alexa Systems Biology for Understanding Cancer Biology | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2332-0737
Current Synthetic and Systems Biology
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Systems Biology for Understanding Cancer Biology

Mariano Bizzarri*

Department of Experimental Medicine,University La Sapienza, Roma Systems Biology Group Lab, Italy

*Corresponding Author:
Mariano Bizzarri
Department of Experimental Medicine
University La Sapienza
Roma Systems Biology Group Lab, Italy
Tel: +39-0-649-766-605
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: May 18, 2014; Accepted date: May 21, 2014; Published date: May 25, 2014

Citation: Bizzarri M (2014) Systems Biology for Understanding Cancer Biology. Curr Synthetic Sys Biol 2:e103. doi:10.4172/2332-0737.1000e103

Copyright: © 2014 Bizzarri M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Current Synthetic and Systems Biology

During last decades the theoretical framework in carcinogenesis studies has been provided by the Somatic Mutation Theory (SMT) [1]. SMT envisions understanding cancer at the cellular level of organization, by claiming that cancer is a problem of regulatory control of cell proliferation and invasiveness, mainly due to mutations and/or deregulation of a specific class of genes. Even though SMT has fostered a meaningful development of molecular-based technologies, on the other hand that approach has encompassed an increasing number of experimental results that contradict its premises [2]. Additionally, current therapeutic approaches based on SMT have been proven to be ineffective in clinical cancer management to the extent that, for now, is urgently required a careful rethinking of our treatment strategies [3,4]

Among others, R.A. Weinberg has substantially contributed in popularizing the SMT among scientists. However, Weinberg himself has recently called into question the entire theoretical construct of SMT. Quoting him, he stated that “half a century of cancer research had generated an enormous body of observations [...] but there were essentially no insights into how the disease begins and progresses”[5]. Despite the expectations raised by “the Ames’ axiom (‘substances act as carcinogens because they have mutagenic activity’), it shortly turned out that most powerful carcinogens are actually not mutagen”; “but fortunately - as Weinberg candidly admits – I and others were not derailed by discrepant facts”. Indeed, a whole series of “discrepant facts” were ignored, while acknowledging that their realistic evaluation would have flawed the dominant paradigm [6]. Yet, despite this realization, the search for mutated oncogenes and/or tumor suppressor genes continued unabated up to the present. “But even this was an illusion, as only became apparent years later [...] the identities of mutant cancer-causing genes varied dramatically from one type of tumor to the next [...] Each tumor seemed to represent a unique experiment of nature”. Unfortunately “we lack the conceptual paradigms and computational strategies for dealing with this complexity. And equally painful, we don’t know how to integrate individual data sets, such as those deriving from cancer genome analyses, with other, equally important data sets, such as proteomics”. Indeed, during the last four decades, Biology has implicitly accepted to be grounded on a reductionistic-based framework [7] according to which “information” flows unidirectionally from genotype to phenotype, and thereby form and functions of organism depend solely on “genetic information”, deemed as ‘digital’ information. However, biological interactions take place at different, entrenched levels, where lower molecular processes are shaped by non-linear dynamics, and are strongly influenced by higher-level organization constraints [8] Thereby, as we are actually unable to grasp such overwhelming complexity, we are also unable to set a reliable theory of biological organization [9].

This is especially true in carcinogenesis studies, where both experimental modelling and theoretical framework have been for long time undisputedly dominated by SMT [10] notwithstanding few alternative explanation have been proposed, grounded on very different biological premises and epistemological settings [11-13]

Those findings have important methodological implications. First, cell function and behaviour cannot be longer studied in isolation, without considering their three-dimensional microenvironment [14], which could enable in integrating data coming from different levels of observation [15]. Second, biophysical cues acting on tissue and cyto/nucleo-skeleton architecture, must be adequately weighted and thoroughly investigated [16]. Third, instead of “single” and “simple” molecular and genetic changes, we have to investigate complex non-linear behaviour of gene/proteomic networks, involving both epithelial and stromal components. This approach represents the updated interpretation of the old concept of homeostasis, currently re-interpreted as auto-conservation, functional stability, evolvability or robustness within a Systems Biology perspective [17]. Indeed, given that homeostasis is dramatically threatened or even disrupted in the course of several diseases, to understand such processes we obligatory require a Systems Biology approach to study non-linear spatio-temporal systems with multiple levels of structural and functional organization.

A widely accepted paradigm will hardly be dropped before a considerable amount of paradoxes and contradictions has been gained, as Kuhn taught us [18]. This moment, as patently admitted even by SMT followers, seems to have come. Thereby, a true progress may be now disclosed embracing new theoretical perspectives as well as methodological frameworks, like those provided by Systems Biology [19,20].

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11591
  • [From(publication date):
    August-2014 - Oct 20, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7813
  • PDF downloads :3778
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

chemicaleng_chem[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords