The Effect of Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) Strains on the Platelet Activation: A Flow Cytometry-Based Study
Received Date: Sep 15, 2017 / Accepted Date: Sep 28, 2017 / Published Date: Sep 29, 2017
Platelet-activation and agonist-induced platelet aggregation process to the pathogenesis of Infective Endocarditis (IE), bacteremia symptoms or other thrombotic complications and cardiovascular diseases. Activation of platelets by probiotic lactic acid bacteria strains is considered as thrombotic initiative factor contributing to the development and progression of Lactobacillus endocarditis. The main purpose of the current study was to evaluate the immunologic enhancement effect of probiotic strains L. plantarum, L. acidophilus and L. rhamnosus on the activation of blood platelets. Whole fresh blood flow cytometry was used to measure p-selectin expression and fibrinogen binding at basal levels and following stimulation with platelet agonists and probiotic lactic acid bacteria strains. Platelet activation was determined by labelling with FITC-conjugated anti-human fibrinogen and phycoerythrin (PE)- conjugated anti-human CD62p before analysis by flow cytometry. Thrombin Receptor Activator Peptide-6 (TRAP-6) was used as positive control. The percentage of CD62p-positive platelets, FITC-conjugated and the light scatter profiles of the agonist-activated platelets were used to identify the occurrence and degree of platelet activation. Probiotic lactic acid bacteria strains included in this study did not show any effect on spontaneous activation of human blood platelets. These test strains also failed to exacerbate or diminish the platelet activation property when co-incubated with TRAP-6 platelet agonist. Hence, this is the first in vitro report showing the safety of a group of probiotic lactic acid bacteria in terms of their potential to contribute to the pathogenesis of infective endocarditic (IE), bacteremia symptoms or other thrombotic disorders and correlated cardiovascular complications by initiating the platelet activation.
Keywords: Probiotic; Lactic acid bacteria; Platelet activation; Vein thrombosis
Platelets have a crucial role in hemostasis, and an important role on immune system and host defense in human. Whereas the role of activation of platelet is crucial on innate immunity, excessive activation of platelets may lead to organ malfunction, and increasing risk of cardiovascular diseases e.g., Infective Endocarditis (IE) . A wide range of microorganism has been investigated for their effect on aggregation  of blood platelets, including probiotic lactic acid bacteria such as Lactobacillus [3,4], Escherichia coli , Streptococci [6,7], Enterococci , Staphylococci , Listeria monocytogenes , Fusobacterium necrophorum [11,12], Yersinia pseudotuberculosis , Aspergillus fumigates  and Candida albicans . Previous scientific works have shown an increased incidence of cardiovascular disorders  in patients with a history of Gram-positive bacterial infection [17,18]. Gram-positive microbiota located in the gastrointestinal tract may leak into the blood circulation due to gastrointestinal injuries, surgery or poor dental hygiene, and then contribute to promote septicemia via aggregation of platelets or contributing in the platelet-fibrin clot formation on the endothelial surface. Lactobacilli  are an example of Gram-positive bacteria that are found in the intestines and in the genital tracts .
Probiotic bacteria, are defined as ‘live micro-organisms, which when consumed in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host [20,21]. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB)  have been used as probiotics for several conditions including renal insufficiency, management of metabolic imbalance, in cancer treatment, and for preventive reasons. Numerous  in vivo and in vitro studies showed beneficial results of some lactic acid bacteria strains in the treatment and prevention of gastrointestinal disorders, cardiovascular disorders (coronary heart diseases, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia) and urogenital infections [23-26].
The physiological ability of platelets to bind fibrinogen can result in unintended aggregation of platelets, and thus to serious cardiovascular complications as a result of vascular thrombosis or infective endocarditis.
Nowadays, lactic acid bacteria, being considered as friendly bacteria, are widely promoted and even used in functional foods and pharmaceutical industry. What still is lacking is evidence that these strains do not induce unintended platelet aggregation, and thus increase the risk of venous and arterial thrombosis. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the platelet activation of Lactobacillus strains.
Materials and Methods
We used whole blood samples collected from healthy non-smoking blood donors, aged 25 to 40 years to reduce individual variation in the degree of augmentation of platelet aggregation .
Preparation of bacterial culturs
Stock cultures of test strains Lactobacillus acidophilus (NCCB 47025), Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum (NCCB 46042) and Lactobacillus rhamnosus (NCCB 98073) were obtained from culture collection of Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (formerly known as The Fungal Biodiversity Centre), that is an institute of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and situated in Utrecht, the Netherlands. These strains were cultivated three times before being subjected to experiment. For in vitro assays Lactobacillus strains were cultured in MRS (de ManRogosa Sharpe) broth for 18 hrs (i.e., to late stationary phase) at 37°C, then harvested by centrifugation (Eppendorf Centrifuge 5810R;3,000Xg at 4°C for 15 min), and washed three times using cold PBS buffer (phosphate-buffered saline), pH-7.3. The probiotic bacteria cells were diluted in PBS buffer to an optical density (OD) of 0.5 ± 0.01 at 610 nm and then concentrated to give a suspension of 109 CFU/ml approximately .
Chemical and antibodies
Thrombin Receptor Activator Peptide-6 (TRAP-6) was used as physiological agonist to induce platelet activation. A working solution of TRAP-6 (50 μM/liter) in HBS buffer was prepared freshly before use in the Hematology laboratory at University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-human CD62p (mouse IgG1, k) monoclonal antibody (MoAb) (clone AK-4) was purchased from BD Pharmingen™ (555524, the Netherlands). This MoAb interacts with P-selectin, the 140-kDa membrane glycoprotein, also known as platelet activation-dependent GMP-140 (granule membrane protein), which is stored in the a-granules of platelets and the Weibel-Palade bodies of endothelial cells, and is rapidly transported to the plasma membrane upon activation. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated rabbit anti-human fibrinogen antibody was obtained from Agilent Technologies (F011102-2, the Netherlands). This antibody reacts both with natural fibrinogen and the fragments D and E and accordingly was used as a marker for platelet fibrinogen binding in this study. Both antibodies were used as a biomarker for activated platelets in this experiment. HBS buffer , Hepes 10 μM/liter, 1 mM/liter MgSO4, 150 mM/liter NaCl, and 5 mM/ liter KCl; pH 7.4, and a fixative buffer containing 0.2% formaldehyde, 154 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 1.12 mM NaH2PO4,1.15 mM KH2PO4, 10.2 mM NaHPO4, and 4 mM EDTA; pH 7.4, were prepared freshly and stored at 4°C.
Collection and preparation of blood samples
Blood samples from six healthy human volunteers were collected into 0.105 M tri-sodium citrate tubes (367714, BD Vacutainer). The blood donors were aged between 25 to 40 years, non-smokers, had consumed no alcohol within the previous two days, and had not taken any medicine during the previous 14 days. On the day of blood sampling, a light standard breakfast was permitted before blood collection.
Five-microliters samples of whole blood were immediately transferred into a set of 2 ml Eppendorf tubes containing 25 microliters HBS buffer or agonist (TRAP-6), bacteria or a combination of agonist and bacteria. Subsequently 25 microliters antibody mix (FITC-antifibrinogen and PE-anti-CD62P was added into each test tube. In these experiments, the ratio of bacteria to blood cells was approximately 1:1. The samples were incubated at 37°C for 10 min, and then 500 microliters of fixative solution was added to each test tube to stop the reactions.
Flow cytometry analysis
Blood samples treated as above were diluted twice and analyzed on a FACSVerse flow cytometer (BD-biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) on the same day of processing. Forward angle light scatter (FSC), Side Scatter (SSC) and fluorescence data were obtained with gain settings in the logarithmic mode .
Single platelets were gated on the basis of their forward-and sidelight scatter profiles in logarithmic mode excluding debris and machine noise from the platelet gate position. Within the platelet gate ten thousands cells were analyzed for binding of fibrinogen and expression of CD62P. The mean fluorescence (MFL) and the percentage of anti-fibrinogen-FITC and CD62p-PE positive cells were utilized to assess the level of platelet activation. The antibody positive platelets were specified as those platelet cells with higher than log10 fluorescence intensity, based on the fluorescence figure of non-labeled platelets with CD62p-PE and anti-fibrinogen-FITC (Figure 1).
Total red blood cell and platelet counts, hemoglobin concentration, packed cell volume, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration were determined on a CELL-DYN Sapphire (Abbott USA) in the clinical biochemistry laboratory at University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
All values are presented as a mean standard error (SE). Where applicable, a 2 tailed Paired Samples t-test was used to compare continues variable within groups (SPSS software; IBM SPSS Statistics 21). P values<0.004 was considered significant. AP value of 0.004 (0.05/13) was used as cut-point to correct for multiple testing.
All hematology values for blood samples were in the normal range.
There was no significant difference in platelet activation between resting platelets and samples incubated with test probiotic strains, P?0.004. The platelets incubated with L. acidophilus showed CD62p and FITC expression percentages similar to resting platelets (6.5 and 5.7 vs.4.8 and 6.0%, respectively). L. rhamnosus and L. plantarum exhibited CD62p and FITC expression percentages were twice as high than in resting platelets (4.8 and 6.0% respectively). The CD62p and FITC expression percentage for L. rhamnosus was 8.4% and 17.1%, respectively and for L. plantarum reached 9.1% and 19.8%, respectively. See also Table 1.
(means ± SE)
(means ± SE)
(means ± SE)
(means ± SE)
|NegativeCtrl||4.8 ± 0.8||758 ± 547||6.0 ± 2||669 ± 51|
|PositiveCtrl||94.4 ± 1.4||9990 ± 1014||89.5 ± 1.6||21191 ± 6122|
|L. plantarum||9.1 ± 3.4||656 ± 248||19.8 ± 8.7||2017 ± 721|
|L. rhamnosus||8.4 ± 2.0||716 ± 359||17.1 ± 1||2150 ± 901|
|L. acidophilus||6.5 ± 2.7||315 ± 121||5.7 ± 2.6||1414 ± 554|
|Agonist + L. plantarum||91.7 ± 2.0||9533 ± 721||88.6 ± 2.1||26448 ± 6064|
|Agonist +L. rhamnosus||94.2 ± 0.8||10059 ± 738||89.0 ± 3.3||30607 ± 5662|
|Agonist +L. acidophilus||92.0 ± 0.8||8538 ± 1237||64.7 ± 22.5||18080 ± 10074|
Table 1: Platelet activation by LAB Probioticstrains.
In contrast, the activation of platelets induced by TRAP-6 dramatically increased, a significant difference in activation of platelets compared to resting platelets (4.8%), P?0.004, and the percentage of CD62p-positive platelets reached up to 94.4%. In FITC-positive platelets activation was 89.5%compared to resting platelets (6.0%, P<0.004). Platelets incubated only with probiotic strains showed similar biomarker expression percentage of both CD62p and FITC to resting platelets, however, platelets treated with TRAP-6 or incorporation of TRAP-6 and bacterial strains demonstrated similar levels of CD62p-positives and FITC-positives.
MFL for the platelets incubated with L. acidophilus was less than half of resting platelets (315 to 758 respectively), however, L. rhamnosus and L. plantarum presented MFL (716 and 656 respectively) similar to those of resting platelets just 758. In platelets treated with TRAP-6, there was significantly higher MFL (9990 ± 1014) in comparison with those of resting platelets (758 ± 547) or probiotic-treated platelets L. plantarum (656 ± 248), L. rhamnosus (716 ± 359) and L. acidophilus (315 ± 121), however, similar to platelets incubated with contribution of TRAP-6 and probiotic strains L. plantarum (9533 ± 721), L. rhamnosus (10059 ± 738) and L. acidophilus (8538 ± 1237) (Table 1).
Platelet activation induced by TRAP-6 showed a significant difference, P?0.004, of biomarker expression percentage of CD62p and FITC in comparison with resting platelets; 91% vs. 0.96%, respectively, upper right quadrant Figure 1. In platelets incubated with probiotic strains, there was an activation pattern of biomarker expression similar to resting platelets, in contrast, platelets incubated with both TRAP-6 and probiotic lactic acid bacteria strains exhibited similar biomarker expression of those platelets that incubated with TRAP-6.
In the present study, there was no obvious inter-individual variation in the degree of augmentation of platelet function which is in contrast to previous studies. In our lab, the test probiotic strains L. plantarum , L. rhamnosus and L. acidophilus failed to induce or enhance significantly any spontaneous (or agonist-induced) platelet activation.
Our results are in line with that of Shried et al.  and Kirjavainen et al.  who reported lactic acid bacteria rarely induce bacteremia, and most likely patients with cultures positive for LAB had severe underlying diseases that predisposed them to bacteremic complications. Our results, however, are in contrast to the PROPATRIA study from Besselink et al.  in which patients with severe pancreatitis received a combination of L. acidophilus with other lactobacilli and bifidobacteria in a randomized controlled trial that needed to be stopped early because of increased mortality in the probiotic-treated group compared to the placebo group. In line with our findings, Kailasapathy and Chin  reported no obvious adverse effects on human health following consumption of L. acidophilus.
Naruszewicz et al.  reported that L. plantarum administration led to a reduction in cardiovascular disease risk factors (e.g., lowering levels of blood lipids and blood pressure in those with hypertension) and could be useful as a protective agent in the primary prevention of atherosclerosis. More recently, Linares et al.  have reviewed the potential health-promoting effect of LAB on human and indicated that the probiotic lactic acid bacteria strains are unlikely to be pathogenic. In our study probiotic lactic acid bacteria strains did not induce platelet activation, and this is an important finding because platelet activation may be in the causal pathway of development of a thrombotic event. It is important to realize that there are also nonentrococcal lactic acid bacteria species and these Lactobacillus species, in particular L. rhamnosus , L. caseior and L. Paracasei have been related to inducing endocarditis [4,20,33,34].
In spite of the fact that Lactobacilli rarely have been reported to initiate causes of infective endocarditis (IE). Nevertheless  the capacity of a few lactic acid bacteria strains to aggregate human platelets is a common contribution of the Lactobacilli in the oral cavity of normal human . Hence, probiotic lactic acid bacteria strains with no platelet-aggregating activity are most likely unable to participate in the pathogenesis of IE. Our results are in line with previous reports by Korpela et al.  and Zhou et al.  which indicated L. rhamnosus GG and L. rhamnosus HN001 less likely participate in the pathogenesis with regards to platelet aggregation factors.
Strengths and limitations
Flow cytometry using platelet-specific Abs is the most sensitive and specific technique for studying platelet function  because of the advantages of using whole blood samples instead of platelet-rich plasma (P-RP) and avoiding the processes required in conventional platelet aggregation methods to prepare samples (which may increase the chance of artificially inducing platelet activation).
Probiotic strains L. rhamnosus , L. plantarum and L. acidophilus do not initiate spontaneous platelet-activation, and thus very unlikely could contribute to thrombotic disorders by the mechanism of platelet activation.
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval from the medical ethics committee of the University Medical Center Utrecht was attained (METC-protocol 07-125/C approved on 1 March 2010).
Conflict of Interest
The authors report no conflict of interest.
We thank Rolf Urbanus and Arnold Koekman (Clinical Hematology Laboratory, UMC) for technical support and Edwin Boel (Medical Microbiology Laboratory, UMC) for help with cultivation of bacterial strains. This work was supported by Julius Center, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Contribution: Khalil Azizpour and Kok van Kessel performed the lab experiments and wrote the paper; Khalil Azizpour, Kok van Kessel and Ruud Oudega designed the research, all authors including Frans Rutten wrote and edit the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
- Linke B, Schreiber Y, Picard Willems B, Slattery P, Nüsing RM, et al. (2017) Activated Platelets Induce an Anti-Inflammatory Response of Monocytes/Macrophages through Cross-Regulation of PGE2 and Cytokines. Mediators of Inflammation.
- Douglas CW, Ian IF (1997) The role of platelets in infective endocarditis. Platelets 8: 285-294.
- Nissilä E, Douillard FP, Ritari J, Paulin L, Järvinen HM, et al. (2017) Genotypic and phenotypic diversity of Lactobacillus rhamnosus clinical isolates, their comparison with strain GG and their recognition by complement system. PloSone 12: e0176739.
- Harty WS, Hume EBH, Oakey HJ, Knox KW (1993) The aggregation of human platelets by Lactobacillus species. Microbiology 139: 2945-2951.
- Moriarty RD, Cox A, McCall M, Smith SGJ, Cox D (2016) Escherichia coli induces platelet aggregation in an FcγRIIa-dependent manner. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 14: 797-806.
- Svensson L, Frick IM, Shannon O (2016) Group G streptococci mediate fibrinogen-dependent platelet aggregation leading to transient entrapment in platelet aggregates. Microbiology 162: 117-126.
- Kurpiewski GE, Forrester LJ, Campbell BJ, Barrett JT (1983) Platelet aggregation by Streptococcus pyogenes. Infection and immunity 39: 704-708.
- Usui Y, Ichiman Y, Suganuma M, Yoshida K (1991) Platelet aggregation by strains of enterococci. Microbiology and immunology 35: 933-942.
- Yeaman MR, Sullam PM, Dazin PF, Norman DC, Bayer AS (1992) Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus-platelet binding by quantitative flow cytometric analysis. Journal of Infectious Diseases 166: 65-73.
- Gahan CGM, Hill C (2017) Listeria monocytogenes: survival and adaptation in the gastrointestinal tract. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 4: 9.
- Forrester LJ, Campbell BJ, Berg JN, Barrett JT (1985) Aggregation of platelets by Fusobacterium necrophorum. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 22: 245-249.
- Horose M, Kiyoyama H, Ogawa H, Shinjo T (1992) Aggregation of bovine platelets by Fusobacterium necrophorum. Veterinary Microbiology 32: 343-350.
- Simonet M, Triadou P, Frehel C, Morel Kopp MC, Kaplan C, et al. (1992) Human platelet aggregation by Yersinia pseudotuberculosis is mediated by invasin. Infection and Immunity 60: 366-373.
- Sheth NK, Kurup VP, Barron BA (1980) The role of Aspergillus fumigatus antigens in blood coagulation and platelet function. Microbios 28: 91-96.
- Kumar R, Saraswat D, Tati S, Edgerton M (2015) Novel aggregation properties of Candida albicans secreted aspartyl proteinase Sap6 mediate virulence in oral candidiasis. Infection and Immunity 83: 2614-2626.
- Weidenmaier C, Peschel A (2008) Teichoic acids and related cell-wall glycopolymers in Gram-positive physiology and host interactions. Nature Reviews Microbiology 6: 276-287.
- Fitzgerald JR, Foster TJ, Cox D (2006) The interaction of bacterial pathogens with platelets. Nature Reviews Microbiology 4: 445-457.
- Cox D, Kerrigan SW, Watson SP (2011) Platelets and the innate immune system: mechanisms of bacterial-induced platelet activation. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 9: 1097-1107.
- Aguirre M, Collins MD (1993) Lactic acid bacteria and human clinical infection. Journal of Applied Microbiology 75: 95-107.
- Adams MR, Marteau P (1995) On the safety of lactic acid bacteria from food. International Journal of Food Microbiology 27: 263-264.
- Seddik HA, Bendali F, Gancel F, Fliss I, Spano G, et al. (2017) Lactobacillus plantarum and Its Probiotic and Food Potentialities. Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins 9: 111-122.
- Joint FAO (2001) Health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. Córdoba, Argentina, pp: 1-4.
- Di Cerbo A, Palmieri B, Aponte M, Morales Medina JC, Iannitti T (2015) Mechanisms and therapeutic effectiveness of lactobacilli. Journal of Clinical Pathology 69: 1-6.
- Kirjavainen PV, Tuomola EM, Crittenden RG, Ouwehand AC, Harty DWS, et al. (1999) In vitro adhesion and platelet aggregation properties of bacteremia-associated lactobacilli. Infection and Immunity 67: 2653-2655.
- De Cuyper IM, Meinders M, Van De Vijver E, De Korte D, Porcelijn L, et al. (2013) A novel flow cytometry-based platelet aggregation assay. Blood 121: e70-e80.
- Zhou JS, Rutherfurd KJ, Gill HS (2005) Inability of probiotic bacterial strains Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 and Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 to induce human platelet aggregation in vitro. Journal of Food Protection 68: 2459-2464.
- Kessler CM, Nussbaum E, Tuazon CU (1987) In vitro correlation of platelet aggregation with occurrence of disseminated intravascular coagulation and subacute bacterial endocarditis. The Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 109: 647-652.
- Sherid M, Samo S, Sulaiman S, Husein H, Sifuentes H, et al. (2016) Liver abscess and bacteremia caused by lactobacillus: role of probiotics? Case report and review of the literature. BMC Gastroenterology 16: 138.
- Besselink MGH, Timmerman HM, Buskens E, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Akkermans LMA, et al. (2004) Probiotic prophylaxis in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis (PROPATRIA): design and rationale of a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised multicenter trial [ISRCTN38327949]. BMC Surgery 4: 12.
- Kailasapathy K, Chin J (2000) Survival and therapeutic potential of probiotic organisms with reference to Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp. Immunology and Cell Biology 78: 80-88.
- Naruszewicz M, Johansson ML, Zapolska Downar D, Bukowska H (2002) Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum 299v on cardiovascular disease risk factors in smokers. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 76: 1249-1255.
- Linares DM, Gómez C, Renes E, Fresno JM, Tornadijo ME, et al. (2017) Lactic Acid Bacteria and Bifidobacteria with Potential to Design Natural Biofunctional Health-Promoting Dairy Foods. Frontiers in Microbiology 8: 846.
- Aaron JG, Sobieszczyk ME, Weiner SD, Whittier S, Lowy FD (2017) Lactobacillus rhamnosus Endocarditis Following Upper Endoscopy. In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases. Oxford University Press US, p: 85.
- Stiles ME (1996) Biopreservation by lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 70: 331-345.
- Liévin Le Moal V, Servin AL (2014) Anti-infective activities of lactobacillus strains in the human intestinal microbiota: from probiotics to gastrointestinal anti-infectious biotherapeutic agents. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 27: 167-199.
- Korpela R, Moilanen E, Saxelin M, Vapaatalo H (1997) Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103) and platelet aggregation in vitro. International Journal of Food Microbiology 37: 83-86.
Citation: Azizpour K, Kessel KV, Oudega R, Rutten F (2017) The Effect of Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) Strains on the Platelet Activation: A Flow Cytometry-Based Study. J Prob Health 5: 185. Doi: 10.4172/2329-8901.1000185
Copyright: © 2017 Azizpour K, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Share This Article
7th International Conference and Exhibition on Probiotics, Functional and Baby Foods
July 18-19, 2018 Prague, Czech Republic
28th World Nutrition Congress
August 9- 10 2018 Manila, Philippines
8th Annual Congress on Probiotics & Functional Foods
September 24-25, 2018 Tokyo, Japan
- Total views: 752
- [From(publication date): 0-2017 - Jun 19, 2018]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 682
- PDF downloads: 70