alexa Systems of Connected and Aggregated Enzyme Reactions | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2332-0737
Current Synthetic and Systems Biology
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Systems of Connected and Aggregated Enzyme Reactions

Jacques Ricard*

Jacques Monod Institute CNRS, Université of Paris, France

*Corresponding Author:
Jacques Ricard
Director of Jacques Monod Institute CNRS
Université of Paris, France
Tel: +33140620631
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: June 29, 2015; Accepted date: August 27, 2015; Published date: August 29, 2015

Citation: Ricard J (2015) Systems of Connected and Aggregated Enzyme Reactions. Curr Synthetic Sys Biol 3:125. doi:10.4172/2332-0737.1000125

Copyright: © 2015 Ricard J. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Current Synthetic and Systems Biology


It is well known that in the living cell many enzymes display numerous interactions. It is logical to think that these interactions affect the behaviour of these enzymes. The change may be enormous and can lead to quasi-novel reactions. The system thus generated is controlled by a number of “local flows” that generate some specific properties such as the emergence of information in the system.


Enzyme; Metaprocess; Thermodynamic; Substrate


It is often explicitly, or implicitly, considered that an enzyme reaction occurring under steady state conditions is a system that collects connected states of the enzyme that appear during the reaction. Moreover, there is little doubt that many enzymes in vivo are aggregated as multienzyme complexes in such a way that one can wonder whether the corresponding enzyme reactions are not aggregated to form a functional structure that connects and associates the elementary reactions as to form a coherent whole.

The isolated enzyme reaction as a coherent system

Let us consider an isolated enzyme reaction shown in Figure 1. This reaction is assumed to be simple. It involves two substrates, A and B, that bind to the enzyme following a compulsory order.


Figure 1: Two simple enzyme reactions involving either the sequential binding of two substrates, or of one substrate only, to the enzyme.
The double arrows indicate that the binding process is reversible. The simple arrow means that the catalytic process is not.

We assume for simplicity that catalysis and product release occur in one step. The corresponding steady state equation can be written as

image (1)

In this expression, where [E]o is the total enzyme concentration, one can write


image (2)

Where K1 and K2 are equilibrium binding constants of substrates A and B to the enzyme. Equation (1) can then be rewritten as

image (3)

Dividing numerator and denominator by k-1k-2 yields

image (4)


image (5)

and image (6)

Equation (12) becomes

image (7)

One can notice that imageand image can be viewed as local flows that lead to the free enzyme E and to the EA complex, respectively. Both of these local flows are expressed relative to a local flow of substrate desorption image.The flows imageand imageallow the system to be in a steady state i.e. to display constant concentrations of E, EA and EAB under non-equilibrium conditions [1]. It is worth noticing that such a situation implies the self-organization of the system due to the local flows imageand image [2].

Now let us consider another simple reaction catalyzed by enzyme E2, for instance the hydrolysis of substance C. One has the situation described in Figure 1. If the processes shown in Figures 1 and 2 take place in a complex made up of two enzymes E1 and E2 in interaction the resulting “global process” can be described as shown in Figure 2.


Figure 2: If the two enzymes E1 and E2 are bound together their activity gives rise to an atypical process with two catalytic constants.

The rate equation of the two-enzyme global model

The rate equation of the global system of Figure 3 becomes more complex than the individual equations of the enzymes E1 and E2 in isolation. However, one can notice that the global system is dependent upon antagonistic effects exerted by system 1. A first effect is a tendency to drift towards thermodynamic equilibrium. This tendency is exerted through the rate constants of substrate binding and release. A second effect is a tendency of the system to drift from the equilibrium and is exerted through a subtle combination of catalytic and substrate binding constants [3]. The situation is thus of the same type, but more complex, than the one already described. A global steady state of the system its organization, is the result of these interactions.


Figure 3: The various types of catalytic flows. 1-4 represent the four flows that lead to the free enzyme. 5-7 show the three flows leading to the ΕΑ complex. 8 shows the flow leading to the EAB complex.

Let us consider the concentrations of the four states image,image,image and imageOne has




One can notice that


image (9)

The relations (8 ) can be rewritten as

image (10)

As previously, k and K are the rate and the equilibrium constants. uE, uEA and uEAB are local functions that tend to increase the steady state concentrations of image,image and imageDividing the concentrations of , and image,imageand imageby by imageyields


image (11)



One can see that, depending on the complexity of the model, the u,s and u’,s describe local flows leading to states E, EA and EAB of the system. These functions u’,s are the corresponding local flows divided by the same “flow” of substrate release i.e. image .

The u’s functions are responsible for the spontaneous organization of the system

A u, or a u’ function can be viewed as a function that tends to create and maintain some kind of a stability in a dynamic system [4]. The u can be viewed as graphs leading to nodes E, EA or EAB. The u’ are the same graphs leading to the same nodes divided by the “flow” of substrate release i.e.image . Hence, the numerators of these ratios collect all the possible pathways leading to the same node and including substrate binding, release, or catalysis. The denominators of these ratios correspond to substrate release processes leading to the same nodes [5]. Hence any individual u’ is the ratio between two local flows, one involving catalysis as well as substrate binding, substrate release and catalysis. The local flows are all identical and expressed by image. In Figure 3 are shown the networks pertaining to Figure 2.

One can see from the data of Figure 3 that uE collects four pathways leading to image .Similarly, uEA collects three pathways leading to node image and uEAB one pathway only. It follows that the expressions of image and and uEA are


image (12)


These expressions can be rewritten as


image (13)


It is worth noting that all these expressions vanish if substrate desorption constants are much larger than the corresponding catalytic constants K’ and K”.

The interactions between the enzyme reaction

The steady state of the system can be derived from equations (11). The expression of the steady state rate can be derived from the following equation

image (14)

Taking advantage of equations (11) and (12) leads to

image (15)

If we take account of expressions (13), the numerator N and the denominator D become

image (16)



image (17)

It follows that

image (18)


The local flows and their significance

The system made up of two enzymes and three substrates is far more complex than an enzyme reaction involving three substrates [6]. This implies that some kind of interactions between the two enzymes should take place. In fact, the local flows u’s should play an important role in defining such information. If we consider the ratio image imageit can be viewed as the probability of occurrence of B, p(B), generated by the local flows. Similarly,imageimage can be viewed as the conditional probability p(B/A). One has

image (19)


image (20)

It is then clear that p(B/A)>p(B) and it is well known that the information generated by the system is

I(B:A)=log image (21)

Hence one can conclude that some information is generated in the system owing to the activity of the local flows u’. This amount of information is directly related to the expression


This expression is, of necessity, larger than one which means that information has been generated in the system [7].


It is well known that, in the living cell, many enzymes are not in a free state but are bound to other enzymes and form complexes. Moreover, within such a complex, it is quite possible that an enzyme changes its conformation upon the binding of a ligand to another enzyme. Hence its properties will be altered. The idea developed in the present paper is that the physical association possesses a biological meaning, namely that two, or more than two, associated enzymes are able to catalyse a unique “metaprocess” involving the interaction of two, or more than two, catalytic processes [8]. Then one can expect that the global system emerging from the interactions between different enzymes can be considered as some kind of novel entity.

One of the basic ideas of the present paper is to express reaction rates in terms of equations involving equilibrium constants for systems that are away from equilibrium. Such an apparent paradoxical situation can be explained only if the local concentrations of free enzyme, as well as that of the enzyme-substrate complexes, are maintained at fixed values by local flows. For the system considered in this paper, there is, in fact, three local flows, one leading to free enzyme and two others leading to enzyme-substrate(s) complexes. It is the dynamics of the system that maintains constant for a while the concentrations of free and bound enzyme. It is the dynamics of the system that contributes to define its organization that can be complex. Moreover the local flows generate an information that can be used to contribute to the organization of the system. Such systems are able to self-organize [9]. It is then apparent that, for simple physical reasons, the system can maintain, or alter, the probability of occurrence of its nodes. In other words, this physical model can display elementary self-organization.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

  • 2nd International Conference on Nucleic Acids , Molecular Biology & Biologics
    August 31-September 01, 2017 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Article Usage

  • Total views: 7877
  • [From(publication date):
    December-2015 - Aug 23, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7818
  • PDF downloads :59

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version