alexa Tensile Strength Assessments of CFRP Adhesive Bonded Joint | OMICS International
ISSN: 0976-4860
International Journal of Advancements in Technology
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Tensile Strength Assessments of CFRP Adhesive Bonded Joint

Henok Yilma Kebede1, Tae Min Kim1 and Dong Ho Bae2*

1Graduated School, Mechanical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Korea

2School of Mechanical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Korea

*Corresponding Author:
Dong Ho Bae
School of Mechanical Engineering
Sungkyunkwan University, Korea
Tel: +82 -31-290-7443
Fax: +82-31-295-1937
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: February 06, 2017; Accepted Date: February 19, 2017; Published Date: March 01, 2017

Citation: Bae DH, Kebede HY, Kim TM (2017) Tensile Strength Assessments of CFRP Adhesive Bonded Joint. Int J Adv Technol 8:180. doi: 10.4172/0976-4860.1000180

Copyright: © 2017 Kebede HY, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License; which permits unrestricted use; distribution; and reproduction in any medium; provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at International Journal of Advancements in Technology

Abstract

In this paper, stress distribution analysis and tensile strength assessment of CFRP bonded joint were studied. First a mixture of Epoxy adhesives and MWCNT was fabricated. Since failure is initiated at the ends of overlap, the stress distribution at the ends of the overlap and bonded joint was numerically analyzed. After the stress distributions were analyzed based on the result obtained the experimental steps were followed to assess the tensile strength of bonded joint. The stress distribution analysis and the tensile strength assessment results showed an agreement that the geometrical factors directly affect the reliability of the bond.

Keywords

Adhesive bonding; Finite element stress analysis; Tensile strength; Stress distribution; Multi-wall carbon nanotubes; Composites (CFRP)

Introduction

Joining technology is widely used for assembling of aerospace and automotive structures. Compared to mechanical fastened, riveted joints and spot welds, adhesive bonding have the following advantages such as structural integrity, higher strength to weight ratio, ease of applicability, join dissimilar materials, reduced stress concentration, and improved fatigue resistance [1-3]. Epoxy resin is an engineering adhesive that has outstanding mechanical and thermal properties [4].

Reinforcements are mostly used in the development of composite materials ranging from macro to nano-scale. Nanofillers are commonly added as reinforcement to enhance the performance of the adhesive properties of Epoxy resin. Due to their excellent stiffness and strength and exceptional high aspect ratio combined with low density, Carbon nanotubes are considered as an ideal candidate for the reinforcement of conventional adhesives [5-7]. The electrical, thermal and mechanical property of CNT provides a new perspective for improving the conducting performance of the mechanical adhesives.

On this study the Epoxy resin was mixed with multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) as a reinforcement to increase the mechanical, thermal and electrical properties of Epoxy adhesives.

Single-lap joint is used as standard test specimen used to determine the mechanical properties of adhesives. Adhe-sively bonded single-lap joint is widely used for connecting composite structures [8]. Since almost 70% of failures initiated in the joint, it’s very important to analyze the stress distribution in the joints to resolve such kinds of failures. Stress distribution of single-lap joint was numerically and experimentally studied by many scholars but still needs further research to clarify the controversial ideas and to obtain optimized adhesive bonded joint [9-11].

Stress distribution analysis

Analysis model

When the external tensile shear load is applied to the adhesive bonded joint of Figure 1, two kinds of internal forces act on bonded part, in-plane shear force (Pt) and out-of-plane bending moment (M), as illustrated in Figure 2. These internal forces cause a very complicated deformation and stress concentration which results failure of adhesive bond at the edge of the bonded joint. Therefore, it is very important to calculate the accurate stress and strain distribution of the bonded joint for a reasonable strength assessment of the adhesively bonded CFRP sheets. FEM was used for stress distribution analysis of single-lap joints [12,13].

advancements-technology-configuration

Figure 1: Configuration of adhesive bonded joint: T- thickness of adherend, L- lapped length, t- thickness of adhesive.

advancements-technology-adhesive

Figure 2: Schematic of internal forces in the adhesive bonded joint by the tensile shear load: P- applied load.

In this paper, 3D solid brick elements were used for FEA (Finite element analysis) model. The upper and lower plates as well as the bonding layer have each layer of solid brick element. Boundary condition and load condition of the FE modeling is the same as of the tensile tests.

ABAQUS, a commercial FEA package, was used for the modeling and stress analysis of adhesively bonded CFRP. The geometrical dimensions of the FEM (Finite element model) were the same as the experimental evaluation of the CFRP bonded joint. The modeling of CFRP were done based on the mechanical properties obtained from manufacturers specification and test results of tensile strength of CFRP, as shown on the Table 1.

Material Tensile strength (MPa) Young's modulus (GPa) Ultimate elongation (%) Poisson's ratio Thickness (mm)
CFRP 598.83 38.05 1.638 0.22 1
Epoxy (Araldite AW106)   2.937   0.33 0.1

Table 1: CFRP and epoxy material properties.

On this study five layers of CFRP with a thickness of 0.2 mm each layers were modeled. Figure 3 shows the FEM of CFRP and its fiber direction. The material properties of composites and damage initiation are also analyzed during model modeling of CFRP in the material property section of FEM (Abaqus modeling). Damage initiation and propagation are analyzed for CFRP bonded joint on the FEA and the analysis result illustrates the maximum stress generated at the free ends of the overlap.

advancements-technology-element

Figure 3: Finite element model of CFRP.

For the FEM stress analysis of adhesives the cohesive property and damage analysis are also considered on the material property section of modeling. The adhesive bonded area was super fine meshed for better assessment of stress distribution. Since mesh refinement has the direct impact for the accuracy of Finite element analysis. Generally, the stress distribution contour proves that the maximum stress concentration area and failure points. The finite element analysis result shows the point of maximum stress concentration which is responsible for adhesive failure.

Results of numerical analysis

Figures 4 and 5 shows, when MWCNT %=1 and applied load (P)=100 N, the result of stress contour around the outer surface of adhesive bonded joint. It shows that stress concentration occurs at the joint edge on the loading side due to in-plane shear force and out-ofplane bending moment. It is known that the geometrical factors such as the plate thickness, adhesive thickness, the width of the plate, and lapped length of adhesive bonded joint affect stress concentration around the joint edge.

advancements-technology-analysis

Figure 4: Finite element analysis of CFRP joint.

advancements-technology-bonded

Figure 5: Finite element analysis of CFRP bonded joint.

In this paper, for systematic tensile strength evaluation of adhesive bonded joints subjected to tensile shear load, the effects of the geometrical factors of the joint on stress distribution and concentration were evaluated.

The influence of geometrical factors on stress distribution of adhesive bonded joint

Figures 6-9 shows, when MWCNT %=1 and applied load (P)=100 N, the results showed the effects of the geometrical factors of joint on the maximum stress. Figure 6 shows the relationship between the maximum stress and plate thickness of adhesive bonded joint. The maximum stresses decreased as plate thickness increases this is because of bending stiffness increment.

advancements-technology-thickness

Figure 6: Stress vs. CFRP plate thickness ratio.

advancements-technology-relations

Figure 7: Stress vs. plate width relations.

advancements-technology-lapped

Figure 8: Stress vs. lapped length relations.

advancements-technology-thickness

Figure 9: Stress vs. adhesive thickness relations.

Figure 7 shows the relationship between the maximum stresses and the width of the plate. Since the adhesive bonded area of joint increases as the width of the plate increases, the maximum stresses remarkably decreased. Showing this difference between lapped length and width of the plate is due to the difference of deformation mechanism this is because of tension shear load as shown on Figure 2. Out-of-plane bending results due to the deformation of the upper and lower plate of adhesive bonded joint decreases as the lapped length increased, however it is not remarkable due to increase of bonded area. When width of the plate increases, deformation mechanism becomes more complicated than lapped length increment. In this case, beside of outof- plane bending as shown in Figure 2, out-of-plane bending deformation on the width direction (transversal direction) of the plate also increases as width of the plate increased. Therefore, the maximum stress decreases by out-of-plane bending deformation which is in the combined longitudinal and transversal directions.

Figure 8 shows the relationship between the maximum stress and lapped length of adhesive bonded joint. The maximum stress decreases due to the adhesive bonded area of joint increase, as the lapped length increased.

Figure 9 shows the relationship between the maximum stress and the thickness of adhesive layer of adhesive bonded joint. The maximum stress decreases as thickness of adhesive layer increases. However, when the thickness of adhesive layer becomes more than 0.3 mm, decreasing rate of the maximum stress is not remarkable due to decrease of out-of-plane bending deformation as in-plane shear deformation increases.

Experiment (MWCNT Composite Adhesives)

Materials characterization

Carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) was selected for the adherend, characterized by its high tensile strength (598.7 MPa) obtained from the Tensile strength assessment. This specific composite material has the following characteristics: (1) light weight (2) the strongest and stiffest material (3) corrosion resistant (4) better damping property. Therefore, CFRP is the promising composite material for the automobile and aerospace body structure.

On this study the tensile strength of the CFRP sheet is tested Based on the tensile strength result the stress-strain curve was plotted and the material properties are calculated accordingly.

The tensile properties of the CFRP material were deter-mined according to the ASTM D3039 [14]. Four CFRP tensile specimens were prepared with a dimension of, width=15 mm and length=250 mm and tested in tension using an 840 KN MTS hydraulic testing machine and results brittle failure because of the nature of composite materials. The measured stress-strain relationships of the CFRP plate up to failure is shown on the Figure 10. The measured elastic modulus, tension strength and failure strength of the CFRP plate is shown in Table 1.

advancements-technology-relation

Figure 10: Stress vs. strain relation of CFRP.

An Epoxy resin (Araldite AW106) was used as substrate to fabricate MWCNT. In general, because of its high impact, peel strength and environmental resistance Epoxy resin is widely used for automobile body manufacturing process.

The properties of Epoxy resin which was shown on the Table 1 used as input for the FEM analysis. The reinforcement (MWCNT) is synthesized by catalytic CVD process [5-7,15]. The reinforcement has the purity of above 95% without any purification and a high oxidation temperature of 600°C.

Joint fabrication and testing

First the epoxy resin is heated and MWCNTs are added to the heated Epoxy resin. The mixture of Epoxy resin and MWCNT are kept at temperature of 40?C to reduce the viscosity of the epoxy and enhance the fluidity of the mixture [6,16,17]. The mixture is stirred by a directly driven stirrer (Model PL-SS20) for 3 hours with a speed of 100-500 rpm to ensure the separation of entangled MWCNT and uniform distribution of MWCNTs in Epoxy, and vacuumed in Varian DS402 vacuum chamber for 1 hour with a maximum pressure of 60 mmHg. As the mixture is vacuumed the steering process is kept constant to remove the entrapped air from Epoxy resin/MWCNT mixture.

After the mixture of MWCNT and Epoxy resin are cooled at room temperature, the curing agent were added and stirred at a speed of 300 rpm for 30 minutes within the vacuum chamber for uniform distribution of mixtures and extracting the entrapped air. Finally the Epoxy/MWCNT mixture will be kept at room temperature for 10 minutes, and then the MWCNT/Epoxy mixture is applied by spatula on the CFRP plate. After the MWCNT/Epoxy mixture is applied on the CFRP sheet, the bonded CFRP sheet in lap guide was gripped for 3 hours until the jelly structure of adhesive bond hardened. And then trimming was followed to remove unwanted adhesives from the joint. On this study for the alignment of lapped joint, lap guide was designed with a dimension of length 200 mm , width 30 and thickness of 3 mm, 4 mm, 5 mm according to adhesive thickness difference. For the lap guide design the tolerance of 0.01 mm included for ease of extracting the bonded joint after the lapped joint hardened.

Finally, the CFRP bonded joint is put into oven (Forced convection oven) and heated at 50?C for 5 hours to cure the bonded joint. The cured CFRP bonded joint is cooled down at room temperature for 2 days before the tensile test.

The single-lap joint geometry and dimensions are shown on the Figure 2. The joints are fabricated by the following steps: (i) The surfaces to bonded were roughened by manual abrasion with 800 grit superfine sand paper and cleaned with acetone, (ii) The joints were bonded in lap-guide for the correct alignment, and the desired value of adhesive thickness was achieved during assembly with a dummy adherend and 0.1 mm calibrated spacer under the upper adherend, jointly with the application of pressure with grips and (iii) Tabs were glued at the specimen edges for a correct alignment in the testing machine.

Static tensile strength testing

The static tensile test was conducted based on the ASTM D5868 standard test method for plastics and polymers [18]. The tensile testing to the joints was carried out in an Instron MTS hydraulic testing machine with 840 KN load cell, at room temperature and under displacement control (0.5 mm/min).

Results and Discussion

In this study, MWCNT/Epoxy mixture is fabricated and the tensile strength of CFRP bonded joints was tested. From the test result two kinds of failures occurred: adhesive failure (at the adhesive-adherend interface) and light fiber tear failure.

The CFRP bonded joints test result showed that as the geometry of the bonded joint varies the values of tensile strength also varied (Figure 11). The lapped length difference shows an inverse relation with the tensile strength which shown on Figure 12. As the lapped length increased from 30 mm to 60 mm the experimental result decreased. As the thickness of the adhesive increased it also showed the decrement of tensile strength, the tensile strength of CFRP bonded joint with respect to different adhesive thickness was shown on Figure 11.

advancements-technology-bonded

Figure 11: Tensile test result of CFRP bonded joint.

advancements-technology-respect

Figure 12: Tensile test result of CFRP bonded with respect to lapped length.

Increasing the time of stirring showed better distribu-tion of MWCNT into Epoxy resin, Figures 13 and 14 shows the SEM images of 3 and 5 hours stirring of MWCNT/Epoxy mixture. The addition of MWCNTs in Epoxy improves the tensile strength of Epoxy.

advancements-technology-epoxy

Figure 13: SEM images of 3 hours stirred Epoxy/MWCNT mixture bond.

advancements-technology-stirred

Figure 14: SEM images of 5 hours stirred Epoxy/MWCNT mixture.

Conclusion

A composite adhesive bond which mixed CNT (carbon nanotubes) and EPOXY bond was developed. Adhesive bonded CFRP joint was fabricated using this composite bond. For the purpose of safe design of adhesive bonded thin sheet structures, the stress distribution and static tensile strength of adhesive bonded CFRP joint are analyzed. Summarized results are obtained.

As the tensile shear load applied to composite adhesive bonded CFRP joint, the maximum stresses are generated at the free edges of the joint. The maximum stress decreased with thickness of adhesive bonding layer and lapped length of the joint increase

The tensile strength of adhesive bonded CFRP joints decreased with thickness of adhesive bonding layer and lapped length of the joint increase.

As the stirring time of Epoxy resin/MWCNT mixture increases the distribution of MWCNT increased across the Epoxy resin.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Article Usage

  • Total views: 796
  • [From(publication date):
    May-2017 - Dec 11, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 707
  • PDF downloads : 89
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version