Targeting Gene Fusion Events in Bladder Carcinoma
Received Date: Aug 24, 2018 / Accepted Date: Sep 03, 2018 / Published Date: Sep 06, 2018
Studies over the past decades revealed the driving role of fusion genes in tumorigenesis. With the advent of sequencing methods, a surge in the identification of novel fusions genes has been evident. These events may also rearrange gene promoters to amplify the expression of oncogenes or to decrease the expression of tumor suppressor genes. Several gene fusion events are determined in bladder carcinoma including well characterized FGFR3–TACC3 and FGFR3–BAIAP2L1 fusion genes. These fusion genes generate chimeric proteins which retain the complete sequence of FGFR3 except the final exon fused in-frame to different C-terminal regions of the TACC3 and BAIAP2L1. The presence of fusion genes offers promising targetable molecules for treatment, resulting improved patient outcome. Oncogenic FGFR3 is a druggable gene fusion signifying that it may aid in selection of patients for FGFR-targeted therapy in bladder carcinoma.
Keywords: Urothelial carcinoma; Next-generation sequencing; FGF receptor; Clinical trial
Bladder carcinomas show diverse molecular landscapes with poor clinical outcome and present several challenges in clinical management. No clinically targeted treatment has been approved so far for bladder carcinoma. Numerous studies reported on determining the landscape of single nucleotide variations, insertions, deletions, and copy number alterations in bladder carcinoma [1-11]. Although these genomic alterations comprised of large fraction of the mutation burden in tumors, gene fusions or translocations play a key role in tumorigenesis. Fusion genes were initially discovered in hematologic malignancies and have been recently reported in various other tumors. FGFR3- TACC3 gene fusions were observed in a variety of tumors including adeno- and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung glioma, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), bladder carcinoma, esophageal carcinoma, cervical carcinoma, gastric carcinoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) [12-26].
FGFR3-TACC3 fusion products induce aneuploidy and chromosome instability in GBM . It promotes cell proliferation and anchorage independent cell growth by increasing STAT3 and ERK activation in GBM cell lines . It has also been suggested that the transforming ability of FGFR3-TACC3 fusion results from loss of miRNA regulation in GBM . FGFR3-TACC3 fusion activates Akt and ERK signaling pathways further promoting cell proliferation, colony formation and transforming ability in two NPC cell lines (HNE1 and HK1) . FGFR3- BAIAP2L1 fusion genes were reported in bladder and lung carcinomas . It induces growth signals via activation of MAPK cascade and inhibits tumor-suppressive signals via the TP53/RB1/CDKN2A pathways . Figure 1 depicts the product of well characterized fusion genes, FGFR3- TACC3 and FGFR3- BAIAP2L1 in bladder carcinoma.
Figure 1: FGFR3-TACC3 and FGFR3–BAIAP2L1 gene fusion products in bladder carcinoma. This schematic representation shows fusion products of FGFR3-TACC3 and FGFR3–BAIAP2L1 gene fusions in bladder carcinoma. (A) Depicting three gene fusion products of FGFR3 isoform IIIb and TACC3. (B) Depicting gene fusion product of FGFR3 isoform IIIb and BAIAP2L1. The breakpoints are depicted by red arrows.
FGFR3-TACC3 gene fusion in bladder carcinoma
FGFR3-TACC3 was widely reported in patients with bladder carcinoma contributing to 3% cases of advanced tumor as reported by Ross et al. and Weinstein et al., 3.5% by Wu et al., 3.2% by Helsten et al. and 2.2% by Williams et al. Among 43 bladder carcinoma cell lines, Williams et al. and Wu et al. reported FGFR3- TACC3 fusions in 3 cell lines RT4, RT112 and LUCC2 [20,28]. FGFR3-TACC3 fusion appeared at various genomic locations in bladder carcinoma [20,21,25,28,29] (Table 1). The loss of exon 19 was apparent in all the fusions. The breakpoints in FGFR3 were majorly seen at intron 18 retaining the kinase domain of FGFR3 with varying joining points in TACC3 like exon 4, 8, 11 or intron 10 retaining the entire coiled coil region of TACC3 (Figure 1A). The fusion gene products were found to be involved in constitutive dimerization and stabilization of kinetochore fibres during mitosis . Williams et al. observed that the chimeric protein was highly activated and induce signaling via MAPK pathway and lacked the ability to activate PLCγ1 . Lombardi et al. identified nine pathways significantly regulated in a cell line expressing FGFR3- TACC3 fusion. These pathways were involved in chaperon activation, TP53 expression and degradation, depolymerisation of nuclear lamina, MET negative regulation, modulation of bacterial toxins and regulation of receptor tyrosine kinase pathways. They also identified five pathways regulated only by stimulation of the wild-type FGFR3, which were involved in TP53 activity regulation, netrin mediated repulsion signals, apoptic execution phase, activation of KTN1 by RHO GTPases and apoptic cleavage of cellular proteins .
|Fusion Genes||Ref||Tissue/Cell Line||Number of Samples Analyzed||Number of Samples/Cell Lines
Harboring Fusion Genes
|Breakpoint of Fusion
|Breakpoint of Fusion Partner 2||Inhibitor/Clinical Trial|
|||Tissue||131||3||Intron 16 (2 cases) and
Exon 17 (1 case)
|||Tissue||85||3||Exon 18||Exon 11|
|||Cell lines||43||RT112||Intron 18||Intron 10|
|RT4||Intron 18||exon 4|
|LUCC2||Intron 18||Intron 10|
|||Cell lines||30||T4V6 and T112||NR||NR|
|FGFR3-BAIAP2L1||||Cell lines||43||SW780||Exon 18||Intron 1||NA|
|||Cell lines||2||SW780||Exon 18||Exon 2|
(NR- Not Reported; NA- Not Available)
Table 1: Summary of the gene fusions in bladder carcinoma. The table combines various studies identified several gene fusion events in bladder carcinoma. The most frequently studied gene fusion in bladder carcinoma is FGFR3-TACC3 and is undertaken for clinical trial.
FGFR3–BAIAP2L1 gene fusion in bladder carcinoma
The FGFR3-BAIAP2L1 fusion genes were identified by Williams et al. and Wu et al. and the breakpoints in FGFR3 are seen at exon 18 retaining the kinase domain of FGFR3 with joining points in BAIAP2L1 at intron 1 or exon 2 [20,28]. The FGFR3–BAIAP2L1 fusion retains the entire kinase domain of FGFR3, with IMD domain, SH3 domain and a putative WW domain interacting motif, of BAIAP2L1 (Figure 1B) . A detailed list of fusion genes in bladder carcinoma is provided in Table 1.
Clinical implications of gene fusions in bladder carcinoma
FGFR3 has been reported as an oncogene in majority of low-grade non-invasive bladder tumors and upregulated in invasive bladder tumors. FGFR3 fusions identified in a subset of bladder carcinoma with upregulated FGFR3 expression. FGFR3-TACC3 fusion contain part of TACC3 gene, encodes a microtubule-associated protein. The fusions lead to constitutively activation of tyrosine kinase domain and promotes aneuploidy. This fusion imparts oncogenic mechanism and can be a potential target for tyrosine kinase inhibitors in tumors [13,18]. Currently, FGFR3–TACC3 fusion is in a phase I clinical trial of the FGFR3 inhibitor JNJ-42756493 (NCT01703481) and has demonstrated partial response in a bladder carcinoma patient with FGFR3-TACC3 translocation [31-33]. In addition, ASP5878 has the potential to be an oral targeted therapy against patients with bladder carcinoma harboring FGFR3 fusion and is also undergoing clinical trial (NCT02038673) . Wu et al. observed that cell lines harboring FGFR3-TACC3 fusion, SW780 and RT4, were sensitive to FGFR kinase inhibitors (PD173074 and pazopanib) in vitro and in in vivo. SW780 xenografts showed ERK1/2 repression upon treatment with PD173074 while RT4 xenografts showed sensitivity to PD173074 treatment .
Nakanishi et al. confirmed the antiproliferative activity of CH5183284/ Debio 1347, a selective FGFR inhibitor, against FGFR3– BAIAP2L1-positive SW780 cells. They demonstrated CH5183284/ Debio 1347 induced apoptosis in SW780 by suppressing FRS and ERK phosphorylation confirming its antitumor activity in SW780 and rat models. They observed FGFR3 or BAIAP2L1 knockdowns using siRNA showed effect on SW780 cells but not on J82 . Wu et al. reported the sensitivity of SW780 (fusion harboring cell line) cells to PD173074 and pazopanib compared to mutation harboring cell lines. Above studies suggest that FGFR3 fusions are sensitive to FGFR inhibitors compared to FGFR3 mutations bearing cell lines and presence of fusions can be used for the selection of patients for FGFR-targeted therapy [27,28].
Bladder carcinoma is highly heterogeneous disease and historically associated with activating mutations in FGFR3 gene. However, FGFR3 gene rearrangements have recently been reported in a unique subset of bladder tumors. Targeting fusion genes would provide a strong impetus for the treatment of patients with bladder carcinoma. Targeting fusionpositive subset of patients from targeted FGFR inhibition would lead to a better treatment option.
PK is a recipient of the Ramanujan Fellowship awarded by Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India. JS is a recipient of Bio-CARe Women Scientists award by Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India. KG is a recipient of Senior Research Fellowship from University Grants Commission (UGC), Government of India. BD is a recipient of INSPIRE Fellowship from Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India.
- Balbas-Martinez C, Sagrera A, Carrillo-de-Santa-Pau E, Earl J, Marquez M, et al. (2013) Recurrent inactivation of STAG2 in bladder cancer is not associated with aneuploidy. Nature Genet 45: 1464-1469.
- Guo G, Sun X, Chen C, Wu S, Huang P, et al. (2013) Whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing of bladder cancer identifies frequent alterations in genes involved in sister chromatid cohesion and segregation. Nature Genet 45: 1459-1463.
- Pan H, Xu X, Wu D, Qiu Q, Zhou S, et al. (2016) Novel somatic mutations identified by whole-exome sequencing in muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Oncol Letters 11: 1486-1492.
- Zhao J, Xu W, He M, Zhang Z, Zeng S, et al. (2016) Whole-exome sequencing of muscle-invasive bladder cancer identifies recurrent copy number variation in IPO11 and prognostic significance of importin-11 overexpression on poor survival. Oncotarget 7: 75648-75658.
- Morrison CD, Liu P, Woloszynska-Read A, Zhang J, Luo W, et al. (2014) Whole-genome sequencing identifies genomic heterogeneity at a nucleotide and chromosomal level in bladder cancer. Proc National Acad Sci USA 111: E672-681.
- Nickerson ML, Dancik GM, Im KM, Edwards MG, Turan S, et al. (2014) Concurrent alterations in TERT, KDM6A, and the BRCA pathway in bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res 20: 4935-4948.
- Liu D, Abbosh P, Keliher D, Reardon B, Miao D, et al. (2017) Mutational patterns in chemotherapy resistant muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Nature Commun 8: 2193.
- Lamy P, Nordentoft I, Birkenkamp-Demtroder K, Thomsen MB, Villesen P, et al. (2016) Paired exome analysis reveals clonal evolution and potential therapeutic targets in urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Res 76: 5894-5906.
- Castells X, Karanovic S, Ardin M, Tomic K, Xylinas E, et al. (2015) Low-coverage exome sequencing screen in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumors reveals evidence of exposure to carcinogenic aristolochic acid. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prevent 24: 1873-1881.
- Poon SL, Huang MN, Choo Y, McPherson JR, Yu W, et al. (2015) Mutation signatures implicate aristolochic acid in bladder cancer development. Genome Med 7: 38.
- Robertson AG, Kim J, Al-Ahmadie H, Bellmunt J, Guo G, et al. (2017) Comprehensive molecular characterization of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Cell 171: 540-556.
- Capelletti M, Dodge ME, Ercan D, Hammerman PS, Park SI, et al. (2014) Identification of recurrent FGFR3-TACC3 fusion oncogenes from lung adenocarcinoma. Clin cancer Res 20: 6551-6558.
- Wang R, Wang L, Li Y, Hu H, Shen L, et al. (2014) FGFR1/3 tyrosine kinase fusions define a unique molecular subtype of non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 20: 4107-4114.
- Shinmura K, Kato H, Matsuura S, Inoue Y, Igarashi H, et al. (2014) A novel somatic FGFR3 mutation in primary lung cancer. Oncol Rep 31: 1219-1224.
- Majewski IJ, Mittempergher L, Davidson NM, Bosma A, Willems SM, et al. (2013) Identification of recurrent FGFR3 fusion genes in lung cancer through kinome-centred RNA sequencing. J Pathol 230: 270-276.
- Kim Y, Hammerman PS, Kim J, Yoon JA, Lee Y, et al. (2014) Integrative and comparative genomic analysis of lung squamous cell carcinomas in East Asian patients. J Clin Oncol 32: 121-128.
- Di Stefano AL, Fucci A, Frattini V, Labussiere M, Mokhtari K, et al. (2015) Detection, Characterization, and Inhibition of FGFR-TACC Fusions in IDH Wild-type Glioma. Clin Cancer Res 21: 3307-3317.
- Singh D, Chan JM, Zoppoli P, Niola F, Sullivan R, et al. (2012) Transforming fusions of FGFR and TACC genes in human glioblastoma. Sci 337: 1231-1235.
- Parker BC, Annala MJ, Cogdell DE, Granberg KJ, Sun Y, et al. (2013) The tumorigenic FGFR3-TACC3 gene fusion escapes miR-99a regulation in glioblastoma. J Clinical Invest 123: 855-865.
- Williams SV, Hurst CD, Knowles MA (2013) Oncogenic FGFR3 gene fusions in bladder cancer. Hum Mol Genet 22: 795-803.
- Ross JS, Wang K, Al-Rohil RN, Nazeer T, Sheehan CE, et al. (2014) Advanced urothelial carcinoma: next-generation sequencing reveals diverse genomic alterations and targets of therapy. Mod Pathol 27: 271-280.
- Baldia PH, Maurer A, Heide T, Rose M, Stoehr R, et al. (2016) Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations in squamous differentiated bladder cancer: A putative therapeutic target for a small subgroup. Oncotarget 7: 71429-71439.
- Mizukami T, Sakai K, Naruki S, Taniyama T, Horie Y, et al. (2016) Identification of a FGFR3-TACC3 fusion in esophageal cancer. Annals Oncol 28: 437-438.
- Carneiro BA, Elvin JA, Kamath SD, Ali SM, Paintal AS, et al. (2015) FGFR3-TACC3: A novel gene fusion in cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol Rep 13: 53-56.
- Kim Y, Kim ST, Lee J, Kang WK, Kim KM, et al. (2017) Identification of FGFR3-TACC3 gene fusion in metastatic gastric cancer. Prec Future Med 1: 168-172.
- Yuan L, Liu ZH, Lin ZR, Xu LH, Zhong Q, et al. (2014) Recurrent FGFR3-TACC3 fusion gene in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Biol Ther 15: 1613-21.
- Nakanishi Y, Akiyama N, Tsukaguchi T, Fujii T, Satoh Y, et al. (2015) Mechanism of oncogenic signal activation by the novel fusion kinase FGFR3-BAIAP2L1. Mol Cancer Therap 14: 704-712.
- Wu YM, Su F, Kalyana-Sundaram S, Khazanov N, Ateeq B, et al. (2013) Identification of targetable FGFR gene fusions in diverse cancers. Cancer Disc 3: 636-647.
- Helsten T, Elkin S, Arthur E, Tomson BN, Carter J, et al. (2016) The FGFR landscape in cancer: analysis of 4,853 tumors by next-generation sequencing. Clin Cancer Res 22: 259-267.
- Lombardi B, Ashford P, Moya-Garcia AA, Rust A, Crawford M, et al. (2017) Unique signalling connectivity of FGFR3-TACC3 oncoprotein revealed by quantitative phosphoproteomics and differential network analysis. Oncotarget 8: 102898-102911.
- Bahleda R, Dienstmann R, Adamo B, Gazzah A, Infante J, et al. (2014) Phase 1 study of JNJ-42756493, a pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Res 1: 325.
- Pietzak EJ, Bagrodia A, Cha EK, Drill EN, Iyer G, et al. (2017) Next-generation sequencing of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer reveals potential biomarkers and rational therapeutic targets. Eur Urol 72: 952-959.
- Stransky N, Cerami E, Schalm S, Kim JL, Lengauer C (2014) The landscape of kinase fusions in cancer. Nature Commun 5: 4846.
- Kikuchi A, Suzuki T, Nakazawa T, Iizuka M, Nakayama A, et al. (2017) ASP5878, a selective FGFR inhibitor, to treat FGFR3-dependent urothelial cancer with or without chemoresistance. Cancer Sci 108: 236-242.
Citation: Sharma J, Gondkar K, Deb B, Kumar P (2018) Targeting Gene Fusion Events in Bladder Carcinoma. J Mol Genet Med 12: 361 DOI: 10.4172/1747-0862.1000361
Copyright: © 2018 Sharma J, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Share This Article
March 11-12, 2019 Nice, France
March 21-22, 2019 Rome, Italy
April 8-9, 2019 Abu Dhabi, UAE
April 11-12, 2019 Abu Dhabi, UAE
April 15-17, 2019 Berlin, Germany
- Total views: 381
- [From(publication date): 0-0 - Jan 18, 2019]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 344
- PDF downloads: 37