alexa Subtleties and Dynamics of Antibody Function: Lessons from Bovine Antibody Fragments
Immunogenetics: Open Access

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business
  • Commentary   
  • Immunogenet Open Access 2016: 110, Vol 1(3)

Subtleties and Dynamics of Antibody Function: Lessons from Bovine Antibody Fragments

Ashish Sachan and Azad K. Kaushik*
*Corresponding Author: Azad K. Kaushik, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada, Email: [email protected]

Received Date: Jun 23, 2016 / Accepted Date: Jun 11, 2016 / Published Date: Jul 15, 2016


The global market for antibody-based drugs is expected to double within a decade given their clinical success against diseases where conventional therapies fail. Our studies of antibody structure and function have revealed subtle differences in the role of VH and VL domains in antigen recognition and virus neutralization functions. Studies of bovine antibody fragments, such as, scFv (single chain fragment variable) highlight how a single substitution mutation in the framework-3 may influence viral neutralization potency. The viral neutralization potency of bivalent diabody, i.e., dimerized scFv, is almost doubly enhanced when compared to its monomeric form as scFv. Further scFv multimerization as tri- and tetrabody does not necessarily enhance virus neutralization function. Future design of antibody-based drugs should take into consideration subtle structural modifications in the framework regions that may influence the desired function.

Keywords: Polyspecificity; Monospecificity; Heavy chain; Light chain; Antibody fragment; scFv; Fd; VH; VL


Antibody, nature’s most magnificent molecule, has come of age moving forward from an era of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies to its applications as functional antibody fragments or modifications thereof for developing new drugs against vexing diseases, such as, cancer and viral infections [1-4]. The conventional therapies against these diseases have not been successful resulting in a shift towards development of novel antibody-based therapeutics. The clinical success of antibodies can be assessed from their major commercial impact as evidenced by the market for antibody drugs being over $60 billion in 2013, which is expected to double globally within the decade.

Role of VH and VL in Antibody Functions

Current knowledge of the structure and function of bovine antibodies [5,6] provides important clues to strategically design antibody-based drugs by optimized engineering [7-12]. Analysis of linked VH+VL pair (single chain fragment variable; scFv) and individual fragment variable heavy (FdVH) or fragment variable light (FdVL) domain of multispecific IgM and monospecific IgG antibodies as compared to whole antibody molecule show subtle differences in their antigen recognition and viral neutralization functions [13]. In some instances, including multispecific IgM and monospecific IgG antibodies, it is mainly the FdVH that recognizes the antigen [13]. There exist subtle differences in antigen recognition pattern among FdVH, scFv and whole antibody molecule. In some instances, the presence of constant region present in the whole IgM antibody enhanced antigen recognition function while in others it did not [13]. Similarly, subtle differences existed between FdVH and scFv where the absence of light chain variable region led to loss of antigen recognition function [13]. Thus, the role of FdVL in providing structural support to antigen recognition is not excluded. In case of monospecific IgG antibody, both FdVH and FdVL in scFv format are required for antigen recognition as well as viral neutralization functions. The phenomenon of antibody degeneracy is clearly evident in an induced monsospecific IgG antibodies [13].

Framework Residues can Influence Antibody Function

Our laboratory was the first to develop bovine single chain fragment variable (scFv) using VH and VL from an IgG1 antibody against bovine herpes virus type 1 (BoHV-1) [14,15]. The VH and VL linked with a flexible 18 amino acid linker (GQS2RS3G3 S2 G3S) in VL-VH orientation allowed proper VH+VL pairing to form a monomeric single chain fragment variable (scFv-18L; Figure 1) with a single antigenbinding site. Indeed, scFv-18L recognized and neutralized BoHV-1 in vitro at molar concentrationsμ as low as 0.18 M. The structural and functional dynamics of the framework regions of the bovine antibody are influenced by the 3rd framework region (FR3) as it has high AGPY: TCN (mutational hot spots) as well as high (A+T): (G+C) ratio [16]. For these reasons, we tested in parallel the antigen recognition and viral neutralization dynamics of a scFv-18L with a substitution mutation at position 98 of FR3 (Asp to Gly; prior to anchor residue), designated as scFv4m-18L. Both wild type scFv-18L and mutant scFv4m-18L recognized the target epitope on the envelope of BoHV-1 in an immunofluorescence assay. Hence, the qualitative antigen recognition function was not affected by the single substitution mutation in the FR3 of mutant scFv. Importantly, the single substitution mutation in the FR3 affected the virus neutralization potency by 2.7 folds as compared to the scFv4m-18L [15].


Figure 1: Structure of antibodies.

The single substitution mutation in FR3 would not have been expected to influence viral neutralization potency to such a large extent as both the wild type and mutant scFv had identical CDRs, including the CDR3H that mainly makes contact with an epitope. Such a remarkable decrease in viral neutralization potency as a result of single substitution mutation in the FR3 suggests subtle influence of framework regions on the configuration of the antigen-binding site where it seems to stearically affect contact between the residues during epitope-paratope interaction [15]. Nevertheless, this requires a direct evidence of such an outcome by crystallographic structural analysis. These are important lessons for designing antibody-based drugs based on these observations where the role of framework regions in modulating epitope-paratope interactions should not be excluded. Rather structural composition of various framework regions should be taken into consideration in antibody based drug design for an optimized and refined development of next generation of antibodybased drugs with a high specificity.

Viral Neutralization Function of Bivalent Diabodies is Comparable to Tri- And Tetra-Bodies

In attempts to enhance viral neutralization potency of the scFvs, our laboratory developed scFvs capable of neutralizing BoHV-1 with 7 (GQS2RS2) and 2 (GS) amino acid linkers [14,17]. A shortening of linker size to ≤ 7 aminoacids does not permit monomeric configuration but results in complementary VH+VL pairing of two fragments with two antigen-binding sites, called bivalent diabody (Figure 1) [18-20]. Theoretically, it would be expected that half a molar concentration of bivalent diabody would be required to achieve viral neutralization as compared to monovalent scFv-18 L. The actual experimental observations indeed proved it to be nearly so, as 0.1 μM concentration of diabody (scFv1-7L) is required to achieve viral neutralization as compared to 0.18 μM diabody (scFv-18L) [14,15]. Clearly, scFv dimerization helps proportionately enhance viral neutralization potency of scFv. Further attempts to enhance viral neutralization potency were made by reducing the linker size to two amino acids that led to generation of either trivalent tribody or tetravalent tetrabody (Figure 1) [17]. A comparison of monomeric scFv-18 L with tri- or tetrabody revealed only two-fold difference in viral neutralization potency. Thus, there is no significant enhancement of viral neutralization potency of tri- or tetrabody when compared to bivalent diabody [17].

Glycosylation does not Affect Antibody Functions

The construction and expression of various antibody fragments using different microbial and mammalian systems is discussed elsewhere [21-26], each with its own advantages or disadvantages. Certain protein expression systems, such as, Pichia pastoris , cause extensive glycosylation of the expressed recombinant antibody fragments. We did not observe that glycosylation introduced by P.pastoris affected antigen recognition and viral neutralization functions of recombinant scFvs or single domains. There is a caveat with regard to the Ni chelating affinity purification, however, as diabodies, tri- and tetrabodies are relatively difficult to purify because of commonly experienced protein aggregation and cleavage or degradation of histag.

Future Directions

Based on studies with the bovine antibody fragments in our laboratory, it is appropriate to conclude that future design of antibodybased drugs should take into consideration subtle structural modifications that could affect antigen recognition and viral neutralization functions. At the same time, it is possible to optimize functions of an antibody or its fragments by optimizing framework residues or including the constant domain. In addition, there exist limits to enhancing scFv viral neutralization potency via multimerization since no significant differences exist in terms of molar concentration beyond bivalent diabody when compared to tri- and tetrabodies. Such fine functional subtleties of scFvs and their multimers would be obvious once their 3-dimensional structural properties, including conformational flexibilities, are fully defined.


This research was supported by NSERC Canada Discovery grant to Dr. Azad K. Kaushik.


Citation: Sachan A, Kaushik AK (2016) Subtleties and Dynamics of Antibody Function: Lessons from Bovine Antibody Fragments. Immunogenet open access 1: 110.

Copyright: © 2016 Sachan A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Post Your Comment Citation
Share This Article
Recommended Conferences

31st Experts Meet On Cancer Therapy & Immuno Oncology

Singapore, Singapore

Global Immuno-Oncology & Biomarkers Summit

Singapore, Singapore
Article Usage
  • Total views: 10085
  • [From(publication date): 9-2016 - Jan 21, 2020]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views: 9942
  • PDF downloads: 143
Share This Article