworking (Mean=4.45), prefer working for themselves (Mean=4.42) and also that they respected other people’s values and talents (Mean=4.12). The respondents agreed that they preferred being employed by another person/company. The respondents however disagreed that they had a good savings culture (Mean=1.88), financially disciplined (Mean=2.12), in full control of their destiny (Mean=2.22), skilled (Mean=2.51) and also that they were committed to work (Mean=2.81).
|I am skilled||228||1||5||2.51||.657|
|I am committed to work||228||1||5||2.81||.626|
|I am financially disciplined||228||1||5||2.12||.726|
|I respect other people’s values and talents||228||1||5||4.12||.943|
|I am hardworking||228||3||5||4.45||.652|
|I have a good savings culture||228||1||5||1.88||1.324|
|I prefer working for myself||228||1||5||4.42||.663|
|I prefer being employed by another person/company||228||1||5||3.01||.673|
|I am creative and innovative||228||2||5||4.56||.688|
|I am aggressive||228||1||5||4.47||.623|
|I am in full control of my destiny||228||1||5||2.22||1.231|
|Valid N (list wise)|
Source: Primary data
Table 5: Behavioral features
The finding that about 52% (118) of the respondents had at least attained an undergraduate degree supports Bates’ (1995) argument that entrepreneurs have high need for education and shows that working with educated people can ensure business sustainability. This could be because educated personal help management to feasibly analyze and craft firm direction and implement it successfully. The results indicate that SMEs that have successfully survived for over a year in Uganda employ individuals who posses business features associated with the tendency to engage in entrepreneurial activities like preference for doing own work which gives them independence to try out new things. These results agree with those of Evans and Leighton (1989) that locus of control, self confidence are some of the characteristics associated with entrepreneurial tendencies and behaviours. Only a very small percentage of respondents was married which supports Cliff (1998) who argued that married women give a higher preference to social considerations than economic considerations when making business expansion decisions. The findings however contradict those carried out by Anna et. al. (2000) to the effect that married persons are more likely to engage in entrepreneurial ventures. It should be noted however, that ‘marriage’ was used in the context of the Ugandan Laws and as such persons who where cohabiting were independently represented. If perceived as married too, then Anna et. al.’s (2000) views could still hold. Generally, the studies support the ideas of (Bates 1995, Ritsila & Tervo 2002; Evans & Leighton 1989; and Amit et. al., 1995) that demographic factors like education have implications on the firm’s ability to innovate through shaping the tendencies and behaviors of entrepreneurs. The results support Reynolds et al., (2000), Higino (2005) and Ocici (2006) arguments that government aid should go to improving business development services. This is because of the need to improve the savings culture of entrepreneurs. This will in turn impact on growth potential of SMEs and hence economic prosperity of the nation. Results also support Brockhaus’s (1982) observations that a risk taking propensity and a need to achieve, can lead to the sustainability of business firms.
The Government interventions aimed at promoting growth of SMEs in Uganda should mainly target adults who are neither more than 35years of age nor married. As such, existing government support schemes like the ‘youth fund’ should be maintained so as to support individuals in this age bracket as they have potentials in form of energy, ample time and ability to ensure sustainable firm innovation and hence survival and growth. The study results also imply that SMEs should hire staff that are driven by need for achievement, are aggressive, hardworking and have an internal locus of control as a way of increasing chances of excelling in innovation and hence ensuring sustainability of the business. Entrepreneurship training needs to be encouraged as part of the business development services as high education levels are associated with ability to excel in innovation. The finding that bank loans are still used by managers as a major source of funding could indicate to policy makers that the outcry the business men have made to government as regards reduction of interest rates needs to be listened to if government is to create and ensure sustainability of this SMEs that employ most of its population. The results also imply that having less social responsibilities like taking care of family members, like is usually the case with unmarried women, can enable individuals to concentrate more conceptual efforts in innovating for the business on a sustained basis. The empirical data used was gathered from Divisions in Kampala which may have unique characteristics from those in other geographical locations and cultures which may limit the application of the results in explaining tendencies and behaviours of entrepreneurs in other locations. While this study took the assumption that most SMEs in Uganda that survive for more than one year, posses sustainability potentials and thus are said to be excelling in innovation, modals which test for business survival like the Altman’s Z score (Altman 1968), multiple linear discriminant analysis (MLDA) and logit analysis (Ooghe, Spaenjers and Vandermoere, 2005) where not invoked to predict whether these businesses could continue surviving through innovations or where at the verge of failure. Further studies could apply some of these models in order to indicate how the results of the study could change as we posit that with time SMEs will posses formally processed financial statements to enable advanced analysis.
We would like to extend our appreciation to the Faculty of Entrepreneurship and Business Administration of Makerere University Business School that funded this study. Special thanks go to the MUBS Principal, Professor Wasswa Balunywa and the Dean faculty of Entrepreneurship and Business Administration, Dr. Warren Byabashaija for their enabling leadership.
Acs, Z. and Audretsch, D. 1987. Innovation, market structure, and Firm size. The review of Economics and Statistics, 4: 657-675
Acs, Z.J., D.B. Audretsch, P. Braunerhjelm and B. Carlsson (2006). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Electron. Work. Pap. Ser., 77: 3-4.
Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioural control, self-efficacy, locus of control and the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol.32, Nº.4, pp(665-683).
Alutu A.N.G. and A.O. Uzamere (2011). The Girl-Child and Entrepreneurial Education: A Case for Economic Sustainability. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences 3(3): 180-187, ISSN: 2041-3246
Amit, R, MacCrimmon, KR, Zietsma, C & Oesch, JM (2001) Does money matter? Wealth attainment as the motive for initiating growth-oriented technology ventures’ Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 119-143
Anna, A., Chandler, G., Jansen, E. & Mero, N. 2000. Women business owners in traditional and nontraditional industries. Journal of Business Venturing, 15:2, 279-303
Asika N (1991). Research Methodology in the Behavioral Sciences. Lagos: Longman Nigeria.
Atkinson, J.W. and Birch, D. (1978) Introduction to motivation. New York: Van Nostrand.
Bates, T., 1995. Self-employment entry across industry groups. Journal of Business Venturing 10:143-156. Bewayo, E. 1995. "Ugandan Entrepreneurs: Why Are They In Business?. Journal of Small Business Strategy 71. Boden JR, Nucci AR (2000). On the survival prospects of men’s and women’s new business ventures. J. Bus.Venturing.
Briggs, B., R. (2009). Issues affecting Ugandan indigenous entrepreneurship in trade. African Journal of Business Management Vol.3 (12), pp. 786-797
Brockhaus, R.H. and P.S. Horwitz 1986. 'The Psychology of the Entrepreneur'. In D.L
Brüderl J, Preisendörfer P, Ziegler R (1992). Survival chances of newly founded business organizations. Am.Soc. Rev.
Carlock, R.S. (1994). Instructor's Guide to Teaching Entrepreneurship. Garland Publishing, New York.
Casson, Mark C. (1995) Studies in the Economics of Trust, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
Cliff, Jennifer E. (1998). Does one size Fit All? Exploring Relationships Between Attitudes Towards Growth, Gender, and Business size, Journal of Business Venturing Vol.13, no.6, pp.523-542
Cooper Ramin Maysami and Christopher Ziemnowicz (2007). Ethnicity, Gender and Entrepreneurial Tendencies: The Singapore Perspective. The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies
Drucker, F. (1985): Innovation and Entrepreneurship New York: Harper & Row
Evans, D. and L. S. Leighton (1989): Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship,American Economic Review,79, S.519-535.
Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal Initiative: An Active Performance Concept for Work in The 21st Century.Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133-187.
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor report (GEM) 2004. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor report (GEM) 2009.
Grant, P. and L.J. Perren, 2002. Small business and entrepreneurial research: Meta-theories, paradigms and prejudices. Int. Small Bus. J., 20(2): 185-209.
Higino Schneider, P. (2005). "International trade, economic growth and intellectual property rights: A panel data study of developed and developing countries." Journal of Development Economics 78(2): 529-547.
Horth and Buchner, (2009). Innovation Leadership. Center for Creative Leadership www.ccl.org
Kaplan R S and Norton D P (1996) "Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action" Harvard Business School Press
Kline, S. J. and N. Rosenberg (1986). An overview of innovation. The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. R. Landau and N. R. (Eds). Washington, DC, National Academy Press: 275-305.
Kolvereid, L. 1996. Organisational employment versus self employment: Reasons for career choice intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 20 (3): 23-31.
Kothari CR. (2004). Research Methodology, Methods and Techniques (2nd Edition). New Delhi: New Age
Les R. (2009). A summary of Diffusion of Innovations. Retrieved from http://www.enablingchange.com.au/Summary_Diffusion_Theory.pdf on 11/02/2013
Linda J. Cox (2002). Understanding Entrepreneurship. College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources
McClelland, D.C. (1961). The achieving society. Priceton: Van Nostrans Reinhold.
Ocici Charles (2006). A Working Paper On Entrepreneurship Presented At National Consultation Conference: Legal Empowerment Of The Poor. Commission on Legal Empowerment, International Law Institute
Ooghe, H., Spaenjers, C., and Vandermoere, P. (2005). Business failure prediction: simple-intuitive models versus statistical models. Working Paper, Ghent University, Belgium. D/2005/7012/56
Pinchort, G. (1985). Intrapreneuring. Harper and Row, New york
Raduan Che Rose, Naresh Kumar and Lim Li Yen (2006). The dynamics of entrepreneurs’ success factors in influencing venture growth. Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability
Rauch Andreas, Michael Frese (2007). Meta-analysis on entrepreneurs personality. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Reynolds, P.D., Carter, N.M., Gartner, W.B., and Greene, P.G. (2004). The Prevalence of Nascent Entrepreneurs in the United States: Evidence from the Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics. Small Business Economics, 23, 263-284.
Ritsila, Jari & Tervo, Hannu, 2002. " Effects of Unemployment on New Firm Formation: Micro level Panel Data Evidence from Finland," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 31-40, August.
Rooks, G., Szirmai, A., & Sserwanga, A., (2009). The Interplay of Human and Social Capital in Entrepreneurship in Developing Countries. The Case of Uganda. Research Paper No. 2009/09. United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research.
Rwakakamba Morrison (2011). Budget Priorities and Job Creation in aCompetitive Regional Market. Twaweza, The African Executive
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of economic development : an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.).
Scotchmer, S. (2004). Innovation and Incentives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sexton, D.L. and Bowman, N.B. (1985). The entrepreneur: a capable executive and more. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 129-140.
Shapero, A., Sokol, L.,1982. The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In: Kent, C.A., Sexton, D.L., Vesper,
K.H. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 72–90. United Nations (1996). Informal Sector Development in Africa, UN, New York.
Walter T, Balunywa W, Rosa P, Sserwanga A, Barabas S, Namatovu R (2004). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, Uganda Executive Report 2004. Kampala: Makerere University Business School.